RESUMEN
AIM: There are certain problems experienced while retightening the seton material during the patient follow-ups, such as pain and anaesthesia requirements in perianal fistula. The aim of the present study was to compare a sailor's knot with other seton tightening methods for the surgical treatment of perianal fistulas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The records of 105 patients who underwent surgeries for perianal fistulas using the seton method between 2016 and 2019 were analysed retrospectively. The demographic characteristics, complaints, fistula localizations, surgery types, hospital stay lengths, postoperative complications and imaging modalities of the patients included in the study were recorded. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical treatment method. Those patients who underwent seton procedures with a sailor's knot were included in Group 1. Group 2 included those patients who underwent other seton procedures, including silk and penrose drain procedures. Groups were compared with regard to success rates and postoperative recurrence. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the age, gender, fistula type and follow-up duration. Success rate in all patient was 88.6%, 91.2% in group 1 and 87.1% in group 2 (p=0.36). The number of patients with a kind of incontinence was 7 (7.1%), 3 (5.8%) in Group 1 and 4 (7.4%) in Group 2 (p = 0.297). CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences with regard to complications and recurrences between the sailor's knot and the other seton tightening methods used for the treatment of anal fistulas. The sailor's knot is recommended with regard to its easy application and seton retightening with satisfactory outcomes. KEY WORDS: Perianal fistula, Sailor's knot, Seton.
Asunto(s)
Personal Militar , Fístula Rectal/cirugía , Técnicas de Sutura , Adulto , Drenaje , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , TurquíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gallbladder tumours rank fifth in the world among gastrointestinal system tumours. Coincidental gallbladder tumours are diagnosed during cholecystectomies, or by examining the cholecystectomy material. AIMS: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the incidence of gallbladder cancer among patients undergoing cholecystectomies due to gallbladder disease. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study METHODS: The files of 341 patients who had undergone routine cholecystectomy operations between January 2013 and March 2016 were reviewed, and their pathology results were recorded. Those patients with gallbladder carcinomas were evaluated in terms of age, gender, preoperative findings, existing symptoms, radiological findings, surgical findings and follow-up. The cancer invasion depth was classified according to the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) atlas, and this study was approved by the ethical committee of our university. RESULTS: Among the 341 patients who participated in this study, 253 (74.41%) were female, 88 (25.80%) were male, and their average age was 49.61 years old (17-86). Seven of the patients (2.05%) had gallbladder tumours; six of which were female, one was male and their average age was 67.71 years old (62-76). One tumour was diagnosed as a frozen specimen during the operation, while the others were diagnosed during the postoperation phase. Three of the patients had T1b and four had T2 tumours. CONCLUSION: Gallbladder tumours detected incidentally could extend survival rates with proper surgical intervention and chemotherapy. The possibility of a tumour should not be dismissed in those patients with advanced age, females or patients with gallbladder stones. Frozen specimens should be created during a cholecystectomy, and if there is any doubt about the diagnosis, a postoperative histopathological examination of the gallbladder should be conducted. KEY WORDS: Cholecystectomy, Gall bladder stone, Incidental gallbladder carcinoma.