Systemic delivery of allogenic muscle stem cells induces long-term muscle repair and clinical efficacy in duchenne muscular dystrophy dogs.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a genetic progressive muscle disease resulting from the lack of dystrophin and without effective treatment. Adult stem cell populations have given new impetus to cell-based therapy of neuromuscular diseases. One of them, muscle-derived stem cells, isolated based on delayed adhesion properties, contributes to injured muscle repair. However, these data were collected in dystrophic mice that exhibit a relatively mild tissue phenotype and clinical features of DMD patients. Here, we characterized canine delayed adherent stem cells and investigated the efficacy of their systemic delivery in the clinically relevant DMD animal model to assess potential therapeutic application in humans. Delayed adherent stem cells, named MuStem cells (muscle stem cells), were isolated from healthy dog muscle using a preplating technique. In vitro, MuStem cells displayed a large expansion capacity, an ability to proliferate in suspension, and a multilineage differentiation potential. Phenotypically, they corresponded to early myogenic progenitors and uncommitted cells. When injected in immunosuppressed dystrophic dogs, they contributed to myofiber regeneration, satellite cell replenishment, and dystrophin expression. Importantly, their systemic delivery resulted in long-term dystrophin expression, muscle damage course limitation with an increased regeneration activity and an interstitial expansion restriction, and persisting stabilization of the dog's clinical status. These results demonstrate that MuStem cells could provide an attractive therapeutic avenue for DMD patients.

Progenitor cell isolation from muscle-derived cells based on adhesion properties.

Adult skeletal muscle possesses remarkable regenerative capacity that has conventionally been attributed to the satellite cells. These precursor cells were thought to contain distinct populations with varying myogenic potential. Recently, the identification of multipotent stem cells capable of new myofiber formation has expanded the general view on the muscle regenerative process. Here we examined the characteristics of turkey skeletal muscle-derived cell (MDC) populations that were separated according to their adhesion abilities. We sought to determine whether these abilities could be a potential tool for separating cells with different myogenic commitment. Using the preplate technique, we showed that MDCs display a wide range of adhesion ability, allowing us to isolate a marginal fraction with initial adhesion defect. Methodological investigations revealed that this defect represents an intrinsic and well-established biological feature for these cells. In vitro behavioral and morphological analyses showed that late adherent cells (LACs) share several primitive cell characteristics. Phenotypic assessment indicated that LACs contain early stage myogenic cells and immature progenitors of satellite cells, whereas early adherent cells consist mainly of fully committed precursors. Overall, our findings demonstrate for the first time in an avian model that differential MDC adhesion properties could be used to efficiently purify cells with varying myogenic commitment, including immature progenitor cells. This manuscript contains online supplemental material at http://www.jhc.org. Please visit this article online to view these materials.

Functional properties of muscle-derived cells related to morphological characteristics.

Satellite cells represent a specific lineage of myogenic progenitors that allow skeletal muscle postnatal growth and repair. They have been described as being heterogeneous in nature, a characteristic associated with functional disparities. Here, we aimed at determining whether the morphometric characteristics of freshly extracted turkey muscle-derived cells (MDC) could represent a distinctive criterion between them and could also be associated with their behavioural features. Morphometric analysis showed that MDC displayed wide cell size diversity, from 4 to 10 mum. Lineage marker analysis was performed on MDC sorted by their size using counterflow centrifugal elutriation and showed that the cell size was associated with the specific expression of myogenic markers, revealing different commitment levels. In vitro, the smallest MDC exhibited limited myogenic activity while larger MDC displayed a myogenic potential that increased with their size. Ultrastructural analysis revealed that the smallest MDC shared quiescent cell features, whereas the other cells displayed metabolic activity that also increased as a function of their size. Collectively, our results demonstrate that the size of freshly extracted MDC is indicative of their respective progression towards myogenic differentiation lineage. This criterion could be useful for the early separation of more or less committed cells in the myogenic programme.