The relevance of outcome expectations in group hypnosis for stress reduction: a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Background: There is evidence that patients' positive outcome expectations prior to study interventions are associated with better treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, to date, only few studies have investigated whether individual outcome expectations affect treatment outcomes in hypnosis. Objective: To examine whether outcome expectations to hypnosis prior to starting treatment were able to predict perceived stress, as measured on a visual analog scale (VAS), after 5 weeks. Methods: We performed a secondary data analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of intervention group participants only. Study participants with stress symptoms were randomized to 5 weekly sessions of a group hypnosis program for stress reduction and improved stress coping, plus 5 hypnosis audio recordings for further individual practice at home, as well as an educational booklet on coping with stress. Perceived stress for the following week was measured at baseline and after 5 weeks using a visual analog scale (0-100 mm; VAS). Hypnosis outcome expectations were assessed at baseline only with the Expectations for Treatment Scale (ETS). Unadjusted and adjusted linear regressions were performed to examine the association between baseline expectations and perceived stress at 5 weeks. Results: Data from 47 participants (M = 45.02, SD = 13.40 years; 85.1% female) were analyzed. Unadjusted (B = 0.326, t = 0.239, p = 0.812, R2 = 0.001) and adjusted (B = 0.639, t = 0.470, p = 0.641, R2 = 0.168) linear regressions found that outcome expectations to hypnosis were not associated with a change in perceived stress between baseline and after 5 weeks in the intervention group. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the beneficial effect of group hypnosis in distressed participants were not associated with outcome expectations. Other mechanisms of action may be more important for the effect of hypnosis, which should be explored in future research.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03525093.

Group hypnosis for stress reduction and improved stress coping: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the trial was to investigate the effect of a hypnotherapeutic group program in healthy persons with increased levels of perceived stress. METHODS: In a randomized controlled multicenter trial participants with a self-assessed subjective stress level ≥ 40 mm on a visual analogue scale (0-100 mm; VAS) for the previous week and a stable state of health were randomized to either 5 weekly sessions of 120-min duration of a hypnotherapeutic group program for stress reduction and improved stress coping plus 5 hypnosis audiorecords for individual practice at home plus an educational booklet for stress coping (hypnosis group) versus an educational booklet only (control group). The primary outcome parameter was the VAS stress level for the previous week after 5 weeks. Secondary outcome parameters included the VAS stress level after 12 weeks, perceived stress (CPSS), depression (ADS-K), self efficacy (SWE) and quality of life (SF 36) after 5 weeks and 12 weeks. Analysis of covariance with a significance level of 5% using the full analysis set was used for analysis; the model included treatment (fixed effect), VAS baseline value (fixed covariate), and center (random effect). RESULTS: A total of 95 participants were randomized; 47 (40 female, 45 ± 13.4 years of age) were allocated to the hypnosis group, and 48 (41 female, 46.9 ± 14.3 years) were allocated to the control group. Regarding VAS stress level after 5 weeks, the adjusted VAS mean in the hypnosis group was 41.8 mm [95% confidence interval (CI): 35.2; 48.4] compared to 62.9 mm [56.2; 69.7] in the control group, and the group difference was - 21.2 mm [- 30.1; - 12.2] (P < 0.001). After 12 weeks, the stress intensity on the VAS showed a between-group difference of - 14.7 mm [- 25.1; - 4.4] (P = 0.006), and the adjusted means were 41.1 mm [33.4; 48.8] in the hypnosis group and 55.9 mm [48.4; 63.5] in the control group. Improvements were also reported for CPSS, SF-36, SWE and ADS-K after 5 and 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Compared to the control group, the hypnosis group showed reduced perceived stress after 5 and 12 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03525093 ; date of registration: May 15, 2018.

Group Hypnosis for Stress Reduction - A Feasibility Study.

The aim of this study was to develop a standardized hypnotherapeutic group program for stress reduction, test its feasibility, and measure its preliminary pre- to postintervention effects. In this prospective, single-arm feasibility study, healthy adult participants with self-assessed increased stress levels received 5 weekly group hypnosis sessions plus audio recordings. Twelve persons (10 females, mean (SD) age 48.9 (11.8) years participated. The mean (SD) intensity of perceived stress on a 0-to-100 mm VAS was reduced from 75.5 (11.5) mm at baseline to 33.9 (18.8) mm after 5 weeks. Cohen's perceived stress scale was reduced from 20.8 (5.7) to 13.8 (5.4). Focus group interviews showed that the study intervention was feasible and well accepted. Confirmatory testing of the intervention in a randomized controlled trial is necessary.

How effective is the early support program Babylotse-Plus for psychosocially burdened mothers and their infants? A comparative intervention study.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to examine the effects of an early perinatal prevention program offered to mothers and families suffering from significant psychosocial burden. METHODS: All mothers giving birth in a Berlin university hospital during Jan-Aug 2013 were screened with a standardized 27-item questionnaire by trained staff. Mothers with a screening-score ≥ 3, who were not enrolled in other public support programs, were defined as psychosocially burdened. They received a detailed needs assessment and were followed up with counseling. When necessary, affected mothers were voluntarily guided through to specialized 'early support' institutions during the 12-month-intervention period. The historical control group (care-as-usual) consisted of children born at the same hospital the year before.At 12 months postnatally, we interviewed mothers in both groups to assess their stress burden and coping skills by Parenting Stress Index and assessed the current childcare condition. Differences between the groups were compared by multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The intervention group and the control group included 225 and 157 families, respectively. After 12-months, mothers in the 'early support' intervention group had significantly less often depression (adjusted odds ratio 0.25, 95%-confidence interval 0.07-0.94), less often a disturbed relationship with the parenting partner (0.34, 0.10-1.14) and reported reduced stress due to the child's demands (0.40, 0.15-1.10) compared to the control group. Childcare indicators did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In mothers at high psychosocial risk, the 'early support' intervention program Babylotse-Plus seemed to reduce the occurrence of depression and several stress indicators in the first postnatal year.

[Evaluation of the Babylotse-Plus screening form : Evaluation of a simple instrument to systematically identify parents of newborns with severe psychosocial stress at Charité Berlin]. / Evaluation des Babylotse-Plus-Screeningbogens : Untersuchung eines einfachen Instruments zur Identifizierung psychosozial belasteter Eltern von Neugeborenen der Berliner Charité.

BACKGROUND: The well-being and healthy development of children are at risk in families with severe psychosocial stress. In Germany, simple and valid screening instruments are lacking to identify families in need of early support. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the diagnostic accuracy of a simple perinatal screening form to identify families at high psychosocial risk. METHODS: For every mother giving birth at Charité Berlin between January and August 2013 the short Babylotse-Plus screening form with 27 items was filled out by medical staff. Completing the form took about 5 min. After calculating a sum score, values of ≥3 were defined as "likely at risk". A one-hour comprehensive standardized interview with the parents after birth served as the reference standard for assessing family resources and stress factors. RESULTS: Among the 279 participants included in the analyses, 215 were "likely at risk" and 64 had a low or no risk, the latter were randomly selected among all families with scores <3. The screening form had an excellent sensitivity (98.9 %; 95 % confidence interval 93.4-99.9 %) to detect families likely at risk, whereas its specificity was only low (33.0 %; 95 % confidence interval 30.5-33.5 %). This resulted in a rather poor positive likelihood ratio of 1.5 but a very good negative likelihood ratio of 0.03. CONCLUSIONS: The screening form identified families with psychosocial risks well, but many families with low or no risk were falsely defined as being at risk. Before recommending the screening instrument for clinical practice, further studies are needed in different settings to improve the specificity without reducing its high sensitivity.

[Measures of grief--a critical review]. / Messinstrumente zur Erfassung von Trauer--Ein kritischer Uberblick.

Scientific investigations show that the course of a grieving process may have a substantial impact on the mental and physical wellbeing of those concerned. An international survey of measuring instruments designed to register grief shows little conformity with respect to the key symptoms of grieving. Only few instruments are derived from scientific theory, the majority have been developed on the basis of clinical observations and only some of the instruments are psychometrically designed. Some instruments display correlations with other constructs such as depression and anxiety, with the question of whether the symptoms are grief-specific or autonomous remaining unanswered. Only few instruments serve to differentiate between normal and pathologic grief. The fact that only two German-language instruments for registering grief are available to date also indicates that this subject matter has attracted only scant attention despite its clinical significance. In conclusion, the demands to be made on an instrument to be developed in the future are outlined.

Psicose atìpica no puerpério. Status nosológico: Relato de caso / Atypical psychoses in puerperium. Nosologic status: Case report

Os autores apresentam um caso clìnico de psicose pós-parto e discutem, através do seu aspectos psicopatológicos, as possibilidades diagnósticas. O conceito de psicose atìpica é discutido como uma alternativa ao dualismo esquizofrenia-doença afetiva