Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Immunother ; 47(5): 182-189, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38333962

RESUMEN

Our aim was to assess the efficacy of adjuvant programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and compare the other adjuvant treatments in patients with surgically resected stage III or IV acral melanoma. This study is a multicenter, retrospective analysis. We included 114 patients with stage III or IV acral malignant melanoma who underwent surgery within the past 10 years. We analyzed the effect of adjuvant programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors on disease-free survival (DFS). The mean follow-up was 40 months, during which 69 (59.5%) patients experienced recurrence. Among the participants, 64 (56.1%) received systemic adjuvant therapy. Specifically, 48.4% received anti-PD-1 therapy, 29.7% received interferon, 14.1% received tezozolomide, and 7.8% received B-Raf proto-oncogene/mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors. Patients who received adjuvant therapy had a median DFS of 24 (10.9-37.2) months, whereas those who did not receive adjuvant therapy had a median DFS of 15 (9.8-20.2) months. Multivariate analysis for DFS revealed that the receipt of adjuvant therapy and lymph node metastasis stage were independent significant parameters ( P = 0.021, P = 0.018, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed for DFS between programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor treatment and other adjuvant treatments. Regarding overall survival (OS), patients who received adjuvant treatment had a median OS of 71 (30.4-111.7) months, whereas those who did not receive adjuvant treatment had a median OS of 38 (16.7-59.3; P = 0.023) months. In addition, there were no significant differences in OS observed between various adjuvant treatment agents ( P = 0.122). In our study, we have shown that adjuvant therapy had a positive effect on both DFS and OS in patients with stages III-IV acral melanoma who underwent curative intent surgery. Notably, we found no significant differences between anti-PD-1 therapy and other adjuvant therapies.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Melanoma , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1 , Proto-Oncogenes Mas , Humanos , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/patología , Melanoma/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años
2.
Anticancer Drugs ; 35(2): 190-194, 2024 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38018837

RESUMEN

Histamine and H1 receptors play a crucial role in the tumor microenvironment. Preclinical data showed that concomitant use of antihistamines and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might increase the effect of ICIs. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of antihistamines on the oncological outcomes of ICIs. This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary cancer center. Advanced cancer patients treated with ICIs were included in this study. A total of 133 patients receiving ICIs in the metastatic setting were included. Melanoma (33.1%) was the most common tumor type. The most common ICI was nivolumab (63.2%). Fifty-five (38.4%) patients received antihistamines concomitantly with ICIs. The most common antihistamine was pheniramine (85.5%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) (8.2 vs. 5.1 months, P  = 0.016) and overall survival (OS) (16.2 vs. 7.7 months, P  = 0.002) were longer in patients receiving antihistamines concomitantly with ICIs. In multivariate analysis, PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40-0.98, P  = 0.042] and OS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.81, P  = 0.006) were also better in those patients after adjusting for confounding factors, such as performance status, bone or liver metastasis, and concurrent chemotherapy. This study suggested that antihistamines may enhance the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced cancer. If validated in prospective trials, antihistamines and ICIs combinations might be new options to improve oncological outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Microambiente Tumoral
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA