Commonly Used Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) Parameters Do Not Influence Efficacy: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarise available randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of EVLA efficacy, and to define the differences in success rate of variations in wavelength, administered energy, outcome definition, and follow up period. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline (Ovid-SP), Cochrane Central Database, and Web of Science from inception to November 2017. RCTs with follow up of more than three months were included. The studied outcome was the proportion of patients with EVLA treatment success, defined as absence of reflux or occlusion of the great saphenous vein (GSV). Pooled proportions of anatomical success were compared. Subgroup and meta-regression analysis included wavelengths (short [810, 940, and 980 nm], long [1470, 1500, and 1920 nm]), amount of energy (≤50 J/cm, > 50 J/cm), follow up (≤1 year, > 1 year), outcome definition (occlusion, no reflux), and quality of the studies (low risk of bias, unclear/high risk of bias). RESULTS: Twenty-eight RCTs, with a total of 2829 GSVs were included. The overall success rate of EVLA was 92% (95% CI 90-94%, I2 = 68%). In subgroup analysis, no statistically significant differences were found for long or short wavelengths (95% [95% CI 91-97%] vs. 92% [95% CI 89-94%], p = .15), high or low administered energy (93% [95% CI 89-95%] vs. 92% [95% CI 90-94%], p = .99), long or short follow up (89% [95% CI 84-93%] vs. 93% [95% CI 91-95%], p = .13) and outcome definition (occlusion group 94% [95% CI 91-96%] vs. absence of reflux group 91% [95% CI 87-94%], p = .26). Studies with low risk of bias reported a significantly higher success rate than high or unclear risk of bias (93% [95% CI 90-95%] vs. 89% [95% CI 83-93%], p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rate of EVLA is high (92%), even with increasing follow up. Commonly used parameters of EVLA (wavelength, administered energy, and outcome definition) have no influence on the treatment success rate.

[Skin disorder as an indication of viral infection]. / Huidafwijking als aanwijzing voor virusinfectie.

BACKGROUND: Gianotti-Crosti syndrome (GCS) is a dermatosis primarily affecting children between 2 and 6 years of age. It is characterized by multiple, itching, monomorphous, pink to red-brown papules or papulovesicles between 1 and 5 mm in size. GCS is associated with viral infections such as hepatitis B virus and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). It is often accompanied by fever, hepatosplenomegaly and lymphadenopathy. The syndrome is self-limiting and disappears within 2 months. No treatment is therefore required. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report a case of a 16-year-old female who presented with itching papulovesicles on the extremities and on the buttocks. She was diagnosed with GCS because of the clinical findings, histopathological tests and positive EBV serology. CONCLUSION: GCS can also affect patients older than 6 years of age. Moreover, this syndrome may be a first sign of infection with Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis B virus, HIV or other viral infections.

Assessment of quality of life as outcome in dementia and MCI intervention trials: a systematic review.

We conducted a systematic review of the use of quality of life (QoL) measures as outcome in pharmacological and nonpharmacologic intervention trials in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment or dementia, and their proxies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from a search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group in April 2006. We also checked references and systematic reviews. Primary and secondary end points were screened for QoL-scales, and it was registered whether information on responsiveness was provided. We found 117 pharmacologic and 108 nonpharmacologic RCTs. One of the pharmacologic and 4 of the nonpharmacologic studies used QoL as primary outcome, and 2 and 3, respectively, as secondary end point. Altogether QoL was assessed in only 10 (4.4%) of these RCTs, of which 2 reported on responsiveness of QoL. This review provides evidence that QoL-instruments are seldom used as outcome measures in RCTs in dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment, and that information on responsiveness is scarce. QoL-measures should be applied more often in clinical trials, as currently no disease modifying drugs are available, although there are valid and reliable QoL-measures for dementia that reflect the aims of palliative care and provide transparent information about patient's and caregiver's treatment benefits. We recommend further research efforts aimed at the determination of the minimal important difference in QoL-scales and the responsiveness of QoL-scales. Subsequently, QoL should be measured as relevant end point, both in patients and their proxies, in all clinical trials in dementia.