RESUMEN
There have been several methods established for immunohistochemical labeling of the PGP 9.5 antigen in human tissue for the assessment of epidermal nerve fiber density, none of which uses neutral-buffered formalin as the preferred fixative for paraffin-embedded tissue. The literature maintains that formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues are unable to be used for this purpose and that other fixatives must be used due to the cross-linkages caused by formalin fixation. This study was undertaken to develop a standardized method for the use of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues for immunohistochemical labeling and assessment of epidermal nerve fiber density. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues from the punch biopsies of patients suspected to have small fiber neuropathy were prepared for immunohistochemical labeling using heat-induced epitope retrieval for one hour at 92°C. The tissues were then stained with a polyclonal rabbit anti-human PGP 9.5 primary antibody. The resulting stains were then evaluated by a licensed pathologist who counted the number of epidermal nerve fibers stained and recorded the epidermal length in millimeters. Human foreskin was used as the tissue control in these studies. Satisfactory immunohistochemical labeling of epidermal nerve fibers was achieved from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues through the use of heat-induced epitope retrieval. The authors of this paper have concluded that formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues may be used to achieve satisfactory immunohistochemical labeling for the assessment of epidermal nerve fiber density.
RESUMEN
There have been several studies on the use of the Verhoeff van Gieson staining method to demonstrate thermal effects on tissues. However, this method has rarely been used for the analysis of periodontal tissues. This study was undertaken to compare the quality and effectiveness of the Verhoeff van Gieson (VVG) staining method with conventional hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) in measuring the thermal effects in gingival tissues. Periodontal tissues around bovine mandibular teeth were treated using different surgical lasers (wavelengths of 10,600 nm, 970 nm, and 445 nm) at 2 W power setting. Measurements of the depth of the coagulation zone were recorded for all treatment groups in sample tissues stained with H&E as well as the VVG-staining method. Measures were interpreted by a trained pathologist. A statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between values recorded for the light penetration depth on tissues stained with each of the two staining methods. It was determined that there was no significant difference in the recorded values (P = 0.23). We have concluded that the VVG-stained tissues were better able to visualize the depth of thermal damage and thus may make it easier for someone not well trained to interpret the depth of light penetration in these tissues.
