Multisensory conflict affects body schema and reaching space.

Multisensory integration plays a crucial role in building the sense of body ownership, i.e., the perceptual status of one's body for which the body is perceived as belonging to oneself. Temporal and spatial mismatching of visual and tactile signals coming from one's body can reduce ownership feelings towards the body and its parts, i.e., produce disownership feelings. Here, we investigated whether visuo-tactile conflict also affects the sensorimotor representation of the body in space (i.e., body schema) and the perception of the space around the body in terms of action potentiality (i.e., reaching space). In two experiments, body schema (Experiment 1) and reaching space (Experiment 2) were assessed before and after either synchronous or asynchronous visuo-tactile stimulation. Results showed that the asynchronous condition, provoking multisensory conflict, caused disownership over one's hand and concurrently affected the body schema and the reaching space. These findings indicate that body schema and reaching space could be dynamically shaped by the multisensory regularities that build up the sense of body ownership.

The influence of arm posture on the Uznadze haptic aftereffect.

The role of arm posture in the Uznadze haptic aftereffect is investigated: two identical test stimuli (i.e., spheres, TS) clenched simultaneously appear haptically different in size after hands have been adapted to two spheres (adapting stimuli, AS) differing in size: the hand adapted to a small AS feels TS bigger than the hand adapted to a big AS. In two experiments, participants evaluated the haptic impressions of two TS after adaptation by finding their match on a visual scale. In Experiment 1, all tasks were carried out with arms either uncrossed or crossed. In Experiment 2, only the matching task was performed with arms either uncrossed or crossed while adaptation was conducted by continuously changing arm posture from uncrossed to crossed and vice versa. The illusion occurred irrespectively of arm posture; however, its magnitude was smaller when adaptation was carried out in the classical condition of uncrossed arms. Results are discussed in light of two functional mechanisms: low-level somatotopic mapping (i.e., stimuli conformation) and high-level level factors (i.e., arm posture) that could modulate the haptic perception. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).