Cinacalcet increases renal calcium excretion in PTHrP-mediated hypercalcemia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: In the acute setting, PTH-independent hypercalcemia is typically treated with anti-resorptive agents such as zoledronic acid or denosumab. When these agents are no longer able to control hypercalcemia, several case reports have shown the utility of cinacalcet. However, it is not known if cinacalcet can be effective in patients naïve to anti-resorptive therapy or how cinacalcet ameliorates the hypercalcemia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old male with a history of alcohol-induced cirrhosis was admitted for left cheek bleeding and swelling from an infiltrative squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. On admission, he was found to have an elevated albumin-corrected serum calcium of 13.6 mg/dL, a serum phosphorus of 2.2 mg/dL and an intact PTH of 6 pg/mL (normal 18-90) with a PTHrP of 8.1 pmol/L (normal < 4.3), consistent with PTHrP-dependent hypercalcemia. Aggressive intravenous saline hydration and subcutaneous salmon calcitonin were initiated, but his serum calcium remained elevated. Given tooth extractions scheduled for the next day and possible irradiation to the jaw in the near future, alternatives to antiresorptive therapy were sought. Cinacalcet was initiated at 30 mg twice daily then increased to 60 mg twice daily the following day. The albumin-corrected serum calcium level decreased from 13.2 to 10.9 mg/dL within 48 h. The fractional excretion of calcium increased from 3.7 to 7.0%. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates the utility of cinacalcet for the treatment of PTHrP-mediated hypercalcemia without prior anti-resorptive therapy via increased renal clearance of calcium.

Predictors of Health Care Utilization Following Major Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery in Older Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To identify patient factors in older patients associated with making posttreatment visits in the first year after major head and neck oncologic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic institution. METHODS: Patients aged ≥60 years who underwent a neck dissection with or without a free flap reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed. Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, social variables, perioperative course, and clinical visits. RESULTS: Within a 1-year postoperative period, the 181 patients in our cohort had a mean ± SD 6.37 ± 3.6 postoperative clinic visits; 70% attended at least 4 visits. Multivariable regression analysis showed a significant association with distance closer to the hospital (P = .013): for every 10-mile increase in distance, the number of visits decreased by 0.15 (SE = 0.06). Additionally, receiving adjuvant radiation therapy (P = .0096) demonstrated significant associations: when compared with no adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy had on average 1.5 (SE = 0.56) more visits, and chemoradiation had 0.04 (SE = 0.73) more visits. CONCLUSION: Older patients who undergo major head and neck oncology surgery are more likely to attend posttreatment visits in the 1 year following surgery if they are discharged home rather than to a skilled nursing facility, live closer to the hospital, and undergo adjuvant radiation therapy.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: Before and During the Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had on the presentation of patients with head and neck cancer in a single tertiary care center. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic institution. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who presented as new patients between September 10, 2019, and September 11, 2020. Patients presenting during the 6 months leading up to the announcement of the pandemic (pre-COVID-19 period) on March 11, 2020, were compared to those presenting during the first 6 months of the pandemic (COVID-19 period). Demographics, time to diagnosis and treatment, and tumor characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: There were a total of 137 patients analyzed with newly diagnosed malignancies. There were 22% fewer patients evaluated during the COVID-19 timeframe. The groups were similar in demographics, duration of symptoms, time to diagnosis, time to surgery, extent of surgery, and adjuvant therapy. There was a larger proportion of tumors classified as T3/T4 (61.7%) in the COVID-19 period vs the pre-COVID-19 period (40.3%) (P = .024), as well as a larger median tumor size during the COVID-19 period (P = .0002). There were no differences between nodal disease burden (P = .48) and distant metastases (P = .42). CONCLUSION: Despite similar characteristics, time to diagnosis, and surgery, our findings suggest that there was an increase in primary tumor burden in patients with HNSCC during the early COVID-19 pandemic.