RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is the predominant cause of paediatric intestinal failure. Although life-saving, parenteral nutrition (PN) is linked to complications and may impact quality of life (QoL). Most children will experience intestinal rehabilitation (IR), but the mechanisms underpinning this remain to be understood. SBS is characterised by abnormal microbiome patterns, which might serve as predictive indicators for IR. We aim to characterise the microbiome profiles of children with SBS during IR, concurrently exploring how parental perspectives of QoL relate to IR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will enrol a minimum of 20 paediatric patients with SBS (0-18 years). Clinical data and biological samples will be collected over a 2-year study period. We will apply 16S rRNA gene sequencing to analyse the microbiome from faecal and gut tissue samples, with additional shotgun metagenomic sequencing specifically on samples obtained around the time of IR. Gas chromatography with flame ionisation detection will profile faecal short-chain fatty acids. Plasma citrulline and urinary intestinal fatty acid binding proteins will be measured annually. We will explore microbiome-clinical covariate interactions. Furthermore, we plan to assess parental perspectives on QoL during PN and post-IR by inviting parents to complete the Paediatric Quality of Life questionnaire at recruitment and after the completion of IR. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (22/EM/0233; 28 November 2022). Recruitment began in February 2023. Outcomes of the study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at scientific meetings. A lay summary of the results will be made available to participants and the public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN90620576.
Asunto(s)
Heces , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Nutrición Parenteral , Calidad de Vida , Síndrome del Intestino Corto , Humanos , Síndrome del Intestino Corto/microbiología , Síndrome del Intestino Corto/epidemiología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Niño , Preescolar , Lactante , Estudios Longitudinales , Femenino , Adolescente , Heces/microbiología , Masculino , Nutrición Parenteral/métodos , Nutrición Parenteral/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , ARN Ribosómico 16S , Intestinos/microbiologíaRESUMEN
The evolution of nutritional care in preterm infants, particularly those classified as extremely preterm, has undergone significant advancements in recent years. These infants, born at less than 28 weeks of gestation, face unique challenges related to their elevated nutrient requirements, underdeveloped organ systems and minimal reserves, posing a need for timely and specialised nutritional strategies. Historically, the nutritional management of preterm infants focussed on short-term goals to promote survival. In recent years, the focus has shifted to the quality of nutrient provision to optimise neurodevelopment and longer-term health outcomes. This review highlights the shift from a generalised nutritional approach to a robust, evidence-based approach for preterm infants, acknowledging the intricate interplay between nutrition, holistic care and developmental outcomes. As neonatal care continues to evolve, ongoing research will refine nutritional interventions, optimise growth and enhance the long-term health outcomes of these vulnerable infants.
RESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244109.].
RESUMEN
Apnoea of prematurity (AOP) is a common complication among preterm infants (< 37 weeks gestation), globally. However, access to caffeine citrate (CC) that is a proven safe and effective treatment in high-income countries is largely unavailable in low- and-middle income countries, where most preterm infants are born. Therefore, the overall aim of this study was to describe the demand, policies, and supply factors affecting the availability and clinical use of CC in LMICs. A mixed methods approach was used to collect data from diverse settings in LMICs including Ethiopia, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, and India. Qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with 107 different health care providers, and 21 policymakers and other stakeholders from industry. Additional data was collected using standard questionnaires. A thematic framework approach was used to analyze the qualitative data and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the quantitative data. The findings indicate that there is variation in in-country policies on the use of CC in the prevention and treatment of AOP and its availability across the LMICs. As a result, the knowledge and experience of using CC also varied with clinicians in Ethiopia having no experience of using it while those in India have greater knowledge and experience of using it. This, in turn, influenced the demand, and our findings show that only 29% of eligible preterm infants are receiving CC in these countries. There is an urgent need to address the multilevel barriers to accessing CC for managing AOP in Africa. These include cost, lack of national policies, and, therefore, lack of demand stemming from its clinical equivalency with aminophylline. Practical ways to reduce the cost of CC in LMICs could potentially increase its availability and use.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is an increasing acceptance and use of donor human milk (DHM) in healthy infants. This review investigates the benefits and risks of mothers' own milk (MOM) supplementation with DHM compared to infant formula (IF) in moderate-late preterm (MLP) and early term (ET) infants. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL and clinical trial registries were searched for studies published up to September 2023. The primary outcome was rates of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE framework. RoB1 and EPHPP were used to assess risk of bias for controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. RESULTS: Eleven studies involving total of 10,147 infants and six ongoing trials were identified. Studies were of low quality, and the certainty of evidence was assessed as very low. Three studies suggested benefits of DHM compared to IF on EBF at discharge, while two suggested no difference. No clear effect was observed on EBF duration, any breastfeeding, hypoglycemia and morbidity. No health risks were reported. CONCLUSION: The effect of supplementing MOM with DHM instead of IF on EBF and other health outcomes is unclear. High-quality studies are required to determine the potential benefits or risks of DHM supplementation in this population. IMPACT: We identified 11 relevant studies reporting on supplementation of mothers' own milk (MOM) with donor human milk (DHM) compared to infant formula (IF). Studies were of low quality, had heterogeneous outcome definitions and were geographically limited; all except two were observational studies. Limited evidence showed no clear difference on rates of exclusive breastfeeding and other health outcomes. No potential risks were reported. The increasing acceptance and use of DHM in healthy infants highlights the need for future high-quality studies.
RESUMEN
The recent advisory issued by the United States Food and Drug Administration, cautioning against the routine administration of probiotics in preterm neonates, has sparked a lively debate within the scientific community. This commentary presents a perspective from members of the Special Interest Group on Gut Microbiota and Modifications within the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and other authors who contributed to the ESPGHAN position paper on probiotics for preterm infants, as well as representatives from the European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants. We advocate for a more nuanced and supportive approach to the use of certain probiotics in this vulnerable population, balancing the demonstrated benefits and risks.
Asunto(s)
Recien Nacido Prematuro , Probióticos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Humanos , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos , Recién Nacido , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Sociedades Médicas , Europa (Continente)RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preterm (born < 37 weeks' gestation) and very low birthweight (VLBW; <1.5kg) infants are at the greatest risk of morbidity and mortality within the first 28 days of life. Establishing full enteral feeds is a vital aspect of their clinical care. Evidence predominantly from high income countries shows that early and rapid advancement of feeds is safe and reduces length of hospital stay and adverse health outcomes. However, there are limited data on feeding practices and factors that influence the attainment of full enteral feeds among these vulnerable infants in sub-Saharan Africa. AIM: To identify factors that influence the time to full enteral feeds, defined as tolerance of 120ml/kg/day, in hospitalised preterm and VLBW infants in neonatal units in two sub-Saharan African countries. METHODS: Demographic and clinical variables were collected for newborns admitted to 7 neonatal units in Nigeria and Kenya over 6-months. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify factors independently associated with time to full enteral feeds. RESULTS: Of the 2280 newborn infants admitted, 484 were preterm and VLBW. Overall, 222/484 (45.8%) infants died with over half of the deaths (136/222; 61.7%) occurring before the first feed. The median (inter-quartile range) time to first feed was 46 (27, 72) hours of life and time to full enteral feeds (tFEF) was 8 (4.5,12) days with marked variation between neonatal units. Independent predictors of tFEF were time to first feed (unstandardised coefficient B 1.69; 95% CI 1.11 to 2.26; p value <0.001), gestational age (1.77; 0.72 to 2.81; <0.001), the occurrence of respiratory distress (-1.89; -3.50 to -0.79; <0.002) and necrotising enterocolitis (4.31; 1.00 to 7.62; <0.011). CONCLUSION: The use of standardised feeding guidelines may decrease variations in clinical practice, shorten tFEF and thereby improve preterm and VLBW outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Enterocolitis Necrotizante , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Kenia/epidemiología , Nigeria/epidemiología , Nutrición Parenteral/efectos adversos , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/etiologíaAsunto(s)
Enterocolitis Necrotizante , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Lactante , Femenino , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Calostro , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Orofaringe , Leche HumanaRESUMEN
Phages and lipids in human milk (HM) may benefit preterm infant health by preventing gastrointestinal pathobiont overgrowth and microbiome modulation. Lipid association may promote vertical transmission of phages to the infant. Despite this, interrelationships between lipids and phages are poorly characterized in preterm HM. Shotgun metagenomics and untargeted lipidomics of phage and lipid profiles from 99 preterm HM samples reveals that phages are abundant and prevalent from the first week and throughout the first 100 days of lactation. Phage-host richness of preterm HM increases longitudinally. Core phage communities characterized by Staphylococcus- and Propionibacterium-infecting phages are significantly correlated with long-chain fatty acid abundances over lactational age. We report here a phage-lipid interaction in preterm HM, highlighting the potential importance of phage carriage in preterm HM. These results reveal possible strategies for phage carriage in HM and their importance in early-life microbiota development.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriófagos , Leche Humana , Lactante , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Viroma , Lactancia , Ácidos GrasosRESUMEN
Introduction: In neonatology, multiple pregnancies are common. Unfortunately, it is not rare for one baby to die. Communication with parents in these circumstances has been demonstrated to be sub-optimal. Methods: Two educational programs were evaluated with pre- and post-course surveys, questionnaires administered to participants, and audits. Results: In the online Butterfly project (UK; n = 734 participants), all participants reported that the training exceeded or met their expectations, 97% reported they learned new skills, and 48% had already applied them. Participants expressed gratitude in their open-ended answers: "I feel a lot more confident in supporting parents in this situation". In the Ribbon project (workshop for neonatal clinicians, Quebec; n = 242), 97% were satisfied with the training and reported feeling more comfortable caring for bereaved parents. Knowledge improved pre-post training. Audits revealed that 100% of cases were identified on the incubator and the baby's/babies' admission card, all changed rooms after the death of their co-twin/triplet, and all had the name of their co-twin/triplet on the discharge summary. All clinicians (55) knew what the ribbon symbol meant when asked during surprise audits at the bedside. Conclusion: Different educational strategies to optimize communication with families after the perinatal loss of a co-twin are appreciated and have a positive impact.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Review of age of onset of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and focal intestinal perforation (FIP) in very preterm (≤32 weeks) and/or very low birthweight (VLBW, ≤1500 g) infants. DESIGN: Preregistered review undertaken according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in July 2021 and updated October 2021. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE/ PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. ELIGIBILITY: Eligible studies reported age of onset of NEC and/or FIP in randomised controlled trials of >200 or observational studies of >500 infants. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Titles/abstracts were screened; eligible articles underwent data extraction. Age of onset as day of life (DOL) and/or corrected gestational age (CGA) were extracted alongside study information, such as NEC definition, included population, intervention, location and dates studied. Weighted means were used to compare onset by birth gestation, study type, NEC definition, trial intervention, location and dates studied. Comparison was done by Mann-Whitney U test or one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Of the 747 screened studies 188 were eligible. Removal of duplicates, studies without onset data and ineligible populations left 10 RCTs and 14 observational studies contributing 51 NEC cohorts; 49 reported onset DOL and 14 CGA. 2984 cases of NEC had average DOL onset of 16.7 (15.5 in RCTs, 16.9 in observational studies), and CGA onset of 30.1 weeks. Gestation did not impact DOL onset. No other demographic feature impacted NEC onset. Few studies included data on FIP. CONCLUSIONS: Average onset of NEC in exclusively very preterm/very low birthweight infants is in the third week of life and unlike in cohorts including more mature or heavier infants is not impacted by birth gestation.
Asunto(s)
Enterocolitis Necrotizante , Enfermedades Fetales , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido , Perforación Intestinal , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Humanos , Femenino , Edad de Inicio , Peso al Nacer , Recien Nacido Extremadamente PrematuroRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes after surgically managed necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and focal intestinal perforation (FIP) in infants <32 weeks requiring transfer to or presenting in a single surgical centre. DESIGN: Retrospective review of transferred and inborn NEC or FIP, from January 2013 to December 2020. PATIENTS: 107 transfers with possible NEC or FIP contributed 92 cases (final diagnoses NEC (75) and FIP (17)); 113 inborn cases: NEC (84) and FIP (29). RESULTS: In infants with a final diagnosis of NEC, medical management after transfer was as common as when inborn (41% TC vs 54% p = 0.12). Unadjusted all-cause mortality was lower in inborn NEC (19% vs 27%) and FIP (10% vs 29%). In infants undergoing surgery unadjusted mortality attributable to NEC or FIP was lower if inborn (21% vs 41% NEC, 7% vs 24% FIP). In regression analysis of surgically treated infants, being transferred was associated with increased all-cause mortality (OR 2.55 (1.03-6.79)) and mortality attributable to NEC or FIP (OR 4.89 (1.80-14.97)). CONCLUSIONS: These data require replication, but if confirmed, suggest that focusing care for infants at highest risk of developing NEC or FIP in a NICU with on-site surgical expertise may improve outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Enterocolitis Necrotizante , Enfermedades Fetales , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Prematuro , Perforación Intestinal , Lactante , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Perforación Intestinal/complicaciones , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades del Prematuro/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Importance: The effect of using an exclusive human milk diet compared with one that uses bovine products in preterm infants is uncertain, but some studies demonstrate lower rates of key neonatal morbidities. A potential mediating pathway is the gut microbiome. Objective: To determine the effect of an exclusive human milk diet on gut bacterial richness, diversity, and proportions of specific taxa in preterm infants from enrollment to 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 neonatal intensive care units in the United Kingdom from 2017 to 2020, microbiome analyses were blind to group. Infants less than 30 weeks' gestation who had only received own mother's milk were recruited before 72 hours of age. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2019 to September 2021. Interventions: Exclusive human milk diet using pasteurized human milk for any shortfall in mother's own milk supply and human milk-derived fortifiers (intervention) compared with bovine formula and bovine-derived fortifier (control) until 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. Fortifier commenced less than 48 hours of tolerating 150 mL/kg per day. Main Outcomes and Measures: Gut microbiome profile including alpha and beta diversity, and presence of specific bacterial taxa. Results: Of 126 preterm infants enrolled in the study, 63 were randomized to control (median [IQR] gestation: 27.0 weeks [26.0-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 910 g [704-1054 g]; 32 [51%] male) and 63 were randomized to intervention (median [IQR] gestation: 27.1 weeks [25.7-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 930 g [733-1095 g]; 38 [60%] male); 472 stool samples from 116 infants were analyzed. There were no differences in bacterial richness or Shannon diversity over time, or at 34 weeks between trial groups. The exclusive human milk diet group had reduced relative abundance of Lactobacillus after adjustment for confounders (coefficient estimate, 0.056; P = .03), but not after false discovery rate adjustment. There were no differences in time to full feeds, necrotizing enterocolitis, or other key neonatal morbidities. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial in preterm infants using human milk-derived formula and/or fortifier to enable an exclusive human milk diet, there were no effects on overall measures of gut bacterial diversity but there were effects on specific bacterial taxa previously associated with human milk receipt. These findings suggest that the clinical impact of human milk-derived products is not modulated via microbiomic mechanisms. Trial Registration: ISRCTN trial registry identifier: ISRCTN16799022.
Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Animales , Bovinos , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Leche Humana , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Peso al Nacer , DietaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To review the current literature and develop consensus conclusions and recommendations on nutrient intakes and nutritional practice in preterm infants with birthweight <1800 g. METHODS: The European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Committee of Nutrition (CoN) led a process that included CoN members and invited experts. Invited experts with specific expertise were chosen to represent as broad a geographical spread as possible. A list of topics was developed, and individual leads were assigned to topics along with other members, who reviewed the current literature. A single face-to-face meeting was held in February 2020. Provisional conclusions and recommendations were developed between 2020 and 2021, and these were voted on electronically by all members of the working group between 2021 and 2022. Where >90% consensus was not achieved, online discussion meetings were held, along with further voting until agreement was reached. RESULTS: In general, there is a lack of strong evidence for most nutrients and topics. The summary paper is supported by additional supplementary digital content that provide a fuller explanation of the literature and relevant physiology: introduction and overview; human milk reference data; intakes of water, protein, energy, lipid, carbohydrate, electrolytes, minerals, trace elements, water soluble vitamins, and fat soluble vitamins; feeding mode including mineral enteral feeding, feed advancement, management of gastric residuals, gastric tube placement and bolus or continuous feeding; growth; breastmilk buccal colostrum, donor human milk, and risks of cytomegalovirus infection; hydrolyzed protein and osmolality; supplemental bionutrients; and use of breastmilk fortifier. CONCLUSIONS: We provide updated ESPGHAN CoN consensus-based conclusions and recommendations on nutrient intakes and nutritional management for preterm infants.