Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Neurol ; 159: 12-15, 2024 Jul 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39094249

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Isolated psychiatric symptoms can be the initial symptom of pediatric anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor autoimmune encephalitis (pNMDARE). Here we report on the prevalence of isolated psychiatric symptoms in pNMDARE. We also assess whether initial neurodiagnostic tests (brain magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], electroencephalography [EEG], and/or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] white blood cell count) are abnormal in children with isolated psychiatric symptoms and pNMDARE. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study from CONNECT (Conquering Neuroinflammation and Epilepsies Consortium) from 14 institutions included children under age 18 years who were diagnosed with pNMDARE. Descriptive statistics using means, medians, and comparisons for continuous versus discrete data was performed. RESULTS: Of 249 children included, 12 (5%) had only psychiatric symptoms without other typical clinical features of autoimmune encephalitis at presentation. All but one (11 of 12 = 92%) had at least one abnormal finding on initial ancillary testing: eight of 12 (67%) had an abnormal EEG, six of 12 (50%) had an abnormal MRI, and five of 12 (42%) demonstrated CSF pleocytosis. The single patient with a normal MRI, EEG, and CSF profile had low positive CSF NMDA antibody (titer of 1:1), and symptoms improved without immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated first-episode psychiatric symptoms in pNMDARE are uncommon, and the majority of children will exhibit additional neurodiagnostic abnormalities. Delaying immunotherapy in a child with isolated psychiatric symptoms and normal neurodiagnostic testing may be warranted while awaiting confirmatory antibody testing.

2.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci ; 63(4): 368-376, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490728

RESUMEN

Validated glass bead sterilization protocols to effectively sterilize rodent surgical instruments after bacterial exposure (for example, cecal contamination) are lacking. To refine current approaches, we added either a multienzyme detergent, neutral pH detergent, or chlorhexidine scrub step before glass bead sterilization of forceps or needle drivers exposed to cecal contents. We exposed sets of forceps and needle drivers to cecal contents, which were then air dried for 3 min. Immediately after, the instruments were wiped several times with a clean, dry paper towel. The contaminated tips were soaked in either a multienzyme or neutral pH detergent (t = 5 min), chlorhexidine scrub (t = 2 min), or no pretreatment solution. To further increase debris removal, instruments (from all groups) were brushed using a clean toothbrush. The nonpretreatment instruments were briefly soaked in saline before brushing. After being rinsed with sterile water, all instruments were exposed to a glass bead sterilizer for 60 s at 500 °F (260 °C). Sets were then swabbed for bacterial culturing. Swabs were plated onto either sheep blood agar (n = 23) or chocolate agar (n = 20) for aerobic culturing or Brucella agar (n = 20) for anaerobic culturing. A subset of instruments was sampled to determine organic material presence after treatment using an ATP luminometer (n = 21). Multiple agar types and bioluminescence were used to more deeply evaluate tool sterility and to differentiate the relative effectiveness of each protocol. From the saline group, only one pair of forceps yielded growth on Brucella agar, and 2 pairs yielded growth on chocolate agar. No other bacterial growth was observed. The use of a pretreatment agent also lowered overall organic contamination levels in needle drivers compared with using only saline. These results indicate that brushing instruments to mechanically remove debris from instruments is paramount to ensure sterility. However, a best practice would be to also use one of the pretreatment options used in this study.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación de Equipos , Esterilización , Esterilización/métodos , Animales , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/microbiología , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Detergentes , Clorhexidina/farmacología , Vidrio
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...