Promising therapies for adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: 2023 and beyond.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a heterogeneous genetic heart disease with an estimated prevalence in the general population of 0.2% to 0.6%. Clinically, HCM can range from no symptoms to severe symptoms such as heart failure or sudden cardiac death. Currently, the management of HCM involves lifestyle modifications, familial screening, genetic counseling, pharmacotherapy to manage symptoms, sudden cardiac death risk assessment, septal reduction therapy, and heart transplantation for specific patients. Multicenter randomized controlled trials have only recently explored the potential of cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs) such as mavacamten as a directed pharmacological approach for managing HCM. AREAS COVERED: We will assess the existing medical treatments for HCM: beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, disopyramide, and different CMIs. We will also discuss future HCM pharmacotherapy guidelines and underline this patient population's unfulfilled needs. EXPERT OPINION: Mavacamten is the first-in-class CMI approved by the FDA to target HCM pathophysiology specifically. Mavacamten should be incorporated into the standard therapy for oHCM in case of symptom persistence despite using maximally tolerated beta blockers and/or calcium channel blockers. Potential drug-drug interactions should be assessed before initiating this drug. More studies are needed on the use of CMIs in patients with kidney and/or liver failure and pregnant/breastfeeding patients.

Real-world experience with mavacamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Observations from a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND: In symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) patients, mavacamten is commercially approved to help improve left ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT) gradients, symptoms, and reduce eligibility for septal reduction therapy (SRT) under the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) program. We sought to prospectively report the initial real-world clinical experience with the use of commercially available mavacamten in a multi-hospital tertiary healthcare system. METHODS: We studied the first 150 consecutive oHCM patients (mean age 65 years, 53% women, 83% on betablockers and 61% in New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III) who were initiated on 5 mg of mavacamten with dose titrations using symptom assessment and echocardiographic measurements of LVOT gradient and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements. We measured changes in NYHA class, LVEF, LVOT gradients (resting and Valsalva) at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: At 261 ± 143 days (range of 31-571 days), 69 (46%) patients had ≥1 NYHA class, and 27 (18%) additional patients had ≥2 NYHA class improvement. The mean Valsalva LVOT gradient decreased from 72 ± 43 mmHg at baseline to 29 ± 31 mmHg at 4 weeks, 29 ± 28 mmHg at 8 weeks and 30 ± 29 mmHg at 12 weeks (p < 0.001). At baseline, 100% patients had Valsalva LVOT gradients ≥30 mmHg, which reduced to 29% at 4 weeks, 28% at 8 weeks and 30% at 12 weeks. In 40 patients who reported no symptomatic improvement, the mean Valsalva LVOT gradient decreased from 73 ± 39 mmHg at baseline to 34 ± 27 mmHg at 4 weeks, 35 ± 28 mmHg at 8 weeks and 30 ± 24 mmHg at 12 weeks (P < 0.001). The mean LVEF at baseline was 66 ± 6% and changed to 64 ± 5% at 4 weeks, 63 ± 5% at 8 weeks and 62 ± 7% at 12 weeks (p < 0.0001). No patient underwent SRT, developed LVEF ≤30% or developed heart failure requiring admission. Three (2%) patients needed temporary interruption of mavacamten due to LVEF<50%. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world study in symptomatic oHCM patients at a multi-hospital tertiary care referral center, we demonstrate the efficacy and safety, along with the logistic feasibility of prescribing mavacamten under the REMS program.

A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Therapies on Deep Learning-based Electrocardiographic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Markers.

Background: Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography (AI-ECG) can identify hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) on 12-lead ECGs and offers a novel way to monitor treatment response. While the surgical or percutaneous reduction of the interventricular septum (SRT) represented initial HCM therapies, mavacamten offers an oral alternative. Objective: To evaluate biological response to SRT and mavacamten. Methods: We applied an AI-ECG model for HCM detection to ECG images from patients who underwent SRT across three sites: Yale New Haven Health System (YNHHS), Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF), and Atlantic Health System (AHS); and to ECG images from patients receiving mavacamten at YNHHS. Results: A total of 70 patients underwent SRT at YNHHS, 100 at CCF, and 145 at AHS. At YNHHS, there was no significant change in the AI-ECG HCM score before versus after SRT (pre-SRT: median 0.55 [IQR 0.24-0.77] vs post-SRT: 0.59 [0.40-0.75]). The AI-ECG HCM scores also did not improve post SRT at CCF (0.61 [0.32-0.79] vs 0.69 [0.52-0.79]) and AHS (0.52 [0.35-0.69] vs 0.61 [0.49-0.70]). Among 36 YNHHS patients on mavacamten therapy, the median AI-ECG score before starting mavacamten was 0.41 (0.22-0.77), which decreased significantly to 0.28 (0.11-0.50, p <0.001 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test) at the end of a median follow-up period of 237 days. Conclusions: The lack of improvement in AI-based HCM score with SRT, in contrast to a significant decrease with mavacamten, suggests the potential role of AI-ECG for serial monitoring of pathophysiological improvement in HCM at the point-of-care using ECG images.