Alternative to In Vivo Tests During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multiple Allergen Simultaneous Tests as a Useful First Screening.

BACKGROUND: In allergy diagnosis we sometimes find some clinical or logistic limitations to be able to carry out in vivo tests, so the detection of serum allergic-specific IgE could be an alternative as a first screening step. Here, we compare the results from the routine diagnostic tools and multiple allergen simultaneous tests to detect inhalant allergen sensitization. METHODS: Thirty-two subjects with a positive ImmunoCAP Phadiatop screening were included, evaluating the accuracy of their diagnosis using (1) specific IgE determination by ImmunoCAP and (2) MAST EUROLINE Immunoblot. RESULTS: The MAST method showed a high agreement and correlation with the ImmunoCAP system for Derma-tophagoides pteronyssinus, cat dander, orchard grass and Alternaria alternata. Of the subjects, 94% were sensitized to at least one of the allergens using MAST EUROLINE immunoblot, whereas 79% of individuals with a positive Phadiatop went undetected when we analyzed only the 4 allergens mentioned before. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed the usefulness of MAST EUROLINE immunoblot for screening detection of specific IgE antibodies directed against a broad spectrum of inhalant allergens as a first screening tool. Furthermore, its performance is not affected by the possible in vivo test limitations and avoids the arbitrary selection of allergenic sources for evaluation, which may lead to incorrect patients' diagnosis and management.

Effectiveness of different methods for anti-Sm antibody identification. A multicentre study.

Methods for the measurement of autoantibodies frequently provide controversial results. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of Spanish Clinical Laboratories in the measurement of anti-Sm antibodies. A total of 23 laboratories participated, analysing 30 serum samples from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune and non-autoimmune diseases. The laboratories used four extractable nuclear antigen screens, eight enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) specific for anti-Sm, one line-blot, one dot-blot and one double immunodiffusion assay, from 15 different manufacturers. A total of 871 results were obtained. In general, very good sensitivity was obtained (95-100%), but specificity was moderate (52-86%) and must be improved. Most ELISAs and the line-blot were valid assays for anti-Sm detection and could serve as tests both for analysis and/or confirmation. The likelihood ratios indicated that both methods can be considered very useful or useful for the determination of anti-Sm antibodies. Nevertheless, the analytical quality of the methods for the measurement of anti-Sm antibodies could probably be improved by standardisation of the methods and the participation of laboratories in external quality control programs.