The bending technique of a scoring balloon Aperta NSE leading to successful crossing into stents.

A new scoring balloon Aperta NSE has 3 longitudinal nylon elements mounted on the non-compliant balloon surface. Although a high-pressure balloon is usually used as a post-dilation balloon in an implanted stent, it is difficult to pass into the stents because a balloon gets caught in stents in some cases. Aperta NSE has some grooves at elements; therefore, this balloon is bendable and shaped in an arc. The bent scoring balloon could eliminate interference between the balloon and the stents or lesions. Moreover, the point where the tip of the balloon contacts could change. As a result, it helps to improve crossability of this balloon. The bending technique of a scoring balloon Aperta NSE could lead to successful crossing into stents or complex lesions.

The ability of contemporary cardiologists to judge the ischemic impact of a coronary lesion visually.

BACKGROUND: Landmark trials showed that invasive pressure measurement (Fractional Flow Reserve, FFR) was a better guide to coronary stenting than visual assessment. However, present-day interventionists have benefited from extensive research and personal experience of mapping anatomy to hemodynamics. AIMS: To determine if visual assessment of the angiogram performs as well as invasive measurement of coronary physiology. METHODS: 25 interventional cardiologists independently visually assessed the single vessel coronary disease of 200 randomized participants in The Objective Randomized Blinded Investigation with optimal medical Therapy of Angioplasty in stable angina trial (ORBITA). They gave a visual prediction of the FFR and Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio (iFR), denoted vFFR and viFR respectively. Each judged each lesion on 2 occasions, so that every lesion had 50 vFFR, and 50 viFR assessments. The group consensus visual estimates (vFFR-group and viFR-group) and individual cardiologists' visual estimates (vFFR-individual and viFR-individual) were tested alongside invasively measured FFR and iFR for their ability to predict the placebo-controlled reduction in stress echo ischemia with stenting. RESULTS: Placebo-controlled ischemia improvement with stenting was predicted by vFFR-group (p < 0.0001) and viFR-group (p < 0.0001), vFFR-individual (p < 0.0001) and viFR-individual (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the predictive performance of the group visual estimates and their invasive counterparts: p = 0.53 for vFFR vs FFR and p = 0.56 for viFR vs iFR. CONCLUSION: Visual assessment of the angiogram by contemporary experts, provides significant additional information on the amount of ischaemia which can be relieved by placebo-controlled stenting in single vessel coronary artery disease.

Lethal complication: Ventricular septal perforation and right ventricular infarction after acute myocardial infarction.

Here, we report a case of ventricular septal perforation complicated with right ventricular infarction after inferior acute myocardial infarction, which was associated with a poor clinical outcome despite the successful surgical treatment.

Drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents for coronary de novo lesions in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty with drug-eluting stent (DES) angioplasty in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions in dialysis patients. METHOD: We retrospectively enrolled 400 consecutive dialysis patients with 464 coronary de novo lesions treated by DCB or DES from five participating institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. We performed serial coronary angiographic analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the rate of TLR between the groups in either crude or propensity score-matched analysis (DES 14.1% vs. DCB 14.7%, P = 0.864, DES 12.1% vs. 12.1%, P = 1.00). Target lesion thrombosis was not observed in the DCB group; however, stent thrombosis was observed in 7 patients (2.2%) in the DES group. The rate of binary restenosis was similar in both groups (DES, 20.9% vs. DCB, 22.8%; P = 0.749). The late lumen loss at follow-up was significantly greater in the DES group than in the DCB group (0.61 ± 0.76 mm vs 0.22 ± 0.48 mm; P < 0.001). Late lumen enlargement was observed in 38.6% of patients in the DCB group. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of DCB angioplasty for de novo coronary artery lesions in dialysis patients was similar to that of DES angioplasty in the real world. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty can be an acceptable treatment for de novo coronary artery lesions in dialysis patients.

Serial assessment of de novo coronary lesions after drug-coated balloon treatment analyzed by intravascular ultrasound: A comparison between acute coronary syndrome and stable angina pectoris.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the serial changes in de novo coronary lesions, including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), treated with a drug-coated balloon (DCB). METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, the intravascular changes in patients with de novo lesions treated with DCB were evaluated with serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) pre-procedure, post-procedure, and at follow-up. A two-dimensional IVUS measurement was performed with slices at 1 mm intervals in the treated lesion. RESULTS: This study comprised 40 lesions, including 27 lesions with stable angina pectoris (SAP) and 13 ACS. IVUS showed that the median vessel and lumen area increased significantly from pre-procedure to post-procedure and from post-procedure to follow-up. The median plaque area decreased significantly from pre-procedure to post-procedure and follow-up. The IVUS between ACS and SAP demonstrated that the total vessel volume and the total lumen volume increased, and the total atheroma volume decreased significantly from pre- to follow-up in both groups. The percent change in the lumen area increased, and the plaque area decreased significantly in ACS compared to SAP from pre- to post-procedure and follow-up. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that DCB treatment for de novo coronary lesions in patients with ACS and SAP may maintain anatomical patency and increase lumen with positive vessel remodeling and regression of plaque.