Aggressive presentation of ameloblastic fibro-odontoma: a clinical-pathological enigma.

Ameloblastic fibro-odontoma (AFO) is a rare, gnathic, benign, mixed odontogenic tumor that commonly presents in the first or second decade of life as a unilocular and rarely multilocular radiolucency with variable amounts of calcified material. Tumor progression is typically indolent, and generally accepted treatment is surgical enucleation and curettage. This case report describes an atypical presentation in a 14-year-old male with a multilocular, aggressive AFO requiring hemimandibulectomy with immediate osseous and dental "Jaw-in-a-Day" reconstruction. This report highlights the debate regarding whether AFO is a true neoplasm or an early-stage hamartoma in the continuum of complex odontoma formation. Regardless of the pathogenesis, maxillofacial surgeons and pathologists should be cognizant of the potential for AFO to develop locally aggressive behavior with considerable morbidity.

Bimaxillary Immediate Prosthetic Rehabilitation Using a Custom Maxillary Subperiosteal Implant and Fibula-Free Flap Mandibular Reconstruction After Tumor Ablation.

Subperiosteal implants (SPIs) using rigid fixation have recently emerged as an acceptable alternative to conventional endosteal implants when there is limited or absent alveolar bone. Modern advances in digital technology and manufacturing have improved the usability and stability of this latest generation of SPIs. Herein, we present the first reported case of a modern patient-specific SPI placed in the United States and, to the authors' knowledge, the first reported case performed in conjunction with a simultaneous free flap reconstruction of the opposing arch, and immediate dental rehabilitation of both arches in the world.

Immediate Free Fibula Flap After Maxillectomy With Simultaneous Full-arch Dental Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Midface and Mandible: The "Super Reconstruction Concept".

Immediate reconstruction and dental rehabilitation for ablative defects of the head and neck in one surgery is now a commonly used technique among reconstructive surgeons. Often patients are edentulous or partially edentulous in the jaw opposing that with pathology. In this case, only rehabilitating the dental arch affected by pathology would not render the patient with a functional occlusion. We introduce the "super reconstruction" concept which includes not only rehabilitating the dental arch affected by pathology but also the opposing arch, giving the patient a fully functional occlusion at the time of ablative surgery. This concept is described through a case of a patient with a T4aN0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the maxilla who underwent total maxillectomy, immediate fibula flap reconstruction of the maxilla with, and full arch dental implant placement into the maxilla and opposing mandible with prosthetic rehabilitation.

Three-dimensionally printed facial prosthesis with a silicone veneer technique: A clinical report.

Digital technology has revolutionized the acquisition of patient data and the fabrication of prosthetic replacements for extraoral defects. This clinical report illustrates the use of a new technique which allows the digital creation of an acrylic resin framework which is then veneered with silicone to create an esthetic prosthesis in less time and with less patient discomfort.

Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report.

Plastic surgical reconstruction is considered to be the gold standard for the repair of microtia as the results are permanent and constructed from the patient's own tissue; however, the multiple surgeries required and the difficulty in attaining adequate cosmetic results often result in patients choosing a prosthesis as a long-term rehabilitation. Advances in osseointegration in the craniofacial region have improved the outcomes with auricular prosthetics by providing a reliable method of attachment of the prosthesis and increasing patient acceptance. A case presentation illustrates the results of both treatment modalities and examines the outcomes on the same patient.

Managing the Oral Health of Cancer Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspective of a Dental Clinic in a Cancer Center.

The practice of dentistry has been dramatically altered by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given the close person-to-person contact involved in delivering dental care and treatment procedures that produce aerosols, dental healthcare professionals including dentists, dental assistants and dental hygienists are at high risk of exposure. As a dental clinic in a comprehensive cancer center, we have continued to safely provide medically necessary and urgent/emergent dental care to ensure that patients can adhere to their planned cancer treatment. This was accomplished through timely adaptation of clinical workflows and implementation of practice modification measures in compliance with state, national and federal guidelines to ensure that risk of transmission remained low and the health of both immunocompromised cancer patients and clinical staff remained protected. In this narrative review, we share our experience and measures that were implemented in our clinic to ensure that the oral health needs of cancer patients were met in a timely manner and in a safe environment. Given that the pandemic is still on-going, the impact of our modified oral healthcare delivery model in cancer patients warrants continued monitoring and assessment.

Shortened dental arch: a review of current treatment concepts.

It is generally assumed that dentition has ceased to be a predominant selection factor in the process of human evolution. With differentiation and reintegration of the human species, gross differences in the morphology and physiology of the stomatognathic system have become apparent. Variability and adaptation of this system have proven that deviations from what may be considered ideal are not pathologic but may, in fact, prove to be a range of normality in this general pattern of evolution. The treatment of patients according to inflexible postulates may be detrimental to the individual patient and the concept of a variable and patient-specific optimal dentition should be considered, especially in the context of the shortened dental arch.