The long-term effects of Medicaid managed care on obstetrics care in three California counties.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effects of Medicaid managed care (MMC) on obstetric service use and program costs in California. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Longitudinal administrative data on Medi-Cal enrollment and claims and encounters related to pregnancy and delivery services were gathered from three counties--two long-standing MMC counties and one traditional fee-for-service Medicaid county--in California between 1987 and 1992. STUDY DESIGN: We studied Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) beneficiaries with live singleton vaginal deliveries with associated hospital stays of 14 days or less. Effects of managed care were examined with respect to prenatal visits, length of stay for delivery, maternal postpartum readmission rates, and total program expenditures. Multivariate analyses examined how the relative effect of managed care on service use and program expenditures in each MMC county evolves over time in comparison to fee-for-service. We controlled for length of Medi-Cal enrollment prior to delivery, data censoring, and individual characteristics such as race and age. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Prenatal care use is consistently lower in the MMC counties, although all three counties' prenatal care provision is well below the national standard. Drastic increases in one-day-stay deliveries were found: up to almost 50 percent of deliveries in MMC counties were one-day stays. Program cost savings associated with MMC enrollment are unambiguous. CONCLUSIONS: MMC cost savings might have come at the expense of reduced provision of prenatal care and shorter delivery length of stay. Future studies should verify any possible causal link and the effects on maternal and infant health outcomes.

A longitudinal evaluation of the effect of Medi-Cal managed care on supplemental security income and aid to families with dependent children enrollees in two California counties.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the differential effect of Medicaid managed care (MMC) among Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) enrollees over time by comparing the experiences of adult nonelderly enrollees in the Health Plan of San Mateo in California versus Ventura County's fee-for-service (FFS) enrollees. RESEARCH DESIGN: Four years of administrative claims data were used to construct a longitudinal data set and estimate panel data models to decompose the effect of managed care over time. RESULTS: AFDC MMC enrollees exhibited generally fewer ambulatory visits, lower expenditures, and higher monthly probabilities of a preventable hospitalization relative to comparably enrolled FFS patients. SSI MMC enrollees had more emergency department visits and higher monthly probabilities of hospitalization. However, SSI MMC enrollees had more ambulatory visits and more medications during the first year of enrollment relative to SSI FFS enrollees, although levels were similar in subsequent years. SSI MMC enrollees did not exhibit a significantly higher level of expenditures in the first year of enrollment, although in subsequent years, expenditure levels were significantly lower. CONCLUSIONS: The results for emergency department visits and preventable hospitalizations presented a decidedly downbeat picture of access to care for AFDC and SSI enrollees in MMC. However, some aspects of utilization under managed care exhibited results consistent with long-term- oriented treatment for enrollees with a greater likelihood of remaining in the system for a longer period of time (SSI enrollees). By contrast, enrollees more likely to be enrolled for shorter periods (AFDC enrollees) tended to exhibit care patterns under MMC consistent with lower levels of care relative to FFS.

Physician enthusiasm as an explanation for area variation in the utilization of knee replacement surgery.

BACKGROUND: Explanations for regional variation in the use of many medical and surgical treatments is controversial. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that might be amenable to intervention, we investigated the determinants of regional variation in the use of knee replacement surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN: We examined the effect of the following factors: characteristics and opinions of surgeons; family physicians and rheumatologists; patients' severity of disease before knee replacement; access to knee-replacement surgery; surgeons' use of other surgical treatment; and county population characteristics. OUTCOMES MEASURE: County utilization rates of knee replacement in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: Counties that had higher rates of knee replacement had older patients (P = 0.0001), higher percentage of medical school affiliated hospital beds (P = 0.04), with more male (P = 0.02) non-North American trained referring physicians (P = 0.002) and orthopedic surgeons who had higher propensities to operate and better perceptions of outcome (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for population characteristics and access to care (including the number of hospital beds, and the density of orthopaedic and referring physicians), orthopaedic surgeons' opinions or enthusiasm for the procedure was the dominant modifiable determinant of area variation. Thus, research needs to focus on the opinions of surgeons which may be important in reducing regional variation for knee replacement.

Management of osteoarthritis of the knee by primary care physicians.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with osteoarthritis (OA) are treated by primary care physicians (in this article, primary care physicians are family physicians and general internists). OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the self-reported practice patterns of family physicians and general internists for the evaluation and management of severe OA of the knee, including factors that might influence referral for total knee replacement. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A survey was developed and mailed to randomly selected community family physicians and general internists practicing in Indiana. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported physician practice patterns regarding OA of the knee. RESULTS: Physical examination was the most common method of evaluating OA of the knee. Family physicians were more likely to examine for crepitation, joint stability, and quadriceps muscle strength than were general internists (P<.05). Patients with OA of the knee treated by family physicians were more likely to receive nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or oral corticosteroids and were less likely to receive aspirin, acetaminophen, or narcotics compared with patients treated by general internists. Six patient characteristics were rated as positive factors favoring a referral for possible total knee replacement, 8 characteristics were rated as negative, and 5 were rated as not a factor in the decision about referral. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that additional research is needed to determine the evaluative techniques for OA of the knee that provide the most useful information for management decisions, the management techniques that maximize patient outcomes, and the criteria that should be used to select patients who would benefit most from referral for possible total knee replacement.

Does hospital procedure-specific volume affect treatment costs? A national study of knee replacement surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The long-run cost savings potential of private sector reform efforts, such as selective contracts with providers, depends in part on the relationship between procedure-specific volume and average hospital resources that are consumed in treating patients associated with that specific procedure. Study examines a model that estimates the relationship between hospital procedure-specific volume and average hospital treatment costs, using an elective surgical procedure as an example. DATA SOURCES: Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) files for 1989 for hospitalizations in which a Medicare beneficiary received a knee replacement (KR) surgery during 1989. Hospital information was obtained from the American Hospital Association's 1989 Annual Survey. All patient-level data were aggregated to the hospital level to create a data file, with the hospital as the unit of observation. STUDY DESIGN: This study used administrative claims data and regression analysis to estimate the effect of hospital procedure-specific volume on average hospital treatment costs of patients receiving KR surgery. We also examined the stability of the volume-cost relationship across hospitals of different sizes. PRINCIPAL FINDING: The average treatment costs associated with KR surgery are inversely related to a hospital's KR volume in the regression equation estimated using all hospitals performing KR surgery. The inverse relationship between cost and volume is found to be robust for different-size hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The potential cost savings associated with performing KR surgery at incrementally higher hospital volume level can amount to as much as 10 percent of the hospital's average treatment cost. However, the incremental cost savings associated with increased patient volume depends on the hospital's current volume level and its size.

Revision rates after knee replacement in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Each year approximately 100,000 Medicare patients undergo knee replacement surgery. Patients, referring physicians, and surgeons must consider a variety of factors when deciding if knee replacement is indicated. One factor in this decision process is the likelihood of revision knee replacement after the initial surgery. This study determined the chance that a revision knee replacement will occur and which factors were associated with revision. METHODS: Data on all primary and revision knee replacements that were performed on Medicare patients during the years 1985 through 1990 were obtained. The probability that a revision knee replacement occurred was modeled from data for all patients for whom 2 full years of follow-up data were available. Two strategies for linking revisions to a particular primary knee replacement for each patient were developed. Predictive models were developed for each linking strategy. ICD-9-CM codes were used to determine hospitalizations for primary knee replacement and revision knee replacement. RESULTS: More than 200,000 hospitalizations for primary knee replacements were performed, with fewer than 3% of them requiring revision within 2 years. The following factors increase the chance of revision within 2 years of primary knee replacement: (1) male gender, (2) younger age, (3) longer length of hospital stay for the primary knee replacement, (4) more diagnoses at the primary knee replacement hospitalization, (5) unspecified arthritis type, (6) surgical complications during the primary knee replacement hospitalization, and (7) primary knee replacement performed at an urban hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Revision knee replacement is uncommon. Demographic, clinical, and process factors were related to the probability of revision knee replacement.

Patient outcomes after knee replacement.

A prospective, observational cohort investigation was performed to help understand the impact of knee replacement on patients with knee osteoarthritis in community practice. Of those, 291 patients (330 knees) were eligible and willing to participate. Forty-eight orthopaedic surgeons referred 563 patients from 25 institutions within the state of Indiana. Demographics, patient completed health status, satisfaction, independent radiographic measures, surgeon reported intraoperative factors, hospital discharge factors, and independent physical examinations were recorded. A minimum 2-year followup was obtained in 92% of the patients. At followup, 88% were satisfied, 3% were neutral, and 9% were dissatisfied with the results of their knee surgery. The physical composite score improved from 27.4 +/- 0.4 (range, 13.3-50.3) to 37.7 +/- 0.7 (range, 12.9-61.3) at two years. Maximal improvement in physical composite score was seen in patients who had their surgery performed in institutions that performed greater than 50 knee replacements per year in patients with Medicare insurance; who had a better mental health status at baseline; who had surgery performed on Monday, Friday, or Saturday; who were older; who were treated with a posterior cruciate sparing device; and who had worse preoperative function. A lower likelihood of complications were found with surgeons who performed greater than 20 knee replacements per year; midweek surgeries; in patients with more severe preoperative knee dysfunction; patients with fewer comorbidities; patients with less preoperative stiffness; patients being treated by younger surgeons; and in patients undergoing unilateral knee replacement. Among voluntarily participating physicians, knee replacement can be a highly effective medical technology with high levels of patient satisfaction and low rates of complications.

Comparison of general internists, family physicians, and rheumatologists managing patients with symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the nature, risks, and benefits of osteoarthritis (OA) management by primary care physicians and rheumatologists. METHODS: Subjects were 419 patients followed for symptoms of knee OA by either a specialist in family medicine (FM) or general internal medicine (GIM) or by a rheumatologist (RH). Management practices were characterized by in-home documentation by a visiting nurse of drugs taken to relieve OA pain or to prevent gastrointestinal side effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and by patient report (self-administered survey) of nonpharmacologic treatments. Changes in outcomes (knee pain and physical function) over 6 months were measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. RESULTS: Patients of RHs were 2-3 years older (P = 0.035) and tended to exhibit greater radiographic severity of OA (P = 0.064) and poorer physical function (P = 0.076) at baseline than the other 2 groups. In all 3 groups, knee pain and physical function improved slightly over 6 months; however, between-group differences were not significant. Compared to drug management of knee pain by FMs or RHs, that by the GIMs was distinguished by greater utilization of acetaminophen and nonacetylated salicylates (P = 0.008), lower prescribed doses of NSAIDs (P = 0.007), and, therefore, lower risk of iatrogenic gastroenteropathy (P < 0.001). In contrast, patients of RHs were more likely than those of FMs and GIMs to report that they had been instructed in use of isometric quadriceps and range-of-motion exercises (P < or = 0.001), application of heat (P = 0.051) and cold (P < 0.001) packs, and in the principles of joint protection (P = 0.016). Neither physician specialty nor specific management practices accounted for variations in patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: This observational study identified specialty-related variability in key aspects of the management of knee OA in the community (i.e., frequency and dosing of NSAIDs, use of nonpharmacologic modalities) that bear strong implications for long-term safety and cost. However, changes in knee pain and function over 6 months were unrelated to variations in management practices.

Serious illness and private health coverage: a unique problem calling for unique solutions.

Authors examine the experience of two nonelderly adult populations in Indiana and their difficulties in obtaining and retaining health insurance once diagnosed with a serious chronic or catastrophic disease.

Outcome implications for the timing of bilateral total knee arthroplasties.

Health Care Financing Administration data from 1985 to 1990 revealed 339,152 total knee arthroplasties of which 62,730 (18.6%) were bilateral procedures (simultaneous 112,922; staged 6 weeks, 4354; staged 3 months, 4524; staged 6 months, 9829; and staged 1 year 31,401). Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bilateral procedures were an average of 73 years of age; demographics revealed that among the various simultaneous and staged groups 57% to 69% were females, 90% were white, 85% to 90% had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, and 30% to 40% were performed in rural hospitals. Between 1985 and 1990, surgical and vascular complications ranged from 2.4% to 4% and 4.1% to 6.8%, respectively, for all types of bilateral staged and simultaneous total knee arthroplasties. All differences were statistically significant. After controlling statistically for demographic variables and diagnoses, a surrogate for case mix, it was found that individuals electing simultaneous bilateral arthroplasties experienced twice the number of intensive care days than those choosing staged procedures. Days in the intensive care unit were double when done simultaneously instead of staged (0.48 versus 0.21). Nosocomial infections were similar within groups (10% versus 13%); however, wound infections were nearly half when done simultaneously (0.5% versus 1%) versus in a staged fashion. Length of stay and cost were much less for the simultaneous procedure group who were sicker as measured by the number of diagnoses. Mortality at 30 days was highest for the simultaneous procedure group (.99%) versus staged 3 or 6 months (0.30%); however, by 2 years it was close to 4% for all groups. Staging the procedure 3 to 6 months seems to offer the fewest disadvantages, is only slightly more expensive, and has the lowest mortality rate.

Demographic variation in the rate of knee replacement: a multi-year analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe the practice variation of knee replacements (KRs) in the elderly ( > or = 65) over time from 1985-1990 in terms of the number of primary, bilateral, and revision KRs; the extent of large area variation in performance rates; and the degree to which demographic variables are the determinants of area rates. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data analyzed are from every hospital in the United States that performed a KR on a Medicare patient during the study period. Data were obtained from the MEDPAR, HISKEW, and denominator files of the Medicare Statistical System. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cohort study of all Medicare beneficiaries who received a KR between 1985 and 1990. The dependent variable in the analyses was the count of the KRs performed in each area. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: This is a population-based sample of Medicare enrollees in the United States. All hospitalizations for Medicare-reimbursed KRs were included in the initial data set. Exclusion criteria were used to identify the Medicare covered population with a definite KR. These criteria resulted in 7.3 percent exclusions and a final set of 414,079 KR hospitalizations. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The number of Medicare-funded KRs increased in each of the study years corresponding to an annual rate of increase of 18.45 percent. The likelihood of receiving a KR was a function of age, gender, and race. For each year, KRs were almost-twice as likely to be performed on women than on men. The odds of whites getting the surgery were over 1.5 times greater than for blacks. Even after adjusting for demographic factors, significant regional variation remained. CONCLUSIONS: Much about area variation and the rate of growth in KR rates remains unexplained. For answers to emerge, better data and different types of studies are required.

Gene therapy: socioeconomic and ethical issues. A roundtable discussion.

Gene therapy research has the potential to revolutionize the way in which many human diseases are treated. Despite its enormous potential, roundtable panelists concluded that the field needs time to mature scientifically without pressure to develop a marketable therapeutic product. In addition, health care decision makers, physicians, and the lay public need to be educated on the future medical, economic, and ethical ramifications of gene therapy.

Medicaid managed care: contribution to issues of health reform.

This chapter examines the emergence of managed care in Medicaid from an alternative to the mainstream delivery system for many beneficiaries. It offers a definition that encompasses the broad spectrum of program manifestations, and presents a brief historical perspective on the major eras of managed care in Medicaid. The major program prototypes are described and their contribution to enrollment growth is discussed. Research evidence is examined to address both operational issues and program impacts. Finally, we conclude with an appraisal of contemporary issues of importance and speculation on the next generation of Medicaid managed care programs with an eye to how federal and state health care reform proposals will shape this future.

Waiting times for knee-replacement surgery in the United States and Ontario.

BACKGROUND: Canada, which has universal single-payer health insurance, is often criticized for waiting times for surgery that are longer than those in the United States. We compared waiting times for orthopedic consultations and knee-replacement surgery and patients' acceptance of them in the United States and in the province of Ontario, Canada. METHODS: A stratified random sample of 1486 Medicare recipients (629 from the U.S. national sample, 428 from Indiana, and 429 from western Pennsylvania) and 516 people from Ontario who had been hospitalized for knee replacement between 1985 and 1989 were surveyed by mail in 1992. Patients were asked how long they had waited to see an orthopedic surgeon and to have surgery, the acceptability of these waiting times, and their overall satisfaction with surgery. RESULTS: About 80 percent of the questionnaires were returned, but not all the respondents answered all the questions. The rate of response to specific questions was about 60 to 65 percent in both countries. The median waiting time for an initial orthopedic consultation was two weeks in the United States and four weeks in Ontario. The median waiting time for knee replacement after the operation had been planned was three weeks in the United States and eight weeks in Canada. In the United States, 95 percent of patients in the national sample considered their waiting time for surgery acceptable, as compared with 85.1 percent in Ontario. Overall satisfaction with surgery ("very or somewhat satisfied") was 85.3 percent for all U.S. respondents and 83.5 percent for Canadian respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Waiting times for initial orthopedic consultation and for knee-replacement surgery were longer in Ontario than in the United States, but overall satisfaction with surgery was similar.

Tricompartmental knee replacement. A comparison of orthopaedic surgeons' self reported performance rates with surgical indications, contraindications, and expected outcomes. Knee Replacement Patient Outcomes Research Team.

The chance of a person with osteoarthritis of the knee receiving a knee replacement is highly variable. To understand better the reasons for this variation, all practicing orthopaedists in Indiana were surveyed about their management of severe knee osteoarthritis and their perception of tricompartmental knee replacement as a therapeutic option. Their perceptions of indications and outcomes of knee replacement were compared with the self reported annual number of patients for whom they performed (or referred to other surgeons for) tricompartmental knee replacements. A completed survey was returned by 220 (79%) of the 280 orthopaedists surveyed; analyses were limited to the 188 respondents who had cared for at least one patient with osteoarthritis of the knee in the prior 2 weeks (mean = 13). These surgeons reported performing (or referring patients for) a mean of 31 knee replacements in the prior year (SD 45, median 21, range 0-480 knee replacements). There was strong agreement (> 95%) among respondents for seven (21%) of 33 surgical indications and contraindications, and more general agreement (> 60%) for 21 (64%). In the five factors (15%) for which there was disagreement, there was no consistent relationship between opinions and self reported knee replacement performance rate. Surgeons reporting more knee replacements had significantly higher estimates of pain relief and functional improvement following surgery, and lower estimates of prosthesis infection and failure rates. When all responses were considered together, four decision factors correlated independently with the performance of more knee replacements, but these four factors explained only 24% of the variation in self reported knee replacement performance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Costing medical care: using Medicare administrative data.

This paper describes how the PORTS are using data from the Medicare administrative records systems to study the medical care costs of specific conditions. The general strengths and weaknesses of the Medicare databases for studying cost related issues are discussed, and the relevant data elements are examined in detail. Changes in the nature of the data collected over time are noted. Information is provided on how the PORTS are using these data to estimate the cost to Medicare of treating Medicare beneficiaries with specific conditions and the social (opportunity) cost of treating these patients. Furthermore, information is provided on how data from the Medicare administrative records system can be used to determine the cost of services for patients who have been identified through other large databases (i.e., state hospital discharge tapes) or who have been enrolled in prospective cohort studies.