Seasonal Variations in Stroke Occurrence.

BACKGROUND: Understanding seasonal variations in stroke can help stakeholders identify underlying causes in seasonal trends, and tailor resources appropriately to times of highest needs. We sought to evaluate the seasonal occurrence of stroke and its subtypes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative data from January 1st, 2003, to December 31st, 2017, in Ontario, Canada's most populous province. We evaluated seasonal variations in stroke occurrence by subtype, via age/sex standardized rates and adjusted rate ratios using Poisson regressions. In those with stroke, we evaluated 30-day case fatality risks by season, adjusted for age, sex, stroke type, and comorbid conditions, and then used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the effect of season on the fatality. The administrative data used in this study were from the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database, the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System Database, the Ontario Registered Persons Database, and the 2006 and 2011 Canada Census and linked administrative databases. RESULTS: During our study period, we observed 394,145 strokes or TIA events, with a decrease in monthly hospitalization/emergency department visits per 100,000 people between January 2003 and December 2017 from 24.22 to 17.43. Compared to the summer, overall stroke occurrence was similar in the spring but slightly lower in the fall (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.98) and winter (aRR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.94-0.95). There were minor variations by stroke subtype. Winter was associated with the highest risk of stroke case fatality compared to the summer (12.4% vs. 11.4%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07-1.13). CONCLUSIONS: We found seasonal variations in stroke occurrence and case fatality, although the absolute differences were small. Further work is needed to better understand how environmental or meteorological factors might affect stroke risk.

Challenges to Widespread Implementation of Stroke Thrombectomy.

Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke is one of the most efficacious and effective treatments in medicine, yet globally, its implementation remains limited. Patterns of EVT underutilization exist in virtually any health care system and range from a complete lack of access to selective undertreatment of certain patient subgroups. In this review, we outline different patterns of EVT underutilization and possible causes. We discuss common challenges and bottlenecks that are encountered by physicians, patients, and other stakeholders when trying to establish and expand EVT services in different scenarios and possible pathways to overcome these challenges. Lastly, we discuss the importance of implementation research studies, strategic partnerships, and advocacy efforts to mitigate EVT underutilization.

Interhospital Transfer for Endovascular Stroke Treatment in Canada: Results From the OPTIMISE Registry.

BACKGROUND: Interhospital transfer for patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusion for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has been associated with treatment delays. METHODS: We analyzed data from Optimizing Patient Treatment in Major Ischemic Stroke With EVT, a quality improvement registry to support EVT implementation in Canada. We assessed for unadjusted differences in baseline characteristics, time metrics, and procedural outcomes between patients with large vessel occlusion transferred for EVT and those directly admitted to an EVT-capable center. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, a total of 6803 patients received EVT at 20 participating centers (median age, 73 years; 50% women; and 50% treated with intravenous thrombolysis). Patients transferred for EVT (n=3376) had lower rates of M2 occlusion (22% versus 27%) and higher rates of basilar occlusion (9% versus 5%) compared with those patients presenting directly at an EVT-capable center (n=3373). Door-to-needle times were shorter in patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis before transfer compared with those presenting directly to an EVT center (32 versus 36 minutes). Patients transferred for EVT had shorter door-to-arterial access times (37 versus 87 minutes) but longer last seen normal-to-arterial access times (322 versus 181 minutes) compared with those presenting directly to an EVT-capable center. No differences in arterial access-to-reperfusion times, successful reperfusion rates (85% versus 86%), or adverse periprocedural events were found between the 2 groups. Patients transferred to EVT centers had a similar likelihood for good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2; 41% versus 43%; risk ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.88-1.01]; adjusted risk ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.91-1.05]) and a higher risk for all-cause mortality at 90 days (29% versus 25%; risk ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.05-1.27]; adjusted risk ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.03-1.28]) compared with patients presenting directly to an EVT center. CONCLUSIONS: Patients transferred for EVT experience significant delays from the time they were last seen normal to the initiation of EVT.

Predicting intracerebral hemorrhage after endovascular therapy for anterior circulation strokes using CT-ASPECT, CTP-ASPECT and DWI-ASPECT: Protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Over the last decade, there have been significant advances in treatments for anterior ischemic stroke, most notably endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Despite the success of EVT on overall outcomes, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is an important post-procedure complication, often associated with mortality and disability. Hence, predicting the risk of ICH can inform EVT decision making. The ASPECT score is used globally to predict patients' prognosis post-reperfusion therapy. Our objective is to perform a systematic review to collect and synthesize data on the association between ASPECT scores on CT, CTP and DWI-MRI (CT-ASPECT, CTP-ASPECT, and DWI-ASPECT) and the risk of symptomatic ICH after EVT for anterior circulation strokes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a broad search of various electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) to identify studies published after January 1st, 2012 (commonly accepted as the beginning of the modern EVT era based on availability of stent-retrievers). Two independent reviewers will screen and include studies evaluating associations between symptomatic ICH after thrombectomy and baseline CT-ASPECT, CTP-ASPECT and DWI-ASPECT scores. Data will be extracted to quantify the risk of sICH after EVT based on the ASPECT scoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023459860.

Endovascular treatment to improve outcomes for medium vessel occlusions: The ESCAPE-MeVO trial.

RATIONALE: Clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) are often poor when treated with best medical management. Data from non-randomized studies suggest that endovascular treatment (EVT) may improve outcomes in MeVO stroke, but randomized data on potential benefits and risks are hitherto lacking. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to guide EVT decision-making in MeVO stroke. AIMS: The primary aim of the ESCAPE-MeVO trial is to demonstrate that acute, rapid EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to MeVO results in better clinical outcomes compared to best medical management. Secondary outcomes are to demonstrate the safety of EVT, its impact on self-reported health-related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATES: Based on previously published data, we estimate a sample size of 500 subjects to achieve a power of 85% with a two-sided alpha of 0.05. To account for potential loss to follow-up, 530 subjects will be recruited. METHODS AND DESIGN: ESCAPE-MeVO is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label study with blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE design), clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05151172. Subjects with acute ischemic stroke due to MeVO meeting the trial eligibility criteria will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to best medical care plus EVT versus best medical care only. Patients will be screened only at comprehensive stroke centers to determine if they are eligible for the trial, regardless of whether they were previously treated at a primary care center. Key eligibility criteria are (1) acute ischemic stroke due to MeVO that is clinically and technically eligible for EVT, (2) last-known well within the last 12 h, (3) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale > 5 or 3-5 with disabling deficit, (4) high likelihood of salvageable tissue on non-invasive neuroimaging. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the modified Rankin scale 90 days after randomization (shift analysis), whereby modified Rankin Score 5 and 6 will be collapsed into one category. Secondary outcomes include dichotomizations of the modified Rankin Score at 90 days, 24 h National Institutes of Health Stroke Score, difference between 24 h and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Score, mortality at 90 days, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L), Lawton scale of instrumental activities of daily living score, reperfusion quality (MeVO expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score) and infarct volume at 24 h, and cost-effectiveness of endovascular recanalization. Safety outcomes include symptomatic and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and procedural complications. DISCUSSION: The ESCAPE-MeVO trial will demonstrate the effect of endovascular thrombectomy in addition to best medical management vis-à-vis best medical management in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to MeVO and provide data for evidence-based treatment decision-making in acute MeVO stroke. DATA ACCESS STATEMENT: The raw data discussed in this mansucript will be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Influence of Stroke-Onset Location on the Efficacy of Endovascular Thrombectomy: Comparison of Outcomes between In-Hospital versus Community-Onset Strokes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have suggested that patients experiencing an in-hospital stroke may face delays in treatment and worse outcomes compared with patients with community-onset strokes. However, most studies occurred when IV thrombolysis was the primary treatment. This study aimed to examine the outcomes of patients experiencing an in-hospital stroke in the endovascular thrombectomy era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients older than 18 years of age with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy within 12 hours of stroke onset from January 1, 2015, to April 30, 2021. Patients were classified into 2 groups: in-hospital strokes and community-onset strokes. We compared the time metrics of stroke care delivery, the rate of successful reperfusion, and functional outcome as scored using the mRS score at 90 days (favorable outcome was defined as mRS 0-2). Differences in proportions were assessed using the Fisher exact and χ2 tests as appropriate. For continuous variables, differences in medians between groups were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: A total of 676 consecutive patients were included, with 69 (10%) comprising the in-hospital stroke group. Patients experiencing in-hospital stroke were more likely to have diabetes (36% versus 18%, P = .02) and less likely to receive thrombolysis (25% versus 68%, P < .001) than those in the community-onset stroke group, but they were otherwise similar. Patients with in-hospital stroke had significantly faster overall time metrics, most notably from stroke recognition to imaging (median, 70 [interquartile range, 38-141] minutes versus 121 [74-228] minutes, P < .001). Successful recanalization was achieved in >75% in both groups (P = .39), with a median NIHSS score at discharge of <4 (P = .18). The 90-day mRS was similar in both groups, with a trend toward higher in-hospital mortality in the in-hospital stroke group (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with in-hospital stroke had shorter workflow delays to initiation of endovascular thrombectomy compared with their community counterparts but with a similar rate of successful recanalization and clinical outcomes. Most important, 90-day mortality and mRS scores were equivalent between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke groups.

Ethical Problems of Observational Studies and Big Data Compared to Randomized Trials.

The temptation to use prospective observational studies (POS) instead of conducting difficult trials (RCTs) has always existed, but with the advent of powerful computers and large databases, it can become almost irresistible. We examine the potential consequences, were this to occur, by comparing two hypothetical studies of a new treatment: one RCT, and one POS. The POS inevitably submits more patients to inferior research methodology. In RCTs, patients are clearly informed of the research context, and 1:1 randomized allocation between experimental and validated treatment balances risks for each patient. In POS, for each patient, the risks of receiving inferior treatment are impossible to estimate. The research context and the uncertainty are down-played, and patients and clinicians are at risk of becoming passive research subjects in studies performed from an outsider's view, which potentially has extraneous objectives, and is conducted without their explicit, autonomous, and voluntary involvement and consent.

Influence of Time of Admission on Endovascular Thrombectomy (EVT): Comparison of Outcomes During Business Hours Versus Off-Business Hours.

Purpose:To investigate the differences in endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) outcomes of patients treated for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) during business versus off-business hours. Methods: A single-centre retrospective cohort study of patients with AIS treated with EVT from February 1, 2015, to May 31, 2021, was performed at a comprehensive stroke centre (CSC). Patients were divided into business (Monday to Friday, 8 AM-5 PM) versus off-business hours groups. The primary outcome was functional neurological disability, scored using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included the rate of successful reperfusion and procedural workflow time delays. Differences in proportions were assessed using Fisher's exact and Chi-Square tests as appropriate. For continuous variables, differences in medians between groups were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: A total of 676 patients were included, with 399 patients (59%) comprising the off-business-hour group. No significant differences were seen in age, sex, ASPECTS score, or NIHSS at arrival. Off-business hours strokes had a longer delay between CSC arrival to groin puncture (minutes: 81 vs 44, P < .0001) and between imaging to groin puncture (minutes: 67 vs 32, P < .0001) compared to the business hours strokes. There were no differences in the rate of successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b) between groups (82% vs 83%, P = .61). At 90 days, 65% of patients in both groups had an mRS ≤2 (P = .91). Conclusion: Despite workflow delays in initiating EVT during off-business hours, there were no differences in the rate of successful reperfusion or functional outcomes.

Stent-assisted Woven EndoBridge embolization for the treatment of pulsatile tinnitus caused by an ipsilateral high-riding jugular bulb.

PURPOSE: Pulsatile tinnitus can be caused by a high-riding jugular bulb (HRJB), characterized by the superior position of the jugular bulb in the petrous temporal bone. The anatomical position and morphology of this entity make it challenging for endovascular treatment. We report our experience with two patients successfully treated with a stent-assisted Woven EndoBridge (WEB; Microvention, Tustin, CA, USA) device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe two cases of HRJB in patients presenting with disabling pulsatile tinnitus. Temporary balloon occlusion of the jugular bulb prior to the intervention reduced tinnitus intensity. Both patients were subsequently treated under general anesthesia with the WEB device deployed in the HRJB which was held by a stent deployed in the sigmoid sinus. RESULTS: Both procedures were successful with good positioning of the WEB device and no procedural complications. Both patients had complete resolution of pulsatile tinnitus immediately after the procedure. Follow-up imaging showed successful occlusion of the venous cavity with a widely patent stent. CONCLUSION: Among patients with pulsatile tinnitus caused by an ipsilateral HRJB, a stent-assisted WEB device seems to be a viable endovascular option with angiographic and clinical success.

Clinical uncertainty in large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: does automated perfusion imaging make a difference? An intra-rater and inter-rater agreement study.

BACKGROUND: Limited research exists regarding the impact of neuroimaging on endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) decisions for late-window cases of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. OBJECTIVE: T0 assess whether perfusion CT imaging: (1) alters the proportion of recommendations for EVT, and (2) enhances the reliability of EVT decision-making compared with non-contrast CT and CT angiography. METHODS: We conducted a survey using 30 patients drawn from an institutional database of 3144 acute stroke cases. These were presented to 29 Canadian physicians with and without perfusion imaging. We used non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals and difference in agreement classification as criteria to suggest a difference between the Gwet AC1 statistics (κG). RESULTS: The percentage of EVT recommendations differed by 1.1% with or without perfusion imaging. Individual decisions changed in 21.4% of cases (11.3% against EVT and 10.1% in favor). Inter-rater agreement (κG) among the 29 raters was similar between non-perfusion and perfusion CT neuroimaging (κG=0.487; 95% CI 0.327 to 0.647 and κG=0.552; 95% CI 0.430 to 0.675). The 95% CIs overlapped with moderate agreement in both. Intra-rater agreement exhibited overlapping 95% CIs for all 28 raters. κG was either substantial or excellent (0.81-1) for 71.4% (20/28) of raters in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the minimal difference in overall EVT recommendations with either neuroimaging protocol one in five decisions changed with perfusion imaging. Regarding agreement we found that the use of automated CT perfusion images does not significantly impact the reliability of EVT decisions for patients with late-window LVO.

Embolization of a pseudoaneurysm of the innominate artery with a Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device.

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) is an intra-aneurysmal flow disruptor designed for the treatment of broad-based arterial aneurysms with a high safety and effectiveness profile.1, 2 It does not require concomitant antiplatelet therapy compared to other devices such as flow diverters or intracranial stents. Innominate artery pseudoaneurysms are a rare consequence of blunt traumatic injury, infection, or atherosclerotic disease.3, 4 We describe the case of an innominate artery pseudoaneurysm successfully treated with a WEB SL device instead of stenting, therefore alleviating the need for dual antiplatelet therapy. The treatment was successful and uneventful and postprocedural computed tomography angiography confirmed the complete occlusion of the pseudoaneurysm.

Endovascular Parent Vessel Occlusion Versus Flow Diversion in the Treatment of Large and Giant Aneurysms: A Randomized Comparison.

OBJECTIVE: Parent vessel occlusion (PVO) is a time-honored treatment for unclippable or uncoilable intracranial aneurysms. Flow diversion (FD) is a recent endovascular alternative that can occlude the aneurysm and spare the parent blood vessel. Our aim was to compare outcomes of FD with endovascular PVO. METHODS: This is a prespecified treatment subgroup analysis of the Flow diversion in Intracranial Aneurysms trial (FIAT). FIAT was an investigator-led parallel-group all-inclusive pragmatic randomized trial. For each patient, clinicians had to prespecify an alternative management option to FD before stratified randomization. We report all patients for whom PVO was selected as the best alternative treatment to FD. The primary outcome was a composite of core-lab determined angiographic occlusion or near-occlusion at 3-12 months combined with an independent clinical outcome (mRS<3). Primary analyses were intent-to-treat. There was no blinding. RESULTS: There were 45 patients (16.2% of the 278 FIAT patients randomized between 2011 and 2020 in 3 centers): 22 were randomly allocated to FD and 23 to PVO. Aneurysms were mainly large or giant (mean 22 mm) anterior circulation (mainly carotid) aneurysms. A poor primary outcome was reached in 11/22 FD (50.0%) compared to 9/23 PVO patients (39.1%) (RR: 1.28, 95% CI [0.66-2.47]; P = 0.466). Morbidity (mRS >2) at 1 year occurred in 4/22 FD and 6/23 PVO patients. Angiographic results and serious adverse events were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The comparison between PVO and FD was inconclusive. More randomized trials are needed to better determine the role of FD in large aneurysms eligible for PVO.

Clinical Reasoning: A 24-Year-Old Woman With Penetrating Neck Injury From a Needlefish.

Evaluating patients with a traumatic spinal cord injury can be complicated by other injuries. In this case, a 24-year-old woman injured by a needlefish presented with combined motor and sensory defects, cranial nerve deficits, and a blunt vascular injury. This case highlights the importance of neurologic and vascular localizations and an understanding of spinal cord injuries involving various ascending and descending tracts. Appreciation of these anatomical considerations through this case illustrates the diagnostic approach to neurologic evaluation. While we present a traumatic etiology for multiple neurologic syndromes, this case gives readers an opportunity to develop a comprehensive differential diagnosis and tailor investigations for other relevant etiologies. Readers walking through this stepwise process will ultimately arrive at several distinct but related diagnoses.

Benefits of First Pass Recanalization in Basilar Strokes Based on Initial Clinical Severity.

PURPOSE: Randomized trials demonstrating the benefits of thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusions have enrolled an insufficient number of patients with a National Institutes for Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score < 10 and shown discrepant results for patients with an NIHSS > 20. Achieving a first pass recanalization (FPR) improves clinical outcomes in stroke. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the FPR on outcomes among basilar artery occlusion patients, characterized by prethrombectomy initial NIHSS score. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry of 279 basilar artery occlusion patients treated with thrombectomy from 6 participating centers. We compared the 90-day clinical outcomes of achieving a FPR versus no FPR, categorized by initial clinical severity: mild (NIHSS < 10), moderate (NIHSS 10-20) and severe (NIHSS > 20). We used Poisson regression with robust error variance to determine the effect of the NIHSS score on the association between FPR and outcomes. RESULTS: The FPR patients with NIHSS < 10 or NIHSS 10-20 were more likely to have a favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS 0-3) than non-FPR patients (relative risk, RR = 1.32, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.04, 1.66, p-value = 0.0213, and RR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.26, 2.53, p-value = 0.0011, respectively). A similar benefit was not found in patients with severe symptoms. We found a significantly lower risk of poor clinical outcome (mRS 4-6) in FPR patients with NIHSS 10-20, but not among patients with an NIHSS > 20. CONCLUSION: Achieving a FPR in basilar artery occlusion patients with mild (NIHSS < 10) or moderate (NIHSS 10-20) symptoms is associated with better clinical outcomes, but not in patients with severe symptoms. These results support the importance of further clinical trials on the benefits of thrombectomy in severe strokes.

Nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage on noncontrast head CT: An accuracy, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (NAPSAH) on Noncontrast Head CT (NCCT) between numerous raters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 45 NCCT of adult patients with SAH who also had a catheter angiography (CA) were independently evaluated by 48 diverse raters; 45 raters performed a second assessment one month later. For each case, raters were asked: 1) whether they judged the bleeding pattern to be perimesencephalic; 2) whether there was blood anterior to brainstem; 3) complete filling of the anterior interhemispheric fissure (AIF); 4) extension to the lateral part of the sylvian fissure (LSF); 5) frank intraventricular hemorrhage; 6) whether in the hypothetical presence of a negative CT angiogram they would still recommend CA. An automatic NAPSAH diagnosis was also generated by combining responses to questions 2-5. Reliability was estimated using Gwet's AC1 (κG), and the relationship between the NCCT diagnosis of NAPSAH and the recommendation to perform CA using Cramer's V test. Multi-rater accuracy of NCCT in predicting negative CA was explored. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability for the presence of NAPSAH was moderate (κG = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.47, 0.69), but improved to substantial when automatically generated (κG = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.59, 0.81). The most reliable criteria were the absence of AIF filling (κG = 0.79) and extension to LSF (κG = 0.79). Mean intra-rater reliability was substantial (κG = 0.65). NAPSAH weakly correlated with CA decision (V = 0.50). Mean sensitivity and specificity were 58% (95%CI: 44%, 71%) and 83 % (95%CI: 72 %, 94%), respectively. CONCLUSION: NAPSAH remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The NCCT diagnosis was moderately reliable and its impact on clinical decisions modest.

Clinical Uncertainty in Large Vessel Occlusion ischemic stroke (CULVO): Does automated perfusion scanning make a difference? Protocol of an intrarater and interrater agreement study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend the use of perfusion computed tomography (CT) to identify emergent large vessel ischemic stroke (ELVIS) patients who are likely to benefit from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) if they present within 6-24 hour (late window) of stroke onset. We aim to determine if the interrater and intrarater reliability among physicians when recommending EVT is significantly different when perfusion CT or non-perfusion CT is reviewed. METHODS: A total of 30 non-consecutive patients will be selected from our institutional database comprising 3144 cranial CT scans performed for acute stroke symptoms January 2018 to August 2022. The clinical and radiologic data of the 30 patients will be presented in random order to a group of 29 physicians in two separate sessions at least three weeks apart. In each session, the physicians will evaluate each patient once with automated perfusion images and once without. We will use non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals and difference in agreement classification as criteria to suggest a difference between the Gwet AC1 statistics (κG). DISCUSSION: The results obtained from this study, combined with the clinical outcomes data of patients categorized through the two imaging techniques and a cost-effectiveness analysis, will offer a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of perfusion CT neuroimaging. Should there be no significant disparity in the reliability of decisions made by clinicians using the two neuroimaging protocols, it may be necessary to revise existing recommendations regarding neuroimaging in the later time window to align with these findings.

Advance Consent in Acute Stroke Trials: Survey of Canadian Stroke Physicians.

Advance consent presents a potential solution to the challenge of obtaining informed consent for participation in acute stroke trials. Clinicians in stroke prevention clinics are uniquely positioned to identify and seek consent from potential stroke trial participants. To assess the acceptability of advance consent to Canadian stroke clinic physicians, we performed an online survey. We obtained 58 respondents (response rate 35%): the vast majority (82%) expressed comfort with obtaining advance consent and 92% felt that doing so would not be a significant disruption to clinic workflow. These results support further study of advance consent for acute stroke trials.