IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors Have the Fastest Time to Meaningful Clinical Response for Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Background/Objectives: Several treatment options with differing mechanisms exist for plaque psoriasis. The objective of this analysis was to compare the time to onset of action among the available systemic therapies for plaque psoriasis. Methods: Randomized controlled trials that investigated two or more therapeutics for the management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were included. A weighted average time for 50% of patients to reach PASI75 and PAI90 with each of the therapeutics was calculated. A network meta-analysis was performed to determine which therapeutics were significantly faster in time to meaningful clinical response than others. Results: IL-17 inhibitors had the shortest time to achieve PASI75 and PASI90 followed by risankizumab in the weighted mean analysis. In the meta-analysis, the fastest time to PASI75 was seen with bimekizumab, brodalumab and ixekizumab. No significant (p < 0.05) difference was seen in the time to meaningful clinical response between these drugs; however, bimekizumab was significantly faster in time to PASI75 among the remaining therapeutics. In the meta-analysis for PASI90, the fastest time was seen with ixekizumab, bimekizumab, risankizumab, secukinumab and guselkumab with no significant differences in between these therapeutics. However, bimekizumab was significantly faster than the remaining therapeutics for PASI90. Conclusions: IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may be considered as requiring the shortest time for meaningful clinical response in plaque psoriasis. In addition to the time to onset, the safety profile of each drug needs to be considered when deciding on a therapeutic to initiate.

Senior Podiatrists in Solo Practice are High Performers of Nail Excisions.

BACKGROUND: Nail excisions are indicated for onychocryptosis and nail spicules. They are technically demanding and require a refined skill set. We aimed to characterize practice patterns of US providers performing nail excisions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Medicare provider use and payment data, part D, for all claims of partial or complete nail/nail matrix excision with/without nail plate removal/destruction (current procedural terminology code 11750). High performers were defined as providers performing annual nail excisions 2 standard deviations above the mean. We analyzed demographic risk factors for nail excision high performers, including practice location, years of experience, household median income, practice type, and provider gender. Statistical analysis was conducted in SAS v9.4, with values of P < .05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Providers (n = 32,279) and high performers (n = 942) performed mean 34.7 and 173 nail excisions annually. Unsurprisingly, podiatrists constituted 99.7% of all nail excision performers. Providers in the South versus Midwest and Northeast were more often nail excision high performers (odds ratio [OR], 1.95; P < .0001, and OR, 1.46; P < .0001). Solo versus group practitioners were more likely, respectively, to be nail excision high performers (OR, 2.15; P < .0001). With linear regression analysis, for every 10-year increase in years of provider experience, there was an increase of 1.2 nail excisions annually per provider (P < .0001). For every $100,000 increase in household median income of practice location, there was a decrease of 9.9 nail excisions annually per provider. CONCLUSIONS: Southern podiatrists, podiatrists with more years of experience, solo practitioners, and those practicing in regions with lower household median incomes were more likely to perform higher numbers of nail excisions. Identifying performance trends among podiatrists can help podiatrists understand how their performance of nail excisions compares to other podiatrists across the country.

Transition to Medicare Does Not Contribute to Rise in Outpatient Visits for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer, Actinic Keratosis, or Actinic Cheilitis in the US Population.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient visits for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and actinic keratoses (AK) have risen steadily in the United States, notably among Medicare beneficiaries. Individuals may delay seeking care for minimally symptomatic conditions until they qualify for Medicare coverage, indicating potential delay of nonurgent screening interventions for uninsured or underinsured patients younger than 65 years. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates whether an atypical increase in outpatient visits for NMSC, AK, or actinic cheilitis (AC) occurs at the age of Medicare transition by utilizing the National Ambulatory Care Survey from 1993 to 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Ambulatory Care Survey data were analyzed for patients aged within 5 years of 65 years. Diagnoses were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. Linear regression and outlier detection were used to identify a relationship between Medicare eligibility and outpatient visits for NMSC and AK/AC. RESULTS: Predicted visits for AK/AC and NMSC increased with age. However, there was no evidence of a disproportionate increase in outpatient visits for NMSC and AK/AC at the age of Medicare eligibility. CONCLUSION: Outside evidence indicates health care utilization increases after Medicare transition. This study's data do not support a corresponding rise in outpatient visits for NMSC and AK/AC at the age of Medicare eligibility.

Rosacea Core Domain Set for Clinical Trials and Practice: A Consensus Statement.

Importance: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of rosacea is impeding and likely preventing accurate data pooling and meta-analyses. There is a need for standardization of outcomes assessed during intervention trials of rosacea. Objective: To develop a rosacea core outcome set (COS) based on key domains that are globally relevant and applicable to all demographic groups to be used as a minimum list of outcomes for reporting by rosacea clinical trials, and when appropriate, in clinical practice. Evidence Review: A systematic literature review of rosacea clinical trials was conducted. Discrete outcomes were extracted and augmented through discussions and focus groups with key stakeholders. The initial list of 192 outcomes was refined to identify 50 unique outcomes that were rated through the Delphi process Round 1 by 88 panelists (63 physicians from 17 countries and 25 patients with rosacea in the US) on 9-point Likert scale. Based on feedback, an additional 11 outcomes were added in Round 2. Outcomes deemed to be critical for inclusion (rated 7-9 by ≥70% of both groups) were discussed in consensus meetings. The outcomes deemed to be most important for inclusion by at least 85% of the participants were incorporated into the final core domain set. Findings: The Delphi process and consensus-building meetings identified a final core set of 8 domains for rosacea clinical trials: ocular signs and symptoms; skin signs of disease; skin symptoms; overall severity; patient satisfaction; quality of life; degree of improvement; and presence and severity of treatment-related adverse events. Recommendations were also made for application in the clinical setting. Conclusions and Relevance: This core domain set for rosacea research is now available; its adoption by researchers may improve the usefulness of future trials of rosacea therapies by enabling meta-analyses and other comparisons across studies. This core domain set may also be useful in clinical practice.

Race and ethnicity are inadequate predictors of ambulatory visit length and utilization of preventive services.

Health disparities can be experienced by any disadvantaged group who has limited access to healthcare or decreased quality of care. Quality of care can be measured by physician-patient communication measures such as length of visit, health outcomes, patient satisfaction, or by the services one receives such as screening or health education. This study aims to determine the relationship between length of physician-patient encounter, number of preventive services, ethnicity, and race. This study utilizes data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2007 to 2016. Visits with a single diagnosis were selected. Visits with the five most frequent diagnoses were selected by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or Tenth Revision (ICD-9/ICD-10) classification. The primary outcome is time spent with a physician in minutes and the number of preventive services provided represented by the Preventive Service Index (PSI). Of 255,916 visits, non-white individuals made up 16.2% (95% Confidence Interval 15.9-16.4) while Latinos represented 13.4% (95%CI 13.2-13.6) of individuals. Multivariate analysis revealed minimal differences in visit length in race and ethnic groups regardless of diagnosis. Greater PSI was associated with individuals less than 43 years old (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.0, 95% CI 1.8-2.3, p =< 0.0001), those who reside in metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4, p = 0.006), non-white individuals (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3, p = 0.004), and those with private insurance (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.4, p =< 0.0001). Race and ethnicity do not predict length of time with a physician regardless of diagnosis. Age, race, location within a metropolitan area, and insurance are significant but minimal predictors of receiving preventive services in the rank-order leading five most frequent diagnoses. This large, population-based study highlights improvements in the distribution of healthcare services from previous studies.

The Persistence of Nystatin Use for Dermatophyte Infections.

BACKGROUND: Despite the limited use of nystatin for tinea infections, physicians may continue to use it. METHODS: We assessed the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for all to determine the extent of topical nystatin use in tinea infections. RESULTS: Topical nystatin was used at 4.3% (2.1%, 6.0%) of all tinea infection visits. It was not used at visits with dermatologists and was most common among family medicine physicians (P=.02). DISCUSSION: Physicians are continuing to use nystatin for the treatment of tinea infections. Dermatologists have discontinued this treatment regimen, whereas other specialties have an opportunity to further improve their knowledge in this regard. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):e49-e50.     doi:10.36849/JDD.5606e.

Management of Pediatric Psoriasis: A U.S. Survey Based on Visits from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS).

INTRODUCTION: Approximately one-third of psoriasis cases present in the first two decades of life. Many psoriasis treatments are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adults, including topical agents, systemic non-biologic agents, and systemic biologic agents. Only a handful of psoriasis treatments are FDA approved for children. Given the constantly evolving landscape of pediatric psoriasis management, our aim is to characterize how children with psoriasis are treated in the U.S. METHODS: Data from the 2003-2016 and 2018 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) were used to evaluate patient demographics and treatment patterns for visits of children with psoriasis. Visits were stratified by those with a diagnosis of psoriasis and those for children with a diagnosis of psoriasis. Separate analyses for visits of children with a diagnosis of psoriasis were performed, including for sex, race, ethnicity, age, specialty of provider seen, and medications prescribed. RESULTS: Pediatric psoriasis visits accounted for 3.3% of visits with psoriasis from 2003 to 2016 and in 2018; about one-third of those visits were to primary care providers. Children with psoriasis were prescribed a variety of topical and systemic medications, of which the most frequently prescribed treatments were topical tacrolimus, followed by topical clobetasol and topical betamethasone dipropionate or betamethasone valerate. Etanercept was the only biologic prescribed to children. At least 59% of the visits for children with a diagnosis of psoriasis included a topical prescription while at least 5.3% of the visits included a systemic prescription. CONCLUSION: Use of off-label treatments was common for pediatric psoriasis. Most children with psoriasis were treated with topicals, of which tacrolimus, an unapproved treatment, was the most common. The frequent use of tacrolimus could indicate an avoidance of corticosteroids in children.

Onychomycosis Treatment Prescribed at Only Twenty Percent of Visits: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 2007 to 2016.

BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis represents the highest proportion of nail disorders seen in clinical practice. Onychomycosis management may differ amongst specialties, with impact on patient outcomes and quality of life (QoL). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize onychomycosis treatment across specialties, accounting for patient demographics, to assess for potential onychomycosis practice gaps. MATERIALS/METHODS: We conducted a population based cross-sectional analysis using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) 2007 to 2016 (the most recent years available). RESULTS: Overall, 71.6% of onychomycosis visits were with general practitioners (GPs), 25.8% with dermatologists, and 2.58% with pediatricians. No onychomycosis treatment was prescribed at 82.0% of dermatology visits and 78.9% of GP visits. Dermatologists (Odds Ratio (OR):2.27 [95% Confidence Interval (CI):[2.14-2.41]; P<0.0001) and GPs (OR:2.32 [2.21-2.44]; P<0.0001) were more likely than pediatricians to prescribe treatment vs no treatment. Dermatologists were more likely than GPs to prescribe both no treatment vs treatment and topical vs oral antifungals (OR:1.33 [1.16-1.52]; P<0.0001 and OR:4.20 [3.80-4.65]; P<0.0001), respectively. DISCUSSION: Our study showed that there is a low treatment rate for onychomycosis, with treatment prescribed at only 20% of visits. Untreated onychomycosis might result in secondary infection, pain, and negative QoL impact.1 Although dermatologists are specialists in nail disease management, they saw only about 25% of onychomycosis visits. Future efforts should be directed towards promoting onychomycosis therapy, and educating both patients and referring physicians that dermatologists are primary resources for nail disorder treatment.J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(10):1040-1045 doi:10.36849/JDD.6770.