Comparison of Monte Carlo tally techniques for dosimetry in a transmission-type x-ray tube.

This study discussed comparing result accuracy and time cost under different tally methods using MCNP6 for a novel transmission x-ray tube which was designed for the Auger electron yield with specific material (e.g. iodine). The assessment included photon spectrum, percent depth dose, mass-energy absorption coefficient corresponding to air and water, and figure of merit comparison. The mean energy of in-air phantom was from 41.8 keV (0 mm) to 40.9 keV (100 mm), and the mean energy of in-water phantom was from 41.41 keV (0 mm) to 45.2 keV (100 mm). The specific dose conversion factors based mass-energy absorption coefficient corresponding to different materials was established and the difference was less than 2% for the dose conversion of FMESH comparing to measurement data. FMESH had better figure of merit (FOM) than the F6 tally for the dose parameter assessment, which mean the dose calculation that focused on the superficial region could be assessed with more calculation efficiency by FMESH tally for this novel transmission x-ray tube. The results of this study could help develop treatment planning system (TPS) to quickly obtain the calculated data for phase space data establishment and heterogeneous correction under different physical condition settings.

Technical note: Evaluation of the dose enhancement effect for a novel transmission-type x-ray tube using the Monte Carlo method.

PURPOSE: Transmission-target x-ray tubes generate more x-rays than reflection thick-target x-ray tubes. A transmission x-ray tube combined with radiosensitizers has a better radiation enhancement effect. This study investigated the feasibility of using a transmission x-ray tube with radiosensitizers in clinical radiotherapy and its effect on radiation dose enhancement. METHODS: This study used MCNP6.2 to simulate the model of a transmission x-ray tube and Co-60 beam.   The radiation enhancement effect of radiosensitizers was examined with iodine-127 (I-127), radioiodinated iododeoxyuridine (IUdR), and gold nanoparticles (GNPs). RESULTS: The study results showed that the dose enhancement factor (DEF) of the transmission x-ray tube with GNPs was 10.27, which was higher than that of I-127 (6.46) and IUdR (3.08). The DEF of the Co-60 beam with GNPs, I-127, and IUdR was 1.23, 1.19, and 1.2, respectively. The Auger electron flux of the transmission x-ray tube with GNPs was 1.19E+05 particles/cm2 . CONCLUSIONS: This study found that a transmission x-ray tube with appropriate radiosensitizers could produce a high rate of Auger electrons to fulfill the radiation enhancement effect, and this procedure has the potential to become a radiotherapy modality.

The evaluation of an on-site monitoring program for activity meter quality assurance with exemption-level sources.

This paper discusses the feasibility of a monitoring program for the quality assurance status of activity meters. We sent a questionnaire to clinical nuclear medicine departments of medical institutions, requesting information on their activity meters and quality assurance practices. On-site visits were conducted with exemption-level standard sources (Co-57, Cs-137 and Ba-133) for dose calibrators in nuclear medicine departments including physical inspection, accuracy and reproducibility. A method offering a quick check on the detection efficiency of the space dimension inside the activity meters was also introduced. For dose calibrator quality assurance, the daily checks had the highest implementation. However, annual checks and upon acceptance/after a repair check were reduced to 50% and 44%, respectively. The accuracy results of dose calibrators showed that all models exceeded the ±10% criteria with Co-57 and Cs-137 sources. The reproducibility results showed that some models exceeded the ±5% criteria with Co-57 and Cs-137 sources. The appropriate application of exemption-level standard sources considering the uncertainty that affects the measurement is discussed.

Results of the performance test for quality assessment of personal radiation dosimetry services including the influence of the dosimeter readout frequency.

This study was to determine the significance of factors considered for the measurement accuracy of personal dosimeter in dosimetry services such as dosimetry service, irradiation category, years of use and readout frequency. The investigation included management information questionnaire, on-site visit and blind test. The blind test with random selected personal badge was used in inter-comparison of eight dosimetry services, and the test results followed ANSI/HPS N13.11 criteria. This study also analyzed the measurement deviations if they felt in the criteria of ICRP 75 or not. One-way ANOVA tests were used to analyze the significant difference of the measurement deviations in different dosimetry services, irradiation categories, and years of use. Simple linear-regression test was performed for the significance of the prediction model between measurement deviations and readout frequencies. All visited dosimetry services followed the proper statue of basic management and passed the performance check of the tolerance level. The average deviations corresponding to category I, category II deep dose, and category II shallow dose were 6.08%, 9.49%, and 10.41% respectively. There had significant differences of measurement deviation in different dosimetry services (p < 0.0001) and irradiation categories (p = 0.016) but no significant difference in years of use (p = 0.498). There was no significance in the linear-regression model between measurement deviation and badge readout frequencies. Based on the regular calibration of the personal dosimeter, the deviation of the measured value is mainly affected by different dosimetry services and irradiation categories; and there shows no significant influence by years of use and readout frequency.

The Analysis with Quantitative Indexes for Public's Awareness of Radiation Knowledge in Taiwan.

(1) Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiation awareness level of the public in Taiwan. (2) Methods: This study designed an online survey form to investigate the radiation awareness level with six topics: basic knowledge of radiation, environmental radiation, medical radiation, radiation protection, and university/corporate social responsibility. The score of respondents were converted into knowledge and responsibility indexes for the quantitative evaluation. Logistic regression was used to assess the correlation between the knowledge index and individual factors. Paired t-test was used to assess the significant difference in knowledge index between pre-training and post-training. (3) Results: The knowledge index of each job category reflected the proportion of radiation awareness of the job. The logistic regression result indicated that radiation-related people could get higher knowledge index. The paired t-test indicated that the knowledge index before and after class had significant differences in all question topics. (4) Conclusions: The public's awareness of medical radiation was the topic that needed to be strengthened the most-the responses with high knowledge index significantly correlated with their experience in radiation education training or radiation-related jobs. It significantly increased the knowledge index of radiation if the public received radiation education training.

Skin Surface Dose for Whole Breast Radiotherapy Using Personalized Breast Holder: Comparison with Various Radiotherapy Techniques and Clinical Experiences.

PURPOSE: Breast immobilization with personalized breast holder (PERSBRA) is a promising approach for normal organ protection during whole breast radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the skin surface dose for breast radiotherapy with PERSBRA using different radiotherapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed PERSBRA with three different mesh sizes (large, fine and solid) and applied them on an anthropomorphic(Rando) phantom. Treatment planning was generated using hybrid, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques to deliver a prescribed dose of 5000 cGy in 25 fractions accordingly. Dose measurement with EBT3 film and TLD were taken on Rando phantom without PERSBRA, large mesh, fine mesh and solid PERSBRA for (a) tumor doses, (b) surface doses for medial field and lateral field irradiation undergoing hybrid, IMRT, VMAT techniques. RESULTS: The tumor dose deviation was less than five percent between the measured doses of the EBT3 film and the TLD among the different techniques. The application of a PERSBRA was associated with a higher dose of the skin surface. A large mesh size of PERSBRA was associated with a lower surface dose. The findings were consistent among hybrid, IMRT, or VMAT techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Breast immobilization with PERSBRA can reduce heart toxicity but leads to a build-up of skin surface doses, which can be improved with a larger mesh design for common radiotherapy techniques.

Accuracy Evaluation of Collapsed Cone Convolution Superposition Algorithms for the Nasopharynx Interface in the Early Stage of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

This study combined the use of radiation dosimeteric measurements and a custom-made anthropomorphic phantom in order to evaluate the accuracy of therapeutic dose calculations at the nasopharyngeal air-tissue interface. The doses at the nasopharyngeal air-tissue interface obtained utilizing the Pinnacle and TomoTherapy TPS, which are based on collapsed cone convolution superposition (CCCS) algorithms, were evaluated and measured under single 10 × 10 cm2, 2 × 2 cm2, two parallel opposed 2 × 2 cm2 and clinical fields for early stage of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by using EBT3, GR-200F, and TLD 100. At the air-tissue interface under a 10 × 10 cm2 field, the TPS dose calculation values were in good agreement with the dosimeter measurement with all differences within 3.5%. When measured the single field 2 × 2 cm2, the differences between the average dose were measured at the distal interface for EBT3, GR-200F, and TLD-100 and the calculation values were -15.8%, -16.4%, and -4.9%, respectively. When using the clinical techniques such as IMRT, VMAT, and tomotherapy, the measurement results at the interface for all three techniques did not imply under dose. Small-field sizes will lead to dose overestimation at the nasopharyngeal air-tissue interface due to electronic disequilibrium when using CCCS algorithms. However, under clinical applications of multiangle irradiation, the dose errors caused by this effect were not significant.

Estimation of the Surface Dose in Breast Irradiation by the Beam Incident Angle and the 1 cm Depth Dose.

To develop a method of estimating surface dose in whole breast irradiation, we used an anthropomorphic phantom with accessories for the simulation of different breast sizes. The surface points, which are measured by TLDs, are set along with two main directions, superior-inferior and medial-lateral. The incident angle between the photon beam and the surface and the doses at 1 cm beneath the surface at every point are assessed by a computerized treatment planning system (cTPS). With the prescription dose of 200 cGy, the average surface doses under tangential irradiation are 97.73 (±14.96) cGy, 99.90 (±10.73) cGy, and 105.26 (±9.21) cGy for large, medium, and small breast volumes, respectively. The surface dose increased in the model of small breast volume without significance (p = 0.39). The linear analysis between surface dose and the incident angle is y = 0.5258x + 69.648, R2 = 0.7131 (x: incident angle and y: surface dose). We develop the percentage of skin surface dose with reference to a depth of 1 cm (PSDR1cm) to normalize the inhomogeneous dose. The relationship between incident angle and PSDR1cm is y = 0.1894x + 36.021, R2 = 0.6536 (x: incident angle and y: PSDR1cm) by linear analysis. In conclusion, the surface dose in whole breast irradiation could be estimated from this linear relationship between PSDR1cm and incident angle in daily clinical practice by cTPS. Further in vivo data should be studied to verify this formula.