RESUMEN
Aim of this paper is to investigate the presence of White Matter Lesions (WMLs) in subjects affected by Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) and possibly to evaluate the significance of WMLs in SSNHL patients. A total of 64 patients (cases) affected by SSNHL were included in this case-control study. Hearing tests were performed at SSNHL onset, after 7â¯days and after 30â¯days. Cerebral MRI sequences were performed to rule out retrocochlear pathology, and WMLs were evaluated if present. MRI control group included 32 subjects, without hearing loss, affected by pituitary adenoma, who underwent cerebral MRI of follow-up. WML presence in those affected by SSNHL resulted having a similar distribution to that of the control group; however, we observed complete hearing recovery in 42,9% of patients without WML and in 11,6% of patients with WML >1 (pâ¯=â¯0,017*). The incidence of WML in patients with SSNHL was not different compared to that of the control group; however, MRI could have a prognostic role for SSNHL patients, as the presence of WMLs can been linked to a poorer hearing recovery rate.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/patología , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/patología , Sustancia Blanca/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Oído/inervación , Oído/patología , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/etiología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is currently the most popular and used ablation modality for the treatment of non surgical patients with primary and secondary liver tumors, but in the last years microwave ablation (MWA) is being technically improved and widely rediscovered for clinical use. Laser thermal ablation (LTA) is by far less investigated and used than RFA and MWA, but the available data on its effectiveness and safety are quite good and comparable to those of RFA and MWA. All the three hyperthermia-based ablative techniques, when performed by skilled operators, can successfully treat all liver tumors eligible for thermal ablation, and to date in most centers of interventional oncology or interventional radiology the choice of the technique usually depends on the physician's preference and experience, or technical availability. However, RFA, MWA, and LTA have peculiar advantages and limitations that can make each of them more suitable than the other ones to treat patients and tumors with different characteristics. When all the three thermal ablation techniques are available, the choice among RFA, MWA, and LTA should be guided by their advantages and disadvantages, number, size, and location of the liver nodules, and cost-saving considerations, in order to give patients the best treatment option.
RESUMEN
Proliferation of imaging studies for different clinical purposes and continuous improvement of imaging technology have led to an increasing number of incidental findings of renal masses. It is estimated that over 50% of patients older than 50 years have at least one renal mass. The majority of incidental renal masses are simple cysts that can be easily diagnosed by conventional ultrasonography. However, some incidental renal masses are not simple cysts, and differentiation between benign and malignant entities requires further imaging modalities. In the past, multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were considered the primary imaging modalities used to characterize and stage complex cystic and solid renal lesions. Currently, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography represents a novel alternative to contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography employs microbubble contrast agents that allow the study of different enhancement phases of the kidney without risk of nephrotoxicity and radiation exposure. The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the characterization of complex renal cysts is comparable to that of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and several studies have demonstrated its reliability also in identifying solid lesions such as pseudotumors, typical angiomyolipomas, and clear cell renal carcinomas. Considering the high incidence of incidental renal masses and the need for rapid and reliable diagnosis, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography could be proposed as the first step in the diagnostic work-up of renal masses because of its safety and cost effectiveness. In this paper, we propose a diagnostic algorithm for the characterization of cystic and solid renal masses.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Renal/anomalías , Venas Renales/anomalías , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color/métodos , Anciano , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Renales/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Image fusion between sonography and CT allows real-time synchronization of CT multiplanar reconstructed images with the corresponding sonographic images. This technique has mainly been used in liver imaging. We report the use of image fusion to target and successfully guide the percutaneous biopsy of a retroperitoneal a mass. This technique represents a promising tool in abdominal imaging, and it should be considered for the biopsy of lesions that are difficult to approach with conventional imaging guidance techniques.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Erdheim-Chester/diagnóstico , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Biopsia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espacio Retroperitoneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Espacio Retroperitoneal/patología , Interfaz Usuario-ComputadorRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the ablation area produced by a single application of a microwave ablation (MWA) system, equipped with a miniaturized device on the tip of the antenna entrapping reflected microwaves, with that produced by an internally cooled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with primary or secondary inoperable liver tumors, selected to undergo percutaneous thermal ablation, were randomly assigned to MWA or RFA procedure. The ablation areas produced by a single application of MWA (ablation time 10 min) or RFA (ablation time 12 min) energy were assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography immediately after the end of the procedure. The long- and short-axis diameters of the ablation areas were measured and compared using Student t test. RESULTS: Long- and short-axis diameters of the ablation areas produced by MWA were significantly greater than those produced by RFA: 48.5 ± 6.7 versus 30.9 ± 1.1 mm (p < 0.0001) and 38.5 ± 4.6 versus 26.8 ± 2.9 mm (p < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The MWA system can achieve significantly larger ablation areas than the internally cooled RFA system. Broader randomized trials are strongly warranted to investigate whether such superiority can translate into better long-term outcome of the ablation procedure.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/instrumentación , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Microondas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Ondas de Radio , Resultado del Tratamiento , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
Primary achalasia is a rare disorder of unknown aetiology characterized by dysfunction of esophageal motility secondary to degeneration of esophageal neurons. Some diseases, in particular neoplastic diseases, can cause symptoms similar to achalasia, and this condition is called pseudoachalasia. Pseudoachalasia can be indistinguishable from primary achalasia, and many investigations are often necessary to detect or exclude an underlying neoplasia. We report a case in which thoracic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and percutaneous CEUS-guided lung biopsy played a central role in differentiating aspiration pneumonia secondary to achalasia and complicated by lung abscess from pseudoachalasia secondary to lung carcinoma, after computed tomography (CT) yielded inconclusive findings. US contrast agent SonoVue® has an exclusively intravascular distribution, and its ability to discriminate between contrast vascular signal and tissue signal is greater than that of CT, making CEUS superior to CT in distinguishing perfused, viable tissues from avascular necrotic tissues. Although its use in pleuropulmonary pathology is still off-label, CEUS can play a useful role in characterizing peripheral pulmonary masses in selected cases.
RESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic peripheral pleuro-pulmonary lesions. METHODS: One hundred patients with pleural or peripheral pulmonary lesions underwent thoracic CEUS. An 8 microliters/mL solution of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles stabilized by a phospholipid shell (SonoVue(®)) was used as US contrast agent. The clips were stored and independently reviewed by two readers, who recorded the following parameters: presence/absence of arterial enhancement, time to enhancement (TE), extent of enhancement (EE), pattern of enhancement (PE), presence/absence of wash-out, time to wash-out, and extent of wash-out. After the final diagnosis (based on histopathologic findings or follow-up of at least 15 mo) was reached, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of each CEUS parameter in the differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions were calculated. Furthermore, an arbitrary score based on the ratio between the PPVs of each CEUS parameter was calculated, to evaluate if some relationship could exist between overall CEUS behaviour and neoplastic or non-neoplastic nature of the lesions. RESULTS: Five patients were lost at follow-up before a conclusive diagnosis was reached, 53 lesions resulted neoplastic and 42 non-neoplastic. Enhancement in the arterial phase was observed in 53/53 neoplastic lesions and 30/42 non-neoplastic lesions. On the whole, 40/42 non-neoplastic lesions showed absence of enhancement or early enhancement (95.2%) vs 3/53 neoplastic lesions (5.7%). EE was marked in 29/53 (54.7%) neoplastic lesions and 25/30 (83.3%) non-neoplastic lesions, moderate in 24/53 (45.5%) and 5/30 (16.7%), respectively. PE was homogeneous in 6/53 (11.3%) neoplastic lesions and 18/30 (60%) non-neoplastic lesions, inhomogeneous in 47/53 (88.7%) and 12/30 (40%), respectively. 19/30 (63.3%) non-neoplastic lesions enhancing in the arterial phase had no wash-out in the venous phase, 11/30 (36.7%) had late and mild wash-out. Wash-out was early in 26/53 (49%) neoplastic lesions, late in 26/53 (49%), absent in 1 (2%); marked in 16/53 (30.2%), and moderate in 36/53 (67.9%). The delayed enhancement in the arterial phase showed a sensitivity of 94.32%, specificity of 95.2%, PPV of 96.2%, NPV of 93%, PLR of 19.81, and NLR of 0.06 in identifying the neoplastic lesions. All other parameters individually considered showed unsatisfactory values of sensitivity, or specificity, or both, in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions. The median of the overall arbitrary score was 3 (range 0-14) in non-neoplastic lesions, and 16.5 (range 7.0-17.5) in neoplastic lesions (P < 0.001). The correlation between the diagnosis of neoplastic vs non-neoplastic lesion and the score value was statistically significant (r = 0.858, P < 0.001). Based on the score distribution, a cut-off of 7.5 enabled to reach a sensitivity of 98.1%, specificity of 95.1%, PPV 96.3%, NPV 97.5%, PVR 20.1 and NVR 0.02 in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions. CONCLUSION: CEUS could be useful in the diagnostic workup of pleuropulmonary lesions. A delayed TE or a score ≥ 7.5 suggest the neoplastic nature of a lesion.
RESUMEN
We report a case of Krukenberg tumor of gastric origin with adnexal metastasis, in which ultrasonography (US) and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) played a key diagnostic role. An 64-year-old female patient was referred to our department for abdominal pain, nausea and ascites. US examination was performed as first line diagnostic imaging approach, confirming the presence of ascites and detecting marked thickness of the gastric wall and a right adnexal mass. CEUS was immediately performed and showed arterial enhancement followed by wash-out in the venous phase of both the gastric wall and the adnexal mass, suggesting the diagnosis of gastric cancer with right adnexal metastasis (Krukenberg syndrome). The patient underwent US-guided paracentesis and esophagogastroduodenoscopy that showed linitis plastica. Cytologic examination of the peritoneal fluid revealed the presence of signet-ring cells, and histologic examination of the specimen obtained by endoscopic biopsy showed primary gastric mucus-producing adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cells. Although transvaginal US is undoubtedly the method of choice to evaluate ovarian tumors, abdominal US and CEUS can provide key diagnostic elements, supporting clinicians in the first steps of the diagnostic work-up of abdominal and pelvic masses.