Interim analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without preservation of splenic vessels: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) is a widely adopted surgical approach for benign and low-grade malignant neoplasms of the distal pancreas. The Kimura and Warshaw techniques represent two principal strategies, yet it still needs to be determined which one is superior. Our investigation aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with each technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, parallel-group, patient-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at the XXXXX University. Stratified block randomization was utilized to enroll 114 patients starting in March 2022, with an interim analysis of short-term outcomes scheduled after 45%-50% of participant enrollment. Patients were randomized to receive LSPDP via either the Kimura or Warshaw technique. The primary endpoint was intraoperative blood loss, while secondary endpoints included a range of outcomes from composite outcome to quality of life, as quantified by the EQ-5D-5L. RESULTS: From March 2022 to November 2023, 53 patients were randomly allocated to the Kimura (n=25) or Warshaw (n=28) groups for LSPDP. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were similar between the groups, such as pancreatic fistula incidence, EQ-5D-5L index scores, and delayed gastric emptying rates. Per-protocol (PP) analysis revealed that the Kimura group experienced significantly less blood loss (52.5±51.6 mL vs. 91.7±113.5 mL, P=0.007) and a reduced rate of composite outcome (23.8% vs. 56.7%, P=0.019), but incurred higher costs in the Warshaw group (¥56,227.4±¥7,027.0 vs. ¥63,513.8±¥12,944.5, P=0.013). Splenic infarction rates were higher in the Warshaw group, though not statistically significant (ITT: 39.3% vs. 12.5%, P=0.058; PP: 36.7% vs. 14.3%, P=0.113), without necessitating intervention. Neither group experienced postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, 90-day mortality, or ICU admissions, and all postoperative complications were mild (Clavien-Dindo Grade

Independent external validation and comparison of existing pancreatic fistula risk scores after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with Bing's pancreaticojejunostomy.

BACKGROUND: The fistula risk score (FRS) is the widely acknowledged prediction model for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). In addition, the alternative FRS (a-FRS) and updated alternative FRS (ua-FRS) have been developed. This study performed external validation and comparison of these 3 models in patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with Bing's pancreaticojejunostomy. METHODS: The FRS total points and predictive probabilities of a-FRS and ua-FRS were retrospectively calculated using patient data from a completed randomized controlled trial. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and CR-POPF were defined according to the 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria. The correlations of the 4 risk items of the FRS model with CR-POPF and POPF were analyzed and represented using the Cramer V coefficient. The performance of the 3 models was measured using the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plot and compared using the DeLong test. RESULTS: This study enrolled 200 patients. Pancreatic texture and pathology had discrimination for CR-POPF (Cramer V coefficient: 0.180 vs 0.167, respectively). Pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic texture, and pathology had discrimination for POPF (Cramer V coefficient: 0.357 vs 0.322 vs 0.257, respectively). Only the calibration of a-FRS predicting CR-POPF was good. The differences among the AUC values of the FRS, a-FRS, and ua-FRS were not statistically significant (CR-POPF: 0.687 vs 0.701 vs 0.710, respectively; POPF: 0.733 vs 0.741 vs 0.750, respectively). After recalibrating, the ua-FRS got sufficient calibration, and the AUC was 0.713 for predicting CR-POPF. CONCLUSION: For LPD cases with Bing's pancreaticojejunostomy, the 3 models predicted POPF with better discrimination than predicting CR-POPF. The recalibrated ua-FRS had sufficient discrimination and calibration for predicting CR-POPF.

The role of cardiac remodeling associated with renal function in mediating cardiovascular event outcomes.

The potential impact of renal function-related cardiovascular remodeling on associated cardiovascular risk has not been previously investigated. Hence, we conducted multiple mediation analyses in the UK Biobank study to evaluate this association. Using multiple Cox models, we found lower renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate based on cystatin C, eGFR-cysC) was independently related to increased risks of various cardiovascular events and mortalities. Multivariable linear regression revealed a progressive relationship between declining eGFR-cysC and adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and impaired systolic function. In Cox models, larger LV volume, mass, as well as decreased systolic function, were significantly correlated with adverse events, particularly in heart failure. Mediation analyses showed that undesirable LV remodeling and cardiometabolic diseases were independent mediators. Our study explores the connections between reduced renal function and poor cardiovascular phenotypes, as well as their significant independent role in mediating renal function-cardiovascular outcome relationships.