Evaluating Outcomes of Nonaccidental Trauma in Military Children.

BACKGROUND: Nonaccidental trauma (NAT), or child abuse, is a leading cause of childhood injury and death in the US. Studies demonstrate that military-affiliated individuals are at greater risk of mental health complication and family violence, including child maltreatment. There is limited information about the outcomes of military children who experience NAT. This study compares the outcomes between military-dependent and civilian children diagnosed with NAT. STUDY DESIGN: A single-institution, retrospective review of children admitted with confirmed NAT at a Level I trauma center was performed. Data were collected from the institutional trauma registry and the Child Abuse Team's database. Military affiliation was identified using insurance status and parental or caregiver self-reported active-duty status. Demographic and clinical data including hospital length of stay (LOS), morbidity, specialty consult, and mortality were compared. RESULTS: Among 535 patients, 11.8% (n = 63) were military-affiliated. The median age of military-associated patients, 3 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1 to 7), was significantly younger than civilian patients, 7 months (IQR 3 to 18, p < 0.001). Military-affilif:ated patients had a longer LOS of 4 days (IQR 2 to 11) vs 2 days (IQR 1 to 7, p = 0.041), increased morbidity or complication (3 vs 2 counts, p = 0.002), and a higher mortality rate (10% vs 4%, p = 0.048). No significant difference was observed in the number of consults or injuries, trauma activation, or need for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Military-affiliated children diagnosed with NAT experience more adverse outcomes than civilian patients. Increased LOS, morbidity or complication, and mortality suggest military-affiliated patients experience more life-threatening NAT at a younger age. Larger studies are required to further examine this population and better support at-risk families.

A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Open Management of Index Small Bowel Obstruction in Children.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited literature on the optimal approach to treat adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) in children. We sought to compare rates and outcomes of laparoscopic (LAP) and open (OPEN) surgery for pediatric ASBO. METHODS: A California statewide database was used to identify children (<18 years old) with an index ASBO from 2007 to 2020. The primary outcome was the type of operative management: LAP or OPEN. Secondary outcomes were hospital characteristics, patient demographics, and postoperative complications. We excluded patients treated non-operatively. RESULTS: Our study group had 545 patients. 381 (70%) underwent OPEN and 164 (30%) LAP during the index admission. Over the study period, there was increasing use of laparoscopic surgery, with higher use in older children (p < 0.001). LAP was associated with fewer overall complications (65.2% vs. 81.6%, p < 0.001), with a decreasing trend in complications over time (p < 0.001). The LAP group had significantly lower rates of bowel resection (4.9% vs. 17.1%, p < 0.001), length of stay (LOS) (17 vs. 23 days, p < 0.001), and TPN use (12.2% vs. 29.1%, p < 0.001). Mortality rates were equivalent. Although the LAP group had lower readmission rates (22.6% vs. 37.3%, p < 0.001), the length of time between discharge and readmission was similar (171 vs. 165 days, p = 0.190). DISCUSSION: The use of laparoscopic surgery for index ASBO increased over the study period. However, it was less commonly utilized in younger children. LAP had fewer overall complications as well as shorter LOS, decreased TPN use, and fewer readmissions. The benefits and risks of each approach must be weighed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Trends in Management of Index Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction in Children.

INTRODUCTION: To examine practice patterns and surgical outcomes of nonoperative versus operative management (OPM) of children presenting with an index adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). METHODS: A California statewide health discharge database was used to identify children (<18 y old) with an index ASBO from 2007 to 2020. The primary study outcome was evaluating initial management patterns (nonoperative versus OPM and early [≤3 d] versus late surgery [>3 d]) of ASBO. Secondary outcomes were hospital characteristics, patient demographics, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Of the 2297 patients identified, 1948 (85%) underwent OPM for ASBO during the index admission. Of these, 14.7% underwent early surgery within 3 d. Teaching hospitals had higher operative intervention than nonteaching centers (87.1% versus 83.7%, P = 0.034). OPM was the highest in 0-5-year-olds compared to other ages (89% versus 82%, P < 0.001). In comparison to early surgery, late surgery was associated with longer length of stay (early 7[interquartile range 5-10], late 9[interquartile range 6-17], P < 0.001), increased infectious complications (16.4% versus 9.8%, P = 0.004), and greater use of total parenteral nutrition (28.0% versus 14.3%, P = 0.001); there was no difference in bowel resection (21% versus 18%, P = 0.102) or mortality (P = 0.423). CONCLUSIONS: Our pediatric study demonstrated a high rate of OPM for index ASBO, especially in newborns and toddlers. Although operative intervention, especially late surgery, was associated with increased length of stay, increased infectious complications, and increased total parenteral nutrition use, the rates of bowel resection and mortality did not differ by management strategy. These trends need to be further evaluated to optimize outcomes.

Pediatric penetrating thoracic trauma: Examining the impact of trauma center designation and penetrating trauma volume on outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: We analyzed the impact of treating center designation and case volume of penetrating trauma on outcomes after pediatric penetrating thoracic injuries (PTI). METHODS: PTI patients <18 years were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (2013-2016). Centers were categorized by type (Pediatric or Adult) and designation status (Level I, Level II, and other). Performance was calculated as the difference between observed and expected mortality and standardized using the total penetrating trauma volume per center. Expected mortality was calculated using the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model. Pearson correlation and linear mixed-effects models evaluated the association between variables and performance. RESULTS: We identified 4,134 PTI patients treated at 596 trauma centers: 879 (21%) at Adult Level I, 608 (15%) at Adult Level II, 531 (13%) at Pediatric Level I, 320 (8%) at Pediatric Level II, and 1,796 (43%) at other centers. Primary injury mechanisms were firearm-related (58%) and cut/piercing (42%). Overall mortality was 16% and median predicted mortality was 3.6% (IQR: 1.5% - 11.2%). Among patients with thoracic firearm-related injuries, centers with lower penetrating case volume and total trauma care demonstrated significantly worse outcomes. Multivariable analysis revealed Adult Level I centers had superior outcomes compared with all other non-Level I centers. There was no difference in mortality between Pediatric and Adult Level I centers. DISCUSSION: Adult Level I trauma center designation and annual case volume of penetrating thoracic trauma are associated with improved mortality after pediatric firearm-related thoracic injuries. Further study is needed to identify factors in higher volume centers that improve outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.