Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation improves motor function in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an accelerated protocol of 48 Hz cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation results in improved motor function in individuals with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized sham-controlled study, 35 individuals with Parkinson's disease and stable medical treatment were randomized to either sham or verum transcranial magnetic stimulation. The stimulation was applied bilaterally and medial over the cerebellum and comprised a novel accelerated protocol encompassing two sessions per day on 5 consecutive days. Patients were assessed at baseline, on day 5 after the last stimulation and 1 month post intervention. Measurements included dynamic posturography, UPDRS III, 8-Meter walk test, and Timed Up and Go test. RESULTS: The accelerated protocol was safe and feasible in an outpatient setting. Patients in the verum group showed significant improvement (p < 0.001) of motor symptoms as measured in the UPDRS III. Improvement was mainly carried by the domains rigor, bradykinesia, and gait and persisted after 1 month (p = 0.009), whereas tremor remained unchanged. INTERPRETATION: The effect of a high-dose transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease is encouraging and comparable to other studies using much longer stimulation protocols. This short-term intervention of 5 days facilitates the future application in an outpatient setting. Reduction in hospitalization rates directly benefits patients with motor impairment.

Effects of cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus physiotherapy in spinocerebellar ataxias - A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In absence of drug therapy options, standard treatment for spinocerebellar ataxia consists of symptomatic physiotherapy and speech therapy. New therapeutic options are urgently needed. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a promising therapeutic option, but applicability is limited by lengthy duration of stimulation protocols. METHODS: In this randomized sham controlled clinical trial, patients were assigned to verum (n = 15) or sham (n = 18) cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation. To yield best possible treatment effects, both intervention groups received intensified physiotherapy for the duration of the study. RESULTS: Ataxia severity was reduced by 1.6 points on the Scale for assessment and Rating of Ataxia among patients in the verum group (p < 0.001). Clinical improvement was significantly larger in the verum group, compared to the sham group (p < 0.01). The treatment effect was mainly carried by improved appendicular coordination. Patients in the verum group also significantly improved in the 8 Meter Walk Test (p < 0.05) and PATA rate (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cerebellar rTMS ameliorates ataxia severity in patient with spinocerebellar ataxia. Condensing treatment duration to only 5 days without reduction of treatment effects facilitates applicability and therefore broadens availability to larger patient populations.

Feasibility of a randomized, sham-controlled pilot study for accelerated rTMS-treatment of the cerebellum plus physiotherapy in CANVAS patients.

BACKGROUND: Cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy and bilateral vestibular areflexia (CANVAS) is a rare neurodegenerative disease affecting the cerebellum, the peripheral nervous system and the vestibular system. Due to the lack of approved drugs, therapy comprises physiotherapy and speech therapy. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a promising non-invasive therapeutic option to complement classical symptomatic therapies. OBJECTIVE: To test feasibility of the combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation using an accelerated protocol and standard symptomatic therapy in patients with CANVAS. METHODS: Eight patients with genetically confirmed CANVAS were assigned to either verum or sham cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation using an accelerated protocol. Treatment duration was limited to 5 days. Additionally, patients in both groups received symptomatic therapy (speech and physiotherapy) for the duration of the study. RESULTS: All patients completed the stimulation protocol. Adverse events were rare. Ataxia severity improved in the verum group only. CONCLUSION: The combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation and classic symptomatic therapy is feasible in a neuro-rehabilitation setting and potentially ameliorates ataxia severity.