Safety of radiofrequency ablation in patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer: A phase II study.

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proposed as a new treatment option for locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). In preparation of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the aim of this phase II study was to assess the safety of RFA for patients with LAPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with LAPC confirmed during surgical exploration between November 2012 and April 2014 were eligible for inclusion. RFA probes were placed under ultrasound guidance with a safety margin of at least 10 mm from the duodenum and 15 mm from the portomesenteric vessels. During RFA, the duodenum was continuously perfused with cold saline to reduce risk for thermal damage. Primary outcome was defined as the amount of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III). RFA-related complications were predefined as: pancreatic fistula, pancreatitis, thermal damage to the portomesenteric vessels and duodenal perforation. RESULTS: In total, 17 patients underwent RFA. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) requiring endoscopic feeding tube placement occurred in 4 patients (24%) as only major complication. Five patients (29%) had a major complication other than DGE. One (6%) RFA-related major complications occurred. One patient (6%) died due to complications from a biliary leak following hepaticojejunostomy. After evaluation of the first 5 patients, gastrojejunostomy was no longer performed routinely. Since then severe DGE seemed to occur less (3/5 vs. 3/12 grade C DGE). CONCLUSION: RFA is a major, but safe procedure for patients with LAPC if performed with strict predefined safety criteria. A RCT is currently investigating the true effectiveness of RFA in patients with LAPC.

Diagnostic accuracy of CT in assessing extra-regional lymphadenopathy in pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Computed tomography (CT) is the most widely used method to assess resectability of pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer. One of the contra-indications for curative resection is the presence of extra-regional lymph node metastases. This meta-analysis investigates the accuracy of CT in assessing extra-regional lymph node metastases in pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting on CT assessment of extra-regional lymph nodes in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included. Data on baseline characteristics, CT-investigations and histopathological outcomes were extracted. Diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity were calculated for individual studies and pooled data. RESULTS: After screening, 4 cohort studies reporting on CT-findings and histopathological outcome in 157 patients with pancreatic or peri-ampullary cancer were included. Overall, diagnostic accuracy, specificity and NPV varied from 63 to 81, 80-100% and 67-90% respectively. However, PPV and sensitivity ranged from 0 to 100% and 0-38%. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 25%, 86%, 28% and 84% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CT has a low diagnostic accuracy in assessing extra-regional lymph node metastases in pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer. Therefore, suspicion of extra-regional lymph node metastases on CT alone should not be considered a contra-indication for exploration.

Radiofrequency ablation for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Median survival in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer lies in the range of 9-15 months. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may prolong survival, but data on its safety and efficacy are scarce. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library with the syntax '(radiofrequency OR RFA) AND (pancreas OR pancreatic)' for studies published until 1 January 2012. In addition, a search of the proceedings of conferences on pancreatic disease that took place during 2009-2011 was performed. Studies with fewer than five patients were excluded as they were considered to be case reports. The primary endpoint was survival. Secondary endpoints included morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Five studies involving a total of 158 patients with pancreatic cancer treated with RFA fulfilled the eligibility criteria. These studies reported median survival after RFA of 3-33 months, morbidity related to RFA of 4-37%, mortality of 0-19% and overall morbidity of 10-43%. Pooling of data was not appropriate as the study populations and reported outcomes were heterogeneous. Crucial safety aspects included ensuring a maximum RFA tip temperature of < 90 °C and ensuring minimum distances between the RFA probe and surrounding structures. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation seems to be feasible and safe when it is used with the correct temperature and at an appropriate distance from vital structures. It appears to have a positive impact on survival. Multicentre randomized trials are necessary to determine the true effect size of RFA and to minimize the impacts of selection and publication biases.

Radiofrequency ablation of the pancreas with and without intraluminal duodenal cooling in a porcine model.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the short-term outcome of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of pancreatic tissue near the duodenum and portomesenteric vessels (PMV) in a porcine model with and without intraluminal duodenal cooling. BACKGROUND: RFA has been proposed as a new treatment strategy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. RFA may cause thermal damage to the duodenum and vascular structures, but these risks and potential protective measures have never been systematically addressed. Intraluminal duodenal cooling during RFA could prevent thermal damage to the duodenum. METHODS: RFA was performed in 11 pigs during laparotomy with a bipolar probe of 30 mm active length at a power of 30 W until a total energy of 15 kJ was administered. The RFA probe was inserted in the pancreas at 5 or 15 mm from the duodenum, PMV, and in the pancreatic tail. RFA near the duodenum was performed with and without intraluminal duodenal cooling using 100 mL/min saline of 5°C. Histopathologic assessment was performed. RESULTS: The maximum RFA-induced temperature was 92°C. RFA with one single probe induced adequate ablation lesions with a diameter of 20 mm over a length of 30 mm. Without duodenal cooling, RFA induced duodenal thermal damage, whereas with duodenal cooling, no damage was observed. RFA at 15 mm from the PMV resulted in minimal superficial focal vascular damage, without thrombosis or hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: RFA provides adequate ablation zones in the pancreas of the porcine. Thermal damage to the duodenum can be prevented by intraluminal duodenal cooling without loss of ablation effectivity.