Subspine femoroacetabular impingement: retrospective study of a series of patients treated by hip arthroscopic resection.

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a common hip pathology that causes pain and functional limitation in young patients. subspine femoroacetabular impingement (SFAI) is an increasingly diagnosed extra-articular subtype that occurs from mechanical conflict of the anteroinferior iliac spine (AIIS) with the cervico-diaphyseal junction during hip flexion, which is poorly described in the literature. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We aimed to describe the clinical, functional, and radiological results of the arthroscopic treatment of a group of patients with SFAI treated in our Hip Unit. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: We present a retrospective study of ten patients with SFAI treated between 2013 and 2020 with arthroscopic resection. Clinical results were assessed with scales such as visual analog scale (VAS); modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Radiological results were assessed with radiological measurements, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) reconstructions. RESULTS: Six patients had a Type III AIIS and four of them had Type II. Two patients had previously been surgically treated for FAIS. The range of motion improved in flexion from 107 ± 11 degrees before surgery to 127.5 ± 6 degrees (p = 0.005). MHHS improved from 48.1 (38-75.3) before surgery to 83.1 (57-91) (p = 0.007) and HOOS improved from 65.2 (58-75) to 89 (68.1-100) (p = 0.007). VAS improved from 7.3 (5-9) pre-surgical to 2.5 (0-8) post-surgical (p = 0.005). We did not have significant complications except for an asymptomatic case of heterotopic ossification (Brooker I). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic decompression of AIIS in SFAI patients is a safe procedure that provides satisfactory short-term functional results, improving clinical symptoms, function, sports performance, and range of motion in our study.

Talonavicular Coalition as a Cause of Foot Pain.

Tarsal coalitions have an incidence of 2% and are often underdiagnosed. These are considered to be one of the causes of chronic ankle and foot pain. Among all tarsal coalitions, the talonavicular type represents a rare and uncommon condition. The purpose of this article was to present the case of a 35-year-old male patient with a bilateral talonavicular coalition treated conservatively. A review of the literature was also performed to understand the management of this rare condition.

Diagnosis of infection in hip and knee revision surgery: intraoperative frozen section analysis.

UNLABELLED: In this study we validated intraoperatively the analysis of polymorphonuclear leucocyte frozen sections for diagnosis of infection in hip and knee revisions. Between 1996 and 2002 we examined sections and cultured periprosthetic tissues in prosthetic revision in 170 cases, including 146 cases (83 hips and 63 knees). We assessed sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), Youden index, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). We compared intraoperative findings and paraffin-embedded samples. The results in the knee group were SE=66.7%, SP=89.7% [95% confidence interval (CI)], PPV=81% (95% CI), NPV=81.4% (95% CI), Youden index=0.56, PLR=6.5 (95% CI) and NLR=0.4 (95% CI). In the paraffin-embedded samples the results were SE=91%, SP=87% (95% CI), PPV=81% (95% CI), NPV=94% (95% CI), PLR=7 (95% CI) and NLR=8.7 (95% CI). We found a significant difference. The results in the hip group were SE=50%, SP=100% (95% CI), PPV=100% (95% CI), NPV=94.9% (95% CI), Youden index=0.5 and PLR=0.5 (95% CI). In hip and knee prosthetic revision surgery the presence of polymorphonuclear cells correlates with infection, but their absence does not exclude it. It is a quick and inexpensive test that should be included in the diagnostic protocol in revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: diagnostic Study (investigating a diagnostic test), level I. See instructions to authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.