Prognostic value of temporal patterns of left atrial reservoir strain in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether repeatedly measured left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients provides incremental prognostic value over a single baseline LASr value, and whether temporal patterns of LASr provide incremental prognostic value over temporal patterns of other echocardiographic markers and NT-proBNP. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 153 patients underwent 6-monthly echocardiography, during a median follow-up of 2.5 years. Speckle tracking echocardiography was used to measure LASr. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for LASr from Cox models (baseline) and joint models (repeated measurements). The primary endpoint (PEP) comprised HF hospitalization, left ventricular assist device, heart transplantation, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Mean age was 58 ± 11 years, 76% were men, 82% were in NYHA class I/II, mean LASr was 20.9% ± 11.3%, and mean LVEF was 29% ± 10%. PEP was reached by 50 patients. Baseline and repeated measurements of LASr (HR per SD change (95% CI) 0.20 (0.10-0.41) and (0.13 (0.10-0.29), respectively) were both significantly associated with the PEP, independent of both baseline and repeated measurements of other echo-parameters and NT-proBNP. Although LASr was persistently lower over time in patients with PEP, temporal trajectories did not diverge in patients with versus without the PEP as the PEP approached. CONCLUSION: LASr was associated with adverse events in HFrEF patients, independent of baseline and repeated other echo-parameters and NT-proBNP. Temporal trajectories of LASr showed decreased but stable values in patients with the PEP, and do not provide incremental prognostic value for clinical practice compared to single measurements of LASr.

Appropriate 3-dimensional echocardiography data acquisition interval for left ventricular volume quantification: implications for clinical application.

UNLABELLED: Volume-rendered 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) acquired with small imaging intervals has been validated for accurate left ventricular (LV) volume measurement. However, its clinical application is often impeded by the lengthy acquisition time. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of LV volume measurement from 3DE data acquired at different intervals. METHODS: Transthoracic 3DE LV data sets were acquired at intervals of 2 degrees, 6 degrees, 9 degrees, 12 degrees, 15 degrees, 18 degrees, and 20 degrees in 10 human subjects with various cardiac shapes and function. The LV end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume were measured from each 3DE data set with the "summation of disks" method. Interobserver and intraobserver variability were also examined. Measurements obtained from data acquired at 2 degrees intervals were used as references for comparison. RESULTS: From 10 subjects a total of 70 3DE data sets were obtained. Data acquisition time decreased from 189 +/- 143 seconds at intervals of 2 degrees to 19 +/- 6 minutes at 20 degrees. No statistically significant difference was found among the measurements derived from data obtained at various intervals. Excellent agreement was obtained between interobserver and intraobserver measurements. CONCLUSION: Data acquired at 12 degrees and 15 degrees intervals remained accurate for LV volume measurement and saved over 80% of time in comparison with data acquired at 2 degrees intervals. A further increase in imaging intervals tended to underestimate LV volumes without significant acceleration of the procedure.

The apical long-axis rather than the two-chamber view should be used in combination with the four-chamber view for accurate assessment of left ventricular volumes and function.

BACKGROUND: Most biplane methods for the echocardiographic calculation of left ventricular volumes assume orthogonality between paired views from the apical window. Our aim was to study the accuracy of biplane left ventricular volume calculations when either the apical two-chamber or long-axis views are combined with the four-chamber view. The left ventricular volumes calculated from three-dimensional echocardiographic data sets were used as a reference. Twenty-seven patients underwent precordial three-dimensional echocardiography using rotational acquisition of planes at 2-degree intervals, with ECG and respiratory gating. End-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction on three-dimensional echocardiography were calculated by (1) Simpson's methods (3DS) at 3 mm short-axis slice thickness (reference method) and by (2) biplane ellipse from paired views using either apical four- and two-chamber views (BE-A) or apical four- and long-axis views (BE-B). Observer variabilities were studied by the standard error of the estimate % (SEE) in 19 patients for all methods. RESULTS: The spatial angles (mean +/- SD) between the apical two-chamber, long-axis and four-chamber views were 63.3 degrees +/- 19.7 and 99.1 degrees +/- 25.6, respectively. The mean +/- SD of end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes (ml) and ejection fraction (%) by 3DS were 142.2 +/- 60.9, 91.8 +/- 59.6 and 39.6 +/- 17.5, while that by BE-A were 126.7 +/- 60.4, 84.0 +/- 57.9 and 39 +/- 17 and by BE-B were 134.3 +/- 62.4, 88.6 +/- 59.7 and 39.1 +/- 16.7, respectively. BE-B intra-observer (8.4, 6.7 and 3.5) and inter-observer (9.8, 11.5 and 5.4) SEE for end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes (ml) and ejection fraction (%), respectively, were smaller than that for BE-A (10.8, 8.8 and 4.1 and 11.4, 14.7 and 6.1, respectively). There was excellent correlation between 3DS and BE-A (r = 0.99, 0.98 and 0.98) and BE-B (0.98, 0.98 and 0.98) for calculating end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volume and ejection fractions, respectively. There were no significant differences between BE-A and BE-B with 3DS for end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volume and ejection fraction calculations (P = 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 and P = 0.5, 0.5 and 0.4, respectively). There were closer limits of agreement (mean +/- 2 SD) between 3DS and BE-B 7.9 +/- 18.8, 3.2 +/- 14.2 and 0.8 +/- 5.8 than that between 3DS and BE-A 15.5 +/- 19.6, 7.8 +/- 16.2 and 1.1 +/- 7.4 for calculating end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volume and ejection fractions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both apical two-chamber and apical long-axis views are not orthogonal to the apical four-chamber view. Observer variabilities of BE-B were smaller than that for BE-A. BE-A and BE-B have excellent correlation and non-significant differences with 3DS for left ventricular volume and ejection fraction calculations. There were closer limits of agreement between BE-B with 3DS for left ventricular volume and ejection fraction calculations than that between BE-A and 3DS. Therefore, we recommend the use of the apical long-axis rather than the two-chamber view in combination with the four-chamber view for accurate biplane left ventricular volume and ejection fraction calculations.