Impact of TTF-1 Expression on the Prognostic Prediction of Patients with NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression Levels of 1% to 49%, Treated with Chemotherapy vs Chemoimmunotherapy: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) expression is a useful predictor of treatment efficacy in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate whether TTF-1 could predict the effectiveness of chemotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-squamous NSCLC with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression between 1% and 49%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with NSCLC who were treated with chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy between March 2016 and May 2023. The patients had histologically confirmed NSCLC, stage III-IV or postoperative recurrence, TTF-1 measurements, and PD-L1 expression levels between 1% and 49%. Clinical data were analyzed to evaluate the effect of TTF-1 expression on treatment efficacy. RESULTS: This study included 283 of 624 patients. TTF-1-positive patients showed longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (PFS: 6.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0-9.4] vs 4.1 months [95% CI: 2.7-6.1], p=0.03, OS: 17.9 months [95% CI: 15.2-28.1] vs 9.4 months [95% CI: 6.3-17.0], p<0.01) in the chemotherapy cohorts (n=93). In the chemoimmunotherapy cohort (n=190), there was no significant difference in PFS and OS between TTF-1-positive and negative groups (PFS: 7.6 months [95% CI: 6.4-11.0] vs 6.0 months [95% CI: 3.6-12.6], p=0.59, OS: 25.0 months [95% CI: 18.0-49.2] vs 21.3 months [95% CI: 9.8-28.8], p=0.09). CONCLUSION: In patients with NSCLC with PD-L1 expression between 1% and 49%, TTF-1 expression was a predictor of chemotherapeutic, but not chemoimmunotherapeutic, efficacy.

Clinical significance of a prospective large genomic screening for small-cell lung cancer: the genetic classification and a biomarker driven phase II trial of gedatolisib.

INTRODUCTION: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been treated as a single entity resulting in limited survival improvement. Developing effective tools for guiding appropriate therapeutic strategies is crucial. METHODS: 1035 SCLCs were prospectively analyzed by a genomic screening platform: LC-SCRUM-Asia. Fresh frozen tumor samples were subjected to a next-generation sequencing system enabling the integrative analysis of cancer-related genes. A phase II trial of gedatolisib for SCLC with PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway mutations was conducted based on this screening. RESULTS: Based on the treatment outcomes and therapeutic targets, 5 distinct genetic subgroups were identified in SCLC: NSCLC-subgroup (genetic alterations associated with non-small cell lung cancer, 8.5%); Hotspot-subgroup (targetable hotspot mutations common in tumors, 3.0%); PI3K-subgroup (PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway mutations, 7.4%); MYC-subgroup (MYC family amplifications, 13.0%); and HME-subgroup (mutations in the histone-modifying enzymes, 17.6%). The NSCLC-subgroup (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.03) and MYC-subgroup (hazard ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.93) showed significantly shorter progression-free survivals after first-line platinum-based treatment. The Hotspot-subgroup and MYC-subgroup were candidates for novel targeted therapies. The HME-subgroup showed a favorable survival in patients received PD-(L)1 inhibitor-based therapies (p = 0.005, log-rank test) regardless of some overlap with other subgroups. 15 patients were enrolled into the phase II trial of gedatolisib in the PI3K-subgroup, the overall response rate and the disease control rate was 6.7% and 20%, respectively. MYC-subgroup or NSCLC-subgroup were associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in this trial. CONCLUSION: Molecular classification of SCLC by genetic approach is beneficial for predicting the treatment outcomes and effectively guiding the clinical choices.

Impact of Cachexia and First-Line Systemic Therapy for Previously Untreated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: NEJ050A.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia complicates advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, it remains unclear how often cachexia occurs and how it affects the course of chemotherapy in patients receiving first-line systemic therapy. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, prospective observational study and enrolled previously untreated NSCLC patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-2 and cachexia between September 2020 and September 2021. The primary outcome measure was the trends in the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment and Anorexia/Cachexia Subscale [FAACT (A/CS)] scores by cohort. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of cachexia before the initiation of first-line systemic therapy, quality of life (QOL) measures, body weight (BW) changes, and efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapy. RESULTS: A total of 887 consecutive patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS of 0-2 who were initiated on first-line systemic therapy were evaluated. A total of 281 patients (31.7%) experienced BW loss consistent with the criteria of cachexia, and 186 were evaluated for QOL, BW and outcome measurements. Overall, 180/186 patients received first-line systemic therapy. Cohort 1 (targeted therapy), cohort 2 [cytotoxic chemotherapy (CTx) ± immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] and cohort 3 (ICIs) included 42, 98 and 40 patients, respectively. There were significant variations in QOL trends by cohort, with chemotherapy-associated emesis affecting early appetite-related QOL. The change in the FAACT (A/CS) score at 1 week from baseline was worse in cohort 2 (the least square mean change ± standard error: -3.0 ± 0.9) than in cohorts 1 (1.6 ± 1.2, p = 0.003) and 3 (1.8 ± 1.0, p = 0.002); meanwhile, the change at 6 weeks was worse in cohort 1 (-1.5 ± 1.2) than in cohorts 2 (3.6 ± 0.9, p = 0.001) and 3 (3.5 ± 1.1, p = 0.004). BW reduction was observed in all cohorts within 6 weeks of therapy initiation. The targeted therapy cohort demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) to CTx ± ICIs cohort or ICIs cohort (median PFS was 9.7 months, 6.3 months, 3.1 months, in cohort 1, 2, 3, respectively (cohort 1 vs. cohort 2: HR, 0.58, p = 0.018; cohort 1 vs. cohort 3: HR, 0.41, p = 0.001); median OS was not reached, 15.8 months, 9.9 months, respectively (cohort 1 vs. cohort 2: HR, 0.52, p = 0.033; cohort 1 vs. cohort 3: HR, 0.37, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1/3 patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC have cachexia. Appetite-related QOL trends vary based on the type of first-line systemic therapy in cachectic NSCLC patients, and the PFS and OS of these patients seemed to be shorter.

Repeating late-phase pseudo-progression in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer treated with long-term nivolumab monotherapy; a case report.

Background: Immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) are standard treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nearly a decade has passed since nivolumab was approved by the FDA for NSCLC patients. However, long-term outcomes and clinical features remain unclear for individual cases. Pseudo-progression is a well-known paradoxical radiological response pattern under ICI treatment which occurs when tumor index lesions regress after apparent initial progression. We herein report a unique case of NSCLC with repeating pseudo-progression in late phase treated with nivolumab monotherapy for 8.5 years. Case presentation: A 56-year-old male diagnosed with Non-sq NSCLC clinical stage IVA, at the left upper lobe primary lesion. The primary lesion was PD-L1 negative with no oncogenic driver mutations. He had multiple pulmonary metastases and a left adrenal gland metastasis, and subsequently, received nivolumab as third-line therapy. After initiation of nivolumab, the lung lesion and adrenal metastasis shrank rapidly; however, the patient experienced three late-phase pseudo-progressions in the mediastinal lymph node (LN). This patient is still receiving nivolumab with no symptoms and PS 0. Acquired resistance should be judged carefully in patients with LN-only oligo-progression to avoid unnecessary local therapies and the misjudgment of treatment.

DLL3-guided therapies in small-cell lung cancer: from antibody-drug conjugate to precision immunotherapy and radioimmunotherapy.

DLL3 acts as an inhibitory ligand that downregulates Notch signaling and is upregulated by ASCL1, a transcription factor prevalent in the small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) subtype SCLC-A. Currently, the therapeutic strategies targeting DLL3 are varied, including antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. Although rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) showed promise in a phase II study, it failed to produce favorable results in subsequent phase III trials, leading to the cessation of its development. Conversely, DLL3-targeted BiTEs have garnered significant clinical interest. Tarlatamab, for instance, demonstrated enhanced response rates and progression-free survival compared to the standard of care in a phase II trial; its biologics license application (BLA) is currently under US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review. Numerous ongoing phase III studies aim to further evaluate tarlatamab's clinical efficacy, alongside the development of novel DLL3-targeted T-cell engagers, both bispecific and trispecific. CAR-T cell therapies targeting DLL3 have recently emerged and are undergoing various preclinical and early-phase clinical studies. Additionally, preclinical studies have shown promising efficacy for DLL3-targeted radiotherapy, which employs ß-particle-emitting therapeutic radioisotopes conjugated to DLL3-targeting antibodies. DLL3-targeted therapies hold substantial potential for SCLC management. Future clinical trials will be crucial for comparing treatment outcomes among various approaches and exploring combination therapies to improve patient survival outcomes.

Real-World Data on Subsequent Therapy for First-Line Osimertinib-Induced Pneumonitis: Safety of EGFR-TKI Rechallenge (Osi-risk Study TORG-TG2101).

BACKGROUND: Although osimertinib is a promising therapeutic agent for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer, the incidence of pneumonitis is particularly high among Japanese patients receiving the drug. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of subsequent anticancer treatments, including EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) rechallenge, which are to be administered after pneumonitis recovery, remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge in patients who experienced first-line osimertinib-induced pneumonitis, with a primary focus on recurrent pneumonitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who developed initial pneumonitis following first-line osimertinib treatment across 34 institutions in Japan between August 2018 and September 2020. RESULTS: Among the 124 patients included, 68 (54.8%) patients underwent EGFR-TKI rechallenge. The recurrence rate of pneumonitis following EGFR-TKI rechallenge was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-39) at 12 months. The cumulative incidence of recurrent pneumonitis was significantly higher in the osimertinib group than in the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI (conventional EGFR-TKI) groups (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.5; p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between EGFR-TKI type (osimertinib or conventional EGFR-TKI) and pneumonitis recurrence, regardless of severity or status of initial pneumonitis (HR 3.29; 95% CI 1.12-9.68; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib rechallenge after initial pneumonitis was associated with significantly higher recurrence rates than conventional EGFR-TKI rechallenge.

Clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR Exon20 in-frame insertions in the near-loop and far-loop: Results from LC-SCRUM-Asia.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we explored the clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR Exon20 in-frame insertions (Exon20ins), and the impact of the location of Exon20ins on these clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The efficacies of current systemic therapies in NSCLC patients harboring Exon20ins were investigated using a large-scale clinico-genomic database of LC-SCRUM-Asia, and compared with that of amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial. RESULTS: Of the 11,397 patients enrolled in LC-SCRUM-Asia, Exon20ins were detected in 189 patients (1.7 %). Treatment with classical EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (classical TKIs) was associated with a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins as compared with Exon19 deletions and L858R. Post platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were associated with a shorter PFS than with docetaxel in patients with Exon20ins (HR [95 % CI]; TKIs vs docetaxel, 2.16 [1.35-3.46]; ICIs vs docetaxel, 1.49 [1.21-1.84]). Patients treated with amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial showed a risk reduction in PFS and overall survival as compared with LC-SCRUM-Asia patients treated with docetaxel, classical TKIs, or ICIs. Among the 189 patients, Exon20ins were classified as near-loop or far-loop insertions in 115 (61 %) and 56 (30 %) patients, respectively. Treatment with osimertinib was associated with a longer PFS in patients with Exon20ins in near-loop as compared with far-loop (median, 5.6 vs. 2.0 months; HR [95 % CI], 0.22 [0.07-0.64]). CONCLUSIONS: After platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and ICIs are less effective in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins, and amivantamab may be a promising targeted therapy. There is a possibility that the location of Exon20ins has an impact on the efficacy of TKIs.

Cancer cell immunity-related protein co-expression networks are associated with early-stage solid-predominant lung adenocarcinoma.

Background: Solid-predominant lung adenocarcinoma (SPA), which is one of the high-risk subtypes with poor prognosis and unsatisfactory response to chemotherapy and targeted therapy in lung adenocarcinoma, remains molecular profile unclarified. Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) was used for data mining, especially for studying biological networks based on pairwise correlations between variables. This study aimed to identify disease-related protein co-expression networks associated with early-stage SPA. Methods: We assessed cancerous cells laser-microdissected from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues of a SPA group (n = 5), referencing a low-risk subtype, a lepidic predominant subtype group (LPA) (n = 4), and another high-risk subtype, micropapillary predominant subtype (MPA) group (n = 3) and performed mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis. Disease-related co-expression networks associated with the SPA subtype were identified by WGCNA and their upstream regulators and causal networks were predicted by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Results: Among the forty WGCNA network modules identified, two network modules were found to be associated significantly with the SPA subtype. Canonical enriched pathways were highly associated with cellular growth, proliferation, and immune response. Upregulated HLA class I molecules HLA-G and HLA-B implicated high mutation burden and T cell activation in the SPA subtype. Upstream analysis implicated the involvement of highly activated oncogenic regulators, MYC, MLXIPL, MYCN, the redox master regulator NFE2L2, and the highly inhibited LARP1, leading to oncogenic IRES-dependent translation, and also regulators of the adaptive immune response, including highly activated IFNG, TCRD, CD3-TCR, CD8A, CD8B, CD3, CD80/CD86, and highly inhibited LILRB2. Interestingly, the immune checkpoint molecule HLA-G, which is the counterpart of LILRB2, was highly expressed characteristically in the SPA subtype and might be associated with antitumor immunity. Conclusion: Our findings provide a disease molecular profile based on protein co-expression networks identified for the high-risk solid predominant adenocarcinoma, which will help develop future therapeutic strategies.

An approach for improvement of the accuracy of cancer gene panel testing.

BACKGROUND: Tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly being employed for genotype-directed therapies in patients with advanced cancer. However, tissue availability may limit their potential applications. In Japan, the cost of cancer gene panel tests is covered by public insurance for patients diagnosed with advanced solid tumors once in their lifetime. Therefore, it is essential to improve the success rate (reportability) and accuracy of CGP tests. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors associated with efficient and accurate CGP testing using relevant information obtained from real-world data. METHODS: This study included 159 samples analyzed using tumor-only panel FoundationOne® CDx cancer genome profiling (F1CDx) and 85 samples analyzed using matched-pair panel OncoGuide™ NCC Oncopanel system (NCCOP) at St. Marianna University Hospital. Sample characteristics (fixation conditions, storage period, histology, tumor cell ratio, and genomic tumor cell content), CGP performance, and quality control status were evaluated across all 244 tested samples. RESULTS: In 237/244 samples (97.1%), CGP testing results were successfully obtained [F1CDx, 99.4% (158/159) and NCCOP, 92.9% (79/85)]. An increased number of fibroblasts, inflammatory cells, and necrotic tumor cells, long-term storage, and/or prolonged fixation of tissue sections were involved in the unreported results and/or qualified CGP results. In addition, a negative correlation between median insert size values and ΔΔCq was observed in the NCCOP system. CONCLUSION: We identified various factors associated with efficient and accurate CGP testing using relevant information obtained from real-world data, suggesting that thorough selection and preparation of tissue sections could optimize CGP and maximize useful information.

Machine learning analysis of pathological images to predict 1-year progression-free survival of immunotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: In small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) could be a promising biomarker for immunotherapy, but objectively evaluating TIME remains challenging. Hence, we aimed to develop a predictive biomarker of immunotherapy efficacy through a machine learning analysis of the TIME. METHODS: We conducted a biomarker analysis in a prospective study of patients with extensive-stage SCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy as the first-line treatment. We trained a model to predict 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) using pathological images (H&E, programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and double immunohistochemical assay (cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) and forkhead box P3 (FoxP3)) and patient information. The primary outcome was the mean area under the curve (AUC) of machine learning models in predicting the 1-year PFS. RESULTS: We analyzed 100,544 patches of pathological images from 78 patients. The mean AUC values of patient information, pathological image, and combined models were 0.789 (range 0.571-0.982), 0.782 (range 0.750-0.911), and 0.868 (range 0.786-0.929), respectively. The PFS was longer in the high efficacy group than in the low efficacy group in all three models (patient information model, HR 0.468, 95% CI 0.287 to 0.762; pathological image model, HR 0.334, 95% CI 0.117 to 0.628; combined model, HR 0.353, 95% CI 0.195 to 0.637). The machine learning analysis of the TIME had better accuracy than the human count evaluations (AUC of human count, CD8-positive lymphocyte: 0.681, FoxP3-positive lymphocytes: 0.626, PD-L1 score: 0.567). CONCLUSIONS: The spatial analysis of the TIME using machine learning predicted the immunotherapy efficacy in patients with SCLC, thus supporting its role as an immunotherapy biomarker.

AXL signal mediates adaptive resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors in KRAS G12C-mutant tumor cells.

Recently, novel Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) inhibitors have been clinically developed to treat KRAS G12C-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, achieving complete tumor remission is challenging. Therefore, the optimal combined therapeutic intervention with KRAS G12C inhibitors has a potentially crucial role in the clinical outcomes of patients. We investigated the underlying molecular mechanisms of adaptive resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors in KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC cells to devise a strategy preventing drug-tolerant cell emergence. We demonstrate that AXL signaling led to the adaptive resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors in KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC, activation of which is induced by GAS6 production via YAP. AXL inhibition reduced the viability of AXL-overexpressing KRAS G12C-mutated lung cancer cells by enhancing KRAS G12C inhibition-induced apoptosis. In xenograft models of AXL-overexpressing KRAS G12C-mutated lung cancer treated with KRAS G12C inhibitors, initial combination therapy with AXL inhibitor markedly delayed tumor regrowth compared with KRAS G12C inhibitor alone or with the combination after acquired resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitor. These results indicated pivotal roles for the YAP-GAS6-AXL axis and its inhibition in the intrinsic resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitor.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3.

PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer with driver alterations. METHODS: This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS: This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Eight new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date. RECOMMENDATIONS: Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients based on targetable driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3.

PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver alterations. METHODS: This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS: This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Ten new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date. RECOMMENDATIONS: Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients without driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.

Phase II Study of Durvalumab Immediately after Completion of Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: TORG1937 (DATE Study).

PURPOSE: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab consolidation for up to 12 months is the standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, exactly when to initiate durvalumab therapy after chemoradiation completion remains unknown. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab, administered immediately after CCRT completion, for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a prospective, single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial. Patients without disease progression after definitive CCRT (two cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with 60 Gy/30 Fr radiotherapy) received durvalumab (every 2 weeks for up to 12 months) from the next day (up to 5 days) after the final radiation dose. The primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) from registration before the start of CCRT. RESULTS: From January 2020 to August 2020, 47 of 50 enrolled patients were evaluable for treatment efficacy and safety. The 1-year PFS from registration was 75.0% [60% confidence interval (CI), 69.0-80.0 and 95% CI, 59.4-85.3]. The objective response rate throughout the study treatment and median PFS from registration were 78.7% and 14.2 months (95% CI, 13.4 to not reached), respectively. Grade 3/4 pneumonitis and febrile neutropenia were each 4.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study met the primary endpoint. The incidence of pneumonitis was similar to that of a Japanese subset in the PACIFIC study. Our data support the efficacy and safety of durvalumab administered immediately after the completion of CCRT for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

A phase II study of atezolizumab with bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after TKI treatment failure (NEJ043 study).

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment failure are limited. An exploratory analysis of 26 patients in the IMpower150 study indicated that treatment with atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) was effective in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy of ABCP in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after TKI treatment. METHODS: Patients with non-squamous NSCLC harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations were enrolled. ABCP therapy was administered every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to extramural review (ER). Key secondary endpoints and preplanned analysis included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and differences in the efficacy of ABCP according to prior EGFR-TKI administration, liver metastases, and brain metastases. RESULTS: Sixty patients from 26 centers were enrolled. Median PFS was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7-8.2). The median OS was 23.1 months (95% CI: 13.1-not reached), and the ORR was 55.9%. PFS was significantly shorter in patients who had received osimertinib as a first-line treatment (7.2 months vs. 7.4 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.932, p = 0.023), those with brain metastases (5.7 months vs. 8 months, HR 1.86, p = 0.032), or those with liver metastases (5.4 months vs. 7.9 months, HR 2.779, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Although this study did not meet the primary endpoint, ABCP showed clinically meaningful efficacy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.

Dexamethasone-sparing on days 2-4 with combined palonosetron, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, and olanzapine in cisplatin: a randomized phase III trial (SPARED Trial).

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the non-inferiority of dexamethasone (DEX) on day 1, with sparing on days 2-4 in cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with malignant solid tumors who were treated with cisplatin (≥50 mg/m²) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either DEX on days 1-4 (Arm D4) or DEX on day 1 (Arm D1) plus palonosetron, NK-1 RA, and olanzapine (5 mg). The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) during the delayed (24-120 h) phase. The non-inferiority margin was set at -15%. RESULTS: A total of 281 patients were enrolled, 278 of whom were randomly assigned to Arm D4 (n = 139) or Arm D1 (n = 139). In 274 patients were included in the efficacy analysis, the rates of delayed CR in Arms D4 and D1 were 79.7% and 75.0%, respectively (risk difference -4.1%; 95% CI -14.1%-6.0%, P = 0.023). However, patients in Arm D1 had significantly lower total control rates during the delayed and overall phases, and more frequent nausea and appetite loss. There were no significant between-arm differences in the quality of life. CONCLUSION: DEX-sparing is an alternative option for patients receiving cisplatin; however, this revised administration schedule should be applied on an individual basis after a comprehensive evaluation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: UMIN000032269.

A Phase â ¡ Study of Ubenimex Combined With Pembrolizumab, Nab-Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin for Previously Untreated Advanced Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: TORG2241 (UBE-Q).

BACKGROUND: According to the results of the KEYNOTE-407 trial, pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with previously untreated advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ubenimex, a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor, is an oral drug with immunostimulatory and antitumor activities. We aim to assess the safety and efficacy of ubenimex in combination with pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial is conducted to confirm the tolerability and efficacy of the tested drugs. Patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC will receive a predetermined daily dose of ubenimex orally plus 4 cycles of pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin, followed by continuous administration of ubenimex and pembrolizumab for a maximum of 2 years. To confirm tolerability, the daily dose of ubenimex will begin at level 1 (30 mg), which will be increased to levels 2 (60 mg) and 3 (120 mg) according to the escalation criteria, with a standard 3 + 3 design for achieving the target dose-limiting toxicity rate of 33%. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ubenimex at the determined dose level will be analyzed. The primary endpoint of the efficacy evaluation will be the objective response rate assessed by an independent review committee. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ubenimex combined with pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC. The results will help devise future treatment strategies.

Clinicogenomic Features and Targetable Mutations in NSCLCs Harboring BRAF Non-V600E Mutations: A Multi-Institutional Genomic Screening Study (LC-SCRUM-Asia).

INTRODUCTION: BRAF non-V600E mutations occur in 1% to 2% of NSCLCs. Because of their rarity, the clinical backgrounds and outcomes of cytotoxic chemotherapy or immunotherapy remain unclear, and no targeted therapies are approved for BRAF non-V600E-mutant NSCLC. METHODS: In this multi-institutional prospective lung cancer genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Asia), we evaluated the clinicogenomic characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of BRAF non-V600E-mutant NSCLC. RESULTS: From March 2015 to November 2021, a total of 11,929 patients with NSCLC were enrolled. BRAF mutations were detected in 380 (3.5%), including the V600E (class I) in 119 (31%) and non-V600E in 261; the non-V600E were functionally classified into class II (122, 32%), class III (86, 23%), and non-classes I to III. Smokers and having concurrent RAS gene family or TP53 mutations were more frequently associated with class II or III than with class I. In patients with class III as compared with class I, the progression-free survival in response to platinum-containing chemotherapies (median, 5.3 versus 11.5 mo, p < 0.01) and the overall survival (median, 14.5 versus 34.8 mo, p < 0.02) were significantly shorter. Furthermore, class IIa mutations were significantly more frequent in our Asian cohort than in previously reported cohorts. The clinicogenomic features associated with class IIa were similar to those associated with class I, and one patient with NSCLC with K601E had a good response to dabrafenib plus trametinib. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSCLCs with BRAF non-V600E, especially class III, were associated with poorer therapeutic outcomes than those with V600E. Furthermore, patients with NSCLC with class IIa had distinct clinicogenomic features, and further preclinical and clinical studies are needed to evaluate class IIa mutations as a therapeutic target.

Outcomes of Chemoimmunotherapy Among Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer According to Potential Clinical Trial Eligibility.

Importance: Chemoimmunotherapy is the standard first-line therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, whether findings from pivotal trials can be extrapolated to the clinical practice setting remains unclear. Objective: To compare treatment outcome gaps following first-line chemoimmunotherapy for patients with ES-SCLC between those who met and did not meet the eligibility criteria used in previous clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort study was conducted from September 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020, at 32 hospitals in Japan, with at least 12 months of follow-up. Participants included consecutive patients with ES-SCLC who received carboplatin and etoposide with atezolizumab as first-line therapy. Exposures: Patients who met eligibility criteria for pivotal phase 3 clinical trials were considered trial-eligible. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 6-month progression-free survival. The secondary outcomes were differences in progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety according to whether key clinical trial eligibility criteria were met. Results: A total of 207 patients were analyzed (median age, 72 years; range, 46-87 years; 170 [82%] were male). Sixty-four patients (31%) were older adults (age ≥75 years), and most (184 [89%]) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. There were 132 (64%) trial-eligible patients. The 6-month progression-free survival rate for all patients was 38.8% (95% CI, 32.4%-45.7%). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in trial-eligible patients and 4.7 months in trial-ineligible patients (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97; P = .03). The proportion of patients who achieved disease control was 93% (118 of 127) in trial-eligible patients and 77% (55 of 71) in trial-ineligible patients (P = .002). The median overall survival was 15.8 months in trial-eligible patients and 13.1 months in trial-ineligible patients (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51-1.07; P = .10). The rate of severe adverse events was numerically higher among trial-ineligible patients than among trial-eligible patients (39% vs 27%; P = .07). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the overall treatment outcome was comparable to that reported in pivotal clinical trials. However, treatment outcomes after chemoimmunotherapy might differ between trial-eligible and trial-ineligible patients. These findings suggest that trial-eligibility criteria may be useful in clinical practice, and further studies using data from clinical practice settings are required to inform regulatory approval and clinical decision-making.