Family History is Underestimated in Children with Isolated Hypospadias: A French Multicenter Report of 88 Families.

PURPOSE: While familial forms of complex disorders/differences of sex development have been widely reported, data regarding isolated hypospadias are sparse and a family history is thought to be less frequent. We aimed to determine the frequency of hypospadias in families of boys with hypospadias, to establish whether these familial forms exhibit a particular phenotype and to evaluate the prevalence of genetic defects of the main candidate genes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 395 boys with hypospadias were prospectively screened for a family history with a standardized questionnaire, extensive clinical description, family tree and sequencing of AR, SF1, SRD5A2 and MAMLD1. RESULTS: Family history of hypospadias was more frequent than expected (88 patients, 22.3%). In 17 instances (19.3%) familial hypospadias cases were multiple. Familial hypospadias was related to the paternal side in 59.1% of cases, consisting of the father himself (30.7%) as well as paternal uncles and cousins. Premature birth, assisted reproductive techniques, other congenital abnormalities and growth retardation were not more frequent in familial hypospadias than in sporadic cases. The severity of phenotype was similar in both groups. The results of genetic analysis combined with previous data on androgen receptor sequencing revealed that familial cases more frequently tend to demonstrate genetic defects than sporadic cases (5.68% vs 1.63%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Familial forms of hypospadias are far more frequent than previously reported. Even minor and isolated forms justify a full clinical investigation of the family history. Detecting these hereditary forms may help to determine the underlying genetic defects, and may improve followup and counseling of these patients.

Is Hypospadias Associated with Prenatal Exposure to Endocrine Disruptors? A French Collaborative Controlled Study of a Cohort of 300 Consecutive Children Without Genetic Defect.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have focused on the association between endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and hypospadias. Phenotype variability, the absence of representative comparison groups and concomitant genetic testing prevent any definitive conclusions. OBJECTIVE: To identify the role of occupational and environmental exposures to EDCs in nongenetic isolated hypospadias. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 408 consecutive children with isolated hypospadias and 302 normal boys were prospectively included (2009-2014) in a multi-institutional study in the south of France, the area of the country with the highest prevalence of hypospadias surgery. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: In patients without AR, SRD5A2, and MAMLD1 mutations, parental occupational and professional exposures to EDCs were evaluated based on European questionnaire QLK4-1999-01422 and a validated job-exposure matrix for EDCs. Environmental exposure was estimated using the zip code, the type of surrounding hazards, and distance from these hazards. Multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: Fetal exposure to EDCs around the window of genital differentiation was more frequent in the case of hypospadias (40.00% vs 17.55%, odds ratio 3.13, 95% confidence interval 2.11-4.65). The substances were paints/solvents/adhesives (16.0%), detergents (11.0%), pesticides (9.0%), cosmetics (5.6%), and industrial chemicals (4.0%). Jobs with exposure were more frequent in mothers of hypospadiac boys (19.73% vs 10.26%, p=0.0019), especially cleaners, hairdressers, beauticians, and laboratory workers. Paternal job exposure was more frequent in the cases of hypospadias (40.13% vs 27.48%, p=0.02). Industrial areas, incinerators, and waste areas were more frequent within a 3-km radius for mothers of hypospadiac boys (13.29% vs. 6.64%, p<0.00005). Association of occupational and environmental exposures increases this risk. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter prospective controlled study with a homogeneous cohort of hypospadiac boys without genetic defects strongly suggests that EDCs are a risk factor for hypospadias through occupational and environmental exposure during fetal life. The association of various types of exposures may increase this risk. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our multi-institutional study showed that parental professional, occupational, and environmental exposures to chemical products increase the risk of hypospadias in children.