Lung impedance changes during awake prone positioning in COVID-19. A non-randomized cross-over study.

BACKGROUND: The effects of awake prone positioning (APP) on respiratory mechanics in patients with COVID-19 are not well characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate changes of global and regional lung volumes during APP compared with the supine position using electrical lung impedance tomography (EIT) in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This exploratory non-randomized cross-over study was conducted at two university hospitals in Sweden between January and May 2021. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with confirmed COVID-19, an arterial cannula in place, a PaO2/FiO2 ratio <26.6 kPa (<200 mmHg) and high-flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive ventilation were eligible for inclusion. EIT-data were recorded at supine baseline, at 30 and 60 minutes after APP-initiation, and 30 minutes after supine repositioning. The primary outcomes were changes in global and regional tidal impedance variation (TIV), center of ventilation (CoV), global and regional delta end-expiratory lung-impedance (dEELI) and global inhomogeneity (GI) index at the end of APP compared with supine baseline. Data were reported as median (IQR). RESULTS: All patients (n = 10) were male and age was 64 (47-73) years. There were no changes in global or regional TIV, CoV or GI-index during the intervention. dEELI increased from supine reference value 0 to 1.51 (0.32-3.62) 60 minutes after APP (median difference 1.51 (95% CI 0.19-5.16), p = 0.04) and returned to near baseline values after supine repositioning. Seven patients (70%) showed an increase >0.20 in dEELI during APP. The other EIT-variables did not change during APP compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: Awake prone positioning was associated with a transient lung recruiting effect without changes in ventilation distribution measured with EIT in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19.

Effect of high-flow nasal oxygen on postoperative oxygenation in obese patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Background and Aim: Postoperative hypoxemia is common after general anesthesia in obese patients. We investigated if early application of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) improved postoperative oxygenation in obese patients compared with standard oxygen therapy following general anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Methods: This was an open labeled randomized controlled trial conducted at a university hospital in Sweden between October 23, 2018 and February 11, 2020. The study was performed as a substudy within a previously published trial. After ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 40 obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg m-2) scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery were randomized to receive oxygen using a standard low-flow nasal cannula (NC group) or HFNO at 40 L min-1 (HF group) immediately upon arrival to the post-anesthesia care unit. Flow rate (NC group) or FiO2 (HF group) was titrated to reach an initial SpO2 of 95%-98% after which settings were left unchanged. The primary outcome was PaO2 at 60 min following postoperative baseline values. Secondary outcomes included PaCO2, SpO2, hemodynamic variables, and patient self-assessed discomfort. Results: Thirty-four patients were available for analysis. PaO2 was similar between groups at postoperative baseline. After 60 min, PaO2 had increased to 12.6 ± 2.8 kPa in the NC group (n = 15) and 14.0 ± 2.7 kPa in the HF group (n = 19); (mean difference 1.4 kPa, 95% confidence interval -0.6 to 3.3; p = 0.16). There were no differences in PaCO2, hemodynamic variables, or self-assessed discomfort between groups after 60 min. Conclusion: In obese patients, HFNO did not improve postoperative short-term oxygenation compared with standard low-flow oxygen following general anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

High-flow nasal cannula versus face mask for preoxygenation in obese patients: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Preoxygenation efficacy with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in obese patients is not clearly established. The primary aim of this study was to compare heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula with face mask for preoxygenation in this population. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, randomised, controlled trial. Forty subjects with BMI ≥ 35 kg m-2 were randomly assigned to receive 5.0 min of preoxygenation with face mask and 7 cm H2 O of PEEP (PEEP group) or HFNC at 70 L min-1 (HF group). Following induction, bag-mask ventilation continued until laryngoscopy, whereas HFNC was maintained before and during intubation. The primary outcomes were end-tidal fraction of oxygen (EtO2 ) at 2.5 and 5.0 min duration of preoxygenation. Secondary outcomes included PaO2 and PaCO2 at 2.5 and 5.0 min of preoxygenation and at intubation. RESULTS: Mean (±SD) EtO2 was 0.89 (±0.04) versus 0.90 (±0.05) after 2.5 min (95% CI for mean difference -0.02, 0.04) and 0.93 (±0.02) versus 0.91 (±0.02) after 5.0 min of preoxygenation (95% CI for mean difference -0.03, -0.002) in the PEEP (n = 18) and HF group (n = 20), respectively. All subjects reached an EtO2  ≥ 0.85 at 5.0 min. There were no differences in mean PaO2 or PaCO2 during preoxygenation. Subjects in the HF group had a mean (±SD) apnoea time of 199 (±38) s, but no desaturation (SpO2  < 100%) occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Face mask with PEEP was superior to HFNC for preoxygenation in obese subjects. HFNC provided adequate preoxygenation quality in all subjects and may be considered as an alternative to face mask in selected patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: #ISRCTN37375068 (www.isrctn.com).

Awake prone positioning in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19: the PROFLO multicenter randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of awake prone positioning on intubation rates is not established. The aim of this trial was to investigate if a protocol for awake prone positioning reduces the rate of endotracheal intubation compared with standard care among patients with moderate to severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Adult patients with confirmed COVID-19, high-flow nasal oxygen or noninvasive ventilation for respiratory support and a PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 20 kPa were randomly assigned to a protocol targeting 16 h prone positioning per day or standard care. The primary endpoint was intubation within 30 days. Secondary endpoints included duration of awake prone positioning, 30-day mortality, ventilator-free days, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, use of noninvasive ventilation, organ support and adverse events. The trial was terminated early due to futility. RESULTS: Of 141 patients assessed for eligibility, 75 were randomized of whom 39 were allocated to the control group and 36 to the prone group. Within 30 days after enrollment, 13 patients (33%) were intubated in the control group versus 12 patients (33%) in the prone group (HR 1.01 (95% CI 0.46-2.21), P = 0.99). Median prone duration was 3.4 h [IQR 1.8-8.4] in the control group compared with 9.0 h per day [IQR 4.4-10.6] in the prone group (P = 0.014). Nine patients (23%) in the control group had pressure sores compared with two patients (6%) in the prone group (difference - 18% (95% CI - 2 to - 33%); P = 0.032). There were no other differences in secondary outcomes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The implemented protocol for awake prone positioning increased duration of prone positioning, but did not reduce the rate of intubation in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 compared to standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN54917435. Registered 15 June 2020 ( https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN54917435 ).

Laparoscopic left lobe liver resection in a porcine model: a study of the efficacy and safety of different surgical techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic liver surgery is evolving and the best technique for dividing the liver parenchyma is currently under debate. The aim of this study was to study different techniques during a full laparoscopic lobe resection, and determine the efficacy and risks of bleeding and gas embolism. METHODS: Sixteen pigs were randomized to two groups: group US underwent an operation with Ultracision shears (AutoSonix) and ultrasonic dissector (CUSA) and group VS with a vessel sealing system (Ligasure) and ultrasonic dissector. A left lobe resection was performed. Transesophageal endoscopic echocardiography (TEE) was used to detect gas emboli in the right side of the heart and pulmonary artery. The operations and TEE were recorded for later assessment. RESULTS: Compared with group VS, group US exhibited significantly more intraoperative bleeding (p = 0.02), a trend towards a longer operation time (p = 0.08), and a trend towards more embolization for grade I emboli. In total, 10 of 15 animals had emboli during the operation. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a laparoscopic left lobe resection can be performed with a combination of AutoSonix and CUSA as well as with Ligasure and CUSA instrumentation. In our hands, less bleeding was incurred with Ligasure than with AutoSonix.