RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis of traumatic axonal injury (TAI) is challenging because of its underestimation by conventional MRI and the technical requirements associated with the processing of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Serum biomarkers seem to be able to identify patients with abnormal CT scanning findings, but their potential role to assess TAI has seldomly been explored. METHODS: Patients with all severities of traumatic brain injury (TBI) were prospectively included in this study between 2016 and 2021. They underwent blood extraction within 24 hours after injury and imaging assessment, including DTI. Serum concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein, total microtubule-associated protein (t-Tau), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) were measured using an ultrasensitive Simoa multiplex assay panel, a digital form of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score was determined at 6 months after TBI. The relationships between biomarker concentrations, volumetric analysis of corpus callosum (CC) lesions, and fractional anisotropy (FA) were analyzed by nonparametric tests. The prognostic utility of the biomarker was determined by calculating the C-statistic and an ordinal regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included. Concentrations of all biomarkers were significantly higher for patients compared with controls. Although the concentration of the biomarkers was affected by the presence of mass lesions, FA of the CC was an independent factor influencing levels of UCH-L1 and NfL, which positioned these two biomarkers as better surrogates of TAI. Biomarkers also performed well in determining patients who would have had unfavorable outcome. NfL and the FA of the CC are independent complementary factors related to outcome. CONCLUSIONS: UCH-L1 and NfL seem to be the biomarkers more specific to detect TAI. The concentration of NfL combined with the FA of the CC might help predict long-term outcome.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Imagen de Difusión Tensora , Humanos , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía , Benchmarking , Pronóstico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Biomarcadores , Ubiquitina TiolesterasaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) is one of the most devastating entities secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI). Even though radiological computed tomography (CT) findings, such as hematoma thickness (HT), midline shift (MLS), and MLS/HT ratio, have an important prognostic role, they suffer from important drawbacks. We hypothesized that relative cross-sectional area (rCSA) of specific brain regions would provide valuable information about brain compression and swelling, thus being a key determining factor governing the clinical course. METHODS: We performed an 8-year retrospective analysis of patients with moderate to severe TBI with surgically evacuated, isolated, unilateral aSDH. We investigated the influence of aSDH rCSA and ipsilateral hemisphere rCSA along the supratentorial region on the subsequent operative technique employed for aSDH evacuation and patient's clinical outcomes (early death and Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] at discharge and after 1-year follow-up). Different conventional radiological variables were also assessed. RESULTS: The study included 39 patients. Lower HT, MLS, hematoma volume, and aSDH rCSA showed a significant association with decompressive craniectomy (DC) procedure. Conversely, higher ipsilateral hemisphere rCSA along the dorso-ventral axis and, specifically, ipsilateral hemisphere rCSA at the high convexity level were predictors for DC. CT segmentation analysis exhibited a modest relationship with early death, which was limited to the basal supratentorial subregion, but could not predict long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: rCSA is an objectifiable and reliable radiologic parameter available on admission CT that might provide valuable information to optimize surgical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Hematoma Subdural Agudo , Humanos , Hematoma Subdural Agudo/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pronóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Hematoma , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The large number of infected patients requiring mechanical ventilation has led to the postponement of scheduled neurosurgical procedures during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aims of this study were to investigate the factors that influence the decision to postpone scheduled neurosurgical procedures and to evaluate the effect of the restriction in scheduled surgery adopted to deal with the first outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain on the outcome of patients awaiting surgery. DESIGN: This was an observational retrospective study. SETTINGS: A tertiary-level multicentre study of neurosurgery activity between 1 March and 30 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 680 patients awaiting any scheduled neurosurgical procedure were enrolled. 470 patients (69.1%) were awaiting surgery because of spine degenerative disease, 86 patients (12.6%) due to functional disorders, 58 patients (8.5%) due to brain or spine tumours, 25 patients (3.7%) due to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) disorders and 17 patients (2.5%) due to cerebrovascular disease. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was mortality due to any reason and any deterioration of the specific neurosurgical condition. Second, we analysed the rate of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: More than one-quarter of patients experienced clinical or radiological deterioration. The rate of worsening was higher among patients with functional (39.5%) or CSF disorders (40%). Two patients died (0.4%) during the waiting period, both because of a concurrent disease. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine independent covariates associated with maintaining the surgical indication. We found that community SARS-CoV-2 incidence (OR=1.011, p<0.001), degenerative spine (OR=0.296, p=0.027) and expedited indications (OR=6.095, p<0.001) were independent factors for being operated on during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Patients awaiting neurosurgery experienced significant collateral damage even when they were considered for scheduled procedures.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , España/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Factors determining the risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms have been extensively studied; however, little attention is paid to variables influencing the volume of bleeding after rupture. In this study the authors aimed to evaluate the impact of aneurysm morphological variables on the amount of hemorrhage. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively collected data set of 116 patients presenting at a single center with subarachnoid hemorrhage due to aneurysmal rupture. A volumetric assessment of the total hemorrhage volume was performed from the initial noncontrast CT. Aneurysms were segmented and reproduced from the initial CT angiography study, and morphology indexes were calculated with a computer-assisted approach. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients were included in the study. Factors influencing the volume of hemorrhage were explored with univariate correlations, multiple linear regression analysis, and graphical probabilistic modeling. RESULTS: The univariate analysis demonstrated that several of the morphological variables but only the patient's age from the clinical-demographic variables correlated (p < 0.05) with the volume of bleeding. Nine morphological variables correlated positively (absolute height, perpendicular height, maximum width, sac surface area, sac volume, size ratio, bottleneck factor, neck-to-vessel ratio, and width-to-vessel ratio) and two correlated negatively (parent vessel average diameter and the aneurysm angle). After multivariate analysis, only the aneurysm size ratio (p < 0.001) and the patient's age (p = 0.023) remained statistically significant. The graphical probabilistic model confirmed the size ratio and the patient's age as the variables most related to the total hemorrhage volume. CONCLUSIONS: A greater aneurysm size ratio and an older patient age are likely to entail a greater volume of bleeding after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Roto , Aneurisma Intracraneal , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Aneurisma Roto/complicaciones , Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía Cerebral , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraneal/complicaciones , Aneurisma Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicaciones , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been found to improve the neurological condition. The underlying mechanisms are still unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the roles of the postural changes and atmospheric pressure (AP) in the brain hemodynamics and their relationship with clinical improvement. Seventy-eight patients were studied before and 72 h after cranioplasty with cervical and transcranial color Doppler ultrasound (TCCS) in the sitting and supine positions. Craniectomy size, shape, and force exerted by the AP (torque) were calculated. Neurological condition was assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Barthel index. Twenty-eight patients improved after cranioplasty. Their time elapsed from the DC was shorter (214 vs 324 days), preoperative Barthel was worse (54 vs 77), internal carotid artery (ICA) mean velocity of the defect side was lower while sitting (14.4 vs 20.9 cm/s), and torque over the craniectomy was greater (2480.3 vs 1464.3 N*cm). Multivariate binary logistic regression showed the consistency of these changes. TCCS findings were no longer present postoperatively. Lower ICA (defect side) velocity in the sitting position correlates significantly with clinical improvement. Greater torque exerted by the AP might explain different susceptibilities to postural changes, corrected by cranioplasty.
Asunto(s)
Craniectomía Descompresiva , Cráneo , Encéfalo/cirugía , Craneotomía , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Cráneo/cirugía , Ultrasonografía Doppler TranscranealRESUMEN
Background: We describe a case of candida spondylodiscitis secondary to coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Case report: A 47-year-old man diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) required prolonged admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Four months later, he was diagnosed with thoracic candida spondylodiscitis. Medical management was insufficient, so he eventually underwent surgery. Discussions: Fungal infections seem to be more likely in patients with COVID-19, but it is unknown whether they are directly attributed to COVID-19 or other surrounding factors. Regardless of the answer, the diagnosis is complicated, and the mortality rate is high. Lessons: COVID-19 is posing a challenge to the society, and new and unexpected diseases that had once disappeared have risen again. It is our duty to suspect them and to treat them in the most effective way possible.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the outcome of neurosurgical patients in Spain. SETTINGS: The initial flood of COVID-19 patients overwhelmed an unprepared healthcare system. Different measures were taken to deal with this overburden. The effect of these measures on neurosurgical patients, as well as the effect of COVID-19 itself, has not been thoroughly studied. PARTICIPANTS: This was a multicentre, nationwide, observational retrospective study of patients who underwent any neurosurgical operation from March to July 2020. INTERVENTIONS: An exploratory factorial analysis was performed to select the most relevant variables of the sample. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of mortality and postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Sixteen hospitals registered 1677 operated patients. The overall mortality was 6.4%, and 2.9% (44 patients) suffered a perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of those infections, 24 were diagnosed postoperatively. Age (OR 1.05), perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 4.7), community COVID-19 incidence (cases/105 people/week) (OR 1.006), postoperative neurological worsening (OR 5.9), postoperative need for airway support (OR 5.38), ASA grade ≥3 (OR 2.5) and preoperative GCS 3-8 (OR 2.82) were independently associated with mortality. For SARS-CoV-2 postoperative infection, screening swab test <72 hours preoperatively (OR 0.76), community COVID-19 incidence (cases/105 people/week) (OR 1.011), preoperative cognitive impairment (OR 2.784), postoperative sepsis (OR 3.807) and an absence of postoperative complications (OR 0.188) were independently associated. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection in neurosurgical patients was associated with an increase in mortality by almost fivefold. Community COVID-19 incidence (cases/105 people/week) was a statistically independent predictor of mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CEIM 20/217.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Surgical evacuation is the mainstay of treatment in patients with altered neurological status or significant mass effect. Nevertheless, concerns regarding surgical indication still persist. Given that clinicians often make therapeutic decisions on the basis of their prognosis assessment, to accurately evaluate the prognosis is of great significance. Unfortunately, there is a lack of specific and reliable prognostic models. In addition, the interdependence of certain well-known predictive variables usually employed to guide surgical decision-making in ASDH has been proven. Because gray matter and white matter are highly susceptible to secondary insults during the early phase after TBI, the authors aimed to assess the extent of these secondary insults with a brain parenchyma densitometric quantitative CT analysis and to evaluate its prognostic capacity. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis among their prospectively collected cohort of patients with moderate to severe TBI. Patients with surgically evacuated, isolated, unilateral ASDH admitted between 2010 and 2017 were selected. Thirty-nine patients were included. For each patient, brain parenchyma density in Hounsfield units (HUs) was measured in 10 selected slices from the supratentorial region. In each slice, different regions of interest (ROIs), including and excluding the cortical parenchyma, were defined. The injured hemisphere, the contralateral hemisphere, and the absolute differences between them were analyzed. The outcome was evaluated using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended at 1 year after TBI. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (38.5%) had a favorable outcome. Collected demographic, clinical, and radiographic data did not show significant differences between favorable and unfavorable outcomes. In contrast, the densitometric analysis demonstrated that greater absolute differences between both hemispheres were associated with poor outcome. These differences were detected along the supratentorial region, but were greater at the high convexity level. Moreover, these HU differences were far more marked at the cortical parenchyma. It was also detected that these differences were more prone to ischemic and/or edematous insults than to hyperemic changes. Age was significantly correlated with the side-to-side HU differences in patients with unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The densitometric analysis is a promising prognostic tool in patients diagnosed with ASDH. The supplementary prognostic information provided by the densitometric analysis should be evaluated in future studies.