Comparison of juvenile and adult myasthenia gravis in a French cohort with focus on thymic histology.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by muscle fatigability due to acetylcholine receptor (AChR) autoantibodies. To better characterize juvenile MG (JMG), we analyzed 85 pre- and 132 post-pubescent JMG (with a cutoff age of 13) compared to 721 adult MG patients under 40 years old using a French database. Clinical data, anti-AChR antibody titers, thymectomy, and thymic histology were analyzed. The proportion of females was higher in each subgroup. No significant difference in the anti-AChR titers was observed. Interestingly, the proportion of AChR+ MG patients was notably lower among adult MG patients aged between 30 and 40 years, at 69.7%, compared to over 82.4% in the other subgroups. Thymic histological data were examined in patients who underwent thymectomy during the year of MG onset. Notably, in pre-JMG, the percentage of thymectomized patients was significantly lower (32.9% compared to more than 42.5% in other subgroups), and the delay to thymectomy was twice as long. We found a positive correlation between anti-AChR antibodies and germinal center grade across patient categories. Additionally, only females, particularly post-JMG patients, exhibited the highest rates of lymphofollicular hyperplasia (95% of cases) and germinal center grade. These findings reveal distinct patterns in JMG patients, particularly regarding thymic follicular hyperplasia, which appears to be exacerbated in females after puberty.

Innovative Therapeutic Approaches in Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes.

Background and Objectives: To provide real-word clinical follow-up data on patients carrying variations of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) and who respond to some innovative drugs. Methods: Patients recruited from the Neurology Department of the Mustapha Bacha university hospital in Algiers. Treated with innovative drugs, they were monitored and their clinical progress was evaluated on the basis of clinical arguments suggestive of CMSs, but also para clinical arguments (electromyography and genetic study). Results: Six patients carrying different mutations in different genes of CMSs were studied. They had different pathophysiologic profiles (slow or fast channel syndromes, low expressor of receptor). Their therapeutic management was based on innovative drugs, normally indicated in other, non-neurological pathologies. Their outcome was toward a clear clinical improvement. Discussion: This work relates the interest of proposing treatments (outside of Pyridostigmine) in the management of CMSs. These therapies can greatly modify the prognosis of patients suffering from this orphan disease. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with congenital myasthenic syndromes, some innovative treatments are effective.

Pathogenic DPAGT1 variants in limb-girdle congenital myasthenic syndrome (LG-CMS) associated with tubular aggregates and ORAI1 hypoglycosylation.

AIMS: Limb-girdle congenital myasthenic syndrome (LG-CMS) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder characterized by muscle weakness and fatigability. The LG-CMS gene DPAGT1 codes for an essential enzyme of the glycosylation pathway, a posttranslational modification mechanism shaping the structure and function of proteins. In DPAGT1-related LG-CMS, reduced glycosylation of the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) reduces its localization at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), and results in diminished neuromuscular transmission. LG-CMS patients also show tubular aggregates on muscle biopsy, but the origin and potential contribution of the aggregates to disease development are not understood. Here, we describe two LG-CMS patients with the aim of providing a molecular diagnosis and to shed light on the pathways implicated in tubular aggregate formation. METHODS: Following clinical examination of the patients, we performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify the genetic causes, analysed the biopsies at the histological and ultrastructural levels, investigated the composition of the tubular aggregates, and performed experiments on protein glycosylation. RESULTS: We identified novel pathogenic DPAGT1 variants in both patients, and pyridostigmine treatment quantitatively improved muscle force and function. The tubular aggregates contained proteins of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) and structurally conformed to the aggregates observed in tubular aggregate myopathy (TAM). TAM arises from overactivation of the plasma membrane calcium channel ORAI1, and functional studies on muscle extracts from our LG-CMS patients evidenced abnormal ORAI1 glycosylation. CONCLUSIONS: We expand the genetic variant spectrum of LG-CMS and provide a genotype/phenotype correlation for pathogenic DPAGT1 variants. The discovery of ORAI1 hypoglycosylation in our patients highlights a physiopathological link between LG-CMS and TAM.

Sirolimus for treatment of patients with inclusion body myositis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept, phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: Inclusion body myositis is the most frequent myositis in patients older than 50 years. Classical immunosuppressants are ineffective in treating inclusion body myositis, and to date there are no recommendations for pharmacological approaches to treatment. When used after organ transplantation, sirolimus can block the proliferation of effector T cells, while preserving T regulatory cells, and induce autophagy, all of which are processes that are impaired in inclusion body myositis. In this pilot study, we aimed to test the efficacy of sirolimus in patients with inclusion body myositis. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept, phase 2b trial was done at a single hospital in Paris, France. The study included men and women (aged 45-80 years) who had a defined diagnosis of inclusion body myositis according to established criteria. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once-daily oral sirolimus 2 mg or placebo. Centralised balanced block randomisation (blocks of four) was computer generated without stratification. The study comprised a 15-day screening period (days -15 to 0) and a 52-week treatment period (day 0 to month 12). The primary endpoint was the relative percentage change from baseline to month 12 in maximal voluntary isometric knee extension strength. Secondary endpoints included the following assessments at months 6 and 12: 6-min walking distance, isometric muscle strength for hand grip (finger flexors), knee flexion and elbow flexion and extension, forced vital capacity, muscle replacement with fat measured by quantitative nuclear MRI, Inclusion Body Myositis Weakness Composite Index (IBMWCI), Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS), Health Assessment Questionnaire without Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and analyses of T-cell subpopulations by mass cytometry. The primary analysis was done on the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02481453. FINDINGS: Between July 15, 2015, and May 13, 2016, we screened 285 patients, 44 of whom were randomly allocated to sirolimus (22 patients) or placebo (22 patients). We observed no difference in the primary outcome of relative percentage change from baseline to month 12 of the maximal voluntary isometric knee extension strength (median difference 3·78, 95% CI -10·61 to 17·31; p=0·85). For secondary outcomes, differences between the groups were not significant for changes in strength of other muscle groups (grip, elbow flexion and extension, or knee flexion), IBMWCI, IBMFRS, and lower limb muscle fat fraction. However, we observed significant differences in favour of sirolimus between the study groups for HAQ-DI, forced vital capacity, thigh fat fraction, and 6-min walking distance. Ten (45%) of 22 patients in the sirolimus group had a serious adverse event compared with six (27%) of 22 patients in the placebo group. Four (18%) patients in the sirolimus group stopped their treatment because of adverse events (severe mouth ulcers, aseptic pneumonia, renal insufficiency, and peripheral lower limb oedema), which resolved after treatment discontinuation. Canker sores were the most frequent side-effect and were mainly mild or moderate in ten patients. INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence for efficacy of sirolimus for treating inclusion body myositis based on maximal voluntary isometric knee extension strength and other muscle strength measures, and the side-effects of treatment were substantial for some patients. However, we believe there was enough evidence of benefit in certain secondary outcomes to pursue a multicentre phase 3 trial to further assess the safety and efficacy of sirolimus. FUNDING: Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Direction générale de l'offre de soins, and Association Française contre les Myopathies.