Free fatty acid receptor 1 stimulates cAMP production and gut hormone secretion through Gq-mediated activation of adenylate cyclase 2.

OBJECTIVE: Free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFAR1) is highly expressed in enteroendocrine cells of the small intestine and pancreatic beta cells, where FFAR1 agonists function as GLP-1 and insulin secretagogues, respectively. Most efficacious are so-called second-generation synthetic agonists such as AM5262, which, in contrast to endogenous long-chain fatty acids are able to signal through both IP3/Ca2+ and cAMP pathways. Whereas IP3 signaling is to be expected for the mainly Gq-coupled FFAR1, the mechanism behind FFAR1-induced cAMP accumulation remains unclear, although originally proposed to be Gs mediated. METHODS AND RESULTS: When stimulated with AM5262, we observe that FFAR1 can activate the majority of the Gα proteins, except - surprisingly - members of the Gs family. AM5262-induced FFAR1-mediated transcriptional activation through cAMP response element (CREB) was blocked by the specific Gq inhibitor, YM253890. Furthermore, in Gq-deficient cells no CREB signal was observed unless Gq or G11 was reintroduced by transfection. By qPCR we determined that adenylate cyclase 2 (Adcy2) was highly expressed and enriched relative to the nine other Adcys in pro-glucagon expressing enteroendocrine cells. Co-transfection with ADCY2 increased the FFAR1-induced cAMP response 4-5-fold in WT HEK293 cells, an effect fully inhibited by YM253890. Moreover, co-transfection with ADCY2 had no effect in Gq-deficient cells without reintroduction of either Gq or G11. Importantly, although both AM5262/FFAR1 and isoproterenol/ß2 adrenergic receptor (ß2AR) induced cAMP production was lost in Gs-deficient cells, only the ß2AR response was rescued by Gs transfection, whereas co-transfection with ADCY2 was required to rescue the FFAR1 cAMP response. In situ hybridization demonstrated a high degree of co-expression of ADCY2 and FFAR1 in enteroendocrine cells throughout the intestine. Finally, in the enteroendocrine STC-1 and GLUTag cell lines AM5262-induced cAMP accumulation and GLP-1 secretion were both blocked by YM253890. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that Gq signaling is responsible not only for the IP3/Ca2+ but also the cAMP response, which together are required for the highly efficacious hormone secretion induced by second-generation FFAR1 agonists - and that ADCY2 presumably mediates the Gq-driven cAMP response.

Amino acids differ in their capacity to stimulate GLP-1 release from the perfused rat small intestine and stimulate secretion by different sensing mechanisms.

The aim of this study was to explore individual amino acid-stimulated GLP-1 responses and the underlying stimulatory mechanisms, as well as to identify the amino acid-sensing receptors involved in amino acid-stimulated GLP-1 release. Experiments were primarily based on isolated perfused rat small intestines, which have intact epithelial polarization allowing discrimination between luminal and basolateral mechanisms as well as quantitative studies of intestinal absorption and hormone secretion. Expression analysis of amino acid sensors on isolated murine GLP-1 secreting L-cells was assessed by qPCR. We found that l-valine powerfully stimulated GLP-1 secretion but only from the luminal side (2.9-fold increase). When administered from the vascular side, l-arginine and the aromatic amino acids stimulated GLP-1 secretion equally (2.6- to 2.9-fold increases). Expression analysis revealed that Casr expression was enriched in murine GLP-1 secreting L-cells, whereas Gpr35, Gprc6a, Gpr142, Gpr93 (Lpar5), and the umami taste receptor subunits Tas1r3 and Tas1r1 were not. Consistently, activation of GPR35, GPR93, GPR142, and the umami taste receptor with specific agonists or allosteric modulators did not increase GLP-1 secretion (P > 0.05 for all experiments), whereas vascular inhibition of CaSR reduced GLP-1 secretion in response to luminal infusion of mixed amino acids. In conclusion, amino acids differ in their capacity to stimulate GLP-1 secretion. Some amino acids stimulated secretion only from the intestinal lumen, whereas other amino acids exclusively stimulated secretion from the vascular side, indicating that amino acid-stimulated GLP-1 secretion involves both apical and basolateral (postabsorptive) sensing mechanisms. Sensing of absorbed amino acids involves CaSR activation as vascular inhibition of CaSR markedly diminished amino acid stimulated GLP-1 release.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using isolated perfused rat small intestines, we show that amino acids differ in their mechanisms and capacity of stimulating GLP-1 release. Furthermore, we demonstrate that sensing by GPR142, GPR35, GPR93, and the umami taste receptor (Tas1R1/Tas1R3) are not involved in amino acid stimulated GLP-1 release. In contrast to previous studies, this experimental model allows discrimination between the luminal and the vascular side of the intestine, which is essential when studying mechanisms of amino acid-stimulated GLP-1 secretion.

Gq and Gs signaling acting in synergy to control GLP-1 secretion.

GPR40 is generally known to signal through Gq. However, in transfected cells, certain synthetic agonists can make the receptor signal also through Gs and cAMP (Hauge et al., 2015). Here we find that, in colonic crypt cultures, the GLP-1 secretion induced by such Gq + Gs GPR40 agonists is indeed inhibited by blockers of both Gq and Gs and is eliminated by combining these. This in contrast to Gq-only GPR40 agonists which only are affected by the Gq inhibitor. Importantly, Gq-only GPR40 agonists in combination with low doses of selective synthetic agonists for Gs coupled receptors, e.g. GPR119 and TGR5 provide more than additive GLP-1 secretion both ex vivo and in vivo in mice. It is concluded that under physiological circumstances triglyceride metabolites, i.e. long chain fatty acids and 2-monoacyl glycerol plus bile acids, act synergistically through their respective receptors, GPR40, GPR119 and TGR5 to stimulate GLP-1 secretion robustly by combining Gq and Gs signaling pathways.