Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 17(6): 756-767, 2024 Mar 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38385926

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of calcified lesions in selected patients with stable coronary disease. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to assess the performance of coronary IVL in calcified coronary lesions in a real-life, all comers, setting. METHODS: The REPLICA-EPIC18 study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients treated with IVL in 26 centers in Spain. An independent core laboratory performed the angiographic analysis and event adjudication. The primary effectiveness endpoint assessed procedural success (successful IVL delivery, final diameter stenosis <20%, and absence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]). The primary safety endpoint measured freedom from MACE at 30 days. A predefined substudy compared outcomes between acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients (456 lesions) were included, 63% of the patients presenting with ACS. IVL delivery was successful in 99% of cases. Before IVL, 49% of lesions were considered undilatable. The primary effectiveness endpoint was achieved in 66% of patients, with similar rates among CCS patients (68%) and ACS patients (65%). Likewise, there were no significant differences in angiographic success after IVL between CCS and ACS patients. The rate of MACE at 30 days (primary safety endpoint) was 3% (1% in CCS and 5% in ACS patients [P = 0.073]). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary IVL proved to be a feasible and safe procedure in a "real-life" setting, effectively facilitating stent implantation in severely calcified lesions. Patients with ACS on admission showed similar angiographic success rates but showed a trend toward higher 30-day MACE compared with patients with CCS. (REPLICA-EPIC18 study [Registry of Coronary Lithotripsy in Spain]; NCT04298307).


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Litotricia , Calcificación Vascular , Humanos , Vasos Coronarios , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Corazón , Litotricia/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/terapia
2.
Cardiol J ; 30(4): 506-515, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581426

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several scoring systems have been developed in order to predict percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) result of chronic total occlusion (CTO). The scores principally include anatomic and clinical variables. Operator experience is a decisive factor for achieving successful result. We sought to assess the real impact of operator growing experience on CTO-PCI success. METHODS: The angiographic and clinical variables of CTO-PCIs performed in our center between May 2007 and April 2021 were collected, and variables with potential association with procedural result were thoroughly reviewed. The influence of operator experience based on the number of previous CTO-PCIs was statistically assessed. A scoring system with combination of anatomic variables and operator experience was devised. RESULTS: A total of 540 PCIs in 457 patients were performed in our institution. The scoring model was developed from the derivation set (2/3 of the cohort). The final variables in logistic regression model were CTO length ≥ 20 mm, blunt stump, vessel tortuosity > 45o and operator experience < 100 PCIs. The model showed good performance in the derivation set (area under curve [AUC]: 0.768; confidence interval [CI]: 0706-0.830; p < 0.001) with no significant shrinkage in the validation set (AUC: 0.704; CI: 0.613-0.796; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This new score (E-CTO score) adequately predict the probability of CTO-PCI failure. The model includes a variable representing operator experience along with other anatomic variables.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión Coronaria/cirugía , Angiografía Coronaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Enfermedad Crónica , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Cardiol J ; 30(1): 59-67, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34125431

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several scoring systems have been described to assess the level of difficulty and to predict the probability of success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO). The J-CTO score was initially developed to correlate CTO complexity with guidewire time crossing through the lesion within 30 min. Moreover, almost all scoring systems represent procedures performed by seasoned operators. Herein, this study sought to evaluate the predictive capacity of J-CTO for PCI success in a European single-center cohort with growing experience in the approach of CTO. METHODS: Five hundred twenty-six procedures were performed between 2007 and 2020 mainly by a single operator. The predictive power of J-CTO score was assessed by area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) in the entire cohort and additionally in two separate periods. The goodnessof- fit of the model was evaluated by the Hosmer and Lemeshow statistic. RESULTS: Successful procedure in first-attempt PCI was 79.5% and the overall success including 47 repeated procedures was achieved in 85.8%. The retrograde approach was attempted in 14.4%. The score was inversely associated with procedural success with lower success rate in more difficult CTOs (p < 0.001). ROC curve for the entire cohort, and first block (case 1-200) and second block (case 201-526) was 0.696, 0.661 and 0.748, respectively. The model showed good calibration for the entire cohort (X2 = 1.7; p = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: J-CTO score showed an acceptable predictive power for procedural success in this cohort although its discriminatory power is better as the level of experience is improved.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico , Oclusión Coronaria/cirugía , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad Crónica , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo
4.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 34(10): E701-E708, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36075883

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Coronary lithotripsy (CL) works by fracturing the calcified plaque, allowing mean area gain, enhancing vessel compliance, and facilitating stent deployment. This study reports the safety, effectiveness, and durability of the clinical benefit of CL at long-term follow-up of a real-world multicenter registry. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study that included consecutive patients with calcified lesions undergoing CL from August, 2018 to October, 2020 with a clinical follow-up of 20 months (interquartile range, 14.5-25). Exclusion criteria were a target lesion located in a vessel <2.5 mm and/or the presence of dissection prior to CL. The primary endpoint was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, defined as death or target-lesion revascularization [TLR] or myocardial infarction [MI]) at follow-up. RESULTS: This registry included 109 patients (128 lesions). The population was elderly (mean age, 74 years old), with high rates of diabetic patients (58%), renal insufficiency (32%), and multivessel disease (76%). Most of the lesions were predilated with semicompliant/noncompliant balloons (25 with cutting balloon). Rotational atherectomy was used in 20 lesions. On average, CL required the use of 1 balloon delivering a mean of 60 pulses. Twelve patients presented with ST-segment-elevation MI and a culprit calcified coronary lesion undergoing CL. Successful CL was achieved in 99% of cases. There were few procedural complications, with 30-day freedom from MACE rate of 98%. The MACE rate at long-term follow-up was 5.6%. CONCLUSION: This is the first real-world, multicenter registry that confirms the safety and long-term efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified lesions using CL in an unselected and high-risk population with a low long-term follow-up MACE rate.


Asunto(s)
Aterectomía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Litotricia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Calcificación Vascular , Anciano , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Litotricia/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico , Calcificación Vascular/terapia
5.
J Clin Med ; 10(23)2021 Nov 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34884362

RESUMEN

This study aimed to analyze angiographic characteristics of new attempted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on chronic total occlusion (CTO) compared to first attempt group. The cohort of 527 CTO-PCIs was divided into first-attempt and re-attempt groups, and angiographic characteristics, level of complexity, and contributing factors to failure were analyzed. Between-group success rate difference and potential angiographic and technical aspects contributing to the success in new attempts were scrutinized. A total of 47 new PCIs in 39 patients were performed. The reattempt group showed higher J-CTO score compared to the first-attempt group (2.4 ± 1.06 vs. 1.2 ± 1.06; p < 0.001). The use of more complex techniques and devices such as retrograde approach (29.8% vs. 12.9%) and IVUS (48.9 vs. 27.3%; p: 0.002) were more frequent in the reattempt group. Both procedural and fluoroscopy time were higher in the reattempt group (197 ± 83.9 vs. 150.1 ± 72.3 and 97.7 ± 55.4 vs. 68.7 ± 43, respectively; p < 0.001). There was no between-group difference in terms of technical success (79.8 vs. 76.6% for first attempt vs. reattempt group, respectively; p: 0.6). The overall success rate increased by 6.1%, achieving 85.9% in the entire cohort. Reattempted CTO-PCIs required more complex techniques and had comparable technical success rate with regard to the first-attempt group.

7.
Basic Res Cardiol ; 116(1): 4, 2021 01 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33495853

RESUMEN

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) and the GLP-1 analog exenatide activate different cardioprotective pathways and may have additive effects on infarct size (IS). Here, we aimed to assess the efficacy of RIC as compared with sham procedure, and of exenatide, as compared with placebo, and the interaction between both, to reduce IS in humans. We designed a two-by-two factorial, randomized controlled, blinded, multicenter, clinical trial. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 6 h of symptoms were randomized to RIC or sham procedure and exenatide or matching placebo. The primary outcome was IS measured by late gadolinium enhancement in cardiac magnetic resonance performed 3-7 days after PPCI. The secondary outcomes were myocardial salvage index, transmurality index, left ventricular ejection fraction and relative microvascular obstruction volume. A total of 378 patients were randomly allocated, and after applying exclusion criteria, 222 patients were available for analysis. There were no significant interactions between the two randomization factors on the primary or secondary outcomes. IS was similar between groups for the RIC (24 ± 11.8% in the RIC group vs 23.7 ± 10.9% in the sham group, P = 0.827) and the exenatide hypotheses (25.1 ± 11.5% in the exenatide group vs 22.5 ± 10.9% in the placebo group, P = 0.092). There were no effects with either RIC or exenatide on the secondary outcomes. Unexpected adverse events or side effects of RIC and exenatide were not observed. In conclusion, neither RIC nor exenatide, or its combination, were able to reduce IS in STEMI patients when administered as an adjunct to PPCI.


Asunto(s)
Brazo/irrigación sanguínea , Exenatida/uso terapéutico , Incretinas/uso terapéutico , Precondicionamiento Isquémico , Miocardio/patología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Método Doble Ciego , Exenatida/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Incretinas/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/patología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , España , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular Izquierda
8.
Coron Artery Dis ; 32(3): 241-246, 2021 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33186144

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronary laser is a long-established coadjuvant therapy in interventional cardiology. This study aimed to present our experience regarding the safety and efficacy of laser assistance to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in different scenarios of coronary artery disease. METHODS: We used coronary laser as an adjunctive therapy for PCI between May 2014 and March 2020. The safety of laser ablation was evaluated by studying any complication associated with the laser application. Besides, the laser contribution to PCI and 1 year of follow-up for adverse cardiac events was studied. RESULTS: Coronary laser was performed in 81 lesions and 75 patients in different scenarios to assist PCI. The average age was 66 ± 11.7 years and 72 (88.9%) were men. Coronary laser was used in 30 (37%) cases for in-stent-material debulking; 26 (32.1%) in primary angioplasty, 19 (23.4%) in chronic total occlusion and 5 (6.2%) in saphenous vein grafts. Procedural success was achieved in 77 (95.1%) with 1 (1.2%) type III coronary perforation. One year of follow-up for combined adverse cardiac events consisting of death due to any cause, myocardial infarction or target vessel failure showed an event-free rate of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience reveals the safety and efficacy of the current modality of coronary laser as a coadjuvant therapy in PCI with a low rate of adverse cardiac events in 1-year of follow-up. Further studies are needed to establish more precisely the contribution of laser application in different contexts of coronary artery disease.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Terapia por Láser , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Angiografía Coronaria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Vena Safena/trasplante , Stents
9.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 73(12): 1003-1010, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32430261

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Coronary lithoplasty (CL) is a balloon-based technique used to treat calcified lesions. This study reports the initial experience of treatment of calcified lesions with CL in an unselected and high-risk population. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter registry, which included all consecutive cases with calcified coronary lesions that underwent CL between August, 2018 and August, 2019. Exclusion criteria consisted of a target lesion located in a small vessel (< 2.5mm) and the presence of dissection prior to CL. Quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound/optical coherence tomography analysis were completed by an independent central core laboratory. RESULTS: This registry included 57 patients (66 lesions). The population was elderly (72.6±9.4 years) with high proportions of patients with diabetes (56%), chronic kidney disease (35%), and multivessel disease (84%). All lesions were classified as type B/C. More than 75% of lesions were predilated with noncompliant/semicompliant balloons or cutting-balloon. Rotablator was used in 5 lesions (7.6%) prelithoplasty. On average, CL required 1.17 balloons delivering a mean of 60 pulses. Successful CL was achieved in 98%. In 13% of cases, lithoplasty balloon was broken during therapy. There were few procedural complications: 2 cases of significant dissections (none related to lithoplasty balloon rupture) were successfully treated with drug-eluting stent implantation. One patient experienced stent thrombosis 2 days after successfully undergoing target lesion revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: This is a real-world multicenter registry, which supports the feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of PCI for calcified coronary lesions using CL in an unselected and high-risk population with promising results.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Litotricia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Calcificación Vascular , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico , Calcificación Vascular/cirugía
10.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 21(5): 657-660, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31477446

RESUMEN

Device uncrossable lesions are a challenge in interventional cardiology and despite improvements in balloon and microcatheter profile, rotational atherectomy is necessary in some circumstances in order to ablate and traverse the lesion. Nevertheless, the application of rotational atherectomy requires utilization of a specific wire, Rotawire, which is not always so easily navigable. Debulking of device uncrossable lesions can be performed by coronary laser over any kind of angioplasty guidewire. We present a series of six patients with chronic total (100%) and functional occlusions (99% stenosis) in whom after successful wire crossing, microcatheter failed to traverse the lesion. After coronary laser performance, 5 out of 6 lesions were successfully dilated, achieving a successful final angiographic result of 83.3%.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Aterectomía Coronaria/instrumentación , Oclusión Coronaria/terapia , Láseres de Excímeros/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Angiografía Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión Coronaria/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Láseres de Excímeros/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
11.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27267381

RESUMEN

This article has been withdrawn, at the request of the Editor, due to the absence of the corresponding permissions for use of all the data/images. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA