Comprehensive analysis of fibroblast activation protein expression across 23 tumor indications: insights for biomarker development in cancer immunotherapies.

Introduction: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is predominantly upregulated in various tumor microenvironments and scarcely expressed in normal tissues. Methods: We analyzed FAP across 1216 tissue samples covering 23 tumor types and 70 subtypes. Results: Elevated FAP levels were notable in breast, pancreatic, esophageal, and lung cancers. Using immunohistochemistry and RNAseq, a correlation between FAP gene and protein expression was found. Evaluating FAP's clinical significance, we assessed 29 cohorts from 12 clinical trials, including both mono and combination therapies with the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab and chemotherapy. A trend links higher FAP expression to poorer prognosis, particularly in RCC, across both treatment arms. However, four cohorts showed improved survival with high FAP, while in four others, FAP had no apparent survival impact. Conclusions: Our results emphasize FAP's multifaceted role in therapy response, suggesting its potential as a cancer immunotherapy biomarker.

A multicentre analytical comparison study of inter-reader and inter-assay agreement of four programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry assays for scoring in triple-negative breast cancer.

AIMS: Studies in various cancer types have demonstrated discordance between results from different programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays. Here, we compare the reproducibility and analytical concordance of four clinically developed assays for assessing PD-L1-positivity in tumour-infiltrating immune cells in the tumour area (PD-L1-IC-positivity) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS AND RESULTS: Primary TNBC resection specimens (n = 30) were selected based on their PD-L1-IC-positivity per VENTANA SP142 (<1%: 15 cases; 1-5%: seven cases; >5%: eight cases). Serial histological sections were stained for PD-L1 using VENTANA SP142, VENTANA SP263, DAKO 22C3 and DAKO 28-8. PD-L1-IC-positivity and tumour cell expression (≥1 versus <1%) were scored by trained readers from seven sites using online virtual microscopy. The adjusted mean of PD-L1-IC-positivity for SP263 (7.8%) was significantly higher than those for the other three assays (3.7-4.9%). Differences in adjusted means were statistically significant between SP263 and the other three assays (P < 0.0001) but not between the three remaining assays when excluding SP263 (P = 0.0961-0.6522). Intra-class correlation coefficients revealed moderate-to-strong inter-reader agreement for each assay (0.460-0.805) and poor-to-strong inter-assay agreement for each reader (0.298-0.678) on PD-L1-IC-positivity. CONCLUSIONS: In this first multicentre study of different PD-L1 assays in TNBC, we show that PD-L1-IC-positivity for SP142, 22C3 and 28-8 was reproducible and analytically concordant, indicating that these three assays may be analytically interchangeable. The relevance of the higher PD-L1-IC-positivity for SP263 should be further investigated.

Multicentric Analytical and Inter-observer Comparability of Four Clinically Developed Programmed Death-ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry Assays in Advanced Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested increased clinical benefit with inhibition of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed death-1 in patients with PD-L1-positive locally advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined the analytical and inter-observer comparability of PD-L1-positivity across 4 clinically developed immunohistochemistry assays in clear-cell RCC (CCRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomly selected archived, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded nephrectomy specimens from 201 patients with locally advanced CCRCC were screened using VENTANA SP142. From these, 30 cases were selected based on their tumor-infiltrating immune cell (IC) PD-L1 status (PD-L1-IC-positivity of < 1%, 1%-5%, or > 5%; 10 cases each). These cases were stained for PD-L1 using VENTANA SP142 and SP263, and DAKO 22C3 and 28-8, and scored for PD-L1 expression on IC and tumor cells (TC) by trained readers at 5 sites. RESULTS: Adjusted mean percentages of PD-L1-IC-positivity and PD-L1-TC-positivity varied from 4.0% to 4.9% and from 1.3% to 10.7%, respectively, between assays. Inter-assay differences in PD-L1-IC-positivity were small and non-significant (P = .1938 to .9963); for PD-L1-TC-positivity, significant differences were observed between VENTANA SP142 and the other assays (P ≤ .0001) and between VENTANA SP263 and DAKO 28-8 (P = .0248). Intra-class correlation values showed moderate-to-high inter-reader agreement for each assay for PD-L1-IC-positivity and for 3 assays for PD-L1-TC-positivity. CONCLUSIONS: In this first multicenter analytical comparison study of PD-L1 assays in CCRCC, PD-L1-positivity could be assessed reproducibly using all 4 assays for IC and for 3 of the 4 assays for TC.