RESUMEN
AIM: To assess the equity of care of patients with non-traumatic dental presentations (NTDP) to Christchurch Emergency Department (ED) in Aotearoa New Zealand. METHODS: This retrospective observational study reviews NTDP to Christchurch ED over a 2-year period (2018-2020). ED and hospital outcomes were compared for Maori, Pacific peoples and NZ Europeans. Results are interpreted utilising Te Ao Maori principles and discussed referencing a Kaupapa Maori framework. RESULTS: There were a total of 2,034 NTDPs, with Maori (27.0%) and Pacific peoples (6.9%) being over-represented compared to local population estimates (9.4% and 3.2% respectively). Maori experienced shorter wait times (45 minutes, 95% CI 22-86) compared to NZ Europeans (56 minutes, 95% CI 24-97) and Pacific peoples (54 minutes, 95% CI 23-97). Maori had the highest age-standardised incidence of admission, but shorter hospital length of stay (0.9 days, IQR 0.4-2.3) compared to Pacific peoples (3.8 days, IQR 1.8-3.9) and NZ Europeans (2.0 days, IQR 1.0-3.7). CONCLUSION: This is the first paper to employ a Kaupapa Maori approach examining NTDP patients presenting to the ED. While outcome measures were largely positive, differences in demographic variables indicate upstream failures, specifically barriers to accessing primary oral healthcare and a paucity of Kaupapa Maori initiatives. Further action and accountability are required to provide high-quality, equitable care for Maori.
Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Pueblo Maorí , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
AIMS: To survey the national workforce that manages children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Aotearoa New Zealand and compare with glycaemic outcomes for 2021. METHODS: A representative from each tertiary and regional diabetes service in Aotearoa New Zealand was asked to participate in an online survey assessing health-care professional (HCP) workforce numbers operating for the 2021 calendar year. Regional full-time-equivalent (FTE), glycaemic outcomes and population demographics were compared to a previously reported workforce surveys (2015 and 2019). RESULTS: Seventeen sites responded - including all four large tertiary centres - serving >99% of children and adolescents with T1D in Aotearoa New Zealand. HCP resourcing varied across sites, with median (range) HCP/100 patient ratios of: doctors: 0.40 (0.16-1.11), nurses: 1.19 (0.29-5.56), dietitians: 0.25 (0-1.11) and psychologist/social workers: 0 (0-0.26). No site met all of the International Society of Paediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) recommendations of HCP/100 patient ratios. Measures of socio-economic deprivation predicted HbA1c, rather than the diabetes clinic attended. Overall, only 15.1% (240/1585) of patients had an HbA1c less than the recommended 53 mmol/mol. CONCLUSIONS: The Aotearoa New Zealand workforce for children and adolescents with T1D is under-resourced and no site meets the ISPAD recommendations. There has been no significant increase in HCP/100 patient ratios compared to previous workforce surveys over the last decade. Few children and adolescents with T1D meet the recommended HbA1c. Resourcing according to recommended clinical need is required if equity in outcomes for young people with T1D is to be addressed.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda , Adolescente , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) aims to achieve Maori health equity and cultural safety within the surgical workforce. The RACS Maori Health Strategy and Action Plans encourage Surgical Education and Training (SET) selection criteria that recognizes and credit applicants who identify as Maori or demonstrate competence in Maori health issues. This study investigates the current SET selection criteria for Maori entering surgical specialties. METHODS: The selection criteria for each surgical speciality for the proposed 2024 intake were examined through a documentary analysis. Criteria were reviewed for applicability to Maori identification and/or cultural competency. RESULTS: Criteria related to Maori identification and/or cultural competency make up 6%, 2%, and 1.5% of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck, General, and Vascular Surgery total SET selection score respectively. Criteria related to Maori identification and/or cultural competency make up 9% and 0.1% of Orthopaedic and Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery ranking scores for interview eligibility respectively. Cardiothoracic Surgery, Paediatric Surgery, Neurosurgery and Urology specialties do not incorporate any criteria appertaining to Maori. Allocation of research-related points determined by authorship may disincentivize Maori trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Some surgical specialties fail to recognize or credit Maori identification and cultural competency in SET selection criteria. There is a need for regular auditing to ensure SET criteria align with the RACS aspirations for Maori health equity and cultural safety within the surgical workforce.