RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Current literature lacks consensus on initial assessments and routine follow-up care of patients with alpha-mannosidosis (AM). A Delphi panel was conducted to generate and validate recommendations on best practices for initial assessment, routine follow-up care, and integrated care coordination of patients with AM. METHODS: A modified Delphi method involving 3 rounds of online surveys was used. An independent administrator and 2 nonvoting physician co-chairs managed survey development, anonymous data collection, and analysis. A multidisciplinary panel comprising 20 physicians from 12 countries responded to 57 open-ended questions in the first survey. Round 2 consisted of 11 ranking questions and 44 voting statements. In round 3, panelists voted to validate 60 consensus statements. The panel response rate was ≥95% in all 3 rounds. Panelists used 5-point Likert scales to indicate importance (score of ≥3) or agreement (score of ≥4). Consensus was defined a priori as ≥75% agreement with ≥75% of panelists voting. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 60 statements, encompassing 3 key areas: initial assessments, routine follow-up care, and treatment-related follow-up. The panel agreed on the type and frequency of assessments related to genetic testing, baseline evaluations, quality of life, biochemical measures, affected body systems, treatment received, and integrated care coordination in patients with AM. Forty-nine statements reached 90% to 100% consensus, 8 statements reached 80% to 85% consensus, and 1 statement reached 75% consensus. Two statements each reached consensus on 15 baseline assessments to be conducted at the initial follow-up visit after diagnosis in pediatric and adult patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first Delphi study providing internationally applicable, best-practice recommendations for monitoring patients with AM that may improve their care and well-being.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Técnica Delphi , alfa-Manosidosis , Humanos , alfa-Manosidosis/terapia , alfa-Manosidosis/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normasRESUMEN
Infants born to mothers with phenylketonuria (PKU) may develop congenital abnormalities because of elevated phenylalanine (Phe) levels in the mother during pregnancy. Maintenance of blood Phe levels between 120 and 360 µmol/L reduces risks of birth defects. Sapropterin dihydrochloride helps maintain blood Phe control, but there is limited evidence on its risk-benefit ratio when used during pregnancy. Data from the maternal sub-registries-KAMPER (NCT01016392) and PKUDOS (NCT00778206; PKU-MOMs sub-registry)-were collected to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of sapropterin in pregnant women in a real-life setting. Pregnancy and infant outcomes, and the safety of sapropterin were assessed. Final data from 79 pregnancies in 57 women with PKU are reported. Sapropterin dose was fairly constant before and during pregnancy, with blood Phe levels maintained in the recommended target range during the majority (82%) of pregnancies. Most pregnancies were carried to term, and the majority of liveborn infants were reported as 'normal' at birth. Few adverse and serious adverse events were considered related to sapropterin, with these occurring in participants with high blood Phe levels. This report represents the largest population of pregnant women with PKU exposed to sapropterin. Results demonstrate that exposure to sapropterin during pregnancy was well-tolerated and facilitated maintenance of blood Phe levels within the target range, resulting in normal delivery. This critical real-world data may facilitate physicians and patients to make informed treatment decisions about using sapropterin in pregnant women with PKU and in women of childbearing age with PKU who are responsive to sapropterin.