Current challenges in pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infection: a case series with literature review.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease (NTM-PD), particularly caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), is rising due to improved diagnostics, increased awareness, and more susceptible populations. NTM-PD significantly affects quality of life and imposes substantial economic costs. Understanding its clinical features, risk factors, and treatment challenges is vital for enhancing patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A convenience sample from the University of Connecticut Health Center and Wayne State University involving patients with NTM-PD from 2021 to 2024 was studied retrospectively. Cases were selected to demonstrate typical diagnostic and treatment challenges, followed by a multidisciplinary roundtable discussion to examine patient-centered care strategies. RESULTS: Analysis of six cases pinpointed chronic lung conditions and immunomodulatory therapy as key risk factors. Standard treatment, involving extensive multi-drug regimens, frequently results in poor adherence due to side effects and complex management requirements. The discussions underlined the importance of a customized, interdisciplinary approach to improve treatment effectiveness and patient quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: NTM-PD is an escalating public health issue with notable clinical and economic consequences. Managing this disease effectively demands a comprehensive, patient-centered strategy that includes precise diagnosis, flexible treatment plans, and collaborative care.

This paper focuses on a type of lung disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), which are bacteria found in the environment. NTM pulmonary disease has become more common due to better diagnostic methods, increased awareness, and a growing number of people with conditions that make them more vulnerable to infections. This disease can seriously affect a person's quality of life and is challenging to treat because it often requires long and complex antibiotic regimens.The authors, who have expertise in pulmonary diseases and infectious diseases, reviewed the medical records of six patients treated for NTM disease at the University of Connecticut Health Center and Wayne State University between 2021 and 2024. Following the submission of case synopses, the authors engaged in a discussion to explore the challenges of managing NTM infections. The discussion focused on identifying the best practices for diagnosis and treatment, emphasizing a patient-centered approach to care.Patients with preexisting lung conditions or those undergoing certain medical treatments are more susceptible to developing NTM lung disease. The treatment often involved multiple drugs, which posed challenges for patients due to side effects and the complexity of the regimen. The findings underscored the importance of a personalized, collaborative approach in treating NTM lung disease to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Five-Year Outcomes among U.S. Bronchiectasis and NTM Research Registry Patients.

Rationale: Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are prevalent among patients with bronchiectasis. However, the long-term natural history of patients with NTM and bronchiectasis is not well described. Objectives: To assess the impact of NTM on 5-year clinical outcomes and mortality in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods: Patients in the Bronchiectasis and NTM Research Registry with ⩾5 years of follow-up were eligible. Data were collected for all-cause mortality, lung function, exacerbations, hospitalizations, and disease severity. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without NTM at baseline. Mortality was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and the log-rank test. Measurements and Main Results: In total, 2,634 patients were included: 1,549 (58.8%) with and 1,085 (41.2%) without NTM at baseline. All-cause mortality (95% confidence interval) at Year 5 was 12.1% (10.5%, 13.7%) overall, 12.6% (10.5%, 14.8%) in patients with NTM, and 11.5% (9.0%, 13.9%) in patients without NTM. Independent predictors of 5-year mortality were baseline FEV1 percent predicted, age, hospitalization within 2 years before baseline, body mass index, and sex (all P < 0.01). The probabilities of acquiring NTM or Pseudomonas aeruginosa were approximately 4% and 3% per year, respectively. Spirometry, exacerbations, and hospitalizations were similar, regardless of NTM status, except that annual exacerbations were lower in patients with NTM (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Outcomes, including exacerbations, hospitalizations, rate of loss of lung function, and mortality rate, were similar across 5 years in patients with bronchiectasis with or without NTM.

Latent tuberculosis infection in the outpatient general medicine clinic: Efficacy of a nurse-run electronic directly observed treatment program.

Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of infectious death worldwide, with nearly 2 billion currently infected globally. While the largest burden of active TB resides in low to middle-income countries, the US contributes to the global epidemic and can play a significant role in interrupting the spread of TB by recognizing and treating latent TB infection (LTBI). The vast majority of active TB in the US originates from the reactivation of LTBI. This cross-sectional study examines the prevalence of LTBI in a general medicine practice and explores the efficacy of a primary care nurse-run electronic directly observed therapy (eDOT) treatment program. 1221 patients were screened for the presence of historical risk factors for LTBI. Of those screened, 192 were offered QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) testing and a CXR if indicated, resulting in 35 being offered treatment for LTBI. After an initial provider visit to decide on the treatment regimen, patients received weekly nurse calls to verify adherence, assess for side effects and answer additional patient questions. Provider follow-up appointments occurred at the midpoint and completion of treatment. 33 (94%) of patients with LTBI completed treatment. Patients found the nurse calls very helpful to reassure them about their treatment and to address treatment concerns. Primary care providers are particularly well-positioned to identify and treat LTBI. Screening is simple and treatment is generally well tolerated. Utilization of a nurse-run eDOT) program can be quite helpful in facilitating adherence and treatment completion.

Chasing the Ghost: Hyperinflammation Does Not Cause Sepsis.

Sepsis is infection sufficient to cause illness in the infected host, and more severe forms of sepsis can result in organ malfunction or death. Severe forms of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), or disease following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are examples of sepsis. Following infection, sepsis is thought to result from excessive inflammation generated in the infected host, also referred to as a cytokine storm. Sepsis can result in organ malfunction or death. Since COVID-19 is an example of sepsis, the hyperinflammation concept has influenced scientific investigation and treatment approaches to COVID-19. However, decades of laboratory study and more than 100 clinical trials designed to quell inflammation have failed to reduce sepsis mortality. We examine theoretical support underlying widespread belief that hyperinflammation or cytokine storm causes sepsis. Our analysis shows substantial weakness of the hyperinflammation approach to sepsis that includes conceptual confusion and failure to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between hyperinflammation and sepsis. We conclude that anti-inflammation approaches to sepsis therapy have little chance of future success. Therefore, anti-inflammation approaches to treat COVID-19 are likewise at high risk for failure. We find persistence of the cytokine storm concept in sepsis perplexing. Although treatment approaches based on the hyperinflammation concept of pathogenesis have failed, the concept has shown remarkable resilience and appears to be unfalsifiable. An approach to understanding this resilience is to consider the hyperinflammation or cytokine storm concept an example of a scientific paradigm. Thomas Kuhn developed the idea that paradigms generate rules of investigation that both shape and restrict scientific progress. Intrinsic features of scientific paradigms include resistance to falsification in the face of contradictory data and inability of experimentation to generate alternatives to a failing paradigm. We call for rejection of the concept that hyperinflammation or cytokine storm causes sepsis. Using the hyperinflammation or cytokine storm paradigm to guide COVID-19 treatments is likewise unlikely to provide progress. Resources should be redirected to more promising avenues of investigation and treatment.

A missense mutation in TFRC, encoding transferrin receptor 1, causes combined immunodeficiency.

Patients with a combined immunodeficiency characterized by normal numbers but impaired function of T and B cells had a homozygous p.Tyr20His substitution in transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1), encoded by TFRC. The substitution disrupts the TfR1 internalization motif, resulting in defective receptor endocytosis and markedly increased TfR1 expression on the cell surface. Iron citrate rescued the lymphocyte defects, and expression of wild-type but not mutant TfR1 rescued impaired transferrin uptake in patient-derived fibroblasts. Tfrc(Y20H/Y20H) mice recapitulated the immunological defects of patients. Despite the critical role of TfR1 in erythrocyte development and function, patients had only mild anemia and only slightly increased TfR1 expression in erythroid precursors. We show that STEAP3, a metalloreductase expressed in erythroblasts, associates with TfR1 and partially rescues transferrin uptake in patient-derived fibroblasts, suggesting that STEAP3 may provide an accessory TfR1 endocytosis signal that spares patients from severe anemia. These findings demonstrate the importance of TfR1 in adaptive immunity.