Tympanostomy Tube Otorrhea: Microbiological Differences Between Children with and Without Cleft Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize and compare microbiological profiles in tympanostomy tube otorrhea for children with and without cleft palate. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Pediatric otolaryngology and multidisciplinary cleft/craniofacial clinic at a single tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Children with and without cleft palate <18 years of age who underwent tympanostomy tube placement between 2017-2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Otopathogen profiles and antibiotic resistance patterns in ear culture specimens obtained in children presenting for treatment of recalcitrant post-tympanostomy tube otorrhea. RESULTS: Of the 886 children with tympanostomy tubes placed between 2017-2021, 345 (38.9%) had clinically significant otorrhea defined as requiring at least one otolaryngology visit for treatment. Children with cleft palate had higher rates of otorrhea (50.0% versus 35.7%; P < .01). In the 128 cultures obtained, Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism in both groups present in 39.8% of cultures; 49% were methicillin-resistant (MRSA). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was also frequently isolated (20.0% versus 23.4%, P = .69) in children with and without cleft palate. Collectively, fluoroquinolone resistance was observed in 68.6% and 27.6% of the S. aureus and P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively, however, no differences in fluoroquinolone resistance were observed between cleft and non-cleft cohorts. Corynebacterium species were isolated more frequently in children with cleft palate (26.7% versus 6.1%, P < .01), a finding of unclear significance. CONCLUSIONS: Recalcitrant post-tympanostomy tube otorrhea is more common in children with cleft palate. MRSA was the most common isolate, which was commonly resistant to first-line fluoroquinolone therapy.

Cochlear Implantation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients: Speech Perception and Quality of Life.

OBJECTIVES: There is a limited understanding of the impact of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), given the scarcity of reported cases. We aim to evaluate the audiological outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after CI in CMT. METHODS: Multi-institutional, university-affiliated, tertiary-referral centers, retrospective chart review.Our cohort includes 5 patients with CMT. Patients' charts were reviewed for demographic characteristics, operation notes, and pre- and post-implantation audiology evaluation. Patients completed the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 (CIQOL-10) Global questionnaire. RESULTS: Pre-implantation, the mean pure tone average was 84.1 ± 7.2 dB, and the mean word recognition score was 2.4% in the implanted ear. AzBio sentence test was performed in quiet, revealing a mean of 4 ± 1.4% in the implanted ear. Post-implantation, PTA results were all within the mild hearing loss range (mean 33.0 ± 5.9 dB). Post-CI, AZ-Bio test results were 5%, 65%, and 74% (for 3 patients), and HINT scores were 55% and 58% (for 2 patients). The mean score of the CIQOL-10 questionnaire was 42.7 ± 10.47 (range 1-100). Patients were most satisfied with their ability to listen to the television or radio, have conversations in a quiet environment, and feel comfortable being themselves. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the most extensive series of CI in CMT-associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy. Our cohort suggests that CI is a safe and reliable method for hearing rehabilitation that can achieve good speech performance and improve QoL in CMT patients.

Tumor and Nodal Disease Growth Rates in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Though specific growth rate (SGR) has potential prognostic value for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), there is sparse literature defining these rates. Our aims were to establish the SGRs of primary tumors (PTs) and lymph nodes (LNs) in OPSCC and to correlate SGR with oncologic outcome. A pilot study was designed with a retrospective analysis examining 54 patients from the University of California, Davis with OPSCC (diagnosed 2012-2019). Radiation oncology software and pretreatment serial CT scans were used to measure PT and LN volumes to calculate SGR and doubling time (DT). The mean PT-SGR was 1.2 ± 2.2%/day and the mean LN-SGR was 1.6 ± 1.9%/day. There was no statistically significant difference between slow-growing and fast-growing cohorts in terms of age, gender, smoking status, tumor subsite, HPV status (as determined with p16 staining), initial volume, or overall stage. SGR had no impact on 2-year overall survival, disease-free survival, or disease-specific survival. We found the average daily growth rates for OPSCC to be 1.2%/day and 1.6%/day. Our findings suggest PT- and LN-SGR are independent factors, not heavily influenced by known biomarkers and patient characteristics, without a statistical impact on prognosis. This information has value in patient counseling regarding tumor growth and in providing patients worried about fast-growing tumors the appropriate reassurance.

Utility of Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea with the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) in Children with Craniofacial Anomalies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea in children with craniofacial anomalies. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multidisciplinary cleft and craniofacial clinic at a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Children with craniofacial anomalies 2 to ≤18 years of age who both completed a PSQ screen and underwent polysomnography (PSG) without interval surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of the PSQ in detecting an obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 events/hour. RESULTS: Fifty children met study criteria, with 66% (n = 33) having an associated syndrome. Mean patient age at time of PSQ was 9.6 + 4.0 years. Overall, 33 (64%) screened positive on the PSQ, while 20 (40%) had an AHI ≥ 5. The sensitivity and specificity for identifying AHI ≥ 5 was 70% and 40%, respectively. With subgroup analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were higher (100% and 50%) in children with non-syndromic palatal clefting but lower (65% and 31%) in children with a syndrome or chromosomal anomaly. There was no correlation detected between PSQ score and AHI severity (p = 0.25). The mean obstructive AHI in the study population was 10.1 ± 22.7 despite 44% (n = 22) undergoing prior adenotonsillectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The PSQ was less sensitive and specific in detecting an AHI ≥ 5 in children with craniofacial anomalies than in a general population, and particularly poor in for children with syndrome-associated craniofacial conditions. Given the high prevalence of OSA in this patient population, a craniofacial-specific validated screening tool would be beneficial.

Bereavement Practices Among Head and Neck Cancer Surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: Head and neck cancer surgeons frequently interact with dying patients with advanced disease and their families, but little is known about their bereavement practices after a patient's death. The aim of this study is to elucidate the frequency of common bereavement practices, cited barriers to bereavement, and predictive physician factors that lead to an increase in bereavement practices among head and neck cancer surgeons. METHODS: A 20-item survey was sent to 827 active surgeons of the American Head and Neck Society. Approval was obtained and the survey was distributed through the American Head and Neck Society. Demographics, frequency of common bereavement practices, empathy, and barriers were assessed. Multiple linear regression was performed to determine physician factors associated with more frequent bereavement follow-up. RESULTS: There were 156 respondents (18.9% response rate). Overall, surgeons were more likely to usually/always call (48.5%) or send a letter (42.4%) compared with other practices such as attending funerals (0%), offering family meetings (18.6%), or referring family members to counseling (7.7%). Many barriers were cited as being at least somewhat important: being unaware about a patient's death (67.3%) was the most cited, whereas 51.3% cited a lack of mentorship/training in this area. Scoring higher on empathy questions (P ≤ .001) was associated with more frequent surgeon bereavement follow-up with the family of deceased patients. CONCLUSION: There is substantial practice variation among surgeons suggesting a lack of consensus on their roles in bereavement follow-up. Having higher empathy was predictive of higher engagement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 132:1971-1975, 2022.

Landscape of Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts Grant Recipients Over the Past Decade.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the demographics of CORE grant recipients (Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts) over the last decade and evaluate disparity among recipients as compared with otolaryngology overall. To assess whether procurement of a grant predicts pursuit of an academic career. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of grant recipients' bibliometrics. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: The list of recipients of grants from 2010 to 2019 was obtained from the website of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Demographics of recipients were collected through an internet search, including gender, race, residency program, and h-index. Recipients from 2010 were searched to determine current academic faculty rank. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare these factors with otolaryngology overall. RESULTS: The distribution of gender among recipients over the last decade remained nearly constant, with no significant difference versus residents in otolaryngology (P > .05). However, there were significantly more female recipients when adjusted for gender differences in the field overall (P < .01). Asians were relatively overrepresented, while Black and Hispanic residents were underrepresented (P < .01). Many recipients (52.6%) trained at institutions recognized as the best training programs with reputations for quality research output. The h-index of recipients decreased over the last decade (P < .01). The h-index of duplicate winners was significantly higher than those of nonduplicate winners (P < .01). After adjusting for gender and rank, recipients were significantly more likely to hold academic positions (P < .01). CONCLUSION: CORE grants are favorably distributed as related to gender and racial disparities, and recipients frequently go on to achieve high levels of academic success.

Head and neck free-flap salvage.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight three clinical arenas in which head and neck free-flap compromise is encountered and acted upon: nonoperative, operative and postoperative realms. RECENT FINDINGS: Time to identification and intervention is paramount to successful free-flap salvage. Surgical microvascular revision remains chief amongst strategies to revert vascular compromise of a free-flap. Adjuncts, such as thrombolytics and systemic anticoagulation have an important role in the complex work of microvascular free tissue care. Venous congestion of free flaps holds favorable for salvage when compared with arterial insufficiency. SUMMARY: Vascular compromise of head and neck free flaps is a rare and feared event for microvascular surgeons, with successful transfers rates approaching above 95%. Success in salvage is dependent on prompt identification of tissue compromise and timely, directed interventions to re-establish tissue perfusion.

Uncovering Disparities in Scholarly Productivity among Junior Surgical Society Grant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing the number of women and ethnic minority groups in surgery, the academic advancement of such individuals within surgical fields lags behind Caucasian men. We sought to identify gender and ethnic inequalities in the receipt of surgical society research grants for young faculty investigators and compare the scholarly productivity of these groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional and retrospective study, the gender and race of surgical society grant recipients were determined from surgical society Web sites. Surgical society grants aimed at providing research grants for junior faculty investigators were analyzed. Using the Scopus database, each recipient's scholarly productivity was determined by means of h-index, a standardized measure of the quantity and impact of an individual's published articles. We generated descriptive statistics to compare the gender, race, and h-index of grant recipients in the years 2006-2008 and 2016-2018. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2008, there were 68 research grant recipients. Of these recipients, 79% were men and 21% were women. The racial breakdown was 54% Caucasian men, 22% Asian men, 1.4% African American men, 1.4% Hispanic men, 12% Caucasian women, 7% Asian Women, and 1.4% African American women. The average h-index of the male and female recipients is 25 (±14) and 24 (±14), respectively (P = 0.81). Between 2016 and 2018, there were 113 research grant recipients. Of these recipients, 66% were men and 34% were women. The racial breakdown was 47% Caucasian men, 16% Asian men, 3.5% African American men, 1% Hispanic men, 26% Caucasian women, 3.5% Asian women, and 3.5% African American women. The average h-index of the male and female recipients is 12 (±8) and 9 (±6), respectively (P = 0.046). Caucasian women had the only statistically significant change in the proportion of grant recipients from 2006-2008 to 2016-2018, with an increase from 12% to 26% (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Most surgical society research grants for young investigators continue to be awarded to Caucasian men, with Caucasian women earning a distant second in the 2016-2018 cohort. Ethnic minorities continue to be awarded less research grants than Caucasian recipients. Overall, the average h-index of women was less than men. This study highlights the persistent need for surgical societies to consider gender and ethnic disparities when awarding junior investigator grants, including barriers minority groups may face in achieving the same h-index as Caucasian men.

Disproportionally low funding for trauma research by the National Institutes of Health: A call for a National Institute of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is a major cause of death and disability in all ages. Previous reviews have suggested that National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for trauma is not commensurate with its burden of disease, but a detailed analysis has been lacking. We postulated that NIH spending on trauma research was lower than previously thought and was distributed widely, preventing a comprehensive research strategy that could decrease trauma morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool was initially screened using a search of over 20 terms including "trauma," "injury," "shock," "MVC," and excluding clearly unrelated conditions, for example, "cancer." The details of all grants that screened positive underwent manual review to identify true trauma-related grants. An expert panel was used to adjudicate any ambiguity. RESULTS: In FY2016, NIH awarded 50,137 grants, of which 6,401 (13%) were captured by our initial screen. Following review, 1,888 (28%) were identified as trauma-related; 3.7% of all NIH grants. These grants (US $720 million) represent only 2.9% of the NIH extramural budget. In addition, the grants were funded and administered by 24 of the institutes and centers across the NIH ranging from 0.01% (National Cancer Institute) to 11% (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases) of their extramural portfolios. CONCLUSION: Given the extreme burden of trauma-related disability and years of life lost, this review of extramural NIH funding definitively demonstrates that trauma is severely underfunded. The lack of a dedicated home for trauma research at NIH leads to a diffusion of grants across many institutes and makes it impossible to direct a focused and effective national research endeavor to improve outcomes. These data demonstrate the need for a National Institute of Trauma at the NIH to help set an agenda to reach the national goal of Zero Preventable Deaths.

Endoscopic Versus Open Resection of Non-Squamous Cell Carcinoma Sinonasal Malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: Non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SCC) variants of sinonasal cancer are rare cancers which are optimally managed with complete surgical resection. This study aims to assess the impact of surgical approach on outcomes by comparison of cases managed with open versus endoscopic resection. METHODS: The National Cancer Database 2004-2015 datasets were queried for all cases of non-SCC initially managed with definitive surgery. Patients were grouped according to surgical approach (endoscopic vs. open) and compared for patient, tumor, and treatment variables using chi-squared analyses. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of receiving endoscopic surgery. Subgroups were compared for survival using Cox regression and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 1595 cases of non-SCC sinonasal cancers managed with definitive surgery, 42.2% were treated endoscopically. Open and endoscopic groups differed significantly by stage, primary site, histology, facility type, margin status, and clinical stage. Logistic regression showed that increased income was a significant predictor of receiving endoscopic surgery whereas stage IV (odds ratio: 0.58, P = .017) reduced the odds of receiving endoscopic surgery. Open resection patients had longer mean length of stay (LOS) than those who underwent endoscopic resection (5.09 vs. 3.16 days, P < .001). On Cox regression, no difference in survival was observed between open and endoscopic patients (P = .534). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with non-SCC sinonasal cancer managed with endoscopic surgery had a decreased LOS and no significant difference in survival compared to patients undergoing open resection. Therefore, an endoscopic approach may be considered a viable alternative to open resection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130: 1872-1876, 2020.

Comparing endoscopic resection and open resection for management of sinonasal mucosal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SMM) is a rare, aggressive cancer, optimally managed with complete surgical resection. This study aimed to assess the impact of surgical approach on outcomes by comparison of cases managed with open vs endoscopic resection. METHODS: The National Cancer Database 2010-2015 datasets were queried for all cases of non-metastatic SMM initially managed with definitive surgery. Patients were grouped according to surgical approach (open vs endoscopic) and compared for patient, tumor, and treatment variables using chi-square analyses. Case-control matching was used to generate subgroups of cases paired 1:1 between groups, matched for significantly distributed variables. Subgroups were compared for perioperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: Of the 686 cases of SMM managed with definitive surgery, 46.2% were treated endoscopically. Open and endoscopic groups did not differ significantly by T-stage, primary site, or rates of adjuvant therapies. Case-control matching for these variables generated a subpopulation of 240 paired cases. Comparison of matched groups found no significant differences in 30-day or 90-day mortality. Endoscopically managed patients had higher rates of unplanned readmission whereas open resection patients had longer length of stay (LOS). There was no significant difference in OS between groups. CONCLUSION: In surgically managed SMM, open resection patients have significantly longer LOS, whereas endoscopic patients have higher rates of unplanned readmission. Surgical approach does not appear to influence OS.

Impact of palliative treatment on survival in sinonasal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Although palliative care treatment modalities have been shown to improve functional outcomes and provide symptom alleviation in sinonasal cancer, its impact on survival still remains unclear. In this study we aimed to elicit the impact of different palliative therapy options on survival in a nationally representative sample of sinonasal cancer patients. METHODS: National Cancer Database 2004-2015 data sets were queried for cases of primary sinonasal cancer (N = 380). Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to determine median overall survival (M-OS) and overall survival (OS) among the different treatment cohorts (pain management, palliative radiation therapy, palliative chemotherapy, palliative surgery, and combination therapy). Prognostic factors were elicited by comparing OS by log-rank tests and subsequent multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the total patients of sinonasal malignancy treated with palliative therapy, most were <70 years old, had stage 4 cancer, and histology indicating squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.05). On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the 1-year OS (1Y-OS) and M-OS were 43.6% and 10.1 months, respectively. The 1Y-OS and M-OS for pain management alone were 35.3% and 4.56 months, respectively. Surgery had the highest 1Y-OS and M-OS, at 74.7% and 22.8 months, respectively (p = 0.002). All treatment modalities had increased 1Y-OS compared with pain management alone. Multivariant analysis demonstrated palliative surgery to be associated with decreased risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.63). CONCLUSION: In this study we identify the impact of palliative treatment modalities on survival in sinonasal cancer. Palliative surgery was shown to have the highest 1Y-OS and M-OS compared with other palliative treatment modalities.