Plant-Based Diet: Is It as Good as an Animal-Based Diet When It Comes to Protein?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Protein is a macronutrient that is responsible for multiple functions in the human body and is made up of twenty amino acids. Nine amino acids are not synthesized in the human body and require dietary ingestion to prevent deficiency. These essential amino acids are easily obtained through animal-based proteins but can be in limited quantities through plant-based protein sources. With the obesity epidemic rising, great attention has turned to plant-based protein diets and their health and environmental implications. The differences in plant and animal protein sources have been explored for their effects on general health, sarcopenia, and muscle performance. This review discusses the benefits and drawbacks of a plant-based diet, as well as some of the latest literature on muscle protein synthesis between animal- and plant-based dietary intakes of protein. RECENT FINDINGS: High meat consumption is associated with increased saturated fat intake and lower dietary fiber intake. As a result, meat consumption is correlated with obesity, heart disease, metabolic syndrome, and gastrointestinal cancers. However, animal-based diets contain higher amounts of leucine and other essential amino acids which are associated with increased anabolic potential and muscle protein synthesis. Yet, multiple studies show conflicting results on the true benefits of animal-based diets, suggesting total protein intake may be the best predictor for preserving lean muscle mass and increasing muscle performance. While many studies support animal protein sources superior to plant-based diets on intracellular anabolic signaling, other studies show conflicting results regarding the true benefit of animal-based protein diets on overall performance and effect on sarcopenia. The health benefits seem to favor plant-based protein sources; however, further research is needed to examine the effects of protein from plant- and animal-based diets on muscle mass and protein synthesis.

Processed Foods - Getting Back to The Basics.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Real-world data suggested that more than half of daily energy intake is coming from processed and ultra-processed foods in most western countries. This high consumption of processed foods is of concern, given laboratory and epidemiological studies' findings that prove overwhelming harms of processed foods on human health. RECENT FINDINGS: Data demonstrate that consumption of processed foods is increasing with more reports linking ultra-processed foods to various medical conditions; namely, obesity, metabolic syndrome, atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases, and certain types of cancer. Scientific community's understanding of the mechanisms and substances by which processed foods are affecting human health is expanding. Holistic approach to the current critical situation is advisable and requires collaborative public health strategies. The current review describes recent classification of processed foods and highlights the pertinent findings in the relationship between processed foods and health. It also outlines key clinical data relevant to the topic.

Sleep disruption in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: What is the role of lifestyle and diet?

BACKGROUND: Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have sleep disruption. The aim of this study is to understand how underlying factors such as diet, degree of liver disease and morningness-eveningness tendencies contribute to this sleep disruption. METHODS: Patients with NAFLD were recruited from liver clinics at a University and Veterans Affairs practice. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis were excluded. Patients completed self-reported surveys to evaluate sleep disturbance using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and chronotype (circadian preference) using the morningness-eveningness questionnaire (MEQ). Information on occupation, physical activity and dietary intake were collected at clinic intake. Dietary intake was evaluated via food-frequency questionnaire and analyzed as individual categories or grouped on the basis of dietary composition. RESULTS: A 54 patients completed the survey; 37% were female. Median ESS was 8 ± 4.2 and 37% of NAFLD patients were found to have sleep disturbance as defined by ESS >10. Sleep disturbance was common in NAFLD regardless of the liver disease stage. Dietary factors, including higher added sugar (P = 0.01), candy intake (P = 0.01), elevated Ferritin level (P = 0.04) and elevated platelet count (P = 0.05), were significantly associated with sleep disturbance. Chronotype, time to sleep, and duration of sleep were not associated with sleep disruption. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep disruption is present in NAFLD regardless of underlying cirrhosis. Interventions aimed at improving dietary and lifestyle practices such as reduced sugar intake may help mitigate the risk for sleep disruption in NAFLD. Further longitudinal studies are needed to further delineate these links.