The predictive value of coronary microvascular dysfunction for left ventricular reverse remodelling in dilated cardiomyopathy.

Aims: To evaluate the degree of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) first-pass perfusion parameters and to examine the correlation between myocardial perfusion and left ventricle reverse remodelling (LVRR). Methods: In this study, 94 DCM patients and 35 healthy controls matched for age and sex were included. Myocardial perfusion parameters, including upslope, time to maximum signal intensity (Timemax), maximum signal intensity (SImax), baseline signal intensity (SIbaseline), and the difference between maximum and baseline signal intensity (SImax-baseline) were measured. Additionally, left ventricular (LV) structure, function parameters, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were also recorded. The parameters were compared between healthy controls and DCM patients. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of LVRR. Results: With a median follow-up period of 12 months [interquartile range (IQR), 8-13], 41 DCM patients (44%) achieved LVRR. Compared with healthy controls, DCM patients presented CMD with reduced upslope, SIbaseline, and increased Timemax (all p < 0.01). Timemax, SImax, and SImax-baseline were further decreased in LVRR than non-LVRR group (Timemax: 60.35 [IQR, 51.46-74.71] vs. 72.41 [IQR, 59.68-97.70], p = 0.017; SImax: 723.52 [IQR, 209.76-909.27] vs. 810.92 [IQR, 581.30-996.89], p = 0.049; SImax-baseline: 462.99 [IQR, 152.25-580.43] vs. 551.13 [IQR, 402.57-675.36], p = 0.038). In the analysis of multivariate logistic regression, Timemax [odds ratio (OR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-1.00; p = 0.032)], heart rate (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.08; p = 0.029), LV remodelling index (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.06-3.00; p = 0.038) and LGE extent (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.96; p = 0.021) were independent predictors of LVRR. Conclusions: CMD could be found in DCM patients and was more impaired in patients with non-LVRR than LVRR patients. Timemax at baseline was an independent predictor of LVRR in DCM.

The application of radiology for dilated cardiomyopathy diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis prediction: a bibliometric analysis.

Background: Radiology plays a highly crucial role in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis prediction of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Related research has increased rapidly over the past few years, but systematic analyses are lacking. This study thus aimed to provide a reference for further research by analyzing the knowledge field, development trends, and research hotspots of radiology in DCM using bibliometric methods. Methods: Articles on the radiology of DCM published between 2002 and 2021 in the Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCCd) were searched and analyzed. Data were retrieved and analyzed using CiteSpace V, VOSviewer, and Scimago Graphic software, and included the name, research institution, and nationality of authors; journals of publication; and the number of citations. Results: A total of 4,257 articles were identified on radiology of DCM from WoSCCd. The number of articles published in this field has grown steadily from 2002 to 2021 and is expected to reach 392 annually by 2024. According to subfields, the number of papers published in cardiac magnetic resonance field increased steadily. The authors from the United States published the most (1,364 articles, 32.04%) articles. The author with the most articles published was Bax JJ (54 articles, 1.27%) from Leiden University Medical Center. The most cited article was titled "2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure", with 138 citations. Citation-based clustering showed that arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, T1 mapping, and endomyocardial biopsy are the current hots pots for research in DCM radiology. The most frequently occurring keyword was "dilated cardiomyopathy". The keyword-based clusters mainly included "late gadolinium enhancement", "congestive heart failure", "cardiovascular magnetic resonance", "sudden cardiac death", "ventricular arrhythmia", and "cardiac resynchronization therapy". Conclusions: The United States and Northern Europe are the most influential countries in research on DCM radiology, with many leading distinguished research institutions. The current research hots pots are myocardial fibrosis, risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmia, the prognosis of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) treatment, and subtype classification of DCM.

The potential predictive value of cardiac mechanics for left ventricular reverse remodelling in dilated cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: Left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR) is an important objective of optimal medical management for dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients, as it is associated with favourable long-term outcomes. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can comprehensively assess cardiac structure and function. We aimed to assess the CMR parameters at baseline and investigate independent variables to predict LVRR in DCM patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nighty-eight initially diagnosed DCM patients who underwent CMR and echocardiography examinations at baseline were included. CMR parameters and feature tracking (FT) based left ventricular (LV) global strain (nStrain) and nStrain indexed to LV cardiac mass index (rStrain) were measured. The predictors of LVRR were determined by multivariate logistic regression analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CMR parameters and were compared by the DeLong test. At a median follow-up time of 9 [interquartile range, 7-12] months, 35 DCM patients (36%) achieved LVRR. The patients with LVRR had lower LV volume, mass, LGE extent and stroke volume index (LVSVi) and higher left ventricular remodelling index (LVRI), nStrains, rStrains, and peak systolic strain rate (PSSR) in the longitudinal direction and rStrains in the circumferential direction at baseline (all P < 0.05). In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, LVRI [per SD, odds ratio (OR) 1.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-2.98; P = 0.024] and the ratio of global longitudinal peak strain (rGLPS) (per SD, OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.18-3.01; P = 0.008) were independent predictors of LVRR. The combination of LVSVi, LVRI, and rGLPS had a greater area under the curve (AUC) than the combination of LVSVi and LVRI (0.75 vs. 0.68), but not significantly (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LVRR had a lower LV volume index, lower LVSV index, lower LGE extent, higher LVRI, and preserved myocardial deformation in the longitudinal direction at baseline. LVRI and rGLPS at baseline were independent determinants of LVRR.

Identification of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with hypertension: a left atrial myocardial strain cardiac magnetic resonance study.

Background: The noninvasive diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. The role of left atrial (LA) functional changes in patients with HFpEF has attracted increased attention. This study aimed to evaluate LA deformation in patients with hypertension (HTN) using cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking and to investigate the diagnostic value of LA strain for HFpEF. Methods: This retrospective study consecutively enrolled 24 HTN patients with HFpEF (HTN-HFpEF) and 30 patients with pure HTN based on clinical indications. Thirty age-matched healthy participants were also enrolled. All participants underwent a laboratory examination and 3.0 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The LA strain and strain rate, including total strain (εs), passive strain (εe), active strain (εa), peak positive strain rate (SRs), peak early negative strain rate (SRe), and peak late negative strain rate (SRa), were evaluated using CMR tissue tracking and compared among the 3 groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to identify HFpEF. Spearman correlation was used to analyze the correlation between LA strain and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level. Results: Patients with HTN-HFpEF had significantly lower εs (17.70%, IQR 14.65% to 19.70%, εe 7.83%±2.86%), εa (9.08%±3.19%), SRs (0.88±0.24 s-1), SRe (-0.60 s-1, IQR -0.90 to -0.50 s-1), and SRa (-1.10±0.47 s-1) than did patients with HTN and control participants (all P values <0.05). Compared to the control group, patients with HTN had lower εs (25.35%, IQR 21.80% to 27.25%), εe (11.49%±2.64%), SRs (1.10 s-1, IQR 1.00 to 1.48 s-1), and SRe (-1.11±0.37 s-1) (all P values <0.05). The values of εa and SRa were not significantly different between the HTN and control groups. LA total strain εs was independently associated with HFpEF (odds ratio 0.009; P<0.05) with a cutoff value of 19.55% (95% CI: 0.882-0.996), and the sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 97%, respectively. There was a good correlation between the LA strain parameters and BNP level (all P values <0.05). Conclusions: LA function impairment exists in patients with HFpEF. The LA strain parameter has potential value in diagnosing HFpEF.

Case report: Rare benign obstructive disease of the biliary tract-a rare case of eosinophilic cholangitis.

Objective: Eosinophilic cholangitis (EC) is an uncommon form of benign biliary obstruction. It frequently eludes accurate clinical diagnosis, leading to inappropriate treatment methods. It is our aspiration that this clinical report will impart comprehensive insights into EC and, specifically, the critical role of tomographic examination. Case summary: A 34-year-old man was urgently admitted to the hospital due to excruciating abdominal distress persisting for several hours. Following a six-day course of anti-inflammatory therapy, his symptoms displayed marginal improvement, prompting his discharge. He returned to the hospital a month later for re-examination on doctor's orders. Based on the results of the re-examination, the patient refused steroid hormone shock therapy and subsequently underwent laparoscopic left-lateral hepatic lobectomy in order to confirm the diagnosis. The preoperative absolute counts of eosinophils in the peripheral blood were documented as 2.3 × 109/L, 3.06 × 109/L, and 1.50 × 109/L consecutively; concurrently, the corresponding percentages of eosinophils were quantified at levels of 21.90%, 30.70%, and 19.20%. The subsequent postoperative pathological assessment unveiled EC as the definitive diagnosis. The patient has since remained free from disease recurrence and is presently alive. Conclusion: When encountering a patient presenting with persistent elevation in absolute eosinophil count in peripheral blood, coupled with imaging manifestations suggestive of intrahepatic periductal inflammation, diagnosis of EC should be highly suspected. The most optimal diagnostic and therapeutic workflow for EC could entail CT-guided liver lesion biopsy, ensued by glucocorticoid pulse therapy, and finally, short-term monitoring utilizing CT or MRI (including T1WI, T2WI, DWI, CEMRI) techniques.