Examining emergency department utilization following bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) utilization following surgery is poorly understood and places immense strain on the healthcare system, being responsible for up to $38 billion in wasteful spending annually. The aim of this study was to quantify ED utilization following bariatric procedures to identify causes and areas of improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted for all patients who underwent metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) between November 2006 and June 2019. The study includes 4703 patients across 8 hospitals in a single health system. Patients who returned to the ED within 30 and 90 days were analyzed for relation to surgery and preventability. RESULTS: Of the 4703 patients that underwent MBS, 907 (19.3%) visited the ED at least once within 90 days and 350 (7.4%) required hospital readmission. The most common bariatric procedure performed was the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) (3716/4703) with an average BMI of 43.8. The median length between discharge and ED visit was 19 days. Under 50% of patients called prior to ED presentation and 61% of these ED visits resulted in discharge. CONCLUSION: While hospital readmissions following MBS have been scrutinized in literature, investigation of ED utilization remains scarce. Our study is one of few to investigate postoperative ED utilization up to 90 days following bariatric intervention. A clear opportunity exists to improve discharge education and early post-discharge communication. This would additionally alleviate burden to allow focus on the acutely ill.

Rates of Recurrent Marginal Ulcer in Gastric Bypass Patients Undergoing Revisional Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of marginal ulcer (MU) following primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) is approximately .6-16%. Few studies have evaluated recurrence rates following surgical revision for MU. The primary aim of this study was to determine the rate of MU recurrence following revision. The secondary aim was to evaluate the impact of truncal vagotomy (TV) on the recurrence rates and analyze potential risk factors associated with the recurrence of MU after revision. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining data at a single tertiary academic medical center. Adult patients with a history of RYGB who underwent gastrojejunostomy revision for recurrent MU between the years of 2003-2020 were included. We sought to determine our overall rate of MU following revision, with and without TV. Additionally, we examined the association of risk factors with MU recurrence. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the statistical significance of recurrence rates between the groups. RESULTS: We included 90 patients in the study. The overall recurrence rate for MU was 16.7%. Of the 90 patients, 35 (35.4%) patients underwent TV at the time of revision. The recurrence rate of MU after GJ revision with TV was 14.3% in comparison to those without TV, 18.2% (P = .775). Smoking, steroid, alcohol use, history of cardiac surgery/intervention, and helicobacter pylori were not significantly associated with recurrent MU following revision. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of recurrence after revision for MU is high. Adding TV trended towards decreased MU recurrence after revisional surgery, however not significant. Larger studies are needed to evaluate risk factors associated with recurrent MU after revision.

Impact of Urinary Catheterization on Postoperative Outcomes After Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery in Propensity-Matched Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: The impact of urinary catheter avoidance in bariatric enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols is yet to be established. The purpose of the current study is to determine whether urinary catheter use in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures has an effect on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: An institutional database was utilized to identify adult patients undergoing primary minimally invasive RYGB surgery. Outcomes included incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) within 30 days postoperatively, 30-day readmission rates, proportion of patients discharged after postoperative day 1 (delayed discharge), length of stay (LOS), and operating room time. These were compared between propensity-matched groups with and without urinary catheter placement. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in postoperative UTI's (2.2% for both cohorts, P = .593) or 30-day readmission rates for patients with and without urinary catheters (6.6% and 4.4%, respectively, P = .260). Mean LOS (1.7 vs. 1.5 days, P = .001) and the proportion of patients having a delayed discharge (47.3% vs. 33.7%, P = .001) was greater in patients with a catheter. Operating room time was longer in the urinary catheter group (221.8 vs. 207.9 minutes, P = .002). DISCUSSION: Avoidance of indwelling urinary catheters in RYGB surgical patients decreased delayed discharges and LOS without affecting readmission or reoperation rates. Therefore, we recommend that avoidance of urinary catheters in routine RYGB surgery be considered for inclusion into standardized ERAS protocols. Urinary catheters should continue to be utilized in select cases, however, as these were not shown to affect rate of UTIs.

Is Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery Justified? An MBSAQIP Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic approach is utilized in greater than 90% of bariatric surgeries. With the growing prevalence of robotic-assisted surgery in bariatrics, there has been limited consensus on the superiority of either laparoscopic or robotic approaches, especially in revisional procedures (conversion from sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of the MBSAQIP PUF database of patients who underwent conversion from SG to RYGB procedures in either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted approaches. The groups underwent 2:1 propensity matching and primary outcomes included post-conversion days until discharge (POD), conversion operation length, total and major morbidity, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, 30-day reintervention, and 30-day mortality after conversion. RESULTS: After 2:1 propensity score matching, 3411 patients (2274 laparoscopic vs 1137 robotic) were included in the study. Intraoperatively, no significant difference was found in total morbidity (6.5% lap vs 5.9% robotic) or major morbidity (1.9% lap vs 1.7% robotic); however, the operative times were significantly longer robotically (126 min vs 164 min). Post-operatively, no significant differences were found in discharge day (1.8 lap vs 1.8 robotic), 30-day readmission (7.6% lap vs 8.6% robotic), reoperation rate (2.9% lap vs 3.7% robotic), additional intervention rate (2.5% lap vs 3.3% robotic), or 30-day mortality (0.1% vs 0.1%). CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in perioperative or intraoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted SG to RYGB conversion procedures other than a longer operative time in the robotic approach, suggesting increased efficiency with the laparoscopic approach.

A comparative evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a critical evaluation on the impact of postoperative pain and opioid requirements.

INTRODUCTION: The benefits of minimally invasive surgery using laparoscopy on postoperative pain and opioid use are well established. Our goal was to determine whether patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using a robotic approach (RA-RYGB) had lower postoperative pain and required less opioids than those undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (L-RYGB). Secondary outcomes evaluated included length of stay, operative time, and readmissions. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: This was a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary academic medical center. Patients who underwent L-RYGB or RA-RYGB between 5/1/2018 and 10/31/2019 were included. Cases with concomitant hernia repair, chronic opioid use, and those who did not receive a TAP block or multimodal pain control were excluded. Baseline demographics were compared. Inpatient and outpatient opioid use in Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) and pain scores (10-point Likert scale) were compared. RESULTS: There were 573 RY patients included (462 L-RYGB; 111 RA-RYGB). Median and maximum inpatient pain scores were similar for L-RYGB and RA-RYGB (3.0 vs 3.1, p = 0.878; 7.0 vs 7.0, p = 0.688). Median inpatient opioid use and maximum single day use were similar for L-RYGB and RA-RYGB (40.0 MME vs. 42.0 MME, p = 0.671; 30.0 MME vs 30.0 MME, p = 0.648). Both the outpatient prescribing of opioids (50.2% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.136) and outpatient opioid MME at 2 weeks (L-RYGB 30.0 MME vs. 33.8 MME, p = 0.854) were comparable between cohorts. Patient reported pain at 2-week follow-up was significantly higher for RA-RYGB (68.1%) than L-RYGB (55.6%) (p = 0.030). RA-RYGB had a higher rate of 30-day readmission and longer operative times compared to the L-RYGB (6.3% vs 13.5%, p = 0.010; 144.5 vs 200.0 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study identified no benefit for postoperative pain or opioid requirements in patients undergoing RA-RYGB compared to L-RYGB. The RA-RYGB group was significantly more likely to report pain at the two-week follow-up.

Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients on Chronic Opioids: Can Bariatric Surgery Assist with Decreasing Long-term Opioid Utilization?

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to assess long-term opioid use following bariatric surgery in patients on preoperative narcotics. METHODS: We evaluated patients utilizing preoperative opioids (OP) who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) from 2013 to 2020. Patients were propensity-matched to those without preoperative opioid use (NOP) by demographics and comorbidities. Our objectives were to compare opioid use at 1 and 3 years after surgery and evaluate perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 806 patients, matched 1:1 were evaluated, with 82.7% being females. Mean age was 46.5 years in the OP and 45.6 years in the NOP (p = 0.0018), preoperative BMI was 45.8 in the OP and 46.1 in the NOP (p = 0.695). All patients were followed up for 1 year. In the OP, 156 (38.7%) patients were taking opioids 1 year after surgery as opposed to 27 (6.7%) in the NOP (p < 0.0001). Three years after surgery, 74 (37.5%) patients in the OP and 27 (14.4%) in the NOP were taking outpatient opioids (p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between OP and NOP groups in terms of readmissions (9.4% vs. 5.7% p = 0.06), reinterventions (3.7 vs. 1.7% p = 0.13), reoperations (3.5% vs. 1.5% p = 0.11), or emergency room visits (8.9% vs. 7.2% p = 0.44). There were no mortalities. CONCLUSION: Most patients requiring preoperative opioids can be weaned off after bariatric surgery. Enhanced recovery pathways are key to obtaining these results. Preoperative opioid use is not associated with increased complications compared to opioid-naïve patients.

A 3-Year MBSAQIP propensity-matched analysis of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with concomitant cholecystectomy: Is the robotic or laparoscopic approach preferred?

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to compare outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive RYGB (MIS/RYGB) versus MIS/RYGB with concomitant Cholecystectomy (CCY). A secondary objective was to compare the outcomes for laparoscopic RYGB (LRYGB) and robotic RYGB (RRYGB) with concomitant CCY. METHODS: Outcomes of 117,939 MIS/RYGB with and without CCY were propensity-matched (Age, Gender, BMI, Comorbidities), 10:1, using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database from 2015-2017. The MIS/RYGB with CCY were then separated into LRYGB and RRYGB cases for comparison. Exclusion criteria included emergency cases, conversions to open, and age less than 18. RESULTS: The operative time and length of stay (LOS) was significantly increased with addition of concomitant CCY. There was no significant difference in readmission, reoperation, intervention, morbidity, or mortality. The RRYGB with CCY approach was associated with a significantly longer operative times compared to the LRYGB with CCY (177 vs. 135 min, p < 0.0001). The laparoscopic and robotic groups demonstrated no significant difference LOS, readmission, reoperation, intervention, morbidity, or mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that concomitant cholecystectomy increased the operative time and length of stay. However, concomitant CCY was not associated with any increased morbidity. The study demonstrated no significant difference in morbidity between robotic and laparoscopic approach. The robotic approach, however, was associated with a significantly longer operative time compared to the laparoscopic approach. While the indications for CCY remain controversial, concomitant CCY does not convey additional risk regardless of operative approach.

Examining emergency department utilization in the post-foregut surgery patient.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine emergency department (ED) utilization following minimally invasive foregut surgery and determine its impact on costs. Furthermore, we sought to determine their relationship to the index procedure, whether they are preventable, and describe strategies for decreasing unnecessary ED visits. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for all patients undergoing foregut procedures from January 2018 through June 2019. ED utilization was examined from 0 to 90 days. The proportion of visits related to surgery, preventable visits, and median ED costs were compared between visits occurring 0-30 days (early) versus 31-90 days (delayed) postoperatively as well as occurring from 8 am to 5 pm versus 5 pm to 8 am. RESULTS: Of 458 patients who underwent foregut surgery, 72.5% were female and the mean age was 60 years old. 92 patients (20%) presented to the ED within 90 days. Of these, 59 patients (64.1%) presented to the ED early versus 33 patients (35.9%) delayed. 56.5% of ED visits occurred during clinic hours. 56 (60.9%) ED visits were related to the procedure and 20 (35.7%) were preventable. The median ED return cost was $970. Early ED visits were significantly more likely to be related to surgery (72.9% vs 39.4%, p = 0.0016). There was no significant difference in the proportion of visits that were preventable (32.6% vs 46.2%, p = 0.3755) and ED return cost did not vary significantly ($995 vs $965, p = 0.43) between early and delayed visits. CONCLUSIONS: ED visits are common after foregut surgery and represent a financial burden on healthcare. Most visits occur early and are more likely to be related to surgery. Importantly, more than one-third of ED visits related to surgery were preventable and most occurred during clinic hours on weekdays. Providers should consider implementation of strategies to improve outpatient utilization and decrease unnecessary ED visits.

Emergency department overutilization following cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Emergency Department (ED) utilization following general surgery procedures is poorly understood and places immense strain on the healthcare system. Inefficient ED utilization is responsible for up to $38 billion in wasteful spending annually. Nearly 56% of ED visits may be avoidable. The aim of our study was to quantify ED utilization following elective cholecystectomy (CCY) and inguinal hernia repair (IHR), to characterize the impact and identify causes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients across eight hospitals in a single health system undergoing elective CCY and IHR between January 2018 to June 2019. Patients who returned to the ED within 30 and 90 days were analyzed for hospital readmission, preventability (based on the Goldfield criteria), relation to index surgery and clinician communication within 48 h of presentation. RESULTS: In total, 3678 patients had elective surgery in this timeframe. Of these, 476 patients (13.1%) visited the ED at least once within 90 days from their surgical admission discharge date and 114 were readmitted to the hospital (23.9%). Average length from discharge to ED presentation was 27.1 days. The mean cost associated with these ED visits was $974 per visit. 31.9% communicated with their clinician within 48 h of ED presentation. 73.9% of ED visits occurred between Monday - Friday and 51.5% took place between the hours of 8 am-5 pm. 46.6% of ED visits were related to the index operation and 40.7% of ED visits were deemed preventable. CONCLUSIONS: While hospital readmissions have been scrutinized in the literature, relatively little is known about postoperative ED utilization. Our study is one of the first to document postoperative ED utilization up to 90 days after surgery. For just two common elective general surgery procedures, we found these visits were financially burdensome and led to ED discharge in > 75% of patients. Numerous opportunities to improve care were identified. Most ED visits occurred on weekdays and during daylight hours, suggesting an opportunity to utilize outpatient clinics in lieu of the ED. Nearly 50% were related to the operation and nearly 40% were preventable. Revamping the discharge instructions and post-discharge communication-including novel strategies leveraging telemedicine-by providers has the potential to dramatically decrease postoperative ED utilization.

Comparison of short-term outcomes following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in male and female patients using the MBSAQIP database.

BACKGROUND: Male sex has long been identified as a risk factor for adverse outcomes, including mortality, after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare short-term outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB based on biologic sex. SETTING: Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA. METHODS: Patients undergoing RYGB in the 2015, 2016, and 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database were propensity matched 1:1 to compare 30-day outcomes between male and female sex. RESULTS: A total 47,906 patients were included (23,953 men/23,953 women). The overall complication rate was higher in female patients (11.5% versus 10.2%; P < .001) with no difference in mortality related to RYGB at 30 days. No significant differences were seen between sexes for organ space surgical site infection or septic shock. Women had significantly more superficial surgical site infections (P = .002), urinary tract infections (P < .001), readmissions (P < .001), and reinterventions (P < .001). Men had significantly more episodes of unplanned intubation (P = .008), extended ventilator use (P = .01), progressive renal insufficiency (P = .01), acute renal failure (P = .008), cardiac arrest (P = .005), intensive care unit admission (P < .001), all-cause 30-day mortality (P = .038), and inpatient mortality rate (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex has been identified as a risk factor for adverse events and mortality after RYGB in several risk models. This study demonstrates an overall increased risk of both all-cause mortality and inpatient mortality. The study, however, did not demonstrate a difference in bariatric-related mortality. The prevalence of both major and minor complications was mixed between sexes, while women had a higher overall complication rate after RYGB. The abundance of data available within the MBSAQIP Participant Use Data File facilitates the creation of tools like risk models for bariatric surgery, such as the MBSAQIP Risk calculator.

Primary care provider management of patients with obesity at an integrated health network: A survey of practices, views, and knowledge.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a serious health problem that affects a wide range of patients and disease processes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate perceptions, knowledge, and practice habits of primary care providers (PCPs) regarding the care of patients with obesity, including barriers to effective care and their experience with bariatric surgery in our integrated health network. SETTING: Integrated health network. METHODS: A 16-question survey was distributed electronically to 160 PCPs at our integrated health network. Results were analyzed to identify attitudes, knowledge, practice habits, and bariatric surgery referral patterns while treating patients with obesity. RESULTS: Among 160 PCPs, 45 (28.1%) responded. Specialty, sex, patient population, insurance accepted, and practice years of PCPs were reported. Most PCPs reported "always" calculating patient body mass index (88.9%) with only 13.3% "always" discussing the body mass index results. Respondents most frequently prescribed diet and exercise to patients with obesity and rarely prescribed medications, with bariatric surgery referrals falling between the two. PCPs viewed management of obesity as the responsibility of the patient (97.6%) and the PCP (100%). Ninety-three percent felt obesity is a common diagnosis in their practice, but no one correctly identified the prevalence of obesity in our region. Respondents demonstrated adequate knowledge regarding medical consequences of obesity. A majority was able to identify the correct eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery, as well specific medical problems that can improve or be eliminated postoperatively. While 61.9% of respondents were aware of free weight loss and bariatric informational sessions offered, 28.6% reported that they were unfamiliar with existing bariatric surgeons. One respondent was not aware of any bariatric surgery performed. Some PCPs reported prior negative experiences with post-bariatric surgery patients, and thus were hesitant to refer additional patients. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs report discussing an obesity diagnosis with patients but are not always using body mass index in that discussion. They most often prescribe lifestyle modification as treatment for patients, which they believe to be most effective to treat obesity. However, they report only one third of their patients are motivated to lose weight. Additionally, they demonstrate appropriate knowledge of indications and benefits of bariatric surgery. A majority of the PCPs is aware of weight loss informational sessions and bariatric services provided within our integrated health network, but almost one third were unable to identify a surgeon, a possible target for improved relationships. Barriers to care include patient motivation and insurance coverage.