The challenge of molecular selection in liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer for surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis in the context of current and future approaches.

Objectives: Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) includes resection of liver metastases (LM), however, no validated biomarker identifies patients most likely to benefit from this procedure. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of the most relevant molecular alterations in cancer-related genes of CRC (i.e., RAS, BRAF, SMAD4, PIK3CA) as prognostic markers of survival and disease recurrence in patients with mCRC surgically treated by LM resection. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies reporting data regarding survival and/or recurrence in patients that underwent complete liver resection for CRC LM, stratified according to RAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and SMAD4 mutational status. Hazard ratios (HRs) from multivariate analyses were pooled in the meta-analysis and various adjustment strategies for confounding factors were combined. The search was conducted in numerous databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (EBSCO host), and WHO Global Index Medicus, through March 18th, 2022. Meta-analyses, editorials, letters to the editor, case reports, studies on other primary cancers, studies with primary metastatic sites other than the liver, studies lacking specific oncological outcome variables or genetic data, non-English language studies, and studies omitting residual disease data from liver metastasectomy were excluded. The remaining 47 studies were summarized in a descriptive table which outlines the key characteristics of each study and final results were graphically presented. Results: RAS mutation status was negatively associated with overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.54-1.84) and recurrence free survival (RFS) (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.33-1.61). A negative association was also found for BRAF regarding OS (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 2.15-3.24) and RFS (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.32-2.73) and SMAD4 regarding OS (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.56-2.38) and RFS (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.31-2.91). For PIK3CA only three studies were eligible and no significant association with either OS or RFS could be highlighted. Conclusion: RAS, BRAF, and SMAD4 are negatively associated with OS and RFS in patients undergoing curative liver metastasectomy from colorectal cancer. No conclusion can be drawn for PIK3CA due to the limited literature availability. These data support the integration of RAS, BRAF, and SMAD4 mutational status in the surgical decision-making for colorectal liver metastasis. Nevertheless, we have to consider several limitations, the major ones being the pooling of results from studies that evaluated patient outcomes as either disease-free survival (DFS) or RFS; the inclusion of patients with minimal residual disease and unconsidered potential confounding factors, such as variability in resectability definitions, chemotherapy use, and a potential interaction between biological markers and pre- and post-resection pharmacological treatments.

Rethinking the role of Research Ethics Committees in the light of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 on clinical trials and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Research Ethics Committees (RECs)-or Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), as they are known in the US-were created about 50 years ago to independently assess the ethical acceptability of research projects involving human subjects, their fundamental role being the protection of the dignity and rights of research participants. In this paper we develop some critical reflections about the current situation of RECs. Our starting point is the definition of the role they should ideally play, a role that should necessarily include a collaborative approach and the focus on the ethics component of the review. This ideal is unfortunately quite far from reality: inadequacies in the functioning of RECs have been discussed for decades, along with reform proposals. Both in the US and in the European Union (EU), reforms that aim at the centralization of the review process were recently approved. Even though these reforms were needed, they nonetheless raise concerns. We focus on two such concerns, related in particular to Regulation (EU) No 536/2014: the risk of narrowing the scope of the ethics review and that of disregarding the local context. We argue that the COVID-19 pandemic paved the way for the transition towards the centralized model and that an analysis of its impact on the research review process could provide some interesting insights into possible shortcomings of this new model. We conclude by identifying three objectives that define the role of a REC, objectives that any reform should preserve.

Cell-metal interaction studied by cytotoxic and FT-IR spectroscopic methods.

The main purpose of this work is to investigate the possibility of utilizing both a classical biological method to test cytotoxicity and a physical measurement procedure as the FT-IR spectroscopy to study the interaction between cells lines and heavy metals. Jurkart, a lymphocyte cell line, was treated with cadmium chloride, cadmium oxide and the organic germanium compound named Ge-oxy-132. The utilized value of heavy metal concentration allows us to obtain significant results with both methods and with all metals. In fact by using lower values of concentration any effect is revealed after treatment with germanium. The results of the simultaneous measurements by both experimental procedures are here reported for the first time and show that, while the cytotoxic effects of the two cadmium compounds are confirmed, the organic germanium compound reveals a very different and interesting interaction with Jurkart cells. The behaviour of the Jurkart cells upon the uptake of cadmium or organic germanium is very different: while treatment with CdO and CdCl(2) determines proteins denaturation and lipids oxidation in cells until the death, these processes are not revealed after Ge-oxy-132 treatment.