Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Ophthalmol ; 17(5): 845-851, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766326

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate the effectiveness of combination therapy with transzonular triamcinolone-moxifloxacin and conventional perioperative drops in reducing postoperative complications of cataract surgery. METHODS: Electronic medical records of cataract surgery patients (single surgeon) were reviewed from January 2018 to September 2021. The rate of postoperative complications including prolonged and/or recurrent postoperative inflammation, endophthalmitis, cystoid macular edema (CME), and intraocular pressure (IOP) was compared between the patients receiving combinative therapy and patients receiving drops only. RESULTS: Totally 596 patients and 1057 eyes (Combinative-Therapy group 493 and Drop-Only group 564) were included in this study. Using combination therapy reduced the relative risk of postoperative inflammation by 26.9% (16.6% Combinative-Therapy vs 22.7% Drop-Only, P=0.013). The incidence of endophthalmitis was 0 in Combinative-Therapy group vs 0.5% in Drop-Only group (relative risk reduction 100%), although not statistically significant (P=0.10). The incidence of severe IOP spikes was not significantly different between Combinative-Therapy (2.4%) and Drop-Only (1.6%) groups (P=0.33). The relative risk of postoperative CME was 51.4% less in three months follow up visit in Combinative-Therapy group, although not statistically significant (P=0.07). The visual outcome 1-month postop. (best corrected visual acuity) was significantly better in Combinative-Therapy (logMAR 0.10) compared to Drop-Only (logMAR 0.14) groups (P=0.02) while the baseline visual acuity was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The combinative approach of transzonular triamcinolone-moxifloxacin plus perioperative eyedrops is an effective method to minimize postoperative inflammation, with better visual outcomes. It could potentially reduce the risk of postoperative endophthalmitis and CME (near-significant P-values; larger studies could analyze better considering low incidence).

2.
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep ; 28: 101750, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36407011

RESUMEN

Purpose: To present a case of tattoo side effects not limited to the tattoo site and rise an alarm regarding using non-FDA-approved products. Observations: A 30-year-old female presented with bilateral ocular pain, dryness, and itching. The ocular exam showed bilateral injection and edema of the superior palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva. Several 1-2 mm dark pigmented lesions and papillae coursing along the upper palpebral conjunctival lid margin and 5 mm above the margin were found in both eyes. The ocular surface was dry with diffuse superficial punctate keratitis. The biopsy report showed granular foreign material in the dermis. SOX-10 and MART-1 immunostaining highlighted melanocyte distribution and the sample was diagnosed as exogenous pigment consistent with tattoo ink by the pathologist. On further investigation following the pathology report, the patient stated that she got bilateral permanent eyebrow tattoos 4 months before presentation in a country other than the United States, and she was not aware about the standards of the ink used, nor the certification of the person performing the tattoo. The patient denied any type of tattoo or manipulation on the eyes or orbit, including sclera or conjunctivae. Conclusions: Importance: The complications of periorbital tattooing are not limited to the point tattoo location and can potentially spread to the nearby segments. It is notable that there is no FDA approved tattoo ink available, even with a certified tattoo artist performing the tattoo, the risks of inflammation, infection, and other side effects are still present.

3.
Nat Commun ; 7: 10869, 2016 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26947130

RESUMEN

It is well known that both recipient cells and donor nuclei demonstrate a mitotic advantage as observed in the traditional reprogramming with somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). However, it is not known whether a specific mitotic factor plays a critical role in reprogramming. Here we identify an isoform of human bromodomain-containing 3 (BRD3), BRD3R (BRD3 with Reprogramming activity), as a reprogramming factor. BRD3R positively regulates mitosis during reprogramming, upregulates a large set of mitotic genes at early stages of reprogramming, and associates with mitotic chromatin. Interestingly, a set of the mitotic genes upregulated by BRD3R constitutes a pluripotent molecular signature. The two BRD3 isoforms display differential binding to acetylated histones. Our results suggest a molecular interpretation for the mitotic advantage in reprogramming and show that mitosis may be a driving force of reprogramming.


Asunto(s)
Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Reprogramación Celular , Mitosis , Proteínas de Unión al ARN/metabolismo , Acetilación , Núcleo Celular/genética , Histonas/genética , Histonas/metabolismo , Humanos , Isoformas de Proteínas/genética , Isoformas de Proteínas/metabolismo , Proteínas de Unión al ARN/genética , Factores de Transcripción
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA