Poor Glycemic Control Is Associated with Failure to Complete Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery in Patients with Localized Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of glycemic control in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy is unclear. METHODS: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values were measured in patients with localized pancreatic cancer prior to any therapy (pretreatment) and after neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery (preoperative). HbA1c levels greater than 6.5% were classified as abnormal. Patients were categorized based on the change in HbA1c levels from pretreatment to preoperative: GrpA, always normal; Gr B, worsened; GrpC, improved; and GrpD, always abnormal. RESULTS: Pretreatment HbA1c levels were evaluable in 123 patients; there were 67 (55%) patients in GrpA, 8 (6%) in GrpB, 22 (18%) in GrpC, and 26 (21%) in GrpD. Of the 123 patients, 92 (75%) completed all intended therapy to include surgery; 57 (85%) patients in GrpA, 4 (50%) patients in GrpB, 16 (72%) patients in GrpC, and 15 (58%) patients in GrpD (p = 0.01). Elevated preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (OR 0.22;[0.07-0.66]), borderline resectable (BLR) disease stage (OR 0.20;[0.01-0.45]) and abnormal preoperative HbA1c (OR 0.30;[0.11-0.90]) were negatively associated with completion of all intended therapy. Abnormal preoperative HbA1c was associated with a 2.74-fold increased odds of metastatic progression during neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated preoperative HbA1c is associated with failure to complete neoadjuvant therapy and surgery and a trend for increased risk of metastatic progression.

Patency rates of portal vein/superior mesenteric vein reconstruction after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatectomy with venous reconstruction (VR) for pancreatic cancer (PC) is occurring more commonly. Few studies have examined the long-term patency of the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence following reconstruction. METHODS: From 2007 to 2013, patients who underwent pancreatic resection with VR for PC were classified by type of reconstruction. Patency of VR was assessed using surveillance computed tomographic imaging obtained from date of surgery to last follow-up. RESULTS: VR was performed in 43 patients and included the following: tangential resection with primary repair (7, 16%) or saphenous vein patch (9, 21%); segmental resection with splenic vein division and either primary anastomosis (10, 23%) or internal jugular vein interposition (8, 19%); or segmental resection with splenic vein preservation and either primary anastomosis (3, 7%) or interposition grafting (6, 14%). All patients were instructed to take aspirin after surgery; low molecular weight heparin was not routinely used. An occluded VR was found in four (9%) of the 43 patients at a median follow-up of 13 months; median time to detection of thrombosis in the four patients was 72 days (range 16-238). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatectomy with VR can be performed with high patency rates. The optimal postoperative pharmacologic therapy to prevent thrombosis requires further investigation.

Ablation of liver metastasis: is preoperative imaging sufficiently accurate?

The recent introduction of cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis has expanded the indications for treatment. As technology has advanced, a percutaneous approach has been developed. Percutaneous treatment, however, requires accurate preoperative imaging. From 1993 to 1999, 179 patients underwent operative exploration for treatment of suspected hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. One hundred seventy-seven patients were staged by preoperative CT, two patients were staged by MRI, and complete data were available in 176. Hepatic tumor count by preoperative imaging was compared to intraoperative tumor count obtained by inspection, palpation, ultrasonographic examination using a 3.5/7.5 MHz T probe, and careful gross sectioning of the resected specimen. Post hoc analysis was performed on 35 CT scans by two radiologists who specialize in abdominal CT. These radiologists were blinded to the intraoperative findings. Their interpretations were compared to the intraoperative counts and to each other. Thirty-four (19%) of 179 patients were deemed untreatable at operation because of unsuspected overwhelming liver involvement in 11 (6%) or extrahepatic metastases in 23 (13%). For the group, CT was accurate in 80 patients (45%), showed more lesions than were found in 16 (9%), and showed fewer metastases than were found in 80 (45%). When the preoperative scan predicted a solitary metastasis, it was correct in 45 (65%) of 69 patients and underestimated disease in 24 (35%). In the post hoc analysis, the mean numbers of lesions reported by the two radiologists did not differ from the mean number of tumors found; however, the radiologists' counts agreed on 16 (59%) and disagreed on 11 (41%) of the scans. The accuracy of CT decreased with increasing numbers of lesions. Regardless of the type of preoperative imaging, intraoperative findings altered the course of the operation in 96 (55%) of 176 patients. Preoperative imaging is not sufficiently accurate to permit adequate percutaneous treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

Mesenteric ischemia.

Mesenteric ischemia is an important clinical condition becoming more prevalent with aging of the population. Mesenteric ischemia may be manifest in an acute presentation, usually secondary to thromboembolism or cardiac insufficiency. Patients have abdominal pain, lactic acidosis, benign abdominal examination, and, often, coexistent multisystem organ dysfunction. Chronic mesenteric ischemia is secondary to proximal arterial stenosis or occlusions inadequately compensated by collateral flow. Clinical presentation may simulate occult malignancy. In this review article, the role of Doppler sonography and other diagnostic imaging tests in suspected acute mesenteric ischemia and mesenteric arterial insufficiency are evaluated with emphasis on diagnostic criteria and appropriate use in each clinical context.

Multiphase hepatic CT with a multirow detector CT scanner.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate a new injection-acquisition technique performed using a multirow detector CT scanner for separation of three distinct hepatic circulatory phases (hepatic artery, portal venous inflow, hepatic venous) and to determine which of these phases is optimal for detecting hypervascular neoplasm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two sequential acquisitions were performed during a single breath-hold followed by a third acquisition beginning 60 sec after injection. Injection-to-scan delay for the first acquisition was the individual patient's circulation time, which was determined by a preliminary mini bolus. The mean attenuation of the upper abdominal aorta, portal vein, and hepatic parenchyma were determined for each imaging pass in 20 patients with cirrhosis and 20 patients without cirrhosis. Tumor-to-liver contrast for hypervascular primary and metastatic neoplasm was evaluated in a different set of 16 cirrhotic patients and nine noncirrhotic patients. Three-dimensional CT arteriograms were obtained from first-pass data. RESULTS: Three distinct circulatory phases (hepatic artery, portal vein inflow or late arterial, and hepatic venous) were seen in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. Maximum tumor-to-liver contrast for hypervascular primary and metastatic neoplasm occurred during the second pass for both cirrhotic (p < 0.006) and noncirrhotic (p < 0. 001) patients. A three-dimensional hepatic-mesenteric CT arteriogram of normal or anomalous hepatic vessels without venous overlay was obtained from first-pass data in all patients. CONCLUSION: Rapid-sequence hepatic helical CT allows selection of the optimal time interval for hypervascular tumor detection. A new paradigm for rapid hepatic CT acquisition-namely, hepatic arterial, portal vein inflow, and hepatic venous phases-is recommended to replace hepatic artery dominant and portal venous phases.

Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the imaging performance characteristics of four multidetector-row helical computed tomography (CT) and assess improvement in volume coverage speed over that with single multidetector-row helical CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The section-sensitivity profile and image noise of a four multidetector-row scanner were measured with phantom scans and compared with predictions from theoretic models. Nominal section thickness ranged from 1.25 to 10.00 mm, beam collimation from 1.25 to 5.00 mm, and table speed from 3.75 to 30.00 mm per rotation. Image artifacts with four and single multidetector-row helical CT were compared in both a phantom study and a subjective rating analysis of clinical images. RESULTS: Compared with single multidetector-row helical CT, the volume coverage speed of four multidetector-row helical CT (range, 3.75-30.00 mm per rotation) is at least twice as fast as that with single multidetector-row helical CT (1.0-10.0 mm per rotation) with fully comparable image quality or, in many cases, three times as fast with diagnostically comparable image quality. CONCLUSION: Compared with single multidetector-row helical CT, four multidetector-row helical CT provides a two- to threefold improvement in volume coverage speed with comparable diagnostic image quality.

Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether unenhanced helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis, supplemented as necessary with delayed enhanced CT of the pelvis, is sufficient for urologists to treat patients with acute renal colic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans from 99 patients were analyzed retrospectively for the presence, size, and location of ureteral calculi and the presence and severity of secondary signs of obstruction. Clinical follow-up was analyzed by reviewing charts, directly communicating with patients, and reviewing surgical reports. Clinical information was correlated with CT findings. RESULTS: The findings of 51 CT scans were positive for calculi, and the findings of 48 were negative for calculi. The findings from two CT scans were false-positive, and none of the findings were false-negative. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of helical CT were 100%, 96%, and 98%, respectively. A significant difference in stone size was found between patients who were treated conservatively (3.3 +/- 1.3 mm) and patients who underwent a urologic procedure (7 +/- 6.2 mm) (p < .01) and between patients in whom successful ureteral stent placement was the sole intervention (3.9 +/- 2.8 mm) and patients in whom initial stent placement failed and who then underwent a second urologic procedure (7.4 +/- 3 mm) (p < .05). We found no statistically significant difference between the conservatively and interventionally treated groups with respect to stone location. The presence and severity of secondary signs of obstruction were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Stone size alone was found to correlate with patient treatment. Stone location and the presence and severity of secondary signs of obstruction did not affect patient treatment. Because the degree of obstruction and relative renal function are not relevant to the initial treatment of patients with ureteral stone obstruction, CT is adequate for both diagnosis and treatment.

Appropriateness of imaging procedure requests: do radiologists agree?

OBJECTIVE: We explored the agreement among radiologists in their evaluation of the appropriateness of individual requests for imaging procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 318 noninterventional CT, sonographic, MR imaging, and nuclear medicine procedures ordered at a general internal medicine clinic during 8 months in 1995. Five subspecialty radiologists used data from the radiology request from and clinic notes to independently rate the appropriateness of each requested imaging procedure on a four-point scale. The radiologists were unaware of the results achieved by each procedure. Each case was reviewed by at least three radiologists, of whom at least one had relevant subspecialty expertise. Agreement among radiologists was analyzed using Cohen's kappa statistic and weighted kappa statistics and Cronbach's alpha statistic. RESULTS: Nonchance agreement (kappa) was .19 +/- .05; weighted kappa was .24 +/- .05. Interrater agreement was significantly greater than that expected from chance alone (p < .01). The composite score, defined as the average of the radiologists' scores for each case, showed moderate reliability, as evidenced by a value for Cronbach's alpha of 70. CONCLUSION: In the absence of explicit criteria, we found modest but statistically significant agreement among radiologists about the appropriateness of individual requests for imaging procedures. The disagreement among radiologists highlights the importance of developing well-reasoned, explicit criteria by which to judge the appropriateness of diagnostic radiology procedures. Further study is needed to elucidate the relationship between appropriateness and actual patient outcomes.

Patient evaluation. Laboratory and imaging studies.

The evaluation of urolithiases, in terms of calculus detection and evaluation of the morphology and function of the kidneys, continues to be refined with advances in imaging technology. The most significant recent advance is use of helical or spiral CT scan for the accurate delineation of renal and ureteral calculi in the acute setting. This may provide an accurate, rapid, and cost-effective method of patient evaluation. The alternative approach is to use plain abdominal radiography to detect renal or ureteral calculi. Noncontrast-enhanced helical or spiral CT scanning has its greatest impact in patients with negative abdominal radiographs or in those patients with suspected urinary colic in whom renal but not ureteral calculi are seen. A supplemental intravenous urogram can be used, as appropriate, to evaluate renal function and degree of obstruction on both the involved and uninvolved side. Combined abdominal radiography and sonography may be used for calculus detection and demonstration of obstruction. Sonography is an operator-dependent technique requiring expertise, experience, and adequate imaging equipment for satisfactory results. Physiologic study of renal blood flow and urinary dynamics using Doppler techniques are possible, though considered to be in the realm of clinical investigation at this time. Sonography has a valuable role in the serial evaluation of chronic stone formers with a history of recurrent urinary infections related to obstruction or reflux. Radiography, fluoroscopy, and sonography are the imaging, methods used in ESWL treatment in preprocedure and postprocedure.

Ultrasonographic characteristics of testicular adenomatoid tumors.

PURPOSE: We determined the characteristics of testicular adenomatoid tumors which could distinguish these lesions from testicular malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical presentation and ultrasonographic findings in 3 men with testicular adenomatoid tumors were compared with those in 10 men treated for testicular malignancies. RESULTS: Clinical presentation was similar for all patients. Of the 3 adenomatoid tumors 2 appeared isoechoic on ultrasound and 1 appeared normal. None of the 10 cancers appeared isoechoic or normal on ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: Small tumors that appear isoechoic on ultrasound should be biopsied through an inguinal incision with frozen section assessment rather than immediate radical orchiectomy.

Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to prospectively compare helical CT with pulmonary angiography in the detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with an unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with an unresolved suspicion of pulmonary embolism were evaluated with contrast-enhanced helical CT and with selective pulmonary angiography. An average of 11 hr separated the two studies. The CT scans were obtained during one 24-sec or two 12-sec breath-holds. CT scans were interpreted without knowledge of the results of scintigraphy or angiography. Selective pulmonary angiograms were obtained with knowledge of the findings on the ventilation/perfusion scan only. The sensitivity and specificity of CT were compared with those of angiography for central vessels (segmental and larger) only and for all vessels. RESULTS: Eleven of the 20 patients had proved pulmonary embolism (seven in central vessels and four in subsegmental vessels only). When only central vessels were analyzed, CT sensitivity was 86%, specificity was 92%, and the likelihood ratio was 10.7. However, when subsegmental vessels were included, CT results were 63%, 89%, and 5.7, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our subset of patients, helical CT was only 63% sensitive. Subsegmental emboli are difficult to diagnose. Pulmonary angiography remains the study of choice. CT has a limited role in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism.

Variable-mode helical CT: imaging protocols.

Helical CT provides a rapidly acquired, accurately registered, two-dimensional data set during the phase of maximum vascular and parenchymal enhancement. The z-axis can be covered by using either a single acquisition, single breath-hold technique or by using multiple helical groups with intergroup delays for the patient's breathing. The latter approach, called variable-mode helical CT, allows large z-axis coverage of more than one anatomic region during injection of a single bolus of contrast material. We discuss helical scanning protocols, both single-acquisition and variable-mode, that we have developed for detection of disease involving major blood vessels (pulmonary arteries and aorta), perivascular tissue planes (neck, thorax, and pelvis), and abdominal viscera (liver, pancreas, and kidneys).

Focal masses in cirrhotic liver: CT and MR imaging features.

The development of hepatic cirrhosis triggers attempted repair through regenerative nodules of parenchyma among bands of scar tissue. Some authors believe that this regeneration initiates an evolutionary process that may lead to nodular enlargement and cellular dedifferentiation to malignancy. Both the destructive and reparative processes in cirrhosis produce changes that the radiologist must recognize when imaging the cirrhotic liver. This essay describes the CT and MR features of masses and masslike lesions in the cirrhotic liver, including the identifying characteristics and overlapping appearances of CT and MR.

Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol.

PURPOSE: To develop and compare contrast material injection protocols suitable for hepatic helical computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monophasic and biphasic helical CT were performed with contrast material with an iodine load of 50 g at 3 mL/sec for 60 seconds or at 5 mL/sec for 10 seconds and 2 mL/sec for 65 seconds, respectively. In 58 men and 51 women, aged 22-77 years, aortic and hepatic enhancement curves were constructed from a cluster acquisition with a slip-ring scanner operating in a nonhelical mode. RESULTS: The monophasic protocol produced a higher peak aortic enhancement (180 HU +/- 47 [+/- 1 standard deviation]) than the biphasic protocol (150 HU +/- 24). Peak hepatic enhancement (63-64 HU +/- 15) was equivalent. Calculated equilibrium time for the monophasic protocol was 95.1 seconds and for the biphasic protocol was 101.4 seconds. The contrast enhancement index differed only marginally between the two protocols (P < .4). CONCLUSION: Monophasic and biphasic protocols produced equivalent results when tailored for the shorter temporal window of a rapid-sequence helical acquisition.

Helical CT: clinical performance and imaging strategies.

For nonelectron beam systems, scan speed and image quality have reached a relative plateau of performance. Helical CT makes rapid coverage of the z axis possible, allowing scanning to occur during the optimal phase of vascular and organ enhancement. With the split breath-hold variable-mode approach, extended helical coverage across multiple anatomic regions is possible. The technique adds flexibility in choice of collimation, milliamperage, and breath-hold interval. It is easily tolerated by patients and reproducible, and the intersegment delays produce less heat loading on the x-ray tube.

Current imaging strategies for colorectal cancer.

Endoscopy and barium enema examinations are used to identify the primary site of disease in patients with clinical suspicion of colorectal cancer. Once colorectal cancer has been confirmed by imaging studies and biopsy, preoperative evaluation is directed toward accurate disease staging. Most currently available imaging techniques are inaccurate for detecting transmural extension, perienteric spread of tumors and distant lymph node involvement. Although both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have an unacceptably low sensitivity for accurate staging, CT is clearly superior to MRI for detecting extrahepatic metastases. Transrectal ultrasonography, however, is a promising new method for detecting perirectal spread of disease. The diagnostic efficacy of MRI and intravenous dynamic hepatic CT for detecting liver metastases is approximately equal. CT during arterial portography is recommended before resection of solitary liver metastases. Chest radiography is also part of the routine preoperative evaluation. Bone scans are rarely performed in patients without the skeletal pain suggestive of bone metastases. During the years following surgery for colorectal cancer, many patients undergo special imaging studies to identify local tumor recurrence, secondary tumor growth elsewhere within the large bowel and both regional and distant spread of disease. Thus, for the patient with a sharply increasing carcinoembryonic antigen level, CT of the abdomen and liver is the current recommendation. Immunoscintigraphy is a new imaging modality that addresses some of the limitations of current diagnostic procedures for colorectal cancer. This procedure gives whole body information on disease extent, especially in the extrahepatic abdomen and pelvis, and can therefore contribute to patient management decisions.

Image quality in dynamic CT: a clinical discussion.

Modern state-of-the-art computed tomographic (CT) scanners emphasize three capabilities: image quality, dynamic scan capability, and a high-resolution thin-section technique. Image quality is fundamental and dependent on optimum performance and the interrelationship of all system components. Variables that affect the performance of the scanner include x-ray tube output and rate of heat dissipation; quantum detection efficiency; electronic noise in the acquisition system; speed, accuracy, and integration of mechanical motion in the gantry and table; and the algorithm used for image reconstruction. System design must allow for dynamic scan operation, either in the single-scan or cluster mode, with short interscan or intergroup delays or, as more recently developed, with helical acquisition. Dynamic scanning is frequently used for nonneurologic applications, including diagnosis of vascular and perivascular diseases and multifocal organ disease, particularly hepatic disease. Efficient operation depends on rapid reconstruction and display capability. Modern systems have been engineered to provide flexible modes of operation, particularly in dynamic scanning, and rapid on-line review and analysis, all of which serve to improve the quality of images produced with dynamic CT scanning.