Brain MRI without anesthesia in children less than 3 months old.

INTRODUCTION: The use of general anesthesia in infants involves both short-term and long-term risks. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of brain MRI without anesthesia in infants younger than 3-month-old immobilized with a pillow. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective case-control study was done in 2019. Cases were stable patients less than 3 months old who did not require ventilatory support for whom brain MRI was indicated. Patients were fed so they would fall asleep and placed in the scanner with an immobilizing pillow. Controls were clinically unstable patients matched for age and sex referred for brain MRI under general anesthesia. Three pediatric radiologists evaluated the success of the MRI study (whether it answered the clinical question), recorded whether it was necessary to repeat the study, and rated the presence of motion artifacts on a scale ranging from 1 to 4. RESULTS: A total of 47 cases were included (28 boys and 19 girls; mean age, 31 days). Of these, 42 (89%) MRI studies were considered successful. The proportion of successful MRI studies was lower in outpatients than in inpatients (p = 0.02). The quality of MRI in cases was considered optimal in 60% and suboptimal (motion artifacts in one or two sequences) in 30%. No safety issues related with the technique were detected. The mean duration of the studies was 16.6 min (range, 6-30 min). All of the MRI studies in controls were considered successful; quality was considered optimal in 89% and suboptimal in 11%. In the first year in which we used this technique, we avoided the use of general anesthesia in 47 MRI studies in 42 newborns. CONCLUSION: Brain MRI using the feed and sleep technique in infants younger than 3-month-old immobilized with a pillow can be done safely and efficaciously without general anesthesia.

Brain MRI without anesthesia in children less than 3 months old. / Resonancia magnética cerebral sin anestesia en niños menores de 3 meses.

INTRODUCTION: The use of general anesthesia in infants involves both short-term and long-term risks. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of brain MRI without anesthesia in infants younger than 3-month-old immobilized with a pillow. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective case-control study was done in 2019. Cases were stable patients less than 3 months old who did not require ventilatory support for whom brain MRI was indicated. Patients were fed so they would fall asleep and placed in the scanner with an immobilizing pillow. Controls were clinically unstable patients matched for age and sex referred for brain MRI under general anesthesia. Three pediatric radiologists evaluated the success of the MRI study (whether it answered the clinical question), recorded whether it was necessary to repeat the study, and rated the presence of motion artifacts on a scale ranging from 1 to 4. RESULTS: A total of 47 cases were included (28 boys and 19 girls; mean age, 31 days). Of these, 42 (89%) MRI studies were considered successful. The proportion of successful MRI studies was lower in outpatients than in inpatients (p=0.02). The quality of MRI in cases was considered optimal in 60% and suboptimal (motion artifacts in one or two sequences) in 30%. No safety issues related with the technique were detected. The mean duration of the studies was 16.6minutes (range, 6-30minutes). All of the MRI studies in controls were considered successful; quality was considered optimal in 89% and suboptimal in 11%. In the first year in which we used this technique, we avoided the use of general anesthesia in 47 MRI studies in 42 newborns. CONCLUSION: Brain MRI using the feed and sleep technique in infants younger than 3-month-old immobilized with a pillow can be done safely and efficaciously without general anesthesia.

[Evaluation of clinical diagnostic guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis]. / Evaluación de los criterios diagnósticos clínicos de fibrosis pulmonar idiopática.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the international consensus statement on diagnostic criteria for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. METHODS: All patients diagnosed of any interstitial lung disease by means of open lung biopsy since 1980 were included. The patients' clinical records were examined to determine whether they fulfilled the diagnostic criteria, and their biopsies were reviewed to find those with the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios for the diagnostic criteria in the consensus statement. Afterwards, we performed the analyses again using only one of the two conditions for fulfilling the function criterion. RESULTS: Of 39 patients enrolled in the study, 17 had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Specificity and positive predictive value were both 100%, but sensitivity was 41.2% and negative predictive value was 68.7%. The likelihood ratio for a negative result was 0.59. In the second analysis, sensitivity was 64.7% and negative predictive value was 78.5%, while specificity and positive predictive value remained unchanged. The likelihood ratio for a negative result was 0.35. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria are sufficiently specific to allow us to diagnose confidently when the criteria are fulfilled. However, a slight change in the function criterion should be considered in order to increase diagnostic yield.