High throughput screening of airway constriction in mouse lung slices.

The level of airway constriction in thin slices of lung tissue is highly variable. Owing to the labor-intensive nature of these experiments, determining the number of airways to be analyzed in order to allocate a reliable value of constriction in one mouse is challenging. Herein, a new automated device for physiology and image analysis was used to facilitate high throughput screening of airway constriction in lung slices. Airway constriction was first quantified in slices of lungs from male BALB/c mice with and without experimental asthma that were inflated with agarose through the trachea or trans-parenchymal injections. Random sampling simulations were then conducted to determine the number of airways required per mouse to quantify maximal constriction. The constriction of 45 ± 12 airways per mouse in 32 mice were analyzed. Mean maximal constriction was 37.4 ± 32.0%. The agarose inflating technique did not affect the methacholine response. However, the methacholine constriction was affected by experimental asthma (p = 0.003), shifting the methacholine concentration-response curve to the right, indicating a decreased sensitivity. Simulations then predicted that approximately 35, 16 and 29 airways per mouse are needed to quantify the maximal constriction mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation, respectively; these numbers varying between mice and with experimental asthma.

Sensitivity of the airway smooth muscle in terms of force, shortening and stiffness.

Eight pig tracheal strips were stimulated to contract with log increments of methacholine from 10-8 to 10-5 M. For each strip, the concentration-response was repeated four times in a randomized order to measure isometric force, isotonic shortening against a load corresponding to either 5 or 10 % of a reference force, and average force, stiffness, elastance and resistance over one cycle while the strip length was oscillating sinusoidally by 5 % at 0.2 Hz. For each readout, the logEC50 was calculated and compared. Isotonic shortening with a 5 % load had the lowest logEC50 (-7.13), yielding a greater sensitivity than any other contractile readout (p<0.05). It was followed by isotonic shortening with a 10 % load (-6.66), elastance (-6.46), stiffness (-6.46), resistance (-6.38), isometric force (-6.32), and average force (-6.30). Some of these differences were significant. For example, the EC50 with the average force was 44 % greater than with the elastance (p=0.001). The methacholine sensitivity is thus affected by the contractile readout being measured.

Lung stiffness of C57BL/6 versus BALB/c mice.

This study was undertaken to determine whether a smaller lung volume or a stiffer lung tissue accounts for the greater lung elastance of C57BL/6 than BALB/c mice. The mechanical properties of the respiratory system and lung volumes were measured with the flexiVent and compared between male C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice (n = 9). The size of the excised lung was also measured by volume liquid displacement. One lobe was then subjected to sinusoidal strains in vitro to directly assess the mechanical properties of the lung tissue, and another one was used to quantify the content of hydroxyproline. In vivo elastance was markedly greater in C57BL/6 than BALB/c mice based on 5 different readouts. For example, respiratory system elastance was 24.5 ± 1.7 vs. 21.5 ± 2.4 cmH2O/mL in C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice, respectively (p = 0.007). This was not due to a different lung volume measured by displaced liquid volume. On the isolated lobes, both elastance and the hydroxyproline content were significantly greater in C57BL/6 than BALB/c mice. These results suggest that the lung elastance of C57BL/6 mice is greater than BALB/c mice not because of a smaller lung volume but because of a stiffer lung tissue due to a greater content of collagen.