RESUMEN
Small cell carcinomas (SMC) of the lung are now molecularly classified based on the expression of transcriptional regulators (NEUROD1, ASCL1, POU2F3, and YAP1) and DLL3, which has emerged as an investigational therapeutic target. PLCG2 has been shown to identify a distinct subpopulation of lung SMC with stem cell-like and prometastasis features and poor prognosis. We analyzed the expression of these novel neuroendocrine markers and their association with traditional neuroendocrine markers and patient outcomes in a cohort of bladder neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) consisting of 103 SMC and 19 large cell NEC (LCNEC) assembled in tissue microarrays. Coexpression patterns were assessed and integrated with detailed clinical annotation including overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and response to neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. We identified 5 distinct molecular subtypes in bladder SMC based on the expression of ASCL1, NEUROD1, and POU2F3: ASCL1+/NEUROD1- (n = 33; 34%), ASCL1- /NEUROD1+ (n = 21; 21%), ASCL1+/NEUROD1+ (n = 17; 17%), POU2F3+ (n = 22, 22%), and ASCL1- /NEUROD1- /POU2F3- (n = 5, 5%). POU2F3+ tumors were mutually exclusive with those expressing ASCL1 and NEUROD1 and exhibited lower expression of traditional neuroendocrine markers. PLCG2 expression was noted in 33 tumors (32%) and was highly correlated with POU2F3 expression (P < .001). DLL3 expression was high in both SMC (n = 72, 82%) and LCNEC (n = 11, 85%). YAP1 expression was enriched in nonneuroendocrine components and negatively correlated with all neuroendocrine markers. In patients without metastatic disease who underwent radical cystectomy, PLCG2+ or POU2F3+ tumors had shorter RFS and OS (P < .05), but their expression was not associated with metastasis status or response to neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, the NEC of the bladder can be divided into distinct molecular subtypes based on the expression of ASCL1, NEUROD1, and POU2F3. POU2F3-expressing tumors represent an ASCL1/NEUROD1-negative subset of bladder NEC characterized by lower expression of traditional neuroendocrine markers. Marker expression patterns were similar in SMC and LCNEC. Expression of PLCG2 and POU2F3 was associated with shorter RFS and OS. DLL3 was expressed at high levels in both SMC and LCNEC of the bladder, nominating it as a potential therapeutic target.
RESUMEN
Renal low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) is a recently recognized renal cell neoplasm designated within the "other oncocytic tumors" category in the 2022 World Health Organization classification system. Although the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features reported for LOT have been largely consistent, the data are relatively limited. The morphologic overlap between LOT and other low-grade oncocytic neoplasms, particularly eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (E-chRCC), remains a controversial area in renal tumor classification. To address this uncertainty, we characterized and compared large cohorts of LOT (n = 67) and E-chRCC (n = 69) and revealed notable differences between the 2 entities. Clinically, LOT predominantly affected women, whereas E-chRCC showed a male predilection. Histologically, although almost all LOTs were dominated by a small-nested pattern, E-chRCC mainly showed solid and tubular architectures. Molecular analysis revealed that 87% of LOT cases harbored mutations in the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway, most frequently in MTOR and RHEB genes; a subset of LOT cases had chromosomal 7 and 19q gains. In contrast, E-chRCC lacked mTORC1 mutations, and 60% of cases displayed chromosomal losses characteristic of chRCC. We also explored the cell of origin for LOT and identified L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM), a collecting duct and connecting tubule principal cell marker, as a highly sensitive and specific ancillary test for differentiating LOT from E-chRCC. This distinctive L1CAM immunohistochemical labeling suggests the principal cells as the cell of origin for LOT, unlike the intercalated cell origin of E-chRCC and oncocytoma. The ultrastructural analysis of LOT showed normal-appearing mitochondria and intracytoplasmic lumina with microvilli, different from what has been described for chRCC. Our study further supports LOT as a unique entity with a benign clinical course. Based on the likely cell of origin and its clinicopathologic characteristics, we propose that changing the nomenclature of LOT to "Oncocytic Principal Cell Adenoma of the Kidney" may be a better way to define and describe this entity.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma Oxifílico , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Molécula L1 de Adhesión de Célula Nerviosa , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/química , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/química , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Molécula L1 de Adhesión de Célula Nerviosa/genética , Molécula L1 de Adhesión de Célula Nerviosa/análisis , Molécula L1 de Adhesión de Célula Nerviosa/metabolismo , Anciano , Adulto , Adenoma Oxifílico/patología , Adenoma Oxifílico/genética , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inmunohistoquímica , Clasificación del Tumor , MutaciónRESUMEN
Primary well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WDNT)/carcinoid of the genitourinary tract is rare. Many WDNT reported in the prostate gland have been seen in close association with conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma and/or label for prostate-specific immunohistochemical markers and are best considered prostatic adenocarcinomas with "carcinoid-like" features. We present a case of primary WDNT/carcinoid incidentally detected in a 67-year-old man who underwent radical prostatectomy for Grade group 2 prostatic adenocarcinoma. Morphologically, the neuroendocrine (NE) lesion appeared distinct from the prostatic adenocarcinoma, labeled for NE markers, was negative for prostatic markers (NKX3.1, PSA, and ERG), and showed an overall low Ki-67 proliferation index (<1%). Follow-up was uneventful with no evidence of residual disease or metastasis.
RESUMEN
We investigated whether total Gleason pattern 3 or the proportion of Gleason pattern 4 on biopsy is a significant predictor of adverse pathology. Our findings suggest that quantifying the amount rather than the proportion of Gleason pattern 4 would improve grade group assignment for decision-making in localized prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Medición de Riesgo , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biopsia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Próstata/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy (MRI-biopsy) detects high-Grade Group (GG) prostate cancers not identified by systematic biopsy (S-biopsy). However, questions have been raised whether cancers detected by MRI-biopsy and S-biopsy, grade-for-grade, are of equivalent oncologic risk. The authors evaluated the relative oncologic risk of GG diagnosed by S-biopsy and MRI-biopsy. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all patients who had both MRI-biopsy and S-biopsy and underwent with prostatectomy (2014-2022) at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Three logistic regression models were used with adverse pathology as the primary outcome (primary pattern 4, any pattern 5, seminal vesicle invasion, or lymph node involvement). The first model included the presurgery prostate-specific antigen level, the number of positive and negative S-biopsy cores, S-biopsy GG, and MRI-biopsy GG. The second model excluded MRI-biopsy GG to obtain the average risk based on S-biopsy GG. The third model excluded S-biopsy GG to obtain the risk based on MRI-biopsy GG. A secondary analysis using Cox regression evaluated the 12-month risk of biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: In total, 991 patients were identified, including 359 (36%) who had adverse pathology. MRI-biopsy GG influenced oncologic risk compared with S-biopsy GG alone (p < .001). However, if grade was discordant between biopsies, then the risk was intermediate between grades. For example, the average risk of advanced pathology for patients who had GG2 and GG3 on S-biopsy was 19% and 66%, respectively, but the average risk was 47% for patients who had GG2 on S-biopsy and patients who had GG3 on MRI-biopsy. The equivalent estimates for 12-month biochemical recurrence were 5.8%, 15%, and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings cast doubt on the practice of defining risk group based on the highest GG. Because treatment algorithms depend fundamentally on GG, further research is urgently required to assess the oncologic risk of prostate tumors depending on detection technique. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to help diagnose prostate cancer can help identify more high-grade cancers than using a systematic template biopsy alone. However, we do not know if high-grade cancers diagnosed with the help of an MRI are as dangerous to the patient as high-grade cancers diagnosed with a systematic biopsy. We examined all of our patients who had an MRI biopsy and a systematic biopsy and then had their prostates removed to find out if these patients had risk factors and signs of aggressive cancer (cancer that spread outside the prostate or was very high grade). We found that, if there was a difference in grade between the systematic biopsy and the MRI-targeted biopsy, the risk of aggressive cancer was between the two grades.
Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/cirugía , Próstata/patología , Vesículas Seminales/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ganglioneuroblastoma intermixed (GNBI) is classified as "favorable" histology by International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification system. However, the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) stratifies patients using wider clinicopathological and cytogenetic/molecular parameters. While the diagnosis of GNBI is typically made on resected tumor, it may sometimes be rendered on initial biopsy. We studied GNBI noted at diagnosis to evaluate its correlation with INRG staging and other clinicopathological and molecular features. METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinical, radiological, pathological, cytogenetic, and molecular information from patients with GNBI at diagnosis seen between 1995 and 2021 was analyzed. INRG staging was performed. RESULTS: Of the 15,827 neuroblastoma specimens, GNBI was noted in 237 patients. Of these, 53 had the initial pathological diagnosis of GNBI; median follow-up 3.5 (range: 0.2-14) years. Disease was locoregional in 41 (77%, 16 stage L1 and 25 L2); none relapsed. Twelve (23%) had metastatic disease at presentation; six (50%) relapsed, and two died of disease. MYCN was amplified in two metastatic tumors. Six of 31 (19%) tumors tested had recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities and nonrecurrent somatic gene mutations in 10/23 (43%). The presence of any adverse molecular/cytogenetic findings was associated with metastatic disease (p < .05). For patients with localized GNBI undergoing both biopsy and resection, GNBI was diagnosed in both in 17/19 (90%). CONCLUSIONS: Localized GNBI at diagnosis has excellent long-term clinical outcome even without cytotoxic therapy. For localized GNBI, a biopsy sample is adequate to make the diagnosis. When associated with metastasis at diagnosis, prognosis is poorer, possibly due to associated adverse biological features.
Asunto(s)
Ganglioneuroblastoma , Neuroblastoma , Humanos , Lactante , Ganglioneuroblastoma/diagnóstico , Ganglioneuroblastoma/genética , Ganglioneuroblastoma/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neuroblastoma/patología , Pronóstico , Genómica , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The summary presented herein covers recommendations on the early detection of prostate cancer and provides a framework to facilitate clinical decision-making in the implementation of prostate cancer screening, biopsy, and follow-up. This is Part II of a two-part series focusing on initial and repeat biopsies, and biopsy technique. Please refer to Part I for discussion of initial prostate cancer screening recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review utilized to inform this guideline was conducted by an independent methodological consultant. The systematic review was based on searches in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 1, 2000-November 21, 2022). Searches were supplemented by reviewing reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS: The Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based guideline statements to provide guidance in prostate cancer screening, initial and repeat biopsies, and biopsy technique. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of prostate cancer risk should be focused on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (Grade Group 2 or higher [GG2+]). The use of laboratory biomarkers, prostate MRI, and biopsy techniques described herein may improve detection and safety when a prostate biopsy is deemed necessary following prostate cancer screening.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Biopsia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The summary presented herein covers recommendations on the early detection of prostate cancer and provides a framework to facilitate clinical decision-making in the implementation of prostate cancer screening, biopsy, and follow-up. This is Part I of a two-part series that focuses on prostate cancer screening. Please refer to Part II for discussion of initial and repeat biopsies as well as biopsy technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review utilized to inform this guideline was conducted by an independent methodological consultant. The systematic review was based on searches in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 1, 2000-November 21, 2022). Searches were supplemented by reviewing reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS: The Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based guideline statements to provide guidance in prostate cancer screening, initial and repeat biopsy, and biopsy technique. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based prostate cancer screening in combination with shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended. Current data regarding risk from population-based cohorts provide a basis for longer screening intervals and tailored screening, and the use of available online risk calculators is encouraged.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Biopsia , Tamizaje Masivo/métodosRESUMEN
Neuroendocrine tumors of the prostate are rare and encompass a group of entities that are classified based on a combination of morphological and immunohistochemical features. Despite the 2016 World Health Organization classification of prostatic neuroendocrine tumors, variants have been reported that do not fit well in the categorization scheme. While the majority of these tumors arise in the setting of castration-resistant prostate cancer (postandrogen deprivation therapy), de novo cases may occur. In this review, we highlight the most significant pathological and immunohistochemical features, emerging biomarkers, and molecular features of such tumors.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Neuroendocrino , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/terapia , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Próstata/patología , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: The optimal method of measuring cancer extent in prostate cancer (PCa) biopsies is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nine hundred eighty-one men with clinically localised PCa managed conservatively were reviewed with follow up. The number of positive cores (NPC), the Maximum Cancer Length in a core (MCL), Total Cancer Length (TCL), and percentage of positive cores (%+cores) was calculated and univariate and multivariate analysis performed using prostate-specific antigen (PSA), T-stage, and Gleason score. The presence of stromal gaps (SG) was recorded. Univariate models were run where SG made a difference to the MCL. All variables showed significant association with PCa death in univariate models. In multivariate models, incorporating PSA, T-stage, and Gleason score, only %+cores was a significant predictor of outcome, with a 10% increase in %+cores resulting in a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.07 (likelihood-ratio test P > Χ2 = 0.01). There were 120 patients where SG made a difference to the MCL and a total of 20 events in this group. Including SG, on univariate analysis the median MCL was 10 mm and HR was 1.16 (P = 0.007), not including SG, the median MCL was 6 mm and HR was 1.23 (P = 6.3 × 10-4 ). Inclusion or exclusion of SG made no significant difference to TCL as a predictor of outcome. CONCLUSION: Cancer extent is a strong predictor of PCa death but only %+cores added to the multivariate model. Expressed as a fraction of NPC/total number of cores, this is the simplest method of assessment, which we favour over more complicated methods in nontargeted biopsies.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Patólogos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Prostatectomía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) is recommended as the preferred treatment for men with low-risk disease. In order to optimize risk stratification and exclude undiagnosed higher-grade disease, most AS protocols recommend a confirmatory biopsy. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare outcomes among men with grade group (GG) 2/3 prostate cancer on initial biopsy with those among men whose disease was initially GG1 but was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) in two cohorts: "immediate RP group," with GG2/3 cancer on diagnostic biopsy, and "AS group," with GG1 cancer on initial biopsy that was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Probabilities of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and salvage therapy were determined using multivariable Cox regression models with risk adjustment. Risks of adverse pathology at RP were also compared using logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The immediate RP group comprised 4009 patients and the AS group comprised 321 patients. The AS group had lower adjusted rates of adverse pathology (27% vs 35%, p = 0.003). BCR rates were lower in the AS group, although this did not reach conventional significance (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.06, p = 0.10) compared with the immediate RP group. Risk-adjusted 1- and 5-yr BCR rates were 4.6% (95% CI 3.0-6.5%) and 10.4% (95% CI 6.9-14%), respectively, for the AS group compared with 6.3% (95% CI 5.6-7.0%) and 20% (95% CI 19-22%), respectively, in the immediate RP group. A nonsignificant association was observed for salvage treatment-free survival favoring the AS group (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42, 1.06, p = 0.087). CONCLUSIONS: We found that men with GG1 cancer who were upgraded on confirmatory biopsy tend to have less aggressive disease than men with the same grade found at initial biopsy. These results must be confirmed in larger series before recommendations can be made regarding a more conservative approach in men with upgraded pathology on surveillance biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY: We studied men with low-risk prostate cancer who were initially eligible for active surveillance but presented with more aggressive cancer on confirmatory biopsy. We found that outcomes for these men were better than the outcomes for those diagnosed initially with more serious cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Espera Vigilante , Masculino , Humanos , Espera Vigilante/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Biopsia , Clasificación del Tumor , Próstata/cirugía , Próstata/patologíaRESUMEN
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of Grade Group 1 (GG 1) prostate cancer remains a significant health care problem despite of its improved risk assessment and uptake in conservative management. Removing the cancer label from these non-lethal cancers has been proposed as an expedient way to reduce potential physical, psychological and financial harm to patients. Such a nomenclatural change necessitates a multidisciplinary team effort by clinicians and pathologists. Genitourinary Pathology Society recently conducted a survey of its members, gauging their awareness of this controversy and their position on whether GG 1 prostate cancer should be reclassified. Most respondents (196, 81.7%) opposed removing the cancer label from GG 1 cancer, 33 (13.8%) supported a change in nomenclature, while 11 (4.6%) responded that they were uncertain. Of those who supported the reclassification, 17 (51.5%) supported the change for radical prostatectomy only, 4 (12.1%) for biopsy only, and 12 (36.4%) for both biopsy and radical prostatectomy. This survey results highlight the gap between pathologists and clinicians in whether GG 1 prostate cancer should be labeled as "non-cancer," and calls for continued debates and conversations between pathologists and clinicians, and further studies on the biology, diagnostic reproducibility, and ideal management of GG 1 prostate cancer in order to make a more evidence-based decision for patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Próstata/patología , Biopsia/métodos , Clasificación del Tumor , ProstatectomíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tumor-only genomic profiling is an important tool in therapeutic management of men with prostate cancer. Since clinically actionable germline variants may be reflected in tumor profiling, it is critical to identify which variants have a higher risk of being germline in origin to better counsel patients and prioritize genetic testing. OBJECTIVE: To determine when variants found on tumor-only sequencing of prostate cancers should prompt confirmatory germline testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Men with prostate cancer who underwent both tumor and germline sequencing at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2020 were evaluated. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Tumor and germline profiles were analyzed for pathogenic and likely pathogenic ("pathogenic") variants in 60 moderate- or high-penetrance genes associated with cancer predisposition. The germline probability (germline/germline + somatic) of a variant was calculated for each gene. Clinical and pathologic factors were analyzed as potential modifiers of germline probability. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 1883 patients identified, 1084 (58%) had a somatic or germline pathogenic variant in one of 60 cancer susceptibility genes, and of them, 240 (22%) had at least one germline variant. Overall, the most frequent variants were in TP53, PTEN, APC, BRCA2, RB1, ATM, and CHEK2. Variants in TP53, PTEN, or RB1 were identified in 746 (40%) patients and were exclusively somatic. Variants with the highest germline probabilities were in PALB2 (69%), MITF (62%), HOXB13 (60%), CHEK2 (55%), BRCA1 (55%), and BRCA2 (47%), and the overall germline probability of a variant in any DNA damage repair gene was 40%. Limitations were that most of the men included in the cohort had metastatic disease, and different thresholds for pathogenicity exist for somatic and germline variants. CONCLUSIONS: Of patients with pathogenic variants found on prostate tumor sequencing, 22% had clinically actionable germline variants, for which the germline probabilities varied widely by gene. Our results provide an evidenced-based clinical framework to prioritize referral to genetic counseling following tumor-only sequencing. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with advanced prostate cancer are recommended to have germline genetic testing. Genetic sequencing of a patient's prostate tumor may also identify certain gene variants that are inherited. We found that patients who had variants in certain genes, such as ones that function in DNA damage repair, identified in their prostate tumor sequencing, had a high risk for having an inherited cancer syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Mutación de Línea Germinal , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Pruebas Genéticas , Análisis de Secuencia , Genómica , Predisposición Genética a la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Cancers arising from the bladder urothelium often exhibit lineage plasticity with regions of urothelial carcinoma adjacent to or admixed with regions of divergent histomorphology, most commonly squamous differentiation. To define the biologic basis for and clinical significance of this morphologic heterogeneity, here we perform integrated genomic analyses of mixed histology bladder cancers with separable regions of urothelial and squamous differentiation. We find that squamous differentiation is a marker of intratumoral genomic and immunologic heterogeneity in patients with bladder cancer and a biomarker of intrinsic immunotherapy resistance. Phylogenetic analysis confirms that in all cases the urothelial and squamous regions are derived from a common shared precursor. Despite the presence of marked genomic heterogeneity between co-existent urothelial and squamous differentiated regions, no recurrent genomic alteration exclusive to the urothelial or squamous morphologies is identified. Rather, lineage plasticity in bladder cancers with squamous differentiation is associated with loss of expression of FOXA1, GATA3, and PPARG, transcription factors critical for maintenance of urothelial cell identity. Of clinical significance, lineage plasticity and PD-L1 expression is coordinately dysregulated via FOXA1, with patients exhibiting morphologic heterogeneity pre-treatment significantly less likely to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/metabolismo , Factor Nuclear 3-alfa del Hepatocito/genética , Filogenia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Linaje de la CélulaRESUMEN
Neuroendocrine tumors of the prostate are rare and encompass a group of entities that are classified based on a combination of morphological and immunohistochemical features. Despite the 2016 World Health Organization classification of prostatic neuroendocrine tumors, variants have been reported that do not fit well in the categorization scheme. While the majority of these tumors arise in the setting of castration-resistant prostate cancer (postandrogen deprivation therapy), de novo cases may occur. In this review, we highlight the most significant pathological and immunohistochemical features, emerging biomarkers, and molecular features of such tumors.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Neuroendocrino , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/patología , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare oncologic outcomes and genomic alteration profiles in patients with bladder and urachal adenocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma (UC) with glandular differentiation, and UC, not otherwise specified (NOS) undergoing surgical resection, with emphasis on response to systemic therapy. METHODS: We identified patients with bladder cancer with glandular variants who underwent surgical resection at Memorial Sloan Kettering from 1995 to 2018 (surgical cohort) and/or patients who had tumor sequencing using a targeted next-generation sequencing platform (genomics cohort). Pathologic complete and partial response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival were measured. Alteration frequencies between histologic subtypes were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with bladder adenocarcinoma, 46 with urachal adenocarcinoma, 84 with UC with glandular differentiation, and 1,049 with UC, NOS comprised the surgical cohort. Despite more advanced disease in patients with bladder and urachal adenocarcinoma, no significant differences in recurrence or cancer-specific survival by histology were observed after adjusting for stage. In patients with UC with glandular differentiation, NAC resulted in partial (≤ pT1N0) and complete (pT0N0) responses in 28% and 17%, respectively. Bladder and urachal adenocarcinoma genomic profiles resembled colorectal adenocarcinoma with frequent TP53, KRAS, and PIK3CA alterations while the genomic profile of UC with glandular differentiation more closely resembled UC, NOS. Limitations include retrospective nature of analysis and small numbers of nonurothelial histology specimens. CONCLUSION: The genomic profile of bladder adenocarcinomas resembled colorectal adenocarcinomas, whereas UC with glandular differentiation more closely resembled UC, NOS. Differences in outcomes among patients with glandular bladder cancer variants undergoing surgical resection were largely driven by differences in stage. Cisplatin-based NAC demonstrated activity in UC with glandular differentiation, suggesting NAC should be considered for this histologic variant.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Genómica/métodos , Humanos , Fenotipo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To profile juxtaglomerular cell tumors (JXG) and histologic mimics by analyzing renin expression; to identify non-JXG renin-producing tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets; and to define the prevalence of hypertension (HTN) and patient outcomes with angiotensin signaling inhibitor (ASI) use in tumors of interest. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen JXGs and 10 glomus tumors (GTs), a histologic mimic, were evaluated for clinicopathologic features; TCGA data were analyzed to identify non-JXG renin-overexpressing tumors. An institutional registry was queried to determine the incidence of HTN, the use of ASIs in hypertensive patients, and the impact of ASIs on outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) in a tumor type with high renin expression (clear cell renal cell carcinoma [CC-RCC] diagnosed between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2012). RESULTS: We found an association between renin production and HTN in JXG compared with GT. Analysis of TCGA data found that a subset of CC-RCCs overexpress renin relative to 29 other tumor types. Furthermore, analysis of our institutional registry revealed a high prevalence (64%) of HTN among 1203 patients treated with radical or partial nephrectomy for nonmetastatic CC-RCC. On multivariable Cox regression, patients with HTN treated with ASIs (34%) had improved PFS (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.00; P=.05) compared with patients with HTN not treated with ASIs (30%). CONCLUSION: The identification of renin expression in a subset of CC-RCC may provide a biologic rationale for the high prevalence of HTN and improved PFS with ASI use in hypertensive patients with nonmetastatic CC-RCC.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Hipertensión , Neoplasias Renales , Renina , Humanos , Angiotensinas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Renina/metabolismo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Small cell carcinoma of the bladder (SCCB) is a rare variant of bladder cancer with poor outcomes. We evaluated long-term outcomes of nonmetastatic (M0) and metastatic (M1) SCCB and correlated pathologic response with genomic alterations of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical history and pathology samples from SCCB patients diagnosed at our institution were reviewed. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-nine SCCB patients were identified. (M0: 147 [74%]; M1: 52 [26%]). Among M0 patients, 108 underwent radical cystectomy (RC) (NAC: 71; RC only: 23; adjuvant chemotherapy: 14); 14 received chemoradiotherapy; the rest received chemotherapy alone or no cancer-directed therapy. RC-only patients had a median follow-up of 9.1 years, and median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.1 and 1.2 years, respectively. NAC patients had pathologic response (Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas
, Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria
, Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/patología
, Quimioterapia Adyuvante
, Cistectomía
, Genómica
, Humanos
, Terapia Neoadyuvante
, Estudios Retrospectivos
, Vejiga Urinaria/patología
, Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico
, Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/genética
, Proteína de la Xerodermia Pigmentosa del Grupo D
RESUMEN
AIM: Clinicopathologic characterisation of a contemporary series of neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation in the setting of prostatic carcinoma (PCa) was examined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed institutional databases for in-house cases with a history of PCa and histopathologic evidence of NE differentiation during the disease course. In all, 79 cases were identified: 32 primary and 47 metastases. Metastatic lesions were in liver (n = 15), lymph node (n = 9), bone (n = 6), lung (n = 3), brain (n = 1), and other sites (n = 13). In all, 63 of 76 (82%) cases with NE differentiation and available history were posttherapy: six postradiation therapy (RT), 24 post- androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), and 33 post-RT + ADT. Morphologic assessment (n = 79): (i) 23 pure small-cell/high-grade NE carcinoma (HGNEC): 20/23 metastatic; (ii) 10 combined high-grade PCa and small-cell/HGNEC: 9/10 primary; (iii) 15 PCa with diffuse NE immunohistochemistry (IHC) marker positivity/differentiation, associated with nested to sheet-like growth of cells with abundant cytoplasm and prominent nucleoli, yet diffuse positivity for at least one prostatic and one NE IHC marker: all metastatic; (iv) 11 PCa with patchy NE differentiation, displaying more than single-cell positivity for NE IHC: five primary / six metastatic; (v) nine PCa with focal NE marker positive cells: four primary / five metastatic; (vi) 11 PCa with 'Paneth cell-like' change: all primary. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary series, the majority of NE differentiation in the setting of PCa was seen posttherapy. We highlight the tendencies of small-cell/HGNEC and PCa with diffuse NE differentiation by IHC to occur in metastatic settings, while morphologically combined high-grade PCa + small-cell/HGNEC and 'Paneth cell-like' change occur in primary disease.