RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) may differentiate responding and non-responding tumours early in the treatment of locally advanced gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. Early PET non-responders (P-NR) after induction CTX might benefit from changing to chemoradiation (CRT). METHODS: Patients underwent baseline 18F-FDG PET followed by 1 cycle of CTX. PET was repeated at day 14-21 and responders (P-R), defined as ≥35% decrease in SUVmean from baseline, continued with CTX. P-NR switched to CRT (CROSS). Patients underwent surgery 4-6 weeks post-CTX/CRT. The primary objective was an improvement in R0 resection rates in P-NR above a proportion of 70%. RESULTS: In total, 160 patients with resectable gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas were prospectively investigated by PET scanning. Eighty-five patients (53%) were excluded. Seventy-five eligible patients were enrolled in the study. Based on PET criteria, 50 (67.6%)/24 (32.4%) were P-R and P-NR, respectively. Resection was performed on 46 responders, including one patient who withdrew the ICF, and 22 non-responders (per-protocol population). R0 resection rates were 95.6% (43/45) for P-R and 86.4% (19/22) for P-NR. No treatment related deaths occurred. With a median follow-up time of 24.5 months, estimated 18 months DFS was 75.4%/64.2% for P-R/P-NR, respectively. The estimated 18 months OS was 95.5% for P-R and 68.2% for P-NR. CONCLUSION: The primary endpoint of the study to increase the R0 resection rate in metabolic NR was not met. PET response after induction CTX is prognostic for outcome with a prolonged OS and DFS in PET responders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00002014-000860-16.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Unión Esofagogástrica/diagnóstico por imagen , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , RadiofármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Malignant tumors of the esophagus are the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Postoperative leakage of the esophago-gastrostomy leads to mediastinal sepsis, which is still associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. The aim of this study was to describe the endoscopic view of the different severity grades of an anastomotic leakage. METHODS: Patients Between June 2016 and September 2018, 144 patients were operated upon in the Department of Surgery, University of Munich, Germany. Among these patients, 34 (23.6%) presented with a leakage of the anastomosis. Endoscopy In this retrospective analysis, the focus is to describe different patterns of leakage of the anastomosis. RESULTS: We studied 34 patients in whom post-esophagectomy leakage of the anastomosis was detected and treated with an endoluminal vacuum sponge system. The leakage healed in 26 of 29 patients (success rate 89.7%). With the increasing severity of leakage, the treatment time and the in-hospital mortality correspondingly increased. Furthermore, the incidence of the development of a fistula to the tracheobronchial system increased with higher grades of leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Exact descriptions of leakage are necessary to compare the cases and to prove post-treatment improvement. This is, to our knowledge, the first publication to present a leakage grading score in patients after esophagectomy including reconstruction with a gastric tube. This new grading system needs to be tested in further analyses, with a special focus on prospective analysis.
Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica , Esófago , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Esófago/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has been increasing for decades without significant improvements in treatment. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is best established risk factor for EAC, but current surveillance with random biopsies cannot predict progression to cancer in most BE patients due to the low sensitivity and specificity of high-definition white light endoscopy. METHODS: Here, we evaluated the membrane-bound highly specific Hsp70-specific contrast agent Tumor-Penetrating Peptide (Hsp70-TPP) in guided fluorescence molecular endoscopy biopsy. RESULTS: Hsp70 was significantly overexpressed as determined by IHC in dysplasia and EAC compared with non-dysplastic BE in patient samples (n = 12) and in high-grade dysplastic lesions in a transgenic (L2-IL1b) mouse model of BE. In time-lapse microscopy, Hsp70-TPP was rapidly taken up and internalized by human BE dysplastic patient-derived organoids. Flexible fluorescence endoscopy of the BE mouse model allowed a specific detection of Hsp70-TPP-Cy5.5 that corresponded closely with the degree of dysplasia but not BE. Ex vivo application of Hsp70-TPP-Cy5.5 to freshly resected whole human EAC specimens revealed a high (> 4) tumor-to-background ratio and a specific detection of previously undetected tumor infiltrations. CONCLUSION: In summary, these findings suggest that Hsp70-targeted imaging using fluorescently labeled TPP peptide may improve tumor surveillance in BE patients.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esófago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Animales , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico por imagen , Esófago de Barrett/epidemiología , Biopsia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Humanos , RatonesRESUMEN
The response to neoadjuvant therapy can vary widely between individual patients. Histopathological tumor regression grading (TRG) is a strong factor for treatment response and survival prognosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) patients following neoadjuvant treatment and surgery. However, TRG systems are usually based on the estimation of residual tumor but do not consider stromal or metabolic changes after treatment. Spatial metabolomics analysis is a powerful tool for molecular tissue phenotyping but has not been used so far in the context of neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer. We used imaging mass spectrometry to assess the potential of spatial metabolomics on tumor and stroma tissue for evaluating therapy response of neoadjuvant-treated EAC patients. With an accuracy of 89.7%, the binary classifier trained on spatial tumor metabolite data proved to be superior for stratifying patients when compared with histopathological response assessment, which had an accuracy of 70.5%. Sensitivities and specificities for the poor and favorable survival patient groups ranged from 84.9% to 93.3% using the metabolic classifier and from 62.2% to 78.1% using TRG. The tumor classifier was the only significant prognostic factor (HR 3.38, 95% CI 1.40-8.12, p = 0.007) when adjusted for clinicopathological parameters such as TRG (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.67-1.53, p = 0.968) or stromal classifier (HR 1.86, 95% CI 0.81-4.25, p = 0.143). The classifier even allowed us to further stratify patients within the TRG1-3 categories. The underlying mechanisms of response to treatment have been figured out through network analysis. In summary, metabolic response evaluation outperformed histopathological response evaluation in our study with regard to prognostic stratification. This finding indicates that the metabolic constitution of the tumor may have a greater impact on patient survival than the quantity of residual tumor cells or the stroma. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Metabolismo Energético , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Metaboloma , Metabolómica , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Clasificación del Tumor , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagectomía , Alemania , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción , Suiza , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Revascularization strategies for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) include open (OR) and endovascular (ER) modalities. The primary objective of this study was to analyze the safety and effectiveness of OR and ER and the impact of clinical and morphological variables on early and midterm outcomes in a consecutive series of CMI patients in a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2004 to 2017, all CMI patients treated with OR and ER were retrospectively identified. Patient records, preoperative imaging, as well as peri- and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable analysis was performed to identify clinical or morphological variables affecting reintervention rates within 2 years. RESULTS: In total, 63 patients (33% male; mean age 71, range 60-76 years) were treated by ER (41 patients) or OR (22 patients) for CMI. Mean follow-up was 26 (10-71) months. 30-day mortality was 0.0% after ER and 4.5% after OR (p = 0.069); 30-day morbidity was 9.8% vs. 31.8%, respectively (p = 0.030). Length of stay was significantly longer after OR (14 vs. 4 days; p < 0.001). Freedom from reintervention rate after 2 years was 82% after OR and 73% after ER (p = 0.14). Overall survival did not differ after 2 years (OR 85% vs. ER 86%; p = 0.35). Multivariable analysis revealed that smoking was associated with higher risk of reintervention (hazard ratio, HR: 4.14; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.11-15.53; p = 0.03). Additionally, a nonsignificant trend of lower reintervention rates after OR was detected (HR 0.23 95% CI 0.05-1.08; p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Due to a lower invasiveness, despite the higher reintervention rate, an "endovascular first" strategy is justified and recommended.
Asunto(s)
Arterias Mesentéricas/cirugía , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Anciano , Angioplastia , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Esophageal carcinoma (EC) is one of the most aggressive human malignancies with high rates of resistance to conventional anticancer treatment. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are an important part of the tumor microenvironment and associated with tumor progression. COL11A1, SPARC, and CD90 have been identified as rather specific CAF markers, with COL11A1 expression particularly shown to influence response to chemotherapy. We investigated the impact of CAFs in esophageal cancer with a special focus on response to neoadjuvant treatment (nTX). Two collections of esophageal carcinomas were investigated: 164 cases treated with primary resection and 256 cases receiving nTX before resection. The expression of CAF markers was determined using next-generation tissue microarray (ngTMA®) technology and immunohistochemistry. The presence of COL11A1 and SPARC in fibroblasts within both primary resected cases and nTX-treated cases was associated with unfavorable clinicopathological variables such as higher (y)pT category and lymphatic invasion (p<0.001 each). The presence of COL11A1-positive CAFs was associated with worse overall survival in primary resected cases (HR: 2.162, p = 0.004, CI 95% 1.275-3.686). While in tumors showing regression after nTX, COL11A1-positive CAFs were detected less frequently, SPARC-positive CAFs were enriched after nTX, in both responding and non-responding patients (p < 0.001). Our results support the concept of CAFs as an important factor of tumor promotion and maintenance in EC. The population of CAFs increases with tumor progression and decreases, partly depending on the subtype, after regression following nTX. CAFs may serve as potential target for future therapeutic approaches for these highly aggressive tumors.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Fibroblastos Asociados al Cáncer/metabolismo , Colágeno Tipo XI/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Osteonectina/metabolismo , Antígenos Thy-1/metabolismo , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esófago/metabolismo , Esófago/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cellular Dissociation Grade (CDG) composed of tumour budding and cell nest size has been shown to independently predict prognosis in pre-therapeutic biopsies and primary resections of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of CDG in ESCC after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: We evaluated cell nest size and tumour budding activity in 122 post-neoadjuvant ESCC resections, correlated the results with tumour regression groups and patient survival and compared the results with data from primary resected cases as well as pre-therapeutic biopsies. RESULTS: CDG remained stable when results from pre-therapeutic biopsies and post-therapeutic resections from the same patient were compared. CDG was associated with therapy response and a strong predictor of overall, disease-specific (DSS) and disease-free (DFS) survival in univariate analysis and-besides metastasis-remained the only significant survival predictor for DSS and DFS in multivariate analysis. Multivariate DFS hazard ratios reached 3.3 for CDG-G2 and 4.9 for CDG-G3 neoplasms compared with CDG-G1 carcinomas (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: CDG is the only morphology-based grading algorithm published to date, which in concert with regression grading, is able to contribute relevant prognostic information in the post-neoadjuvant setting of ESCC.
Asunto(s)
Tamaño de la Célula , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Pronóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Clasificación del Tumor , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Modelos de Riesgos ProporcionalesRESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197610.].
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multimodal treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCRT + S) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced or node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (E-SCC). Those who are unsuitable or who decline surgery can be treated with definitive chemoradiation (dCRT). This study compares the oncologic outcome of nCRT + S and dCRT in E-SCC patients. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, 95 patients with E-SCC were scheduled for dCRT or nCRT+ S with IMRT at our department. Patients undergoing dCRT received at least 50 Gy and those undergoing nCRT + S received at least 41.4 Gy. All patients received simultaneous chemotherapy with either carboplatin and paclitaxel or cisplatin and 5-fluoruracil. We retrospectively compared baseline characteristics and oncologic outcome including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and site of failure between both treatment groups. RESULTS: Patients undergoing dCRT were less likely to have clinically suspected lymph node metastases (85% vs. 100%, p = 0.019) than patients undergoing nCRT + S and had more proximally located tumors (median distance from dental arch to cranial tumor border 20 cm vs. 26 cm, p < 0.001). After a median follow up of 25.6 months for surviving patients, no significant differences for OS and PFS were noticed comparing nCRT + S and dCRT. However, the rate of local tumor recurrence was significantly higher in patients treated with dCRT than in those treated with nCRT + S (38% vs. 10%, p = 0.002). Within a multivariate Cox regression model, age, tumor location, and tumor grading were the only independent parameters affecting OS and PFS. In addition to that, proximal tumor location was the only parameter independently associated with an increased risk for local treatment failure. CONCLUSION: In E-SCC patients treated with either dCRT or nCRT + S, a higher rate of local tumor recurrence was seen in patients treated with dCRT than in patients treated with nCRT + S. There was at least a trend towards an improved OS and PFS in patients undergoing nCRT + S. However, this should be interpreted with caution, because proximal tumor location was the only parameter independently affecting the risk of local tumor recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimioradioterapia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Paclitaxel is a powerful chemotherapeutic drug, used for the treatment of many cancer types, including esophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC). Autophagy is a lysosome-dependent degradation process maintaining cellular homeostasis. Defective autophagy has been implicated in cancer biology and therapy resistance. We aimed to assess the impact of autophagy on chemotherapy response in EAC, with a special focus on paclitaxel. Responsiveness of EAC cell lines, OE19, FLO-1, OE33 and SK-GT-4, to paclitaxel was assessed using Alamar Blue assays. Autophagic flux upon paclitaxel treatment in vitro was assessed by immunoblotting of LC3B-II and quantitative assessment of WIP1 mRNA. Immunohistochemistry for the autophagy markers LC3B and p62 was applied on tumor tissue from 149 EAC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including pre- and post-therapeutic samples (62 matched pairs). Tumor response was assessed by histology. For comparison, previously published data on 114 primary resected EAC cases were used. EAC cell lines displayed differing responsiveness to paclitaxel treatment; however this was not associated with differential autophagy regulation. High p62 cytoplasmic expression on its own (p ≤ 0.001), or in combination with low LC3B (p = 0.034), was associated with nonresponse to chemotherapy, regardless of whether or not the regiments contained paclitaxel, but there was no independent prognostic value of LC3B or p62 expression patterns for EAC after neoadjuvant treatment. p62 and related pathways, most likely other than autophagy, play a role in chemotherapeutic response in EAC in a clinical setting. Therefore p62 could be a novel therapeutic target to overcome chemoresistance in EAC.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas Asociadas a Microtúbulos/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ARN/genética , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Autofagia/genética , Biopsia , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Factores de TranscripciónRESUMEN
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that for one of the authors, Stephanie E. Combs, the middle name was accidentally omitted. They also reported that for two of the authors, Daniel Habermehl and Stephanie E. Combs, two affiliations were accidentally omitted. In this Correction the incorrect and correct author name are shown and the two omitted affiliations are listed.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play an important role in cancer biology. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery is a standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, a subset of patients do not respond. We evaluated whether miRNA profiles can predict resistance to radiochemotherapy. METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pretherapeutic biopsies of patients treated by radiochemotherapy followed by esophagectomy were analyzed. The response was determined by histopathological tumor regression grading. miRNA profiling was performed by microarray analysis (Agilent platform) in 16 non-responders and 15 responders. Differentially expressed miRNAs were confirmed by real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) in an expanded cohort of 53 cases. RESULTS: The miRNA profiles within and between non-responders and responders were highly similar (r = 0.96, 0.94 and 0.95). However, 12 miRNAs were differentially expressed (> twofold; p ≤ 0.025): non-responders showed upregulation of hsa-miR-1323, hsa-miR-3678-3p, hsv2-miR-H7-3p, hsa-miR-194*, hsa-miR-3152, kshv-miR-K12-4-3p, hsa-miR-665 and hsa-miR-3659 and downregulation of hsa-miR-126*, hsa-miR-484, hsa-miR-330-3p and hsa-miR-3653. qRT-PCR analysis confirmed the microarray findings for hsa-miR-194* and hsa-miR-665 (p < 0.001 each) with AUC values of 0.811 (95% CI 0.694-0.927) and 0.817 (95% CI 0.704-0.930), respectively, in ROC analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that miRNAs are involved in the therapeutic response in ESCC and suggest that miRNA profiles could facilitate pretherapeutic patient selection.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , MicroARNs/genética , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , MicroARNs/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Curva ROC , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTx) improves survival outcomes of patients with localised esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA). This analysis evaluates the predictive value of histopathological response after neoCTx. METHODS: A total of 461 patients with locally advanced EGA (≥T2 and/or N+) who received neoCTx followed by surgery were analysed: 314 (68.1%) with intestinal, 94 (20.4%) with diffuse and 53 (11.5%) with mixed histological type according to Lauren classification. Histopathological response evaluation was available for 363 patients and performed locally. This analysis evaluates the predictive value of histopathological subtype on histopathological response after neoCTx. Response was correlated with survival. RESULTS: Median patients' age was 63 years, 79.8% were male. Tumours were localised in the stomach in 32.5% and EG junction in 67.5% of the patients. With a median follow-up of 49.4 months, median disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 38.0 and 66.4 months, respectively. Pathological complete response (TRG1a) was 8.8% and combined complete and subtotal regression (TRG1a/b) was 27.3% for all patients. Around 9.2% of patients with intestinal type had a TRG1a compared with 6.2% with diffuse and 10.8% with mixed type. TRG1a/b rate was higher in intestinal (31.0%) than in diffuse (15.4%) and in mixed type (21.6%). For patients with intestinal type, 3-year DFS was 78.4% with TRG1a and 54.3% with other regression grades (p = 0.031). All patients with diffuse and mixed type and TRG1a were disease free after 3 years compared with 31.1% (p = 0.056) and 47.7% (p = 0.044) with other regression grades. CONCLUSION: Histopathological subtype is predictive for histopathological response and outcome after neoCTx, with the highest response rates in intestinal differentiated EGA.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCC). Today radiation oncologists can choose between two different therapy regimes including chemoradiation with cisplatin and 5-fluoruracil (CDDP/5FU) and chemoradiation analogue to the CROSS-regime with carboplatin and paclitaxel (Carb/TAX). However, there is a lack of studies comparing these regimes, especially for the subgroup of patients with SCC. In this study, we want to compare nCRT with CDDP/5FU and nCRT with Carb/TAX for patients with locally advanced SCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared 20 patients who were scheduled for nCRT with a total radiation dose of 41.4 Gy (daily dose of 1.8 Gy) and weekly chemotherapy with carboplatin (Area under the curve 2) and Paclitaxel (50 mg per square meter of body-surface area) according to the CROSS-regime to 31 patients who were scheduled for nCRT with a total radiation dose of 45 Gy (daily dose of 1.8 Gy) and simultaneous chemotherapy with cisplatin (20 mg/m2/d) and 5-fluoruracil (500 mg/m2/d) on day 1-5 and day 29-33. For the per-protocol (PP) analysis, per protocol treatment was defined as either complete radiation with 41.4 Gy, at least three complete cycles of Carb/TAX and subsequent surgery or complete radiation with 45 Gy, at least one complete cycle of CDDP/5FU and subsequent surgery. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (31 patients treated with CDDP/5FU and 20 patients treated with Carb/TAX) were evaluated for the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 44 patients (26 patients treated with CDDP/5FU and 18 patients treated with Carb/TAX) were evaluated for the PP analysis. No significant differences were seen for baseline and tumor characteristics like age, sex, TNM-stage, grading and tumor extension between patients treated with Carb/TAX and patients treated with CDDP/5FU. The most common tumor regression grade after nCRT was grade I as classified by Becker et al., which was observed in 84 and 79% of patients. No significant differences in tumor regression grades were seen between both regimes. Postoperative insufficiency of the anastomosis was seen in 6 patients (33%) who were treated with Carb/TAX and 4 patients (15%) who were treated with CDDP/5FU (p = 0.273). Patients treated with CDDP/5FU developed significantly more cumulative hematologic III° (CTCAE) toxicities (58% vs 20%; p = 0.010) than patients treated with Carb/TAX. In contrast to that, there was no significant difference for overall survival (OS) and freedom from relapse (FFR) between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, no significant difference was seen for OS and FFR between nCRT with CDDP/5FU and nCRT with Carb/TAX. However, the application of CDDP/5FU was associated with significantly more hematologic III°- toxicities compared to Carb/TAX. Future prospective trials should investigate if these results are reproducible in randomized patient cohorts.
Asunto(s)
Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) achieves high conformity to the planned target volume (PTV) and good sparing of organs at risk (OAR). This study compares dosimetric parameters and toxicity in esophageal cancer (EC) patients treated with VMAT and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2007 and 2014, 17 SC patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) with VMAT. Dose-volume histograms and toxicity were compared between these patients and 20 treated with 3D-CRT. All patients were irradiated with a total dose of 45 Gy. All VMAT patients received simultaneous chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5fluorouracil (5-FU) in treatment weeks 1 and 5. Of 20 patients treated with 3D-CRT, 13 (65 %) also received CRT with cisplatin and 5FU, whereas 6 patients (30 %) received CRT with weekly oxaliplatin and cetuximab, and a continuous infusion of 5FU (OE-7). RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the treatment groups. For the lungs, VMAT was associated with a higher V5 (median 90.1 % vs. 79.7 %; p = 0.013) and V10 (68.2 % vs. 56.6 %; p = 0.014), but with a lower V30 (median 6.6 % vs. 11.0 %; p = 0.030). Regarding heart parameters, VMAT was associated with a higher V5 (median 100.0 % vs. 91.0 %; p = 0.043), V10 (92.0 % vs. 79.2 %; p = 0.047), and Dmax (47.5 Gy vs. 46.3 Gy; p = 0.003), but with a lower median dose (18.7 Gy vs. 30.0 Gy; p = 0.026) and V30 (17.7 % vs. 50.4 %; p = 0.015). Complete resection was achieved in 16 VMAT and 19 3D-CRT patients. Due to systemic progression, 2 patients did not undergo surgery. The most frequent postoperative complication was anastomosis insufficiency, occurring in 1 VMAT (6.7 %) and 5 3D-CRT patients (27.8 %; p = 0.180). Postoperative pneumonia was seen in 2 patients of each group (p = 1.000). There was no significant difference in 3year overall (65 % VMAT vs. 45 % 3D-CRT; p = 0.493) or 3year progression-free survival (53 % VMAT vs. 35 % 3D-CRT; p = 0.453). CONCLUSION: Although dosimetric differences in lung and heart exposure were observed, no clinically relevant impact was detected in either patient group. In a real-life patient cohort, VMAT enables reduction of lung and heart V30 compared to 3D-CRT, which may contribute to reduced toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia Conformacional/efectos adversos , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Radiometría , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The management of R1-resected adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is unclear. We aimed to identify risk factors and prevalence of R1 resections, their recurrence and prognosis, and efficacy of postoperative therapy. METHODS: A single center cohort of 766 consecutive patients undergoing curative intent resection for AEG was analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: R1-resection rate was 13%. Poorer tumor differentiation, higher T-, N-, and UICC/AJCC-stages were associated with R1-resections. Compared to R0-resected patients, R1-resected patients had a higher incidence of tumor recurrence (77% vs. 32%; P < 0.001) and worse overall survival (5-year overall survival 43% vs. 10%; P < 0.001). The pattern of recurrence did not differ between R0- and R1-resections with distant metastases in 90% and 87% of patients with tumor recurrence. We found a trend towards better overall survival for R1-resected patients receiving postoperative therapy compared to R1-resected patients without postoperative therapy (median 17.4 vs. 14.6 months, P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: The association of R1-resections with poor tumor characteristics allows for identification of patients at risk for R1-resection. As in R0-resections, tumor recurrence in R1-resections is mainly systemic, not local. The potential benefit of additive local postoperative therapies in R1-resected patients must be balanced against overall prognosis and therapy-specific morbidity and mortality. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:428-433. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Unión Esofagogástrica , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologíaRESUMEN
Tumor budding has prognostic significance in many carcinomas and is defined as the presence of detached isolated single cells or small cell clusters up to 5 cells at the invasion front (peritumoral budding [PTB]) or within the tumor (intratumoral budding [ITB]). For esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs), there are currently only few data about the impact of this morphological feature. We investigated tumor budding in a large collective of 200 primarily resected EACs. Pancytokeratin staining was demonstrated to be superior to hematoxylin and eosin staining for the detection of buds with substantial to excellent interobserver agreement and used for subsequent analysis. PTB and ITB were scored across 10 high-power fields (HPFs). The median count of tumor buds was 130/10 HPFs for PTB (range, 2-593) and 80/10 HPFs for ITB (range, 1-656). PTB and ITB correlated significantly with each other (r = 0.9; P < .001). High PTB and ITB rates were seen in more advanced tumor categories (P < .001 each); tumors with lymph node metastases (P < .001/P = .002); and lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion and higher tumor grading (P < .001 each). Survival analysis showed an association with worse survival for high-grade ITB (P = .029) but not PTB (P = .385). However, in multivariate analysis, lymph node and resection status, but not ITB, were independent prognostic parameters. In conclusion, PTB and ITB can be observed in EAC to various degrees. High-grade budding is associated with aggressive tumor phenotype. Assessment of tumor budding, especially ITB, may provide additional prognostic information about tumor behavior and may be useful in specific cases for risk stratification of EAC patients.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/química , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Biopsia , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Colorantes , Eosina Amarillenta-(YS) , Neoplasias Esofágicas/química , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Alemania , Hematoxilina , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Queratinas/análisis , Modelos Logísticos , Metástasis Linfática , Análisis Multivariante , Clasificación del Tumor , Invasividad Neoplásica , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Oportunidad Relativa , Fenotipo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Coloración y Etiquetado/métodos , SuizaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Because neural invasion (NI) is still inconsistently reported and not well characterized within gastrointestinal malignancies (GIMs), our aim was to determine the exact prevalence and severity of NI and to elucidate the true impact of NI on patient's prognosis. BACKGROUND: The union internationale contre le cancer (UICC) recently added NI as a novel parameter in the current TNM classification. However, there are only a few existing studies with specific focus on NI, so that the distinct role of NI in GIMs is still uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: NI was characterized in approximately 16,000 hematoxylin and eosin tissue sections from 2050 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG)-I-III, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus, gastric cancer (GC), colon cancer (CC), rectal cancer (RC), cholangiocellular cancer (CCC), hepatocellular cancer (HCC), and pancreatic cancer (PC). NI prevalence and severity was determined and related to patient's prognosis and survival. RESULTS: NI prevalence largely varied between HCC/6%, CC/28%, RC/34%, AEG-I/36% and AEG-II/36%, SCC/37%, GC/38%, CCC/58%, and AEG-III/65% to PC/100%. NI severity score was uppermost in PC (24.9±1.9) and lowest in AEG-I (0.8±0.3). Multivariable analyses including age, sex, TNM stage, and grading revealed that the prevalence of NI was significantly associated with diminished survival in AEG-II/III, GC, and RC. However, increasing NI severity impaired survival in AEG-II/III and PC only. CONCLUSIONS: NI prevalence and NI severity strongly vary within GIMs. Determination of NI severity in GIMs is a more precise tool than solely recording the presence of NI and revealed dismal prognostic impact on patients with AEG-II/III and PC. Evidently, NI is not a concomitant side feature in GIMs and, therefore, deserves special attention for improved patient stratification and individualized therapy after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Tejido Nervioso/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Prevalencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Neoadjuvant platin-based therapy is accepted as a standard therapy for advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Patients who respond have a better survival prognosis, but still a significant number of responder patients die from tumor recurrence. Molecular markers for prognosis in neoadjuvantly treated EAC patients have not been identified yet. We investigated the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in prognosis and chemotherapy resistance in these patients. Two EAC patient cohorts, either treated by neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery (n=86) or by surgical resection (n=46) were analyzed for EGFR protein expression and gene copy number. Data were correlated with clinical and histopathological response, disease-free and overall survival. In case of EGFR overexpression, the prognosis for neoadjuvant chemotherapy responders was poor as in non-responders. Responders had a significantly better disease-free survival than non-responders only if EGFR expression level (p=0.0152) or copy number (p=0.0050) was low. Comparing neoadjuvantly treated patients and primary resection patients, tumors of non-responder patients more frequently exhibited EGFR overexpression, providing evidence that EGFR is a factor for indicating chemotherapy resistance. EGFR overexpression and gene copy number are independent adverse prognostic factors for neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated EAC patients, particularly for responders. Furthermore, EGFR overexpression is involved in resistance to cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/enzimología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Receptores ErbB/biosíntesis , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/enzimología , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Receptores ErbB/genética , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Dosificación de Gen , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Pronóstico , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Histopathologic determination of tumor regression provides important prognostic information for locally advanced gastroesophageal carcinomas after neoadjuvant treatment. Regression grading systems mostly refer to the amount of therapy-induced fibrosis in relation to residual tumor or the estimated percentage of residual tumor in relation to the former tumor site. Although these methods are generally accepted, currently there is no common standard for reporting tumor regression in gastroesophageal cancers. We compared the application of these 2 major principles for assessment of tumor regression: hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides from 89 resection specimens of esophageal adenocarcinomas following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independently reviewed by 3 pathologists from different institutions. Tumor regression was determined by the 5-tiered Mandard system (fibrosis/tumor relation) and the 4-tiered Becker system (residual tumor in %). Interobserver agreement for the Becker system showed better weighted κ values compared with the Mandard system (0.78 vs. 0.62). Evaluation of the whole embedded tumor site showed improved results (Becker: 0.83; Mandard: 0.73) as compared with only 1 representative slide (Becker: 0.68; Mandard: 0.71). Modification into simplified 3-tiered systems showed comparable interobserver agreement but better prognostic stratification for both systems (log rank Becker: P=0.015; Mandard P=0.03), with independent prognostic impact for overall survival (modified Becker: P=0.011, hazard ratio=3.07; modified Mandard: P=0.023, hazard ratio=2.72). In conclusion, both systems provide substantial to excellent interobserver agreement for estimation of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinomas. A simple 3-tiered system with the estimation of residual tumor in % (complete regression/1% to 50% residual tumor/>50% residual tumor) maintains the highest reproducibility and prognostic value.