Clinical characteristics of colonization of the amniotic cavity in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, a retrospective study.

To determine the main clinical characteristics of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) complicated by colonization of the amniotic cavity (microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity without intra-amniotic inflammation). A total of 302 women with PPROM were included. Transabdominal amniocentesis was performed and amniotic fluid was assessed. Based of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intra-amniotic inflammation (interleukin-6 ≥ 3000 pg/mL), the women were divided into following groups: intra-amniotic infection, sterile intra-amniotic inflammation, colonization of the amniotic cavity, and negative amniotic fluid. Colonization was found in 11% (32/302) of the women. The most common bacteria identified in the amniotic fluid were Ureaplasma spp. with a lower burden than those with intra-amniotic infection (p = 0.03). The intensity of intra-amniotic inflammatory response measured by interleukin-6 was higher in women with colonization than in those with negative amniotic fluid (medians: 961 pg/mL vs. 616 pg/mL; p = 0.04). Women with colonization had higher rates of acute inflammatory placental lesions than those with negative amniotic fluid. In PPROM, colonization, caused mainly by microorganisms from the lower genital tract, might represent an early stage of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity with a weak intra-amniotic inflammatory response.

A rodent model of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection, induced by the administration of inflammatory agent in a gestational sac, associated with preterm delivery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Rodents are the most commonly used animals in the study of spontaneous preterm delivery (PTD). Intra-amniotic inflammation/infection is a frequent and important cause of PTD. Intraperitoneal and intrauterine administrations of inflammatory agents are traditional methods to establish a rodent model of PTD associated with inflammation and infection. The intra-amniotic administration of inflammatory or infectious triggering agents to rodents can be useful to study not only intra-amniotic inflammatory response but also PTD associated with intra-amniotic inflammation/infection. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed mainly to assess and analyze all described methods of intra-amniotic administration of infectious and/or inflammatory agents to create a rodent model of intra-amniotic inflammation associated with PTD. METHODS: A literature search through two electronic databases from their earliest entries to February 2019 was performed. The selection criteria were as follows: (1) rodents as model animals, (2) a model of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection associated with PTD, and (3) intra-amniotic administration of triggering agents. Data extraction included specification of the study (author and year of publication), characteristics of study animals (species, strain, and number of animals), characteristics of intervention (timing and used technique), substance used for induction of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection, and outcome assessment. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 4673 articles, of which 118 were selected for full-text reading, but only 13 studies were included in the review. Intra-amniotic administration was used only in the articles that were published beyond 2004. Two different approaches were identified: (1) open surgery with direct puncture of the amniotic sacs and (2) transabdominal ultrasound-guided puncture of the gestational sacs. Live microorganisms (Ureaplasma parvum), bacterial products (extracellular membrane vesicles), and pathogen-associated (lipopolysaccharide) and damage-associated molecular patterns (high mobility group box-1, S100B, and surfactant protein A) were used to simulate intra-amniotic inflammation/infection. Differences in the effect on intra-amniotic inflammation/infection associated with PTD in the mouse model were identified among triggering agents. Intra-amniotic application of lipopolysaccharide in the rat model caused intra-amniotic inflammation, but it did not lead to PTD. CONCLUSION: The intra-amniotic administration of the triggering agents can be used to study intra-amniotic inflammatory response and intra-amniotic inflammation/infection in the rodents model.

Cervical Gardnerella vaginalis in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) and/or intra-amniotic inflammation (IAI) and the cervical prevalence of Gardnerella vaginalis DNA in pregnancies with preterm prelabor rupture of membrane (PPROM). METHOD: In total, 405 women with singleton pregnancies complicated with PPROM were included. Cervical fluid and amniotic fluid samples were collected at the time of admission. Bacterial and G. vaginalis DNA were assessed in the cervical fluid samples using quantitative PCR technique. Concentrations of interleukin-6 and MIAC were evaluated in the amniotic fluid samples. Loads of G. vaginalis DNA ≥ 1% of the total cervical bacterial DNA were used to define the cervical prevalence of G. vaginalis as abundant. Based on the MIAC and IAI, women were categorized into four groups: with intra-amniotic infection (both MIAC and IAI), with sterile IAI (IAI without MIAC), with MIAC without IAI, and without either MIAC or IAI. RESULTS: The presence of the abundant cervical G. vaginalis was related to MIAC (with: 65% vs. without: 44%; p = 0.0004) but not IAI (with: 52% vs. without: 48%; p = 0.70). Women with MIAC without IAI had the highest load of the cervical G. vaginalis DNA (median 2.0 × 104 copies DNA/mL) and the highest presence of abundant cervical G. vaginalis (73%). CONCLUSIONS: In women with PPROM, the presence of cervical G. vaginalis was associated with MIAC, mainly without the concurrent presence of IAI.

Lactobacilli-dominated cervical microbiota in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

BACKGROUND: To determine the association between microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) and the presence of Lactobacillus crispatus- or Lactobacillus iners-dominated cervical microbiota in pregnancies with preterm prelabor rupture of membrane. Next, to assess the relationship between the presence of L. crispatus- or L. iners-dominated cervical microbiota and short-term neonatal morbidity. METHOD: A total of 311 women were included. Cervical samples were obtained using a Dacron polyester swab and amniotic fluid samples were obtained by transabdominal amniocentesis. Bacterial DNA, L. crispatus, and L. iners in the cervical samples were assessed by PCR. Cervical microbiota was assigned as L. crispatus- or L. iners-dominated when the relative abundance of L. crispatus or L. iners was ≥50% of the whole cervical microbiota, respectively. RESULTS: Women with MIAC showed a lower rate of L. crispatus-dominated cervical microbiota (21% vs. 39%; p = 0.003) than those without MIAC. Lactobacillus crispatus-dominated cervical microbiota was associated with a lower rate of early-onset sepsis (0% vs. 5%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of L. crispatus-dominated cervical microbiota in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membrane was associated with a lower risk of intra-amniotic complications and subsequent development of early-onset sepsis of newborns.

Gastric fluid used to assess changes during the latency period in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine changes in the intraamniotic environment during the latency period using paired amniotic and gastric fluid samples in pregnancies complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM). METHODS: A total of 34 women with singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM prior to 34 weeks were included in the study. Amniotic fluid was obtained by transabdominal amniocentesis at the time of admission. Immediately after delivery, umbilical cord blood and gastric fluid were obtained. RESULT: Microorganisms in amniotic and gastric fluid samples were found in 38% and 59% of women, respectively. Bedside IL-6 levels were higher in amniotic than in gastric fluid in pregnancies without fetal inflammatory response syndrome (FIRS) (263 pg/mL vs. 50 pg/mL; p < 0.0001), but not in pregnancies with FIRS (318 pg/mL vs. 444 pg/mL; p = 0.91). Funisitis and FIRS was associated with the highest bedside IL-6 levels in gastric fluid. A gastric fluid bedside IL-6 level of 275 pg/mL was found to be the ideal cutoff value to predict funisitis and FIRS. CONCLUSIONS: The microbial and inflammatory status of the intraamniotic compartment changes during the latency period in PPROM. Bedside IL-6 assessment of gastric fluid may be useful in the rapid diagnosis of funisitis and FIRS.