Partial upper sternotomy for aortic valve replacement provides similar mid-term outcomes as the full sternotomy.

Background: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via upper partial sternotomy (MiniAVR) provides very good short-term results and delivers certain advantages in the postoperative course. There is limited data regarding the mid-term mortality and morbidity following this minimally invasive surgery. Methods: We provide a retrospective analysis of the patients, undergoing MiniAVR versus full sternotomy (FS) for aortic valve replacement with biological prosthesis. As the primary combined end-point the combination of death, stroke, and rehospitalization within 3 years postoperatively was defined. Data have been collected from National Cardiac Surgery Registry and insurance companies. Results: Two hundred consecutive patients with aortic valve replacement (100 ministernotomy in MiniAVR group and 100 full sternotomy in FS group) with biological prosthesis were included in this study. Ministernotomy had longer cross-clamp and bypass times (median difference 6.5 min, P=0.005, and 8.5 min, P=0.002 respectively). Patients operated via upper partial sternotomy had a lower postoperative bleeding [300 mL (IQR, 290) vs. 365 mL (IQR, 207), P=0.031]. There was no difference in the 3-year mortality (14% vs. 11%, P=0.485). The mean number of readmission 3 years after surgery per capita was almost the same in both groups (1.65 vs. 1.60, P=0.836). Median time to the first readmission was longer in the MiniAVR group (difference 8.9 months). The incidence of combined end-point during 3 years postoperatively in both groups was not statistically different (P=0.148), as well as readmissions from cardio-vascular reasons (subhazard ratio 0.90, P=0.693). Conclusions: Upper partial sternotomy can be performed safely for aortic valve replacement, without increased risk of death, stroke or re-admission in 3 years postoperatively.

The Efficacy and Safety of Hybrid Ablations for Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to comprehensively determine the procedural safety and midterm efficacy of hybrid ablations. BACKGROUND: Hybrid ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) (thoracoscopic ablation followed by catheter ablation) has been used for patients with nonparoxysmal AF; however, accurate data regarding efficacy and safety are still limited. METHODS: Patients with nonparoxysmal AF underwent thoracoscopic, off-pump ablation using the COBRA Fusion radiofrequency system (Estech) followed by a catheter ablation 3 months afterward. The safety of the procedure was assessed using sequential brain magnetic resonance and neuropsychological examinations at baseline (1 day before), postoperatively (2-4 days for brain magnetic resonance imaging or 1 month for neuropsychological examination), and at 9 months after the surgical procedure. Implantable loop recorders were used to detect arrhythmia recurrence. Arrhythmia-free survival (the primary efficacy endpoint) was defined as no episodes of AF or atrial tachycardia while off antiarrhythmic drugs, redo ablations or cardioversions. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (age: 62.5 ± 10.5 years) were enrolled, 37 (62.7%) were men, and the mean follow-up was 30.3 ± 10.8 months. Thoracoscopic ablation was successfully performed in 55 (93.2%) patients. On baseline magnetic resonance imaging, chronic ischemic brain lesions were present in 60.0% of patients. New ischemic lesions on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging were present in 44.4%. Major postoperative cognitive dysfunction was present in 27.0% and 17.6% at 1 and 9 months postoperatively, respectively. The probability of arrhythmia-free survival was 54.0% (95% CI: 41.3-66.8) at 1 year and 43.8% (95% CI: 30.7-57.0) at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The thoracoscopic ablation is associated with a high risk of silent cerebral ischemia. The midterm efficacy of hybrid ablations is moderate.

A contemporary approach to a young female patient with Loeys-Dietz syndrome and an uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Aortic dissection is a relatively uncommon, but often catastrophic disease that requires early and accurate diagnosis. It often presents in patients with congenital connective tissue disorders. The current aortic surgical techniques are related with serious early and late complications. This case report emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis of aortic root dilatation and the risk of dissection, especially in patients with congenital connective tissue disorders. We present an alternative, contemporary and multidisciplinary approach based on the present state of knowledge. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a rare case of a young female patient with Loeys-Dietz syndrome who was admitted with an uncomplicated aortic dissection (Stanford type B / DeBakey type III) and a dilated aortic root. After a period of close surveillance and extensive vascular imaging, thoracic endovascular aortic repair was deemed to be technically not possible. Medical treatment was optimized and our patient successfully underwent a personalised external aortic root support procedure (PEARS) as a contemporary alternative to existing aortic root surgical techniques. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the importance of interdisciplinary approach, close follow-up and multimodality imaging. The decision to intervene in a chronic type B aortic dissection is still challenging and should be made in experienced centers by an interdisciplinary team. However, if an acute complication occurs, thoracic endovascular aortic repair TEVAR is the method of choice. In all cases optimal medical treatment is important. There is increasing evidence that personalized external aortic root support procedure PEARS is effective in stabilizing the aortic root and preventing its dilatation and dissection not only in patients with Marfan syndrome, but also in other cases of aortic root dilation of other etiologies. Moreover, many publications have reported the additional benefit of reduction or even eradication of aortic regurgitation by improving coaptation of the aortic valve leaflets in dilated aortas.

Hyperuricemia treatment in acute heart failure patients does not improve their long-term prognosis: A propensity score matched analysis from the AHEAD registry.

BACKGROUND: Hyperuricemia is associated with a poorer prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients. Benefits of hyperuricemia treatment with allopurinol have not yet been confirmed in clinical practice. The aim of our work was to assess the benefit of allopurinol treatment in a large cohort of HF patients. METHODS: The prospective acute heart failure registry (AHEAD) was used to select 3160 hospitalized patients with a known level of uric acid (UA) who were discharged in a stable condition. Hyperuricemia was defined as UA ≥500 µmoL/L and/or allopurinol treatment at admission. The patients were classified into three groups: without hyperuricemia, with treated hyperuricemia, and with untreated hyperuricemia at discharge. Two- and five-year all-cause mortality were defined as endpoints. Patients without hyperuricemia, unlike those with hyperuricemia, had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction, a better renal function, and higher hemoglobin levels, had less frequently diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation, and showed better tolerance to treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and/or beta-blockers. RESULTS: In a primary analysis, the patients without hyperuricemia had the highest survival rate. After using the propensity score to set up comparable groups, the patients without hyperuricemia had a similar 5-year survival rate as those with untreated hyperuricemia (42.0% vs 39.7%, P = 0.362) whereas those with treated hyperuricemia had a poorer prognosis (32.4% survival rate, P = 0.006 vs non-hyperuricemia group and P = 0.073 vs untreated group). CONCLUSION: Hyperuricemia was associated with an unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile in HF patients. Treatment with low doses of allopurinol did not improve the prognosis of HF patients.

Residual echocardiographic and computed tomography findings after thoracoscopic occlusion of the left atrial appendage using the AtriClip PRO device.

OBJECTIVES: Thoracoscopic occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) has become a routine part of thoracoscopic ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Evaluation of residual findings of the occluded LAA by echocardiography has yet to be described. METHODS: Patients with AF indicated for hybrid ablation (thoracoscopic procedure followed by catheter ablation) were enrolled in this study. LAA was occluded as a routine part of the thoracoscopic procedure. Follow-up transoesophageal echocardiography was performed at the end of the procedure, 2-5 days and 2-3 months after the procedure (before the endocardial stage). The residual pouches of the LAA were measured in the mitral valve view (30-110°) and in the perpendicular view. The depth of the residual pouch was measured from the ostial plane (connecting the Coumadin ridge and the circumflex artery) to the deepest part of the residuum. The volume of the residual pouch and the distance from the circumflex artery to the proximal and the distal ends of the AtriClip were measured using computed tomography. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled in this study. The success rate for the occlusion of the LAA, assessed on transoesophageal echocardiography 2-5 days after surgery, was 97.5%. Regarding the residual findings, no reperfused LAAs were found, and only residual stumps remained. The depth of the stump was 12.9 ± 5.9 mm, the area was 2.2 ± 1.1 cm2, and the volume was 3.6 ± 1.9 ml (all data are shown as mean ± standard deviation). CONCLUSIONS: The occlusion of the LAA using an AtriClip PRO device was a clinically safe procedure with high efficacy and was associated with the presence of a small residual pouch after occlusion. Clinical trial registration: NCT02832206.

Two-staged hybrid ablation of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: clinical outcomes and functional improvements after 1 year.

OBJECTIVES: Hybrid ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a promising treatment strategy; however, data regarding its efficacy and safety are still limited. METHODS: Patients with non-paroxysmal AF were enrolled. First, a thoracoscopic, epicardial isolation of pulmonary veins and the left atrial posterior wall ('box lesion') was performed; a novel unipolar/bipolar radiofrequency device was used. Moreover, in 12 patients enrolled thereafter, the left atrial appendage was occluded. Electrophysiological evaluation and catheter ablation were performed 2-3 months later, with the goal of verifying or completing (if needed) the box lesion and ablation of the ganglionated plexi and the cavotricuspid isthmus. Outcomes were assessed using 1-week and 24-h Holter monitoring, repeated echocardiography and laboratory measurements. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (13 persistent and 25 long-standing persistent AF) were enrolled with a mean AF duration of 33 ± 32.9 months. The procedure was successfully completed in 35 patients; 3 patients underwent only the surgical part because of a postoperative left atrial appendage thrombus (2 patients) and perioperative stroke (1 patient). After 6 months, 30 (86%) patients were arrhythmia-free, whereas 80% were also off antiarrhythmics. After 1 year, 28 (82%) patients were arrhythmia-free, 79% were off anti-arrhythmics and 47% were off anticoagulation treatment. Four (10.5%) serious postoperative complications occurred, including 1 stroke, 1 right phrenic nerve palsy and 2 pneumothoraxes with a need for drainage. Significant improvements were observed in echocardiographic, functional and serological parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid ablation is an effective treatment strategy for patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF. Over 80% of patients were arrhythmia-free 1 year after the procedure. Sinus rhythm restoration was accompanied by improvements in functional, echocardiographic and serological markers.

Prognostic impact and change of concomitant mitral regurgitation after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Significant aortic stenosis (AS) is frequently associated with mitral regurgitation (MR) of varying degrees. We sought to assess the change in MR grade after the aortic valve procedure, to find predictors of MR improvement and finally to determine the prognostic impact of persistent MR. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a group of 101 AS patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) at our institution between January 2007 and March 2014 and who presented with MR grade 2 or higher on preoperative echocardiogram - 35 patients underwent an isolated AVR, 18 underwent TAVI, and the rest underwent a combined procedure, which included coronary artery bypass grafting. The mean follow-up was 28.5±21 months. RESULTS: MR improved significantly after the procedures (2.4±0.5 vs. 1.9±0.9, p<0.001) and a decline in the severity of MR was observed regardless of etiology (degenerative/post-rheumatic, functional/ischemic, combined) without significant changes between groups (p=0.667). Downgrading of MR severity was associated with improvement in ejection fraction (p=0.021) and reduction in the size of cardiac chambers, especially the left atrium (left atrial diameter, p<0.001). None of the preoperatively evaluated factors (severity of AS, MR etiology, ejection fraction, cardiac chamber dimensions, coronary artery disease, and New York Heart Association functional class) was a significant predictor of MR improvement. Persistence of higher degrees of MR was associated with a more frequent need for cardiovascular hospitalization, while the survival rate 3 years after procedure was not affected (p=0.146). CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of AS patients, an aortic valve procedure leads to reduction in coexistent MR. A significant decrease in the severity of MR in our study was observed regardless of etiology and preoperative grade of MR. Persistence of higher degrees of MR was associated with increased patient morbidity.

Values of osteoprotegerin in aortic valve tissue in patients with significant aortic stenosis depend on the existence of concomitant coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION: Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) is a serious clinical problem. The strongest predictor of CAVS progression is the amount of calcium in the aortic valve. The pathogenesis of CAVS is largely consistent with the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis; however, about 50% of patients with CAVS do not exhibit significant atherosclerosis. Cardiovascular calcification is currently considered an actively regulated process, in which the important role is attributed to the RANKL/RANK/OPG (receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand/RANK/osteoprotegerin) axis. We measured OPG levels in the tissue of calcified, stenotic aortic valves in relation to the presence or absence of coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aortic valve samples were collected from 105 patients with calcified, mainly severe aortic stenosis, who were divided into two groups according to the presence of CAD. In Group A (n=44), there were normal coronary artery findings, while in Group B (n=61), there was angiographically demonstrated >50% stenosis of at least one coronary artery. The control Group C (n=21) consisted of patients without aortic stenosis and with normal angiographic findings on coronary arteries. RESULTS: The highest tissue concentrations of OPG [median (pmol/L), 25th-75th percentile] were found in Group A [6.95, 3.96-18.37], which was significantly different compared to the other two groups (P=.026 and .001, respectively). The levels of OPG in Group B [4.15, 2.47-9.16] and in Group C [2.25, 1.01-5.08] did not differ significantly (P=.078); however, the lowest concentrations of OPG were found in Group C. Neither age nor gender in our study had effect on tissue levels of OPG (P=.994 for gender; P=.848 for age). CONCLUSION: Calcified and narrowed aortic valves, compared to the normal valves, were accompanied by a change in tissue concentrations of OPG, which is, in addition, dependent on the presence or absence of CAD. The highest tissue concentrations of OPG in our work were found in patients with significant aortic stenosis without concomitant CAD.

Positive influence of being overweight/obese on long term survival in patients hospitalised due to acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is clearly associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. However, in patients with acute heart failure (AHF), an increased BMI could represent a protective marker. Studies evaluating the "obesity paradox" on a large cohort with long-term follow-up are lacking. METHODS: Using the AHEAD database (a Czech multi-centre database of patients hospitalised due to AHF), 5057 patients were evaluated; patients with a BMI <18.5 kg/m2 were excluded. All-cause mortality was compared between groups with a BMI of 18.5-25 kg/m2 and with BMI >25 kg/m2. Data were adjusted by a propensity score for 11 parameters. RESULTS: In the balanced groups, the difference in 30-day mortality was not significant. The long-term mortality of patients with normal weight was higher than for those who were overweight/obese (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.26-1.48; p<0.001)). In the balanced dataset, the pattern was similar (1.22; 1.09-1.39; p<0.001). A similar result was found in the balanced dataset of a subgroup of patients with de novo AHF (1.30; 1.11-1.52; p = 0.001), but only a trend in a balanced dataset of patients with acute decompensated heart failure. CONCLUSION: These data suggest significantly lower long-term mortality in overweight/obese patients with AHF. The results suggest that at present there is no evidence for weight reduction in overweight/obese patients with heart failure, and emphasize the importance of prevention of cardiac cachexia.

Comparison of cardiac surgery with left atrial surgical ablation vs. cardiac surgery without atrial ablation in patients with coronary and/or valvular heart disease plus atrial fibrillation: final results of the PRAGUE-12 randomized multicentre study.

AIMS: Surgical ablation procedure can restore sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing cardiac surgery. However, it is not known whether it has any impact on long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre study randomized 224 patients with AF scheduled for valve and/or coronary surgery: group A (left atrial surgical ablation, n = 117) vs. group B (no ablation, n = 107). The primary efficacy outcome was the SR presence (without any AF episode) during a 24 h electrocardiogram (ECG) after 1 year. The primary safety outcome was the combined endpoint of death/myocardial infarction/stroke/renal failure at 30 days. A Holter-ECG after 1 year revealed SR in 60.2% of group A patients vs. 35.5% in group B (P = 0.002). The combined safety endpoint at 30 days occurred in 10.3% (group A) vs. 14.7% (group B, P = 0.411). All-cause 1-year mortality was 16.2% (A) vs. 17.4% (B, P = 0.800). Stroke occurred in 2.7% (A) vs. 4.3% (B) patients (P = 0.319). No difference (A vs. B) in SR was found among patients with paroxysmal (61.9 vs. 58.3%) or persistent (72 vs. 50%) AF, but ablation significantly increased SR prevalence in patients with longstanding persistent AF (53.2 vs. 13.9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical ablation improves the likelihood of SR presence post-operatively without increasing peri-operative complications. However, the higher prevalence of SR did not translate to improved clinical outcomes at 1 year. Further follow-ups (e.g. 5-year) are warranted to show any potential clinical benefit which might occur later.

Predictors of improvement of unrepaired moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing elective isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BACKGROUND: The persistence of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) after isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery is an important independent predictor of long-term mortality. The aim of the present study was to identify predictors of postoperative improvement in moderate IMR in patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing elective isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 135 patients with ischemic heart disease (age, 65+/-9 years; 81% male) and moderate IMR undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Fourteen patients died before the 12-month follow-up echocardiography and were excluded. At the 12-month follow-up, 57 patients showed no or mild IMR (improvement group), whereas 64 patients failed to improve (failure group). Before coronary artery bypass graft surgery, the improvement group had significantly more viable myocardium and less dyssynchrony between papillary muscles than the failure group (P<0.001). All other preoperative parameters were similar in both groups. Large extent (> or =5 segments) of viable myocardium (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.22 to 1.89; P<0.001) and absence (<60 ms) of dyssynchrony (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.29 to 1.72; P<0.001) were independently associated with improvement in IMR. The majority (93%) of patients with viable myocardium and an absence of dyssynchrony showed an improvement in IMR. In contrast, only 34% and 18% of patients with dyssynchrony and nonviable myocardium, respectively, showed an improvement in IMR, whereas 32% and 49%, respectively, of these patients showed worsening of IMR (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reliable improvement in moderate IMR by isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery was observed only in patients with concomitant presence of viable myocardium and absence of dyssynchrony between papillary muscles.