Fertility and reproductive concerns related to the new generation of cancer drugs and the clinical implication for young individuals undergoing treatments for solid tumors.

The treatment landscape of solid tumors has changed markedly in the last years. Molecularly targeted treatments and immunotherapies have been implemented and have, in many cancers, lowered the risk of relapse and prolonged survival. Patients with tumors harboring specific targetable molecular alterations or mutations are often of a younger age, and hence future fertility and family building can be important concerns in this group. However, there are great uncertainties regarding the effect of the new drugs on reproductive functions, including fertility, pregnancy and lactation and how young patients with cancers, both women and men should be advised. The goal with this review is to gather the current knowledge regarding oncofertility and the different novel therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, small molecules and monoclonal antibody targeted therapies. The specific circumstances and reproductive concerns in different patient groups where novel treatments have been broadly introduced are also discussed, including those with melanoma, lung, breast, colorectal and gynecological cancers. It is clear, that more awareness is needed regarding potential drug toxicity on reproductive tissues, and it is of essence that individuals are informed based on current expertise and on available fertility preservation methods.

The drug efficacy testing in 3D cultures platform identifies effective drugs for ovarian cancer patients.

Most patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC) relapse and progress despite systemic therapy, pointing to the need for improved and tailored therapy options. Functional precision medicine can help to identify effective therapies for individual patients in a clinically relevant timeframe. Here, we present a scalable functional precision medicine platform: DET3Ct (Drug Efficacy Testing in 3D Cultures), where the response of patient cells to drugs and drug combinations are quantified with live-cell imaging. We demonstrate the delivery of individual drug sensitivity profiles in 20 samples from 16 patients with ovarian cancer in both 2D and 3D culture formats, achieving over 90% success rate in providing results six days after operation. In this cohort all patients received carboplatin. The carboplatin sensitivity scores were significantly different for patients with a progression free interval (PFI) less than or equal to 12 months and those with more than 12 months (p < 0.05). We find that the 3D culture format better retains proliferation and characteristics of the in vivo setting. Using the DET3Ct platform we evaluate 27 tailored combinations with results available 10 days after operation. Notably, carboplatin and A-1331852 (Bcl-xL inhibitor) showed an additive effect in four of eight OC samples tested, while afatinib and A-1331852 led to synergy in five of seven OC models. In conclusion, our 3D DET3Ct platform can rapidly define potential, clinically relevant data on efficacy of existing drugs in OC for precision medicine purposes, as well as provide insights on emerging drugs and drug combinations that warrant testing in clinical trials.

High density of stroma-localized CD11c-positive macrophages is associated with longer overall survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Pre-clinical studies have identified marker- and tumor compartment-defined functionally distinct macrophage subsets. Our study analyzes marker-defined macrophage subsets in different tumor compartments of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). METHODS: A discovery cohort (N = 113) was subjected to immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses. CD68-positivity was confirmed for CD11c-, CD80- and CD163-positive cells. Subset-marker-positive cells were scored in the total tumor and in four tumor compartments. Correlation analyses investigated co-expression of subsets, relationship to CD8+ cells and survival associations. A validation cohort (N = 121) was used to confirm selected findings from the discovery cohort. RESULTS: CD163-positve cells was the most abundant subtype in all compartments. CD11c and CD163 subsets were strongly correlated with each other in stroma and epithelial areas, whereas CD80 and CD163 were correlated in epithelial areas. CD80 and CD11c in perivascular areas showed low correlations. Strong associations were detected between CD8 and CD80 in the tumor epithelium-dominated areas, and between CD8 and CD11c in stroma areas. High stromal CD11c density was associated with a longer median overall survival in the discovery cohort (HR 0.39; CI 95%, 0.23-0.68; p = 0.001) and in the validation cohort (HR 0.46; CI 95%, 0.22-0.93; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the existence of clinically relevant marker- and localization defined macrophage subsets in HGSC, which are independently regulated. Moreover, it suggests stromal CD11c as a novel prognostic marker in HGSC.

Mesothelin Expression in Patients with High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Does Not Predict Clinical Outcome But Correlates with CD11c+ Expression in Tumor.

INTRODUCTION: Mesothelin (MSLN) is overexpressed in several tumors including ovarian cancer and is the target of current trials. There is limited and conflicting data on MSLN prognostic impact in ovarian cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, analyzing MSLN expression by immunohistochemistry and examining the correlation of its expression to overall and progression-free survival. Correlations of expression of MSLN, CD8, and macrophage markers in different tumor compartments were also investigated. RESULTS: Positive MSLN expression was detected in 55.1% of primary tumors and 51.5% of the metastases. MSLN expression was not correlated with survival. We observed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.34, p = 0.01) between MSLN expression in the metastatic site and CD11c expression in total tumor area and perivascular area in the primary tumor. CONCLUSION: Our results show that MSLN expression does not correlate with clinical outcome. The impact of the correlation between MSLN and CD11c+ cells on immunotherapy outcome should be further explored.

Changing clinical presentation of angiosarcomas after breast cancer: from late tumors in edematous arms to earlier tumors on the thoracic wall.

Angiosarcoma is a rare complication of breast cancer treatment. In order to define predictors, clinical presentation, and outcome, we characterized a population-based 50-year cohort of angiosarcomas after breast cancer. Clinical data were collected from all females with previous breast cancer who developed angiosarcomas/lymphangiosarcomas on the thoracic wall/upper extremity between 1958 and 2008 in the Southern Swedish health care region. In total, 31 angiosarcomas developed at a median age of 71 years. The patients formed two distinct groups; 14 females treated for breast cancer with radical mastectomy and radiotherapy 1949-1988 developed angiosarcomas in edematous arms (Stewart-Treves syndrome) after median 11 years, and 17 females treated by segmental resection, anti-hormonal treatment and radiotherapy 1980-2005 developed angiosarcomas in the irradiated field on the thoracic wall after median 7.3 years. The clinical presentations were heterogeneous and included hematoma-like lesions, multiple bluish-reddish nodules, and asymptomatic lumps. The overall 5-year survival was 16%. In this population-based cohort, the early angiosarcomas developed in edematous arms after radical mastectomies, whereas more recent cases occurred after a shorter time period in the irradiated fields following breast conserving surgery. We conclude that the clinical presentation of angiosarcomas has changed, parallel with altered treatment principles for breast cancer.

Indistinguishable genomic profiles and shared prognostic markers in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and leiomyosarcoma: different sides of a single coin?

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) diagnostics and prognostics are challenging, particularly in highly malignant and pleomorphic subtypes such as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS). We applied 32K BAC arrays and gene expression profiling to 18 extremity soft tissue LMS and 31 extremity soft tissue UPS with the aim of identifying molecular subtype signatures and genomic prognostic markers. Both the gains/losses and gene expression signatures revealed striking similarities between UPS and LMS, which were indistinguishable using unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis and significance analysis for microarrays. Gene expression analysis revealed just nine genes, among them tropomyosin beta, which were differentially expressed. Loss of 4q31 (encompassing the SMAD1 locus), loss of 18q22, and tumor necrosis were identified as independent predictors of metastasis in multivariate stepwise Cox regression analysis. Combined analysis applying loss of 4q31 and 18q22 and the presence of necrosis improved the area under receiver operating characteristic curve for metastasis prediction from 0.64 to 0.86. The extensive genetic similarities between extremity soft tissue UPS and LMS suggest a shared lineage of these STS subtypes and the new and independent genetic prognosticators identified hold promise for refined prognostic determination in high-grade, genetically complex STS.

Genetic profiling differentiates second primary tumors from metastases in adult metachronous soft tissue sarcoma.

Purpose. Patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are at increased risk of second primary malignancies, including a second STS, but distinction between metastases and a second primary STS is difficult. Patients and Methods. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was applied to 30 multiple STS of the extremities and the trunk wall from 13 patients. Different histotypes were present with malignant fibrous histiocytomas/undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas being the predominant subtype. Results. aCGH profiling revealed genetic complexity with multiple gains and losses in all tumors. In an unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis, similar genomic profiles and close clustering between the first and subsequent STS were identified in 5 cases, suggesting metastatic disease, whereas the tumors from the remaining 8 patients did not cluster and showed only weak pairwise correlation, suggesting development of second primary STS. Discussion. The similarities and dissimilarities identified in the first and second STS suggest that genetic profiles can be used to distinguish soft tissue metastases from second primary STS. The demonstration of genetically different soft tissue sarcomas in the same patient suggests independent tumor origin and serves as a reminder to consider development of second primary STS, which has prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Standardizing evaluation of sarcoma proliferation- higher Ki-67 expression in the tumor periphery than the center.

Soft tissue sarcomas often present as large and histopathologically heterogenous tumors. Proliferation has repeatedly been identified as a prognostic factor and immunostaining for Ki-67 represents the most commonly used proliferation marker. There is, however, a lack of consensus on how to evaluate Ki-67 staining regarding optimal cut-off levels, selection of tumor areas, and the number of tumor cells to evaluate. We assessed the impact of targeting peripheral versus central tumor areas using tissue microarray-based staining for Ki-67 throughout the tumor diameter in 25 leiomyosarcomas. In 18/25 tumors, Ki-67 expression was higher in the tumor periphery. If 10% staining tumor nuclei was used as cut-off and the maximal Ki-67 staining section in the tumor periphery was considered, 21/25 tumors would have been classified as highly proliferative compared to 14/25 if the tumor center had been analyzed. Similar results were obtained also when higher cut-off levels were used and if the mean expression rather than the maximal expression was considered and the differences were neither caused by necrosis nor by hypoxia (assessed as HIF-1alpha expression). Our findings suggest that the determination of proliferation in soft tissue sarcomas should be standardized for clinical application of Ki-67 as a prognostic marker.

Diagnostic and prognostic gene expression signatures in 177 soft tissue sarcomas: hypoxia-induced transcription profile signifies metastatic potential.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) diagnosis is challenging because of a multitude of histopathological subtypes, different genetic characteristics, and frequent intratumoral pleomorphism. One-third of STS metastasize and current risk-stratification is suboptimal, therefore, novel diagnostic and prognostic markers would be clinically valuable. We assessed the diagnostic and prognostic value of array-based gene expression profiles using 27 k cDNA microarrays in 177, mainly high-grade, STS of 13 histopathological subtypes. RESULTS: Unsupervised analysis resulted in two major clusters--one mainly containing STS characterized by type-specific genetic alterations and the other with a predominance of genetically complex and pleomorphic STS. Synovial sarcomas, myxoid/round-cell liposarcomas, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors clustered tightly within the former cluster and discriminatory signatures for these were characterized by developmental genes from the EGFR, FGFR, Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog, RAR and KIT signaling pathways. The more pleomorphic STS subtypes, e.g. leiomyosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma/undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and dedifferentiated/pleomorphic liposarcoma, were part of the latter cluster and were characterized by relatively heterogeneous profiles, although subclusters herein were identified. A prognostic signature partly characterized by hypoxia-related genes was identified among 89 genetically complex pleomorphic primary STS and could, in a multivariate analysis including established prognostic markers, independently predict the risk of metastasis with a hazard ratio of 2.2 (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic gene expression profiles linking signaling pathways to the different STS subtypes were demonstrated and a hypoxia-induced metastatic profile was identified in the pleomorphic, high-grade STS. These findings verify diagnostic utility and application of expression data for improved selection of high-risk STS patients.

Gene expression profiles relate to SS18/SSX fusion type in synovial sarcoma.

We applied 27k spotted cDNA microarray slides to assess gene expression profiles in 26 samples from 24 patients with synovial sarcomas (SS). The data were analyzed in relation to histopathologic type, cytogenetic aberrations, gene fusion type and development of distant metastases. Supervised analysis based on gene fusion type in 12 SS with SS18/SSX1 and 9 with SS18/SSX2 revealed significant differences in gene expression profiles. Among the discriminators were several genes that have previously been found to be upregulated in SS, including AXL, ZIC2, SPAG7, AGRN, FOXC1, NCAM1 and multiple metallothioneins. Histopathology and degree of cytogenetic complexity did not significantly influence expression, whereas a genetic signature that related to development of metastases could be discerned, albeit with a high false-positive rate. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate differentially expressed genes for the 2 major gene fusion variants in SS, SS18/SSX1 and SS18/SSX2, and thereby suggest that these result in different downstream effects.

Focus on the tumour periphery in MRI evaluation of soft tissue sarcoma: infiltrative growth signifies poor prognosis.

Purpose. Infiltrative microscopical peripheral growth of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) has been shown to be of prognostic importance and preoperative risk stratification could individualize neoadjuvant treatment. Patients and methods. We assessed peripheral tumour growth pattern on preoperative MRI from 78 STS. The findings were correlated to histopathology and to outcome. Results. The MRI-based peripheral tumour growth pattern was classified as pushing in 34 tumours, focally infiltrative in 25, and diffusely infiltrative in 19. All tumours with diffuse infiltration on MRI also showed microscopical infiltration, whereas MRI failed to identify infiltration in two-thirds of the microscopically infiltrative tumours. Diffusely infiltrative growth on MRI gave a 2.5 times increased risk of metastases (P = .01) and a 3.7 times higher risk of local recurrence (P = .02). Discussion. Based on this observation we suggest that MRI evaluation of STS should focus on the peripheral tumour growth pattern since it adds prognostic information of value for decisions on neoadjuvant therapies.

Intratumor versus intertumor heterogeneity in gene expression profiles of soft-tissue sarcomas.

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) constitute more than 30 histologic entities. In addition, within each entity, tumors are often heterogeneous in macroscopic features, genetic alterations, microscopic appearance, and clinical course. Therefore, there has been concern about whether a single tumor sample can provide a gene expression profile representative of the entire tumor. We used 27-k cDNA microarray slides to assess the importance of intratumor versus intertumor heterogeneity of the gene expression profiles of 2 morphologically heterogeneous STSs. Multiple pieces of tumor (8 and 10 pieces) were obtained from a myxoid variant of malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) and a leiomyosarcoma (LMS), respectively, and the expression patterns were compared with single tumor samples from 20 MFHs and 16 LMSs. Hierarchical clustering analysis of the expression profiles showed that samples from the same tumor clustered together. The average intratumor distance was considerably shorter than the average intertumor distance in both LMS and MFH. In addition, tumor subclusters that distinguished different macroscopic parts of the tumor could be discerned. We concluded that intratumor variability exists but that accurate gene expression profiling also could be obtained using single samples from a large STS.